Overview
In this exercise, you will develop a role-based access control (RBAC) matrix for user access control. RBAC matrices, as a security architecture concept, are a way of representing access control strategies visually. They help the practitioner ensure that the access control strategy aligns with the specific access control objectives. Matrices also help show when access controls may conflict with job roles and responsibilities. When you are completing this type of task, there are a few questions you should always be thinking about:
- Who gets to log into the system?
- Who gets to view what?
- What kind of data are you dealing with (basic data vs. information subject to privacy controls)?
- Who gets to add or delete? Who is view-only?
- Who should not have permission?
An example of an RBAC matrix can be found in Chapter 6 of your course textbook.
Scenario
You are a security analyst for a healthcare firm assigned to create an RBAC matrix for a new software-as-a-service (SaaS) application for managing patient medical files. There are six individuals who have roles within the system and need varying levels of access to the medical patient software. Your objectives are to set up the RBAC matrix to:
- Ensure individuals have access to necessary information for their job role
- Maintain patient privacy by adhering to the Fundamental Security Design Principle of least privilege (i.e., business need-to-know)
The following SaaS application parameters need to be determined:
- Access to patient information
- Access to employee information
- Access to the SaaS
- Access to backup logs
See the User Job Roles and Characteristics table below for information on the users, their roles in the organization, and their job descriptions.
| Users | Job Roles | Job Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Norman | Remote call-center employee |
|
| Ryhead | Sales representative for the healthcare firm |
|
| Simone | HR representative for the healthcare firm |
|
| Janet | Application administrator for the SaaS application |
|
| Dale | Nurse |
|
| Ethan | Auditor |
|
Prompt
Specifically, you must address the critical elements listed below:
- RBAC Matrix: Populate the RBAC matrix in the Module Four Activity Template using one or more of the necessary actions (view, create, modify, delete, none).
- Essential Questions: Answer the following short response questions based on your populated table in the template:
- What changes could be made to user roles through implementation of least privilege to better support that security design principle? (Hint: Refer to the characteristics in the scenario table above, and consider the characteristics that may be contradictory.)
- What is the importance of this tool to you as a security analyst in managing and protecting the environment? Provide an example.
What to Submit
Submit the completed RBAC matrix and short response questions in the Module Four Activity Template. You may also submit this activity in your own Microsoft Word document, but your submission must contain the same elements as the template. Your submission should be 12 pages in length (plus a cover page and references, if used) and written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. The file name should include the course code, assignment number, and your namefor example, CYB_200_Module_Four_Activity_Neo_Anderson.docx.
Module Four Activity Rubric
| Criteria | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (65%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBAC Matrix | Completes 21 or more cells of the RBAC matrix accurately | Completes fewer than 21 cells of the RBAC matrix accurately | Does not complete any of the RBAC matrix cells accurately | 65 |
| Least Privilege | Describes changes that can be made to the user roles through implementation of least privilege that would better support the security design principle | Addresses Proficient criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail | Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant | 15 |
| Importance of Tool | Explains the importance of the tool to a security analyst in managing and protecting the environment, and provides an example | Addresses Proficient criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail | Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant | 15 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization | Submission has some errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 5 |
