After listening to the podcast episode, summarize an argument that the podcast s

After listening to the podcast episode, summarize an argument that the podcast s

After listening to the podcast episode, summarize an argument that the podcast seeks to debunk (that is, you’re not summarizing the podcasters’ argument, but the argument that they’re critiquing).
<
<
When presenting this argument, you should outline its key points and main conclusions, and provide a general idea about its potential implications or repercussions. However, do not reveal how or why the argument is debunked in the podcast. Your goal here is to present the argument as it would be advocated by its proponents, without any critique or analysis, before the podcasters present their critique. As in some of our recent discussions, your primary goal is to accurately summarize an argument to give your classmates an opportunity to practice their critical reasoning skills.
<
<
Note that you do not need to summarize the entire episode – you only need to summarize a single argument, i.e. a single conclusion/claim supported by one or more premises. If you happen to find a suitable argument in the first 10 minutes, hey, you’re done and can just use that! (Though it may still be interesting to listen to the full rest of the episode too).
<
<
subject / Podcast:
<
Science Vs. – “There are a lot of fads, blogs, and strong opinions, but then there’s SCIENCE. Science Vs. finds out what’s fact, what’s not, and what’s somewhere in between. We do the hard work of sifting through all the science, so you don’t have to and cover everything from 5G and pandemics to vaping and fasting diets.”
<
<
https://open.spotify.com/show/5lY4b5PGOvMuOYOjOVEcb9?si=ea2324b7225e455b&nd=1

× How can I help you?