+254 704 052992

Crit Com 2

Overview

A critical commentary is a short essay that introduces a historical document. It provides basic information about what the document is, what cultural and historical context influenced its author in creating it, and why youthe historianbelieve it was important, convincing, effective, or ineffective. Your commentary will be evaluated on your selection of direct evidence, creativity of interpretation, depth of historical context, and clarity of language.

For each critical commentary, you will write about a primary source document of your choice. Please use

document from the list below (from ).

Your commentary should include a thesis statement and make an argument about the source. For more info, check out this

Requirements and Scoring

Papers will be scored on the following criteria (150 points total):

STYLE (25 points)

  • Requirements:
    • 800-900 words plain 11- or 12-point font
    • Include a meaningful title
    • Identify the name, author, and date of the document
    • Clear thesis statement near the beginning of the essay
      • Consist of multiple readable paragraphs Include the phrase “large animal veterinarian”
    • Your commentary should give your reader a sense of the documents style through the use of at least three direct quotations, properly quoted
        • Quotations should not be longer than 1-2 lines
  • Do NOT include:
    • Title page
    • Text that youve copied and pasted from elsewhere without properly quoting and citing your source
    • AI-generated text

IDENTIFICATION (25 points)

Provide a succinct and accurate summary of the document, including relevant details about its date and place of origin, authorship, genre, and argument or purpose.

CONTEXT (50 points)

Identify the broader historical context of the document and explain its relationship to the societal issues or events of its era. What is the historical big picture that your reader must grasp in order to properly understand the document? What was the authors purpose in creating the document? Include convincing quotes, information from the textbook and lecture, or other course materials to demonstrate this.

Tip: each of these primary source documents correspond to a specific chapter in the textbook, which will provide helpful context. To find out which chapter your document pairs with, look in the URL/web address. For example, the URL for Henry George’s Progress and Poverty is http://www.americanyawp.com/reader/16-capital-and-labor/henry-george-progress-and-poverty-selections-1879/. Since the URL includes “16-capital-and-labor”, you know that it goes with Chapter 16.

ANALYSIS (50 points)

In history, analysis is when you explain the meaning and significance of a source or a piece of evidence (quotes, facts, etc.).

Clearly state your evaluation of the authors argument or purpose in your thesis statement. What does the author mean? What were they trying to accomplish? Who is their intended audience? Why is this source historically significant? Do you agree with the author’s position? Are they leaving out important details? In the body of the paper, prove your thesis with convincing detail from the document and its historical context.

Remember, historical analysis is different than literary analysis! Tools from your English or Rhetoric classes like pathos/logos/ethos are not particularly useful here. In History, primary source analysis focuses more on what a source can tell us about the past, both on a micro scale (what was happening with these individuals?) and on a macro scale (does this source give us larger insights into history?).

Analysis resources:

  • (files)

Sample outline

If you are not sure how to structure your commentary, this sample outline might be a helpful guide. You are not required to follow this format, it is just one way of approaching the assignment.

  • Paragraph 1: Introduction
    • Who created this document? When?
    • What kind of document is this (newspaper article, speech, letter, etc.)?
    • Who is the intended audience?
    • Why is it historically significant? (i.e. why do we care?)
    • What else was going on at this time that would be helpful to know when reading this document (historical context)?
  • Paragraph 2: Summary
    • What are the key points in the document?
    • What is the author trying to communicate? What is their perspective?
    • this paragraph is a good place to include quotations
  • Paragraph 3: Analysis
    • Does the author do a good job presenting their case?
    • Is this source reliable? What are its limitations?
    • Do you agree with the author’s points? Why or why not?
    • Concluding sentence: why does this matter? How can it contribute to our understanding of history?

      Sources to use:

    • WW ll Slides

    So use:

  • Primary Source (main source)
    • Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki speech/document:
      Harry Truman Announcing the Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima (1945)

    • This is what you analyze and quote from directly.

    1. Chapter 24 of The American Yawp
      Because your topic is WWII.
      Use this for:
    • WWII context
    • Pacific War
    • reasons for using the bomb
    • U.S.Japan conflict
    • end of the war
    1. WWII slides from your course
      These are VERY useful because professors usually want lecture material included.
    2. Assigned WWII videos from your module:
    • Crash Course – WWII
    • Hiroshima Bombing Remembered By a Survivor

    The survivor video is especially strong because it gives you perspective and helps with ANALYSIS:

    • propaganda
    • civilian suffering
    • morality
    • historical significance

    Your paper will probably focus on:

    • Truman trying to justify the bombing
    • the U.S. presenting the bomb as necessary to end the war
    • the document reflecting American wartime attitudes
    • whether Truman leaves out civilian destruction and long-term effects

    Strong analysis topics:

    • audience = American public + world powers
    • purpose = justify the bombing and show U.S. military strength
    • historical significance = beginning of nuclear age + Cold War implications

    A very strong thesis direction would be something like:

    Trumans announcement framed the atomic bombing as a necessary military action to end World War II quickly, but the document also reveals how the U.S. government minimized civilian suffering while demonstrating Americas new global power.

    And dont forget somewhere in the essay to naturally include:

    large animal veterinarian

    because thats clearly an instruction-check phrase.

    Make sure your analysis is throughout the essay, not only in Paragraph 3. History professors usually want interpretation woven into the whole paper.

    Also, avoid making it sound too modern/opinionated like:

    America was evil

    Instead keep it historical and analytical:

    The document minimizes civilian casualties while emphasizing military necessity.

admin