Ethical question: Should Microsoft have this voluntary goal of being carbon nega

Ethical question: Should Microsoft have this voluntary goal of being carbon nega

Ethical question: Should Microsoft have this voluntary goal of being carbon negative? Should it be voluntarily buying these carbon capture credits? That is, is this one of Microsoft’s moral responsibilities as a company? Why or why not?
Answer this ethical question by writing up answers to the following questions:
Define the two theories of how companies should be run: Milton Friedman’s stockholder theory, R. Edward Freeman’s stakeholder theory.
Explain what these two theories would say about Microsoft’s carbon goals.
State and defend your position on the ethical status of Microsoft’s goal of becoming carbon negative by buying carbon capture credits. Defend your position by making ethical arguments in favor of your position and against the alternative position.
Instructions:
700-800 words (i.e., 2 to 2.5 pages, double spaced with 12 point font)
Include a list of References/Works Cited at the end of your paper. This list will not count toward your page/word count.
You use the MLA reference style
This is not a research paper. Only use assigned texts and videos