1. Writing Rhetoric
(700 words) (APA format) (in-text citations are a must) (No Plagiarism) (No Use of Artificial Intelligence) (The Craft and Annotated Bibliography rubrics are attached)
Description: In this writing assignment, youll choose one of the prompts below to respond to, based on your MA concentration or MFA specialization. The and rubrics will be used.
Text to use for annotated Bibliography: Munro, Alice. What is Real? The Broadview Anthology of Expository Prose, edited by Laura Buzzard, Don LePan, Nora Ruddock, and Alexandria Stuart, 3rd ed., Broadview Press, 2016, pp. 320-3.
Literature: Annotated Bibliography (3 single-spaced paragraphs /700 words total). Choose the Broadview reading Kincaid for this week and write an annotation that includes three short paragraphs: a summary of the text and assessment of the discourse community (audience); a brief craft analysis of the texts thematic concerns and/or generic elements (plot, character development, setting, etc.) in relation to any aspect of Vivian Gornick’s introduction to The Situation and the Story; and a reflection on any aspect of Kincaid, as it applies to your own critical thinking.
2. Forensic Accounting
(4 pages) (APA format) (in-text citations are a must) (No Plagiarism) (No use of Artificial Intelligence)
Must cite: Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Fraud Identification and Classification
Please read the following scenario:
Many of the clients assigned to Amy and Bill have operations in other locations that require frequent travel. On every trip, Bill notices that Amy charges non-job-related expenses to her corporate credit card and submits the charges for payment as part of her travel expense report. The expenditures are then included on the client’s invoice. The expenditures only represent a tiny fraction of total billable services for the client that Amy and Bill are auditing.
Prepare a detailed analysis of the scenario by incorporating your responses to the following questions in well-developed paragraphs (do not use a question-answer format).
- After reviewing the types of fraud discussed in this week’s reading, determine what type of fraud Amy is committing. Does the relative cost of the expenditures to the overall client’s invoice matter? Why or why not?
- Develop some assumptions to address why Amy’s transactions have not been questioned. Does Bill have the responsibility to report her? Why or why not?
- Bill decides to confront Amy first before notifying the engagement partner. Amy acknowledges wrongdoing and agrees to repay all the expenses. Should Bill still report her, or should he consider the situation resolved based on her words? Discuss the ramifications of both options.
- What theories of fraud did you implement in your analysis of this scenario? Include a discussion of the seriousness of fraud and how fraud affects organizations.
Requirements:
- Write a paper of 4 pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages, which you must include.
- Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings, including professional business language.
- Cite at least three sources for this assignment, outside of the textbook.
ACT510 Mod 1 CT (2)
|
ACT510 Mod 1 CT (2) |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements |
10 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
10 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 8 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 6 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis |
30 to >24.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the scenario provided as directed in the prompt; analysis is effectively supported by theories of fraud. 24 to >18.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 18 to >12.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 12 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples |
15 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 12 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria but are lessthan adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 9 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 6 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style |
5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 3 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 2 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style |
5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error. 4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors. 2 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 75
