From what we’ve learned so far in the course by studying various moral theories,
From what we’ve learned so far in the course by studying various moral theories, can good people do bad things?? Or, to restate, is it possible for bad people to do good things? For your first essay, clearly state, and then defend, either an affirmative or negative answer to one of those questions. In thinking about your thesis, you might consider what it means to be a good or bad person, and in addition, what it means to do a good or bad thing; conversely, is being good merely a case of acting good. Your answer should rely heavily on at least three of the theorists that we’ve read thus far in the course, including, for example:
• • The Kantian Categorical Imperative
• Mill’s Utilitarianism
• Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics
paper should include:
1. A short introductory paragraph, with a clear thesis statement (e.g., I shall argue that Rawls’ argument is influenced by … because …). Your thesis should almost always be the last sentence of your introductory paragraph.
2. A short, charitable reconstruction of the argument as presented by the philosopher whose position you rely on (you may, but need not, use standard premise / conclusion form).
13. An brief explanation, in your own words, of the position that you’re describing (such as the Categorical Imperative, Justice as Fairness, etc.)
1. An original argument, in which you make the case that answers the question, based on the philosophical position under investigation.
2. A suitable concluding paragraph.
3. Make reference to, and discuss meaningfully, at least three of the philosophers that we’ve read so far in the course.
4. As you will be discussing three of the theories we’ve discussed so far in the course, your essay should include at least three sources, and zero internet sources. If a source is not printed in a physical book or journal form (even if it is also available on the internet) it is not a suitable source, and should not be referenced in your essay. There is no reason to do any outside research, and your essay should simply cite three articles from our textbook. No direct quotations. It is never necessary to directly quote any author. When it is important to rely on someone else’s ideas, simply explain the position which he/she is defending. It is, however, necessary to cite all authors whose ideas you reference. Thus, if you begin a sentence with, e.g.. “According to Plato..”, you should end that sentence with a citation. Essays that include “direct quotations” will not receive a grade higher than a D. (Read that sentence again, too, to be sure you understand it).
5. A clear and complete References or Works Cited section.
6. Papers must demonstrate an understanding of the arguments being discussed.
7. Papers must demonstrate a mastery of the relevant concepts regarding the philosophical problem.
8. Don’t worry about getting the ‘right answer. Rather, concentrate on the quality of reasoning used in your evaluation
