Overview
The purpose of this Course Project is to provide students the opportuni
Overview
The purpose of this Course Project is to provide students the opportunity to explore a technology used in the healthcare system. The project requires students to work in a small team together in order to describe how this technology supports the patient care experience through the use of information technology and information structures. Teams and topics will be assigned and are nonnegotiable. The final product of this project is a presentation to be shared with the class in Week 8.
Download the Technology Presentation GuidelinesLinks to an external site..
Submit the assignment by the due date, as instructed by your faculty member.
Rubric
NR360 RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines Rubric
NR360 RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction of Technology & Team (20 points/8%)• Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1‐2 criteria fully met Criteria not present
• Title slide introduces team members. described described concisely
• Introduction describes the technology. comprehensively. but not
• Introduction states a purpose for use of the comprehensively (or)
technology in healthcare. one element is not
• Introduction establishes the professional tone for addressed.
the presentation.
20 ptsHighest Level of performance
Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1‐2 criteria fully met Criteria not present • Title slide introduces team members. described described concisely • Introduction describes the technology. comprehensively. but not
18 ptsHigh Level of Performance
Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1‐2 criteria fully met Criteria not present • Title slide introduces team members. described described concisely • Introduction describes the technology. comprehensively. but not • Introduction states a purpose for use of the comprehensively (or) technology in healthcare. one element is not • Introduction establishes the professional tone for addressed.
16 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1‐2 criteria fully met Criteria not present
7 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1‐2 criteria fully met Criteria not present
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1‐2 criteria fully met Criteria not present
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory & Current Use (30 points/14%)• Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present
development of the technology. described described concisely
• Discuss the history and current use of the comprehensively with but not
technology in healthcare. consideration of comprehensively.
• Describe three goals of this technology’s alternate Some elements of
implementation. perspectives or alternate
30 ptsHighest Level of Performance
Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present development of the technology. described described concisely • Discuss the history and current use of the comprehensively with but not technology in healthcare. consideration of comprehensively. • Describe three goals of this technology’s alternate Some elements of implementation. perspectives or alternate presentation of perspectives or supporting data. presentation of
26 ptsHigh Level of Performance
Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present development of the technology. described described concisely • Discuss the history and current use of the comprehensively with but not technology in healthcare. consideration of comprehensively. • Describe three goals of this technology’s alternate Some elements of implementation. perspectives or alternate presentation of perspectives or supporting data. presentation of supporting data are present.
23 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present
10 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Healthcare & Nursing (40 points/16%)Discuss impact on professional nursing practice related
to:
Patient safety
Quality of care measures/monitoring
Risk management
Privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient data
Effect on population within the region
Ethical practice
Compliance with legal and regulatory mandates
Organizational infrastructure and operations
Support discussions with examples & data from
current evidence‐based resources
40 ptsHighest Level of performance
All criteria are described comprehensively with consideration of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data.
35 ptsHigh Level of Performance
All criteria are described concisely but not comprehensively. Some elements of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data are present.
30 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
6 criteria fully met
14 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
3 criteria fully met
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Criteria not present
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThree Advantages & Disadvantages (40 points/16%)Three advantages and disadvantages are presented for:
• Patient’s perspective (e.g., patient outcomes, safety,
patient/family satisfaction)
• Nurse’s perspective (improves/hinders job
efficiency/safety)
• Healthcare organization’s perspective (regulatory
compliance, financial, etc.)
40 ptsHighest Level of performance
All criteria are described comprehensively with consideration of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data.
35 ptsHigh Level of Performance
All criteria are described concisely but not comprehensively. Some elements of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data are present.
30 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
2 criteria fully met
14 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
1 criteria fully met
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Criteria not present
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControversy/Issues/Challenges/Regulatory Implications (30 points/14%)• Controversy, issues, challenges, and regulatory
implications are addressed.
• The presentation answers the question, “how might
issues surrounding the chosen technology be
addressed/solved?”
• Statistically significant data or evidence is provided
to support the findings.
30 ptsHighest Level of performance
All criteria are described comprehensively with consideration of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data.
26 ptsHigh Level of Performance
All criteria are described concisely but not comprehensively. Some elements of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data are present.
23 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
2 criteria fully met
10 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
1 criteria fully met
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Criteria not present
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary (20 points/8%)• The presentation provides a summary.
• The summary reinforces all key points.
• The summary discusses any discoveries made or surprises the team encountered during research and preparation for the presentation.
• Includes lessons learned.
20 ptsHighest Level of performance
All criteria are described comprehensively with consideration of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data.
18 ptsHigh Level of Performance
All criteria are described concisely but not comprehensively. Some elements of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data are present.
15 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
3 criteria fully met
7 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
2 criteria fully met
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Criteria not present
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Project Evaluation (40 points/16%)A team project evaluation is provided and includes the following criteria. Each of the following questions and responses must be present on the slides following the summary slide, but before the reference slide(s):
• How the team functioned well (e.g., team strengths, team balance, etc.).
• Problems the team encountered in interacting as a team (e.g., team weaknesses, outside challenges, technology, etc.).
• Specific actions you would recommend to future teams to help them interact, function, and collaborate successfully.
40 ptsHighest Level of performance
All criteria are described comprehensively with consideration of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data.
35 ptsHigh Level of Performance
All criteria are described concisely but not comprehensively. Some elements of alternate perspectives or presentation of supporting data are present.
30 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
3 criteria fully met
14 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
2 criteria fully met
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
Criteria not present
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation, Scholarly Writing, & APA Format (20 points/8%)The presentation format, scholarly writing, and APA format must meet the following criteria:
• 25‐30 PowerPoint slides with speaker notes (excluding title & reference slides)
• Submitted to Dropbox/Turnitin by Team leader only
• Speaker Notes outline and “script” the presentation for online students.
• Online students’ speaker notes include the name of the student who researched and presented the slide information.
• Copyright and plagiarism guidelines correctly applied
• Scholarly writing and current APA guidelines are followed as applicable to PowerPoint slides.
• Sources cited in APA format in the applicable slides and include the APA formatted reference in the reference list slide(s) ‐ minimum 6 references to meet criteria.
• Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct, even in bullet points and speaker slides (e.g., quotation marks, italics, verb tense, etc.).
• Additional criteria provided by course instructor is met.
20 ptsHighest Level of performance
All criteria are met.
18 ptsHigh Level of performance
Student provides 6 scholarly references and at least 7 criteria fully met.
16 ptsSatisfactory level of performance
Student provides 6 or fewer scholarly references and 6 or more criteria fully met.
7 ptsUnsatisfactory level of performance
5 criteria fully met
0 ptsSection not presented in paper
4 or fewer criteria met
20 pts
Total Points: 240
