Psychology of Human Sexuality – Answer two question

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

GET A 40% DISCOUNT ON YOU FIRST ORDER

ORDER NOW DISCOUNT CODE >>>> WELCOME40

Course: Psychology of Human Sexuality
Read the gender role reading – the task force report on the sexualization of girls. Answer the following questions:
-What are some of the consequences of sexualization for girls that are discussed in the reading?
-What are some of the approaches that the reading offers to counter sexualization or to counter the effects of sexualization on girls?
2 pages, double-spaced, APA format Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls Members Eileen L. Zurbriggen, PhD (Chair) Rebecca L. Collins, PhD Sharon Lamb, EdD Tomi-Ann Roberts, PhD Deborah L.Tolman, EdD L. Monique Ward, PhD Jeanne Blake (Public Member) Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls Available online at http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf Printed single copies available from: American Psychological Association Public Interest Directorate Women’s Programs 750 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20002-4242 (202-336-6044) Suggested bibliographic reference: American Psychological Association,Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2010). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf Copyright © 2010 by the American Psychological Association.This material may be reproduced in whole or in part without fees or permission, provided that acknowledgment is given to the American Psychological Association.This material may not be reprinted, translated, or distributed electronically without prior permission in writing from the publisher. For permission, contact APA, Rights and Permissions, 750 First Street, NE,Washington, DC 20002-4242. This report was originally printed in 2007 and reprinted in 2008. The current edition contains some updated references. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls ii Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Scope of This Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Cultural Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Interpersonal Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Intrapsychic Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Summary of Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Consequences of the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Mechanisms by Which Sexualization Has an Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Developmental Processes Relevant to the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Impact on Girls’ Health and Well-Being . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Impact on Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Impact on Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 Summary of Consequences of the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization . . . . . . .35 Approach 1:Working Through Schools and Formal Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35 Approach 2:Working Through the Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Approach 3:Working Directly With Girls and Girls’ Groups to Resist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 Summary of Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization . . . .41 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65 Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls iii Table of Contents Preface At the recommendation of the American Psychological Association (APA) Committee on Women in Psychology (CWP) and with the approval of the Board for the Advancement of Psychology in the Public Interest (BAPPI) and the Board of Directors, APA’s Council of Representatives established the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls in February 2005. The Council charged the task force as follows: The Task Force will examine and summarize the best psychological theory, research, and clinical experience addressing the sexualization of girls via media and other cultural messages, including the prevalence of these messages and their impact on girls, and include attention to the role and impact of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.The Task Force will produce a report, including recommendations for research, practice, education and training, policy, and public awareness. APA has long been involved in issues related to the impact of media content on children. In 1994,APA adopted a policy resolution on violence in mass media, which updated and expanded an earlier resolution on televised violence. In 2004, the APA Task Force on Advertising and Children produced a report examining broad issues related to advertising to children.That report provided recommendations to restrict advertising that is primarily directed at young children and to include developmentally appropriate disclaimers in advertising. The report also included recommendations regarding research, applied psychology, industry practices, media literacy, advertising, and schools.The sexualization of girls in advertising was outside the scope of that report, however, and the issue was therefore not addressed. In 2005,APA adopted the policy resolution on violence in video games and interactive media, which documented the negative impact of exposure to violent interactive media on children and youth and called for the reduction of violence in these media.These resolutions and reports addressed how violent media and advertising affect children and youth, but they did not address the issue of sexualization. BAPPI appointed six psychologists plus a public member to the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls: Eileen L. Zurbriggen, PhD (Chair); Rebecca L. Collins, PhD; Sharon Lamb, EdD;Tomi-Ann Roberts, PhD; Deborah L.Tolman, EdD; L. Monique Ward, PhD; and Jeanne Blake (Public Member, Blake Works, Inc.). Jessica Henderson Daniel, PhD, served as liaison from the Board of Directors. Janet Shibley Hyde, PhD, and Louise B. Silverstein, PhD, served as liaisons from CWP. Task force members are indebted to the following individuals for their thoughtful reviews and comments on earlier versions of this report: Denise Alston, PhD;Toni Antonucci, PhD;Thema Bryant-Davis, PhD; Bonita Cade, PhD; Joan Chrisler, PhD; Ellen Cole, PhD; Lillian Comas-Diaz, PhD; Deborah Cox, PhD; Jessica Henderson Daniel, PhD; Melissa Farley, PhD; Barbara Fiese, PhD; Jennifer Gibson, PhD; Mary Gregerson, PhD; Janet Shibley Hyde, PhD; Lisa Jaycox, PhD; Joe Kelly; Susan Linn, EdD; Jeanne Marecek, PhD; Susan Newcomer, PhD; Jaquelyn Resnick, PhD; Glenda Russell, PhD; Julia da Silva; Louise Silverstein, PhD; Catherine Steiner-Adair, EdD; Lisa Thomas, PhD; and Maryanne Watson, PhD. The task force also expresses its appreciation to Gwendolyn Puryear Keita, PhD (Executive Director, Public Interest Directorate), for her guidance and support.APA staff who worked with and supported
the task force in developing this report include Leslie A. Cameron, Gabriel H. J.Twose, and Tanya L. Burrwell. Gabriele McCormick assisted in the preparation of the draft.Women’s Programs Office intern Ashley Byrd and visiting middle-school student Alexis Hicks also provided helpful comments. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls v Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls Introduction There are many examples of the sexualization of girls and girlhood in U.S. culture.Toy manufacturers produce dolls wearing black leather miniskirts, feather boas, and thigh-high boots and market them to 8- to 12- year-old girls (LaFerla, 2003). Clothing stores sell thongs sized for 7– to 10-year-old girls (R. Brooks, 2006; Cook & Kaiser, 2004), some printed with slogans such as “eye candy” or “wink wink” (Cook & Kaiser, 2004; Haynes, 2005; Levy, 2005a; Merskin, 2004); other thongs sized for women and late adolescent girls are imprinted with characters from Dr. Seuss and the Muppets (e.g., see www.princesscassie.com/ children/cat.shtml) (Levy, 2005a; Pollett & Hurwitz, 2004). In the world of child beauty pageants, 5-year-old girls wear fake teeth, hair extensions,and makeup and are encouraged to “flirt” onstage by batting their long, false eyelashes (Cookson, 2001). On prime-time television, girls can watch fashion shows in which models made to resemble little girls wear sexy lingerie (e.g., the CBS broadcast of Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show on December 6, 2005). Journalists, child advocacy organizations, parents,and psychologists have become alarmed,arguing that the sexualization of girls is a broad and increasing problem and is harmful to girls (Bloom, 2004;“Buying Into Sexy,” 2005; Dalton, 2005; Lamb & Brown, 2006; Levin, 2005; Levy, 2005a; Linn, 2004; Pollet & Hurwitz, 2004; Schor, 2004). The Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls was formed in response to these expressions of public concern. In this report, we examine and summarize psychological theory, research, and clinical experience addressing the sexualization of girls.We (a) define sexualization; (b) examine the prevalence and provide examples of sexualization in society and in cultural institutions, as well as interpersonally and intrapsychically; (c) evaluate the evidence suggesting that sexualization has negative consequences for girls and for the rest of society; and (d) describe positive alternatives that may help counteract the influence of sexualization. Definition There are several components to sexualization, and these set it apart from healthy sexuality. Healthy sexuality is an important component of both physical and mental health, fosters intimacy, bonding, and shared pleasure, and involves mutual respect between consenting partners (Satcher, 2001; Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States [SIECUS], 2004). In contrast, sexualization occurs when l a person’s value comes only from his or her sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics; l a person is held to a standard that equates physical attractiveness (narrowly defined) with being sexy; l a person is sexually objectified—that is, made into a thing for others’ sexual use, rather than seen as a person with the capacity for independent action and decision making; and/or l sexuality is inappropriately imposed upon a person. All four conditions need not be present; any one is an indication of sexualization. Much of the evidence that we evaluate in this report is specific to the third condition— sexual objectification.The fourth condition (the inappropriate imposition of sexuality) is especially relevant to children.Anyone (girls, boys, men, women) can be sexualized. But when children are imbued with adult sexuality, it is often imposed upon them rather than chosen by them. Self-motivated sexual exploration, on the other hand, is not sexualization by our definition, nor is age-appropriate exposure to information about sexuality. We view the sexualization of girls as occurring along a continuum, with sexualized evaluation (e.g., looking at someone in a sexual way) at the less extreme end, and sexual exploitation, such as trafficking or abuse, at the more extreme end.We offer several examples of the sexualization of girls to clarify our definition: l Imagine a 5-year-old girl walking through a mall wearing a short T-shirt that says “Flirt.” l Consider the instructions given in magazines to preadolescent girls on how to look sexy and get a boyfriend by losing 10 pounds and straightening their hair. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 1 l Envision a soccer team of adolescent girls whose sex appeal is emphasized by their coach or a local journalist to attract fans. l Think of print advertisements that portray women as little girls, with pigtails and ruffles, in adult sexual poses. These examples illustrate different aspects of our definition of sexualization. In the first example, we are concerned with the imbuing of adult sexuality upon a child. In the second, we are reminded that a specific and virtually unattainable physical appearance constitutes sexiness for women and girls in our society. In the third, we see that sexuality is valued over other more relevant characteristics, such as the girls’ athletic abilities. In addition, the girls are being sexually objectified. In the fourth example, the adult models are sexually objectified and the distinction between adults and children is blurred, thus sexualizing girlhood. Sexualization may be especially problematic when it happens to youth. Developing a sense of oneself as a sexual being is an important task of adolescence (Adelson, 1980;Arnett, 2000;W.A. Collins & Sroufe, 1999), but sexualization may make this task more difficult. Indeed, Tolman (2002) argued that in the current environment, teen girls are encouraged to look sexy, yet they know little about what it means to be sexual, to have sexual desires, and to make rational and responsible decisions about pleasure and risk within intimate relationships that acknowledge their own desires.Younger girls imbued with adult sexuality may seem sexually appealing, and this may suggest their sexual availability and status as appropriate sexual objects. Concomitantly, women are often considered sexy only when they appear young, thus blurring the line between who is and is not sexually mature (Cook & Kaiser, 2004). Scope of This Report We propose that the sexualization of girls occurs within three interrelated spheres.: l The contribution by society—that is, the cultural1 norms, expectations, and values that are communicated in myriad ways, including through the media.A culture can be infused with sexualized representations of girls and women, suggesting that such sexualization is good and normal. l An interpersonal contribution—Girls can be treated as, and encouraged to be, sexual objects by family, peers, and others. l Self-sexualization—Girls may treat and experience themselves as sexual objects (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996). If girls learn that sexualized behavior and appearance are approved of and rewarded by society and by the people (e.g., peers) whose opinions matter most to them, they are likely to internalize these standards, thus engaging in self-sexualization. We review evidence concerning the prevalence of the sexualization of girls and women in each of these three spheres.We also review evidence that links sexualization to a variety of harmful consequences.These consequences include harm to the sexualized individuals themselves, to their interpersonal relationships, and to society. For example, there is evidence that sexualization contributes to impaired cognitive performance in college-aged women, and related research suggests that viewing material that is sexually objectifying can contribute to body dissatisfaction, eating disorders, low self-esteem, depressive affect, and even physical health problems in high-school-aged girls and in young women.The sexualization of girls may not only reflect sexist attitudes, a societal tol
erance of sexual violence, and the exploitation of girls and women but may also contribute to these phenomena. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 2 1 Although there are many sociocultural groups in the United States, most people, in particular young people, receive a great deal of exposure to what is often referred to as the “dominant” U.S. culture (White, middle-to-upper-class, young-to-middle-aged, heterosexual). One especially salient dimension of this dominant culture is “pop” (or popular) culture. For the purposes of this report, culture and cultural generally refer to this dominant culture. Much of the research reviewed in this report concerns the sexualization of women (college age and older) rather than girls.2 One reason for this is the paucity of research specifically on the sexualization of girls—research that is urgently needed. However, research on both the prevalence and the effects of the sexualization of women is highly relevant to understanding the sexualization of girls for several reasons. First, there is a developmental argument that focuses on the importance of modeling as a developmental process (Bandura, 1986, 1994). Girls develop their identities as teenagers and as women, and they learn the socially acceptable ways to engage in intimate relationships by modeling what they see older girls and young women doing (Bussey & Bandura, 1984, 1992; Lips, 1989) and by imitating the ways in which women are represented in the media (Huston & Wright, 1998). Concomitantly, parents and other adults may overtly or inadvertently communicate expectations that girls should embody the appearances, attitudes, and behaviors that are exemplified by sexualized adult women (of course, parents might instead encourage girls to reject these sexualized models).As this report documents, there is no question that girls (and boys) grow up in a cultural milieu saturated with sexualizing messages. Thus, research on the sexualization of women is highly relevant to the sexualization of girls. Second, there is a methodological argument.Although many of the existing studies on media effects have tested college students and have examined their media exposure levels and corresponding sexual attitudes and behavior, this research is not just about the here and now. Most of these studies have been conducted under the premise of cultivation theory (Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1994), which argues that exposure to consistent themes over time leads viewers to adopt a particular perspective of the world, one that coincides with the images they have been viewing.Although researchers typically test this premise by demonstrating that current exposure levels are associated with current attitudes, this is usually done merely for the sake of convenience.The underlying assumption is that a lifetime of exposure to comparable images and messages has led to such attitudes.We must deduce, therefore, that what young women believe about themselves and how they feel in the present moment were shaped by how they were treated and what they were exposed to when they were girls. Knowing how young women feel about and respond to sexualization, then, is entirely relevant to understanding how girls feel about and respond to sexualization. Much of this report focuses on the media, in large part because this cultural contribution to the sexualization of girls and women has been studied most extensively. In addition, children and adolescents spend more time with entertainment media than they do with any other activity except school and sleeping (D. Roberts, Foehr, & Rideout, 2005).We recognize that there are other important socialization influences, including churches, schools, peers, siblings, parents, and other adults in girls’ lives, and where studies concerning these socialization sources exist, we review them.We also acknowledge that the media are not just a means of creating or strengthening cultural values. Fueled by consumer culture, they are also a delivery system for already-existing cultural values. Finally, we do not assume that girls are “empty vessels” into which information from the media is poured but that they are actively engaged in choosing and interpreting the media in their lives, with increasing independence as they mature from girlhood to late adolescence (Rubin, 2002; Steele, 1999). We emphasize the importance of appreciating developmental processes and the enormous differences in girls as they develop.Thus, the effects of sexualization are likely to vary depending on a girl’s age, so that what is inappropriate for a 6-year-old might be perfectly appropriate for a high school girl.The perspectives and experiences that a young girl brings to her exposure to sexualizing images and experiences, as well as her cognitive, intellectual, social, and even physical development, might profoundly influence the effect that such exposure would have on her, rendering it quite different from what a teenage girl would experience. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 3 2 Age ranges for childhood, preadolescence,and adolescence vary across the research summarized in this report.Where relevant, age ranges reported reflect definitions from individual studies. Tween, though not a scientific term, is used by advertisers and marketers, and the report discusses the tween population in that context. Ethnic and sociocultural differences are also relevant. Immigrant girls and girls and women of color have historically suffered stereotypes that focus on their sexuality and their bodies (Hill Collins, 2004). In addition, women’s sexuality (e.g., attitudes, beliefs, behaviors) can vary widely for women of different ethnicities (Greene, 2000; Hurtado, 2003). Negative stereotypes concerning the sexuality of poor women are prevalent (Limbert & Bullock, 2005). Sexual socialization is profoundly heterosexual and heteronormative (Holland, Ramazanoglu, Sharpe, & Thomson, 2004; Phillips, 2000;Tolman, 2006).Throughout this report, therefore, where data are available, we address how the prevalence and effects of sexualization may vary among girls from different ethnic, socioeconomic, religious, and family backgrounds, as well as among girls of different sexual orientations. It is important to note what the report does not cover. It does not review evidence concerning the prevalence and effects of sexually suggestive or sexually explicit material per se. Rather, we are concerned with such material only insofar as it fits within the four-part definition of sexualization given previously.The report also covers extreme forms of sexualization (e.g., prostitution, pornography, trafficking, child sexual abuse) only briefly. Finally, we acknowledge that this phenomenon and the concern about it is not, and cannot be, limited by U.S. borders, in part because U.S. culture is exported worldwide. For the purposes of this report, however, our focus is on the United States. Expanding to an international scope is a useful goal for the future. The rest of the report is divided into four sections. In Section 2, we provide evidence of the existence of the sexualization of girls and women in three spheres: in U.S. society or culture, in girls’ interpersonal relationships, and within individual girls themselves. In the third section, we describe the potential mechanisms by which the sexualization of girls occurs and the known and likely effects of the sexualization of girls: on girls themselves, on others with whom girls have interpersonal relationships (boys, men, adult women), and on U.S. societal institutions. In the fourth section, we outline positive alternatives to the sexualization of girls and describe promising methods of ameliorating the effects of sexualization when it does occur. Finally, in the fifth section, we make recommendations for action, beginning with a call for research to develop a body of knowledge specifically on the sexualization of girls as well as to expand our knowledge of the prevalence and effects of sexualization more generally. Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls Cultural Contribu
tions Media With the plethora of media options available today, it is possible to access the latest news or the most popular song almost anywhere and anytime, yet it is also possible to be inundated by unwanted messages and material. Media content responds to demand and is a reflection of culture, but it also contributes to it.Throughout U.S. culture, and particularly in mainstream media, women and girls are depicted in a sexualizing manner.These representations can be seen in virtually every medium, including prime-time television programs (e.g., Grauerholz & King, 1997; L. M.Ward, 1995), television commercials (e.g., Lin, 1997), music videos (e.g., Gow, 1996; R. C.Vincent, 1989), and magazines (e.g., Krassas, Blauwkamp, & Wesselink, 2001, 2003; Plous & Neptune, 1997). Girls are major consumers of media and receive and engage with these messages every day.According to Nielsen Media Research (1998), the average child or teen watches 3 hours of television per day, and the numbers are higher for Black and Latino youth.When various media are combined, children view 6 hours 32 minutes per day. The Kaiser Family Foundation (2003) reported that 68% of children have a TV in their bedroom, that 51% of girls play interactive games on their computers and video game consoles, and that girls, like boys, are on their computers about an hour each day visiting Web sites, listening to music, frequenting chat rooms, playing games, and sending messages to friends (D. Roberts et al., 2005). Massive exposure to media among youth creates the potential for massive exposure to portrayals that sexualize women and girls and teach girls that women are sexual objects. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 4 Television On television, young viewers encounter a world that is disproportionately male, especially in youth-oriented programs, and one in which female characters are significantly more likely than male characters to be attractive and provocatively dressed (Eaton, 1997). Sexual comments and remarks are pervasive on television (L. M. Ward, 2003), and research has shown that they disproportionately sexually objectify women. For example, in her analysis of prime-time programs popular among children and adolescents, L. M.Ward (1995) found that 11.5% of the verbal sexual messages coded involved sexually objectifying comments, nearly all of which were about women. Similarly, Lampman et al. (2002), studying sexual remarks made on prime-time comedies, found that 23% of the sexual behaviors coded were leering, ogling, staring, and catcalling at female characters.Additionally, 16.5% of the sexual remarks detected were about body parts or nudity.A majority of these comments (85%) came from men. In their analysis of sexual harassment on prime-time programming, Grauerholz and King (1997) reported a similar focus on the denigration of women that alluded to their sexuality and lack of intellect and that objectified their bodies. Of the 81 episodes analyzed, 84% contained at least one incident of sexual harassment, with an average of 3.4 incidents per program.The most frequent acts were sexist comments (33.3% of the incidents) in which a wide variety of deprecating words were used to describe women (e.g., broad, bimbo, dumb ass chick, toots, fox, babe, blondie).The next most frequent occurrences were verbal sexual comments (32% of the incidents).These comments typically focused on women’s bodies or body parts, especially breasts, which were referred to as jugs, boobs, knockers, hooters, cookware, and canned goods.The third most common category was body language (13%) and generally involved men or adolescent boys leering at women or girls. In total, the authors reported that approximately 78% of the harassment focused on demeaning terms for women or on the sexualization of their bodies. In a more recent analysis of sexual harassment in workplace-based situation comedies, Montemurro (2003) made further distinctions, separating gender harassment (jokes, looks, calls) from quid pro quo sexual harassment (touches, favors, dates).Analyzing 56 episodes drawn from five different programs, she found an average of 3.3 incidents of gender harassment per episode and 0.50 incidents of sexual harassment. Dominant were jokes referring to women’s sexuality or women’s bodies and comments that characterized women as sexual objects; 74% of the episodes analyzed contained at least one incident of gender harassment in the form of jokes, most of which were accompanied by laugh tracks. Music Videos Content analyses indicate that 44%–81% of music videos contain sexual imagery (Gow, 1990; Greeson & Williams, 1986; Pardun & McKee, 1995; Sherman & Dominick, 1986). Sexually objectifying images of women constitute a large portion of this sexual content. In music videos, women more frequently than men are presented in provocative and revealing clothing (e.g.,Andsager & Roe, 1999; Seidman, 1992), are objectified (Sommers-Flanagan, Sommers-Flanagan, & Davis, 1993), and typically serve as decorative objects that dance and pose and do not play any instruments (e.g.,Arnett, 2002; Gow, 1996).They are often displayed in ways that emphasize their bodies, body parts, facial features, and sexual readiness. R. C.Vincent, Davis, and Boruskowski (1987) found that 57% of the videos featured a woman portrayed exclusively as a decorative sexual object. In the 182 videos analyzed by Seidman (1992), 37% of women wore revealing clothing, compared with 4.2% of men. L. M.Ward and Rivadeneyra’s (2002) more recent analysis of the most popular music videos on Black Entertainment Television found sexual imagery in 84% of the videos; the two most frequently occurring sexual behaviors were sexual objectification and women dancing sexually. Seventy-one percent of Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 5 Massive exposure to media among youth creates the potential for massive exposure to portrayals that sexualize women and girls and teach girls that women are sexual objects. women in these videos were dressed in mildly provocative or provocative clothing or wore no clothing at all, compared with 35% of male characters. In contrast to public perception, these patterns are not restricted to pop or hip-hop videos. In one analysis of country music videos, 42% of female artists were coded as wearing alluring clothing (Andsager & Roe, 1999). In their analysis of 40 MTV music videos, Sommers-Flanagan et al. (1993) found objectification in 44.4% of the 30-second segments coded.They commented,“given . . . the frequency of objectification within these videos, the concept of a whole person involved in a complex relationship with another whole person is clearly absent from the video’s message” (p. 752). Music videos convey information about female sexuality not only through the images and story lines of individual videos but also through the changing personas of the artists themselves. In their analysis of the last 20 years of music videos, communication scholars Andsager and Roe (2003) noted that one of the distinct ways in which sex is used is as a metamorphosis.They show how teen artists exploit their sexuality to establish a more mature and “edgier” version of their former selves as they cross the threshold from teenage icon to adult musician.According to the authors, this process is exemplified by Christina Aguilera, Faith Hill,and Britney Spears, who displayed her “mature” image at the 2001 MTV Awards in a nude body stocking. The authors commented that such tactics often provoke sexualized discussion of the artist—that is, discussion focuses not on her talent or music but rather on her body and sexuality.These transformations likely drive home the point that being a successful sexual object is the way to be perceived as mature and successful in the music industry. Music Lyrics Although studies have documented the sexualization of women in music videos, sexualizing content in the lyrics that accompany these videos has not been documented as extensively. References to relationships, romance, and sexual behavior are commonplace in popular
music lyrics and videos (Christenson & Roberts, 1998). One comprehensive analysis of sexual content in adolescents’ “media diets” demonstrated that sexual content appeared more frequently in adolescents’ musical choices than in their television, movie, or magazine choices (Pardun, L’Engle, & Brown, 2005); however, there are no recent content analyses to determine how often sexual content consumed by teens objectifies girls or women. It is evident that the lyrics of some recent popular songs sexualize women or refer to them in highly degrading ways, or both. Some examples include the following: l “So blow me bitch I don’t rock for cancer/I rock for the cash and the topless dancers” (Kid Rock,“f*ck off,” 1998) l “Don’tcha wish your girlfriend was hot like me?” (Pussycat Dolls, 2005) l “That’s the way you like to f*** . . . rough sex make it hurt, in the garden all in the dirt” (Ludacris, 2000) l “I tell the hos all the time, Bitch get in my car” (50 Cent, 2005) l “Ho shake your ass” (Ying Yang Twins, 2003) As part of a recent study of the effects of listening to popular music on sexual behavior (Martino et al., 2006), researchers coded the content of 164 songs from 16 artists popular with teens. Overall, 15% of songs contained sexually degrading lyrics. Most of these lyrics were concentrated within the work of rap and R&B artists; as many as 70% of individual artists’ songs included degrading sexual content. Movies Adolescents constitute the largest demographic segment of moviegoers (Strasburger, 1995), and a good number of movies with sexual themes have plots that appeal primarily to teen and young adult audiences (e.g., Cruel Intentions, American Pie). Children are also consumers of movies, with 13% attending movie theaters on a typical day and 39% watching a video or DVD (D. Roberts et al., 2005).Yet few empirical data have been gathered on the sexual content of feature films or the prevalence of sexualizing portrayals of girls and women. One pattern that has been studied, however, is the asymmetrical presence of nudity. In R-rated Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 6 movies of the 1980s, instances of female nudity were reported to exceed those of male nudity in a 4 to 1 ratio (B. S. Greenberg et al., 1993). Another notable trend is the near absence of female characters in the top-grossing motion pictures (Bazzini, McIntosh, Smith, Cook, & Harris, 1997) and in G-rated movies (Kelly & Smith, 2006). Kelly and Smith evaluated the 101 top-grossing G-rated films from 1990 to 2004. Of the over 4,000 characters in these films, 75% overall were male, 83% of characters in crowds were male, 83% of narrators were male, and 72% of speaking characters were male. In addition, there was little change from 1990 to 2004.This gross underrepresentation of women or girls in films with family-friendly content reflects a missed opportunity to present a broad spectrum of girls and women in roles that are nonsexualized. Cartoons and Animation Much of children’s programming features cartoons.Although the prevalence of sexualization in children’s cartoons or teen animation (e.g., anime) has not yet been systematically studied, there is anecdotal evidence that cartoons may contain sexualizing images of girls and women. Several authors (Lamb & Brown, 2006; Levin, 2005) have expressed concern about the presence of sexualized content in some recent movies and television programs for children (e.g., sexy costumes that don’t match the characters’ roles in Ella Enchanted, the parody of a stripper in Shrek 2). Others have noted that Disney’s female characters today (e.g.,The Little Mermaid, Pocahontas) have more cleavage, fewer clothes, and are depicted as “sexier” than those of yesteryear (e.g., Snow White, Cinderella) (Lacroix, 2004).And the currently popular and sexily clad Bratz dolls (discussed in the Products section of this report, pp. 13–15) are the subject of an animated cartoon.This product tie-in could reinforce the appeal of the cartoon Bratz dolls and their potential power to influence girls. Studies do show that, with a few notable exceptions (e.g., Dora the Explorer), cartoons primarily portray girls as domestic, interested in boys, and concerned with their appearance (Thompson & Zerbinos, 1997), suggesting an overemphasis on the self as a romantic object, if not necessarily a sexual one. Magazines The number of teen-focused magazines has increased dramatically from 5 in 1990 to 19 in 2000, and most teens regularly read magazines (“Teen Market Profile,” 2005). For example, one study (D. Roberts et al., 2005) found that 47% of 8- to 18-year-olds reported having read at least 5 minutes of a magazine the previous day, and 22% reported having read a magazine for 20 minutes or more the previous day; on average, 8- to 18-year-olds reported reading magazines 14 minutes a day. Much of the research analyzing the sexual content of magazines focuses heavily on teen girls’ and women’s magazines (e.g., Carpenter, 1998; Durham, 1998; Garner, Sterk, & Adams, 1998; McMahon, 1990). One of the dominant themes about sexuality reported across these studies and across magazines is that presenting oneself as sexually desirable and thereby gaining the attention of men is and should be the focal goal for women. Girls and young women are repeatedly encouraged to look and dress in specific ways to look sexy for men, a phenomenon labeled “costuming for seduction” (M. Duffy & Gotcher, 1996), and to use certain products in order to be more attractive to and desired by males. These studies document that attracting the attention of boys by looking “hot” and “sexy” is the point of many of the articles, text, cover lines, ads, and photographs. Repeated attempts are made, in the form of advice about hairstyles, cosmetics, clothing, diet, and exercise, to remake the reader as an object of male desire (McMahon, 1990). Nearly everything girls and women are encouraged to do in the line of self-improvement is geared toward gaining the attention of men. Even articles on physical fitness Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 7 This gross underrepresentation of women or girls in films with family-friendly content reflects a missed opportunity to present a broad spectrum of girls and women in roles that are nonsexualized. analyzed in Seventeen and the now defunct YM (Durham, 1998) centered on the need for girls to increase their sexual desirability through exercise rather than on improving their health or well-being. Similar results were reported by Garner et al. (1998), who analyzed advice given about sex in five magazines aimed at girls, adolescents, and young women: YM,Teen, Seventeen, Glamour, and Mademoiselle.The authors reported that the content of these magazines encouraged young women to think of themselves as sexual objects whose lives were not complete unless sexually connected with a man. Female readers were given advice on how to look and dress to attract men and on which attributes were most successful in attracting men (i.e., innocence) and which were least successful and should be avoided (e.g., being pushy or bossy, acting like a mom, being too demanding, pushing too early for commitment). Thus, much of the content of mainstream magazines geared toward adolescent girls and young women heavily emphasizes the centrality of heterosexual relationships for women and the need to achieve rigid norms of physical attractiveness through the consumption of products such as cosmetics and fashionable clothing (Durham, 1998). As M. Duffy and Gotcher (1996) concluded from their analysis of YM, the world of YM is a place where young women . . . must consume and beautify themselves to achieve an almost impossible physical beauty ideal.And, it is a place where sexuality is both a means and an objective, where the pursuit of males is almost the sole focus of life. In fact, the objective of attracting males is the only objective presented—it is an unquestioned “good.” (p. 43) Sports Media A large body of research shows that media coverag
e of women’s sports is minimal compared with the extensive coverage of men’s sports, despite the boom in female athletic participation since the passage of Title IX and the development of professional women’s teams (e.g.,Amateur Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles, 2001; M. C. Duncan, Messner, & Williams, 1991; Kane, 1996; Messner, Duncan, & Jensen, 1993; Pedersen & Whisenant, 2003; J.Vincent, Imwold, Johnson, & Massey, 2003).This paucity of research means that what is covered must suffice to represent women’s sports more broadly.Thus, it is particularly problematic that when women’s sports are featured, coverage is often selective (Kane, 1996), and commentary often sexually objectifies female athletes as well as female fans in the audience (Messner, Duncan, & Cooky, 2003; Schultz, 2005). Although scholars have documented differential and sexist treatment of female athletes for over a decade (e.g., Kane & Greendorfer, 1994; Messner et al., 1993, 2003), available evidence suggests a trend for increasing sexualization of female athletes comparable to their overall increasing visibility. Male athletes are rarely depicted solely as sexual objects in their endorsement work, but several female athletes have recently posed nude or in provocative poses in national magazines. For example, eight Olympic athletes were featured in the September 2004 issue of Playboy, swimmer Amanda Beard appeared in Sports Illustrated’s 2005 swimsuit edition, and soccer player Brandi Chastain was in Gear Magazine in 1999. Several targeted studies of specific media genres, sports, or sporting events have documented the frequency with which female athletes are sexualized. Fink and Kensicki (2002) explored the coverage of female athletes in Sports Illustrated (SI) and Sports Illustrated for Women (SIW) from 1997 to 1999.They found that only 10% of the photographs in SI during this 3-year period were of female athletes. Five percent of these photographs were “pornographic/sexually suggestive,” defined as women dressed provocatively or photographed in such a way as to focus solely on sexual attributes (e.g., photograph framed on an athlete’s breasts). Only .2% of the photographs of men fell into this category. Sixty-six percent of the photographs of men showed them actively engaged in a sport versus 34% of the photographs of women. Representations of women in SIW were only slightly better; 56% of photographs of women in SIW depicted them actively engaged in sports, and 2% were pornographic. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 8 Shugart’s (2003) study on print and television coverage of the 1999 U.S. women’s soccer team lends further support for a pattern of sexualizing female athletes. Shugart argued that media coverage of the team was sexualized in three ways: l Subtle sexualization occurred through passive objectification—for example, photographs that favored an athlete’s face rather than her athletic performance. l Less subtle sexualization was shown in commentators’ remarks—for example, when Brandi Chastain removed her jersey after scoring the winning goal of the World Cup.Although this specific behavior was identical to that of male soccer players in the same circumstances, in Chastain’s case, sportscasters called it a “striptease” and deemed her “the owner of the most talked-about breasts in the country” (pp. 12-13). In several media sources, the team was referred to as “booters with hooters” (p. 13). l “Vigilant heterosexuality” was evident in commentary that placed the femininity of female athletes and their family lives in the foreground to suggest that they were not lesbians (regardless of their real-life sexual orientation).This form of sexualization marginalizes the athleticism of female athletes:“Female strength has been redefined as male pleasure” (p. 27).This assessment is echoed by Hill Collins (2004), who argued in an analysis of depictions of several African American athletes that their appearances in passive “sexy” poses in various media counteracted their aggression and passion on the court or field. Video/Computer Games The vast majority of children play video games: 87% of younger children and 70% of adolescents (Paik, 2001).A gender divide in heavy video game play exists, with 41% of boys playing games for more than an hour a day and only 18% of girls doing so (D. Roberts et al., 2005). Girls, however, spend an average of 40 minutes per day playing games online or on home systems (D. Roberts et al., 2005). Games made for specialized systems and those made for personal computers contain highly sexualized content and few strong female protagonists (Dietz, 1998). In a recent study, Haninger and Thompson (2004) sampled 80 “Teen”-rated3 video games from a population of 396 games in release in 2001.They observed sexual themes in 27% of games. Games were significantly more likely to depict female characters partially nude or engaged in sexual behaviors than to depict male characters in this way.When the authors expanded their definition of “sexual theme” to include “pronounced cleavage, large breasts, or provocative clothing,” the percentage of female characters so depicted rose to 46%. Beasley and Standley (2002) examined 64 games for sexualizing themes.Women were seldom depicted in any of these games (14% of all characters were female).When the clothing of female characters was compared with that of males, female characters’ clothing was more likely to expose skin. Dill, Gentile, Richter, and Dill (2005) found that in the 20 top-selling games in 1999, only female characters were portrayed as highly sexualized. Internet Girls use the Internet frequently and for many purposes (D. Roberts et al., 2005). In recent years, studies have shown that girls and boys use the Internet in equal numbers (Lenhart, Lewis, & Rainie, 2001; D. Roberts et al., 2005), with girls leading boys in Internet use in the early middle-school years (Lenhart, Madden, & Hitlin, 2005). The wide popularity of sites like MySpace.com as well as blog centers has encouraged youth, including girls, to describe themselves on the Internet. Recently, public attention has focused on the sexualized self-presentations by some girls on these Web sites and the dangers inherent in this practice (Kornblum, 2005), although there is currently no research that has assessed how girls portray themselves or how dangerous this practice is. Some girls have posed in provocative clothing and posted notices of their sexual availability. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 9 3 According to the Entertainment Software Rating Board (n.d.),“T” or teen-rated video games have content that may be suitable for ages 13 and older.Titles in this category may contain violence, suggestive themes, crude humor, minimal blood, simulated gambling, and/or infrequent use of strong language. The recent and global proliferation of Web sites of all kinds that may be of interest to girls makes it difficult to assess the sexualization of girls and women. Lambiase (2003) examined the sexualization of girls and women on one specific type of Web site that targets and attracts girls and teens: official and fan Web sites of male and female celebrities. She found that female celebrities were far more likely than male celebrities to be represented by sexualized images, regardless of whether the site was official or produced by fans. She also found that female musicians were more likely to be sexualized than other female celebrities. Pornography is readily available on the Internet (Griffiths, 2000), with one source estimating that 12% of all Web sites are pornography sites, and 25% of all search engine requests are for pornography (English, 2005). Extensive data on children’s and adolescents’ exposure to sexually objectifying material online is lacking; however, a Kaiser Family Foundation (2001) study found that 70% of teens 15–17 years of age had accidentally encountered pornography on the Internet, with 23% saying this happened somewhat or very often. Advertising The sexualization of wo
men is particularly prominent in the world of advertising. In prime-time television commercials, for example, Lin (1997) demonstrated that women more often than men were shown in a state of undress, exhibited more “sexiness,” and were depicted as sexual objects (9.2% of men vs. 20.8% of women). Similar findings have appeared in analyses of commercials on MTV (Signorielli, McLeod, & Healy, 1994), on Spanish-language programming (Fullerton & Kendrick, 2000), and in countries around the world, such as Turkey and Japan (Akima, 2003; Uray & Burnaz, 2003). Beer commercials have emerged as a particularly rich source of images that sexualize young women. Of the 72 beer and nonbeer ads randomly selected from prime-time sports and entertainment programming, 75% of the beer ads and 50% of the nonbeer ads were labeled as “sexist,” featuring women in very limited and objectifying roles (Rouner, Slater, & Domenech-Rodriguez, 2003). Magazine advertisements also sexualize women. First, studies indicate that women are frequently featured as sexual objects in such ads (e.g., Baker, 2005; Lindner, 2004; W. J. Rudman & Verdi, 1993). In one analysis of women appearing in advertisements in Time and Vogue from 1955 to 2002, Lindner (2004) reported that an average of 40% of ads featured women as decorative objects.When women are featured as “decorations” in ads (e.g., shown standing seductively next to a car to enhance the image of the car), their major purpose is to be looked at.They are treated as appendages to the product rather than as active consumers or users of the product. Differences in these patterns emerge based on the magazine’s intended audience and are particularly high in magazines targeting men. For example, Baker (2005) reported that in magazines targeting Black men or White men, 68.2% of women appearing in magazines for Black men and 53.3% in magazines for White men could be categorized as filling the decorative object role.This was the case for 22.0% and 15.8% of women in magazines targeting Black women and White women, respectively. Similarly, Reichert and Carpenter (2004) found that whereas women were suggestively dressed, partially clad, or nude about half the time in ads in women’s magazines (e.g., Redbook) published in 2003, almost four out of five women (78%) were depicted in this manner in ads in men’s magazines (e.g., Esquire).Analyses of photographs from Maxim and Stuff (two popular men’s magazines) revealed that 80.5% of the women were depicted as sex objects (Krassas et al., 2003). Magazine advertisements sexualize women in a second way. Evidence indicates that such sexual objectification occurs more frequently for women in magazine ads than for men (Plous & Neptune, 1997; Reichert, 2003; Soley & Kurzbard, 1986). For example, Reichert, Lambiase, Morgan, Carstarphen, and Zavoina (1999) found that women were three times more likely than men to be dressed in a sexually provocative manner in ads. In their analysis of fashion and fitness magazine advertisements published in 1992,W. J. Rudman and Verdi (1993) found Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 10 that female models were more likely than male models to be placed in submissive, sexually exploitive, and violent positions. In approximately 80% of the ads in their sample, female models were posed in sexually exploitive postures. In half of the ads studied, female models were “dismembered” (i.e., body parts were excluded or obscured) by the camera angle or logo placement.This was the case for only 17% of men in ads. Findings document that such patterns have been increasing over time. Sullivan and O’Connor (1988) reported a 60% increase since 1970 in the portrayals of women in purely “decorative” roles. In an analysis of 1,871 ads from 1959, 1969, 1979, and 1989, Busby and Leichty (1993) found an increase in the number of decorative or alluring roles for women—from 54% in 1959 to 73% in 1989. Kang (1997) reported an increase in the display of women’s bodies in advertisements—from 25% of ads in 1979 to 32% in 1991. In comparing the sexual imagery in ads from six magazines published over a 20-year-period, Reichert and Carpenter (2004) found a significant increase over time in the explicitness of female dress, male dress, and physical contact between women and men. Here, 28% of women were shown as suggestively dressed, partially clad, or nude in ads in 1983, and this increased to 49% in 2003. Only one study found no change over time in objectification or body display for women from 1955 to 2002 (Lindner, 2004). Overall, research shows magazines’ growing focus on women’s bodies as sexual objects for others’ viewing pleasure. Some researchers have found that such patterns differ depending on the race of the woman pictured or targeted as an audience for the magazine. In her analysis of images of women’s sexuality in advertisements in eight Black- and White-oriented women’s and men’s magazines, Baker (2005) found that White women in women’s magazines, more often than Black women in women’s magazines, were represented with their faces hidden (thus placing an emphasis on their body and physical attributes).White women were also more likely than Black women to be represented as a decorative object in men’s magazines. Similar findings were reported by Sanchez-Hucles, Hudgins, and Gamble (2005) in their comparison of women in ads in mainstream, Black-oriented, and Latina magazines. In this study, 42% of ads in Cosmopolitan were found to contain suggestive body exposure, compared with 13% in Ebony, 32% in Essence, 0% in Filipinas, and 21% in Latin Girl.These patterns appear to persist over time. Plous and Neptune (1997) examined 10 years of fashion advertisements drawn from six magazines geared toward White women (Cosmopolitan, Glamour), Black women (Ebony, Essence), and White men (Esquire, GQ). They found that body exposure of White women increased significantly over the 10 years, from approximately 34% in 1985-1986 to nearly 50% in 1993-1994.Ads displaying cleavage of White women nearly doubled, from 22.8% in 1985–1986 to 42.8% in 1993–1994. Breast exposure of Black women increased from 30% of ads in 1986-1988 to more than 40% by 1993–1994. If breast exposure is included with other types of body exposure, the percentage of 1993–1994 ads with body exposure rises to 52.9% for Black women and 61.6% for White women. Despite evidence that ads are more sexual than ever (Lin, 1998; Reichert et al., 1999), there is also some indication that this is not what the public wants.A 1999 Adweek poll showed that 70% of respondents thought there was too much sexual imagery in advertising (Dolliver, 1999). Moreover, evidence indicates that such tactics may not be as effective as advertisers think.Advertising and marketing researchers have studied sex in advertising since the 1960s, and a general finding has been that attention and processing resources are directed toward sexual material including nudity, sexual behavior, and embedded sexual material (Lang,Wise, Lee, & Cai, 2003). Recent evidence, however, indicates that drawing attention does not always translate into selling products. In an experimental investigation involving 366 adults 18–54 years of age, Bushman (2005) demonstrated that participants exposed to programming featuring sexual commercials were less likely to remember the advertised brands and expressed less interest in buying those brands than participants who had seen ads with no sexual content. These data indicate that young women and adult women are frequently, consistently, and increasingly presented in sexualized ways in advertising, creating an Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 11 environment in which being female becomes nearly synonymous with being a sexual object.Although advertisers are typically careful not to sexualize young girls directly, several advertising techniques do so indirectly: l There is some empirical evidence that children, and girls especially, are sometimes depicted as sexual objects or as counterparts to adult versions. In their
analysis of children appearing in advertisements drawn from five popular magazines (e.g., Ladies Home Journal, Newsweek) over a 40-year-period, O’Donohue, Gold and McKay (1997) found 38 ads (1.5%) that portrayed children in sexual ways. Moreover, 85% of these ads focused on girls, and this depiction of sexualized girls was found to increase significantly over time. In these ads, girls often appear with sexualized adult women and are posed in matching clothing or seductive poses. l Advertising imagery presents the public with both a “trickle up” and a “trickle down” framework on girls and women (Cook & Kaiser, 2004); thus, the distinction between women and girls may become blurred. In this framework, young girls are “adultified” and adult women are “youthified.” Merskin (2004) wrote that advertising is full of photographs in which women are “dressed down” to look like little girls and young girls are “dressed up” as grown women. Evidence for trickle-up includes the launching of new magazines CosmoGirl and ElleGirl in 2001 and Teen Vogue in 2003.These magazines “downsize” the sexualizing messages of their “mother” publications: how to please your man becomes how to please your prom date. The trickle-down or “youthification” side of the equation includes sexual portrayals of adult women as young girls in advertising (Kilbourne, 1999), often wearing schoolgirl clothing and licking lollipops or popsicles or wearing scaled-up versions of children’s clothing styles like babydoll dresses and tops, knee socks, and Mary Janes, all marketed as adult women’s wear.This trend has led some critics to denounce “pedophilic fashion” (Menkes, 1994). As another example, a recent television fashion show (the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show on CBS in December 2005) featured a Christmas-themed segment in which the highly sexualized runway models were dressed like little girls in baby doll teddies, pulling stuffed animals, and surrounded by toys. l Individual ads have employed youthful or “barely legal” celebrity adolescents in highly sexual ways. News stories over the last 25 years have reported on these ads— both successful and controversial—that have been debated and sometimes pulled because of their presentation of sexualized young girls: the Brooke Shields/Calvin Klein jeans ad, and in more recent years, the Abercrombie and Fitch catalogue, the Calvin Klein child underwear ads, the Christina Aguilera/Skechers ads, and the Paris Hilton/Carl’s Jr. hamburger ads. Such ads often take a star popular with teens and preteens and present her in highly sexualized poses. Some explicitly play up innocence as sexy, as in one of the Skechers “naughty and nice” ads that featured Aguilera dressed as a schoolgirl in pigtails, with her shirt unbuttoned, licking a lollipop. Merskin (2004) concluded that the message from advertisers and the mass media to girls (as eventual women) is they should always be sexually available, always have sex on their minds, be willing to be dominated and even sexually aggressed against, and they will be gazed on as sexual objects. (p. 120) Products Products designed for children and adolescents are big business; toy sales alone amounted to over $21 billion in 2005 (Ackman, 2006).These products are one of the sources of societal-level socialization and can shape children’s development in a variety of ways. For example, cultural model theorists (Bachen & Illouz, 1996; Duveen & Lloyd, 1990) have argued that marketers present schemas to young people for life events about which they have little experience and which then become cultural models for them.Although few systematic studies have been conducted to examine the prevalence or psychological impact of products that sexualize girls or women, the following sections on dolls, clothing, and cosmetics present examples of products marketed to girls that present images of sexy, sexualized persons. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 12 Dolls. Doll play is a popular activity for children, especially girls (Sutton-Smith, 1986). It is therefore of concern when sexualized dolls are marketed to girls. One series of dolls popular with girls as young as age 4 are the Bratz dolls, a multiethnic crew of teenagers who are interested in fashion, music, boys, and image (see www.bratz.com). Bratz girls are marketed in bikinis, sitting in a hot tub, mixing drinks, and standing around, while the “Boyz” play guitar and stand with their surf boards, poised for action (Brown & Lamb, 2005; Lamb & Brown, 2006). Moreover, Bratz dolls come dressed in sexualized clothing such as miniskirts, fishnet stockings, and feather boas.Although these dolls may present no more sexualization of girls or women than is seen in MTV videos, it is worrisome when dolls designed specifically for 4- to 8-year-olds are associated with an objectified adult sexuality.The objectified sexuality presented by these dolls, as opposed to the healthy sexuality that develops as a normal part of adolescence, is limiting for adolescent girls, and even more so for the very young girls who represent the market for these dolls. With the success of the Bratz dolls, other doll manufacturers have followed suit. Mattel created “My Scene Barbie” and was promptly sued by Hasbro for “serial copycatting” (DeSmedt, 2006).The pudgy, cuddly, and asexual troll dolls that sold by the millions in the 1960s have been reinvented as Trollz (à la Bratz), hip teenagers who are “BFFL” (Best Friends for Life; see www.trollz.com) (Sheff, 2005).The full-lipped Sapphire,Amethyst, Onyx, Ruby, and Topaz sport big hair, miniskirts, bare midriffs, and “magical belly gems” and are being marketed to girls as young as 4–8 years old (Sheff, 2005). Recently, Hasbro was poised to release a series of dolls modeled after the musical group The Pussycat Dolls (a former burlesque troup known for their revealing clothing and highly sexualized lyrics), designed for 4- to 8-year-old girls.A grassroots protest campaign convinced them to pull this line of dolls (Goldiner, 2006). Although the hugely popular American Girl dolls, known for their championing of multiethnic girls’ histories, have not been overtly sexualized,American Girl’s recent co-branding with Bath & Body Works (T.Turner, 2005) may lead to product tie-ins that will encourage girls to develop a precocious body consciousness and one associated with narrowly sexual attractiveness. Clothing. Whereas girls may have little control over how they are represented in the media, they have more control over the identity they create via their clothing choices (Cook & Kaiser, 2004). Labre and Walsh-Childers (2003) argued that teen magazines combine fashion and beauty into one category and that girls are encouraged to express their individuality through fashion choices. Indeed, as Lamb and Brown (2006) indicated, marketers specifically sell unique identity to girls via clothing, often pointing out how a girl might choose one day to look “punk” and another to look “innocent.” Given that girls may be developing their identity in part through the clothing they choose, it is of concern when girls at increasingly younger ages are invited to try on and wear teen clothes designed to highlight female sexuality.Wearing such clothing may make it more difficult for girls to see their own worth and value in any way other than sexually.The sexualization of girls in clothing advertisements appeared at least as early as 25 years ago, with such advertisements as a girl in jeans, dropping her rag doll by her side, with the headline “13 going on 18” (1981), and the controversial Calvin Klein ad in which the 15-year-old Brooke Shields declared,“Nothing comes between me and my Calvins” (Cook & Kaiser, 2004). What seems to be a more recent phenomenon, however, is the production of “sexy” clothing in child and teen sizes. Pollett and Hurwitz (2004) noted that the thong, an item of clothing based on what a stripper might wear, is now offered in “tween” stores as well as children’s wear departments, often
with decorations that will specifiReport of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 13 . . . the thong, an item of clothing based on what a stripper might wear, is now offered in “tween” stores as well as women’s wear departments, often with decorations that will specifically appeal to children. cally appeal to children. Retail stores such as Limited Too that focus on the so-called tween population (defined by the store as ages 7 up to teen years) sell sexy lingerie such as camisoles and lacy panties, items that once would have been marketed solely to adults (Lamb & Brown, 2006). In a recent content analysis of Halloween costumes, Nelson (2000) found that there was greater variation in the types of costumes marketed to boys than in those marketed to girls and that girls’ costumes nearly always emphasized physical attractiveness (e.g., beauty queens and princesses). Among the few female villain costumes, sexual eroticism was emphasized (e.g.,“Sexy Devil” or “Bewitched”). Cosmetics.The cosmetics industry has also seen the value of marketing their products to younger and younger girls.Toy shops sell “Girls Ultimate Spa and Perfume Kit” (“for use by up to eight kids and perfect for spa parties, sleepovers, and rainy days”); the Body Shop has lip glosses intended for teens and fruity lip glosses for preteens; Claire’s, an accessory store in thousands of malls, sells lip gloss and perfume to young girls. Barbie has perfumes called “Free Spirit,” “Summer Fun,” and “Super Model.” French perfumeries have introduced perfumes to the market specifically for little girls (e.g.,“smellies”).Villeneuve and de Grandi (1996) stated that “very young girls are targeted with a whole range from the leading brands, with Fleur d’interdit by Givenchy and Tendre Poison by Dior, lighter versions of Interdit and Poison,a reminder of the ‘grown-up version’at gentler prices.”The marketers at Yves Rocher write of their Blackberry Cream perfume,“Little girls love to wear fragrance just like Mom.” Publishers of teen magazines such as CosmoGIRL! advertise cosmetics, perfumes, and personal hygiene products, along with fashion, to their anticipated audience of preteens and teens.These pitches appear to be effective. Marketing surveys show that the average 12- to 19-year-old girl uses fragrances five times a week (Chaplin, 1999).Although there is nothing wrong with girls wanting to smell nice and look attractive, advertisements for adult women’s perfume overwhelmingly advertise seduction and sex appeal through the use of scent. Cosmetics and perfume are often associated specifically with the desire to be sexually attractive,a desire that seems misplaced in prepubescent girls. Summary of Cultural Contributions The evidence reviewed in this section demonstrates that women and girls are more likely than men and boys to be objectified and sexualized in a variety of media outlets (including television, magazines, sports media, and music videos), in advertising, and in several products that are marketed to children.Although much of this research has focused on adult or college-aged women rather than on girls or teenagers, portrayals of adult women provide girls with models that they can use to fashion their own behaviors, self-concepts, and identities.Although media images of girls directly affect girls, media images of women can also affect them through this indirect process. Interpersonal Contributions Societal messages that contribute to the sexualization of girls come not only from media and merchandise but also through girls’ interpersonal relationships (e.g., with parents, teachers, and peers) (Brown & Gilligan, 1992). Parents, teachers, and peers exist within the context of society’s sexualizing representations and can be affected by them.Thus, these individuals may contribute to girls’ sexualization when they convey their support for these cultural messages, either subtly or overtly. In addition, parents, teachers, and peers, as well as others (e.g., other family members, coaches, or strangers) sometimes sexually harass, abuse, or assault girls, a most destructive form of sexualization. Research suggests that parents’ gender schemas have a significant effect on children’s gender self-concepts and gender-related attitudes toward others (Tenenbaum & Leaper, 2002). Fathers’ attitudes in particular influence the gender typing of children’s activities and whether children conform to this gender typing (McHale, Crouter, & Tucker, 1999).Although these studies investigated gender schemas rather than sexualization, they suggest that if parents’ schemas include sexualized ideas about girls (which is likely given that the sexualization of women and heterosexual interactions are a key dimension of dominant cultural femininity; Bartky, 1990; Brown, 2003), these beliefs will be conveyed to their daughters and sons. Because the current standard for sexy physical appearance for girls requires that girls be quite thin, research on Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 14 the “thin ideal” is relevant to the sexualization of girls. There is evidence that parents, peers, and the media all support a “culture of dieting” for girls (Levine, Smolak, & Hayden, 1994; Nichter, 2000). Several studies (with mostly White participants) have shown that mother–daughter interactions affect how adolescent girls respond to cultural messages about thinness (Ogle & Damhorst, 2004) and that mothers’ investment in their own slenderness and mothers’ criticisms of their daughters’ weight are correlated with disordered eating in their daughters (Hill,Weaver, & Blundell, 1990; Levine, Smolak, Moodey, Shuman, & Hessen, 1994). More recently, in a 3-year qualitative, longitudinal study of eighth and ninth graders, Nichter (2000) found that White mothers routinely engaged in “fat talk” about their own bodies and the bodies of their daughters, concluding that “girls seemed to be surrounded by excessive concerns over physical appearance and talk of feeling fat” (p. 120). Fewer girls received messages from fathers, but when they did, it was in the form of criticism, “appraising looks, kidding quips, putdowns, and snide comments like ‘When did you start getting boobs?’” (p. 140). This last comment suggests that body comments and fat talk do, at least for fathers, include specific references to sexuality and that comments on a girl’s body are often conflated or experienced as comments on her sexuality. In addition, such encouragement for girls to look at their bodies rather than attend to their feelings teaches them to treat their bodies as objects to be decorated and made desirable for others; as they mature into adolescence, such looking becomes sexualized (Lamb, 2002, 2006;Tolman, 2002). Nichter (2000) found a different pattern for African American girls, who received much more positive feedback about their appearance and “style” from their parents.They also said that they looked up to their mothers as role models who would teach them how to succeed in a hostile world.Although African American girls reported dieting at almost the same rates as European American girls, they also reported greater body satisfaction and self-esteem and less concern about their weight. Both African American and European American girls thus seem to be internalizing the messages, whether positive or negative, they receive from their parents. Parents can also contribute to the sexualization of their daughters in very direct and concrete ways—for example, by entering their 5-year-old daughter in a beauty pageant in which she and the other contestants engage in behaviors and practices that are socially associated with sexiness: wearing heavy makeup to emphasize full lips, long eyelashes, and flushed cheeks, high heels to emulate adult women, and revealing “evening gowns.”Although relatively few girls actually participate in such pageants, they have become a topic of interest in the news, documentaries, and advertising, in particular regarding whether this precocious se
xualization is problematic for these or other girls. In this way, the participation of a few may in fact contribute to the sexualization of many. Some parents have agreed to let their daughters undergo plastic surgery in order to become sexier or more attractive. Over 77,000 invasive surgical procedures were performed on teens 18 years old and younger in 2005, a 15% increase since 2000 (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2006a). Minors cannot obtain such surgery unless their parents consent; parents typically finance the surgery, as well. Because these procedures are expensive (and generally not covered by health insurance), only girls from upper-middle-class or wealthy families are likely to have access to them. Teachers may also contribute to the sexualization of girls. In her ethnographic research in preschools, Martin (1998) found that girls were encouraged to play dress up more than boys and that teachers encouraged girls in their dress-up games to play at being sexualized adult women. This often involved looking in mirrors, walking in “fancy” high heels, and “vamping.”Teachers may also communicate messages to girls that promote a thin-ideal body image. For example, one study showed that teachers have negative attitudes toward girls whose bodies do not conform to the thin ideal (Villimez, Eisenberg, & Carroll, 1986). In this study, teachers rated children in kindergarten through Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 15 African American girls . . . reported greater body satisfaction and self-esteem and less concern about their weight. fourth grade. Heaviness and body “bulk” were negatively correlated with teachers’ ratings of girls’ competence but positively correlated with their ratings of boys’ competence.Although the thin ideal is conceptually distinct from sexualization, the two are often connected. In another study (Rolón-Dow, 2004), middle-school teachers’ descriptions of their Latina (Puerto Rican) students focused almost exclusively on the appearance and sexuality of the girls.The girls’“hypersexuality” was seen as being incompatible with academic achievement. Peers also participate in the sexualization of girls. Thorne’s (1993) research on girls and boys together on the playground showed that girls are marked as sexual by boys at a very early age, quite independent of their own behavior. Nichter (2000) and Eder (1995) found that girls police each other to ensure conformance with ideals of thinness and sexiness, and Brown (2003) found that teenage girls will seek revenge by negatively sexualizing girls whom they perceive as a threat (e.g., by labeling them as “sluts”). Several authors (Levy, 2005b; P. Paul, 2005; Pollet & Hurwitz, 2004) have argued that girls now equate popularity with sexiness and view behaving in a sexual way with boys as a pathway to power. Indeed, previous research has shown that girls’ popularity is based in part on physical attractiveness and social precocity regarding interest in boys (Adler, Kless, & Adler, 1992). Merten’s (2004) ethnographic study of (mostly White) suburban Chicago junior high school girls also supports this idea. He found that popularity required girls to construct a femininity that focused on physical attractiveness and “emphasized the male gaze” (p. 364). Sexual harassment by boys and men is a regular part of school and work life. In the American Association of University Women’s (2001) “Hostile Hallways” study, 63% of girls reported experiencing sexual harassment “often” or “occasionally.”The most common form of harassment was being made the object of sexual jokes, comments, gestures, or looks; next most frequent was being touched, grabbed, pinched, or brushed up against in a sexual way. Of girls who reported physical sexual harassment, 90% had been harassed by a student, 45% by a former student, and 6% by a teacher. Peers appear to play a very direct role in the sexualization of girls, making sexual commentary and evaluation in school. One recent study explored early adolescents’ experiences with sexual harassment from peers (Lindberg, Grabe, & Hyde, 2007). Even 10- to 12-year-olds, most of whom had not yet completed the fifth grade, reported significant and frequent experiences of sexual harassment in school.Although both boys and girls reported such experiences, the nature and effects of these experiences differed. Girls’ pubertal development predicted more peer sexual harassment.That is, girls experience more sexually harassing comments as their bodies mature.These experiences, in turn, lead girls to experience greater feelings of shame about their bodies. Particularly damaging forms of sexualization include sexual abuse and being prostituted or sexually trafficked. Estimates of the prevalence of child sexual abuse vary, in part because of methodological differences between studies (e.g., how sexual abuse is defined). However, epidemiological and other nationally representative studies generally place lifetime prevalence rates for women at 15%-25%, with men experiencing sexual abuse less frequently (Elliott, 1997; Molnar, Buka, & Kessler, 2001;Tjaden & Thoennes, 1998;Vogeltanz et al., 1999). Girls and women in prostitution are by definition sexualized—objectified and treated as sexual commodities. In the case of girls under age 18, prostitution is legally considered sexual abuse; it is often instead described as commercial sexual exploitation of children or child prostitution. Most women over the age of 18 in prostitution began prostituting when they were adolescents. Boyer, Chapman, and Marshall (1993) interviewed 50 women prostituting in escort services, on the street, in strip clubs, through phone sex, and in massage parlors (brothels) in Seattle,WA.All of these women began prostituting between the ages of 12 and 14. In another study, Nadon, Koverola, and Schludermann (1998) found that 89% of their respondents had begun prostitution before the age of 16. It is difficult to accurately assess the number of girls currently in prostitution, but a multimethod study by Estes and Weiner (2001) estimated that between 244,000 and 325,000 American children and adolescents are at risk each year of Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 16 being victims of commercial sexual exploitation. Childhood sexual abuse puts girls at risk for prostitution (Nadon et al., 1998; Silbert & Pines, 1981, 1982). Intrapsychic Contributions Many parents as well as marketers would likely argue that girls want the clothes and accessories that make them “sexy” and that it is difficult to convince teenagers and younger girls to make less sexualizing choices.As girls participate actively in a consumer culture (often buying products and clothes designed to make them look physically appealing and sexy) and make choices about how to behave and whom to become (often styling their identities after the sexy celebrities who populate their cultural landscape), they are, in effect, sexualizing themselves. Keen observers of how social processes operate, girls anticipate that they will accrue social advantages, such as popularity, for buying into the sexualization of girls (i.e., themselves), and they fear social rejection for not doing so (Brown & Gilligan, 1992; Nichter, 2000;Tolman, 2002). A focus on physical attractiveness is not new; over 3 decades ago, Unger (1979) argued that physical beauty can translate into power for girls. But the definition of attractiveness differs depending on the tastes of the culture. Whereas yesterday’s culture may have equated “domesticity” with attractiveness in women, today’s culture equates “sexy” with attractiveness (Wolf, 1991). Moreover, there is evidence that physical appearance was not always the prime currency for girls’ social success. Brumberg (1997) examined diaries of adolescent girls in the United States over the past 100 years to explore how they discussed self-improvement.Whereas girls of earlier eras focused on improving their studies and becoming more wellmannered, in the last 20 years that Brumberg studied, girl
s almost exclusively described changing their bodies and enhancing their physical appearance as the focus of their self-improvement. Girls sexualize themselves when they think of themselves mostly or exclusively in sexual terms and when they equate their sexiness with a narrow standard of physical attractiveness.They also sexualize themselves when they think of themselves in objectified terms. Psychological researchers have identified self-objectification (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996) as a key process whereby girls learn to think of and treat their own bodies as objects of others’ desires. In self-objectification, girls internalize an observer’s perspective on their physical selves and learn to treat themselves as objects to be looked at and evaluated for their appearance.Though portraying oneself solely as a sexual object to be looked at is sometimes viewed by girls and women as exercising control over their sexuality (e.g., at some social networking Web sites), presentation of the self in this way can be viewed as a form of self-objectification. There is ample evidence that self-objectification is common among girls and women. For example, Slater and Tiggemann (2002) found that girls as young as 12 years old placed greater emphasis on their body’s appearance than on its competence. In addition, many studies have demonstrated that girls and women self-objectify more than boys and men do (e.g., Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998; Strelan & Hargreaves, 2005). Most studies have focused on European Americans, but one study of ninth- and tenth-grade girls showed that most girls, regardless of race, engaged in self-objectification (McConnell, 2001).That is, they internalized an observer’s standard of appearance and engaged in activities designed to enhance their sexual attractiveness. In addition,African American and White girls did not differ in the amount of time they spent enhancing their physical appearance, although African American girls spent more time on their hair and White girls spent more time on their makeup. Nichter’s (2000) study, however, suggests that the time African American girls spend on their appearance may have more to do with creating an individualized and ethnically derived “style” (i.e., one that involves personality and attitude, in addition to physical appearance) than with adhering to the narrow vision of the “ideal girl” depicted in the media.Thus, ethnic differences concerning the meaning attached to self-objectifying practices may exist. In addition to making sexualizing choices regarding clothing, hair, and makeup, girls and teens sometimes “act Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 17 out” in sexually precocious ways. Given the highly sexualized cultural milieu in which most girls are immersed, these behaviors may simply be the result of modeling. It is important to note, however, that sexualized behavior in children (e.g., compulsive sex play, persistent and sometimes public self-stimulation, inappropriate sexual overtures to others) is one of the common sequelae of childhood sexual abuse (Friedrich et al., 2001; Kendall-Tackett,Williams, & Finkelhor, 1993; Letourneau, Schoenwald, & Sheidow, 2004). In this case, girls are sexualizing themselves through their behavior (i.e., they are presenting themselves as sexual objects for others to use and/or they are engaging in age-inappropriate sexual behavior). It would be inaccurate, though, to state that girls are freely choosing these behaviors. Rather, the mental functions and cognitive processes necessary for healthy sexual decision-making have likely been damaged through the experience of sexual abuse victimization (Zurbriggen & Freyd, 2004), leading to precocious or inappropriate sexual behavior. These data support the contention that girls sometimes participate in and contribute to their own sexualization. However, the surrounding cultural milieu (and, for some girls, their experiences of childhood sexual abuse victimization) have encouraged and facilitated this process.Thus, girls’ choices are not fully independent of cultural or past interpersonal influences. In addition, it is important to remember that girls are fully capable of agency and resistance in this area. (We return to this point in the Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization section, pp. 36–42.) Summary of Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls Many studies have suggested that the culture delivers abundant messages about the objectification and sexualization of adult women and that this is the cultural milieu in which girls develop. Parents, schools, and peers sometimes contribute to the sexualization of girls, and girls themselves sometimes adopt a sexualized and selfobjectified identity.Additional research is needed that (a) focuses specifically on girls rather than on adult women; (b) further explores the ways in which parents, schools, and peers sexualize girls; and (c) addresses girls’ self-sexualization—how often it occurs and what factors encourage it. In the next section, we examine research and theory suggesting that the sexualization of women and girls may have a variety of negative consequences for girls as well as for others in our culture. Consequences of the Sexualization of Girls I n this section we describe psychological theories concerning mechanisms whereby people (girls included) might be affected by sexualization.We also describe some of the special vulnerabilities due to developmental stage that are relevant to the sexualization of girls. We then describe research showing that the sexualization of girls is associated with many negative consequences. Mechanisms by Which Sexualization Has an Impact Psychology offers several theories to explain how the sexualization of girls and women could influence girls’ well-being: l Socialization theories describe how girls receive and anticipate direct rewards and punishments from socialization agents regarding sexualization. l Sociocultural theories point out that girls exist within a cultural milieu in which direct reinforcement is not always necessary for internalization or activation of a sexualized standard to be cultivated or for girls to engage in early sexualized behaviors. l Cognitive theories highlight the automatic and unconscious nature of some of the schemas and other cognitive structures that develop through socialization. l Psychoanalytic theories point to early experiences as formative in the development of the self. l Objectification theory combines all of these approaches to argue that girls’ observations of the world around them contribute to an internalization that produces self-sexualization. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 18 Socialization Theories Social learning theory (e.g., Bussey & Bandura, 1999), cognitive developmental theory (e.g.,Warin, 2000), and gender schema theory (e.g., Bem, 1985) all offer explanations for the learning of culturally appropriate gender roles, ideologies, practices, and behaviors via reinforcement from others and modeling.According to socialization theories, girls learn about women’s expected roles in the world and strive to enact these expectations, because doing so brings specific rewards and because being consistent with expectations is itself rewarding. In addition, violations of the boundaries of these roles or ideologies can be met with punishment, denigration, and even violence. Socialization theories help us see that girls’ understanding of appropriate femininity is not “natural” or innate but is acquired through developmental processes whereby girls draw information from the adults and peers, real and fictional, around them. Sociocultural Theories Other psychological theories emphasize the culture or context within which girls develop and through which meanings are created.According to these theories, choices about one’s appearance and behavior, as well as reinforcement from socialization agents, exist within a cultural milieu in which only certain options are available, re
cognized as existing, or sanctioned. Cultivation theory (Gerbner et al., 1994) proposes that when people are exposed to media content or other socialization agents, they gradually come to cultivate or adopt beliefs about the world that coincide with the images they have been viewing or messages they have been hearing.Agenda setting and framing theories (Kosicki, 1993) highlight the fact that important media outlets focus attention on certain issues or domains, in effect telling girls what is and is not salient or important. Feminist psychodynamic theories (e.g., Jordan, Kaplan, Miller, Stiver, & Surrey, 1991) and social construction theories (e.g., Hare-Mustin & Marecek, 1988) emphasize the messages culture delivers regarding femininity and the ways in which such messages maintain gender relations as power relations. Cognitive Theories Social psychologists have demonstrated that many attitudes and beliefs operate, at least in part, on an “implicit” or unconscious (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995) and automatic (Bargh & Ferguson, 2000) level. For example, in numerous studies, most White participants show an automatic association between African Americans’ names or faces and negative adjectives (Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji, 2001).This is true for children as well as adults (Baron & Banaji, 2006).Automatic gender stereotypes and attitudes operate in both women and men (Banaji & Greenwald, 1995; L. Rudman & Kilianski, 2000), and other types of automatic associations (e.g., a link between power and sex; Zurbriggen, 2000) are present in some people.Although these attitudes, beliefs, and associations are automatic, they are not immutable (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001). For example, exposure to female leaders led to a decrease in women’s automatic gender stereotyping (Dasgupta & Asgari, 2004). Schemas and beliefs concerning objectification and sexualization may also operate implictly and automatically. Psychoanalytic Theories Psychoanalytic theories argue that “parental seduction” in the form of overstimulation or boundary crossing can cause guilt and conflict and can produce symptoms that affect the very character of developing children as well as their ability to form relationships in the future (J. Greenberg, 2001; Shengold, 1989).Trauma theory and research show that the early introduction of adult sexual material and behavior in the lives of children through abuse can cause lifelong struggles with their sexual development and with their ability to form intimate relationships (Herman, 1992; Scharff & Scharff, 1994). Shengold (1989) argued that the mechanism through which such effects occur supposes a natural progression of development, which, when interrupted by the introduction of material or behaviors that are too much for a child to bear, causes overwhelming feelings that must be defended against. In psychoanalytic theories, the defenses that explain self-sexualization and risky sexual behavior that leads to retraumatization are sometimes called “enactment” and sometimes “repetition” (Rachman, Kennedy, & Yard, 2005). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 19 Objectification Theory Objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996) is the theory that most directly describes the process by which girls internalize the sexualizing messages of culture.This theory focuses particularly on the impact of the sexual objectification of female bodies as the cultural milieu in which girls exist and develop.According to this theory, girls internalize and reproduce within their own self-schemas this objectified perspective, an effect referred to as “self-objectification.” Self-objectification involves adopting a third-person perspective on the physical self and constantly assessing one’s own body in an effort to conform to the culture’s standards of attractiveness. Self-objectification in a culture in which a woman is a “good object” when she meets the salient cultural standard of “sexy” leads girls to evaluate and control their own bodies more in terms of their sexual desirability to others than in terms of their own desires, health, wellness, achievements, or competence. Developmental Processes Relevant to the Sexualization of Girls Cognitive Development Children’s cognitive development affects their ability to critically process cultural messages.According to researchers, very young children are highly susceptible to marketing (e.g., Borzekowski & Robinson, 1999), they have difficulty distinguishing between commercial and regular programming on TV (Atkin, 1982), and only after they are approximately 8 years old can they recognize that the purpose of advertisements is to persuade them to want to purchase something (Kunkel & Roberts, 1991). Girls’ understanding of sexuality is also limited by their cognitive development. Linn (2005) therefore asked rhetorically, “How does a 7-year-old understand the plastic sexuality of Britney Spears? How do 10-year-olds cope with pressure to dress and act in sexually provocative ways?” (p. 115). Girls have much less ability than adults to comprehend and cope with cultural messages. Identity Formation Identity formation is a developmental hallmark of adolescence in Western cultures. Research has shown identity to be a major concern for adolescent girls (e.g., Brown, 1991), for whom every day can feel like a struggle to fit in. Strasburger and Wilson (2002) argued that preadolescents and adolescents are like actors as they experiment with different features of their newly forming identities and try on different social “masks.”This plasticity may make them especially susceptible to the messages society conveys, particularly when marketers link popularity and social acceptance to their products.Thus, sexualized messages and products may be more easily accepted during this developmental stage. Age-Related Changes in Self-Esteem Just at the time when girls begin to construct identity, they are more likely to suffer losses in self-esteem. Research has documented losses in self-esteem for girls in adolescence (e.g., Harter, 1998; Major, Barr, & Zubek, 1999), and perceived physical attractiveness is closely linked to self-esteem (PolceLynch, Myers, & Kilmartin, 1998). In particular,Tolman, Impett,Tracy, and Michael (2006) have shown that in the eighth grade, girls who objectify their bodies more have much lower self-esteem. For this reason, diminishing selfesteem arising in early adolescence may make girls particularly vulnerable to cultural messages that promise them popularity, effectiveness, and social acceptance through the right “sexy” look. On the other hand, the drop in self-esteem may be related to how responsive they are to these cultural messages. Impact on Girls’ Health and Well-Being In this section, we describe and document the consequences of the sexualization of girls and women.Ample evidence indicates that sexualization has negative effects in a variety of domains, including cognitive functioning, physical and mental health, sexuality, and attitudes and Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 20 “How does a 7-year-old understand the plastic sexuality of Britney Spears? How do 10-year-olds cope with pressure to dress and act in sexually provocative ways?” beliefs.We also briefly review some of the negative consequences of sexual abuse and exploitation (extreme forms of sexualization), noting that because sexual exploitation often involves violence, some of the findings reported in this section might not be applicable to sexualization more broadly. Cognitive and Physical Functioning Perhaps the most insidious consequence of self-objectification is that it fragments consciousness. Chronic attention to physical appearance leaves fewer cognitive resources available for other mental and physical activities. One study demonstrated this fragmenting quite vividly (Fredrickson et al., 1998).While alone in a dressing room, college students were asked to try on and evaluate either a swimsuit or a sweater.While they waited for 10 minutes
wearing the garment, they completed a math test.The results revealed that young women in swimsuits performed significantly worse on the math problems than did those wearing sweaters. No differences were found for young men. In other words, thinking about the body and comparing it to sexualized cultural ideals disrupted mental capacity. Recent research has shown that this impairment occurs among African American, Latina, and Asian American young women (Hebl, King, & Lin, 2004) and extends beyond mathematics to other cognitive domains including logical reasoning and spatial skills (Gapinski, Brownell, & LaFrance, 2003). The implications are stunning and suggest that sexualization may contribute to girls’ dropping out of higher level mathematics in high school. Studies show that as girls develop through adolescence, their science and math self-concepts are less stable than those of boys (e.g., Simpkins, Davis-Kean, & Eccles, 2006). For example, girls begin to underestimate their math ability relative to boys and show diminished interest in upper level, optional math classes in high school (Linver, Davis-Kean, & Eccles, 2002). Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) have pointed out that these declines in estimations of ability and the value girls place on math begin around puberty, when their bodies mature. Studies show that single-sex math classes lead girls to feel less self-conscious and improve their math performance substantially (Rutti, 1997).This may not be solely because boys would otherwise dominate the classroom (one popular explanation for the success of single-sex math classes for girls) but also because without boys, girls can literally take their minds off their own bodies and think more effectively. Self-objectification appears to disrupt physical performance as well. One study explored self-objectification’s relation to the commonly observed phenomenon of “throwing like a girl” (Young, 1980). Girls do indeed appear to have a distinctive way of throwing. Compared with boys, girls tend not to bring their whole bodies into a throw, instead remaining relatively immobile except for the throwing arm, which is often not extended completely (Roberton & Halverson, 1984). Fredrickson and Harrison (2005) had 200 Anglo and African American girls, 10–17 years of age, throw a softball as hard as they could against a distant gymnasium wall.They found that the extent to which girls viewed their bodies as objects and were concerned about their bodies’ appearance predicted poorer motor performance on the softball throw. Selfobjectification, it appears, limits the form and effectiveness of girls’ physical movements. Ample research shows that physical activity leads to experiences of positive mood and feelings of confidence (Plante, 1993), is associated with achieving and maintaining physical health (President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, 1997), and improves cognitive performance (Etnier et al., 1997). If the practices of sexualization and the resultant self-objectification in which many girls engage serve to limit their physical activities, then girls and women are likely to suffer a wide range of consequences for their overall health and well-being. For example, Dowling (2000) suggested that girls and women who are physically active and confident are more able to defend themselves from physical attack and abuse. Taken together, the work on the cognitive and physical decrements associated with self-objectification suggests that sexualization practices may function to keep girls “in their place” as objects of sexual attraction and beauty, significantly limiting their free thinking and movement in the world. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 21 Body Dissatisfaction and Appearance Anxiety Sexualization and objectification undermine confidence in and comfort with one’s own body, leading to a host of negative emotional consequences, such as shame, anxiety, and even self-disgust.The evidence to support this claim comes from studies of self-objectification (mostly using college-aged samples) and from experimental and correlational studies of exposure to media emphasizing a narrow ideal of women’s sexual attractiveness. Studies based on objectification theory have shown that the near-constant monitoring of appearance that accompanies self-objectification leads to increased feelings of shame about one’s body (e.g., Fredrickson et al., 1998; McKinley, 1998, 1999;Tiggemann & Slater, 2001). Shame is an emotion that occurs when one perceives one’s failure to meet cultural standards of conduct (Lewis, 2000). Individuals who feel shame deem the whole self as deficient and typically have the urge to hide or disappear. Given that so few women meet the dominant cultural standard for an attractive, sexy appearance (Wolf, 1991), it is not surprising that a girl’s chronic comparison of her own body to this impossible cultural standard would result in feelings of inadequacy and shame. A second emotional consequence of self-objectification is appearance anxiety, which is manifested by checking and adjusting one’s appearance. Not knowing exactly when or how one’s body will be looked at and evaluated creates anxiety about exposure. Girls’ fashions arguably compound the opportunities for this kind of anxiety:Tight-fitting “belly shirts,” micro-miniskirts, and plunging necklines require regular body monitoring and a kind of chronic vigilance about whether everything is in place. Indeed, numerous studies have shown stronger appearance anxiety in those young women who internalize a sexualizing gaze as their primary view of self (e.g.,Tiggemann & Lynch, 2001); other studies have shown that young women, in general, will have stronger appearance anxiety after viewing media portrayals of idealized women’s bodies (Monro & Huon, 2005) or after being exposed to sexualizing words that commonly appear on magazine covers, such as sexy or shapely (T-A. Roberts & Gettman, 2004). In one study of adolescent girls, Slater and Tiggemann (2002) found that self-objectification correlated with both body shame and appearance anxiety. For girls as young as 12 and 13 years of age, viewing oneself primarily from the perspective of an observer and emphasizing features like “attractiveness” and “sex appeal” with respect to one’s body were related to higher levels of anxiety about appearance and feelings of shame. In addition to leading to feelings of shame and anxiety, sexualizing treatment and self-objectification can generate feelings of disgust toward one’s physical self. Girls may feel they are “ugly” and “gross” or untouchable. In the study in which college students were asked to try on and evaluate swimwear, young women, regardless of body size, responded to the experience with feelings of “disgust, distaste, and revulsion” compared with those who tried on a sweater (Fredrickson et al., 1998).The authors speculated that standing alone in a dressing room and seeing their bodies in the mirror led the young women to imagine critical viewers, and this made them feel not only ashamed but repulsive. Complementing the evidence from studies on selfobjectification, strong empirical evidence indicates that exposure to ideals of sexual attractiveness in the media is associated with greater body dissatisfaction among girls and young women (for recent reviews, see Groesz, Levine, & Murnen, 2002; Holmstrom, 2004).At least 38 experiments, 32 surveys, and 2 interview studies have been conducted investigating these harmful connections, most of which yielded the expected, statistically reliable results. For example, Hargreaves and Tiggemann (2004) exposed high school girls and boys either to “beauty ideal” or to “nonappearance” commercials. Girls exposed to beauty ideal commercials expressed significantly increased body dissatisfaction. S. L.Turner, Hamilton, Jacobs,Angood, and Dwyer (1997) examined the impact of exposure to fashion magazines on women’s body image.Young women who viewed fashion magazines versus news magazines preferred to weigh less, were less sa
tisfied with their bodies, were more frustrated about their weight, were more preoccupied with the desire to be thin, and were more afraid of getting fat than were their peers who viewed news magazines. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 22 Many of the studies to date have mostly consisted of White samples. Because the cultural ideal for female beauty is racialized (i.e., the idealized beautiful woman is White), exposure to these idealized images may affect girls of color differently. Indeed, the evidence from studies of African American girls suggests that identification with the idealized standard may be an important predictor of negative outcomes.When exposed to sexualized women in the media who are White,African American girls did not demonstrate negative body-image effects of objectifying media (Frisby, 2004; Makkar & Strube, 1995). Moreover, qualitative interviews of Black and White high school girls (Duke, 2000; Milkie, 1999) suggest that Black girls are largely uninterested in the beauty images of mainstream teen magazines because they conflict with African American standards of attractiveness and appeal. Frisby (2004) found, however, that when Black women were exposed to idealized images of African American models, those who were initially lower in self-esteem were later less satisfied with their own bodies. Furthermore, Botta (2003) found that for both White and Black teenage girls, the more they idealized TV images and compared themselves and their friends to those images, the stronger their drive was to be thin and the more dissatisfied they were with their bodies. Parmariega, Gustavson, and Gustavson (1994) found that many Black female stars in the film, music, and fashion industry are now just as thin as their White counterparts. This finding, combined with the results reported previously, suggest that body dissatisfaction among African American girls may increase. Body dissatisfaction may spur teens to seek plastic surgery, a decision that incurs health risks and comes at a high financial cost. Between 2000 and 2005, there was a 15% increase in teen (age 18 and younger) invasive cosmetic surgery and a 7% increase in minimally invasive cosmetic procedures (e.g., botox injections, chemical peels, laser hair removal), according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2006a). Given that the most common procedures sought by teenagers are breast enlargements, nose and ear reshaping, and liposuction (“More Teens Opt for Plastic Surgery,” 2000), it is safe to assume that the majority of teens receiving plastic surgery are girls. Indeed, from 2002 to 2003, the number of girls 18 years old and younger who got breast implants nearly tripled, from 3,872 to 11,326 (Olding & Zuckerman, 2004). In one study, two thirds of 16-year-old girls in a suburban high school knew someone who had undergone cosmetic surgery (Pearl & Weston, 2003). Many of these girls desired it themselves, and the most desired procedures were liposuction for the reduction of fat in the hips, thighs, and belly and breast augmentation (Pearl & Weston, 2003).The fact that parents must consent to these procedures for their daughters under age 18 (and that parents often pay for the procedures) illustrates that girls’ self-sexualization desires and practices occur in a broader context. In this case, they are likely to be directly supported by parents. Body image dissatisfaction may also support girls’ use not only of cosmetics and beauty products but also of expensive salon treatments such as facials, manicures, pedicures, waxing, and eyebrow shaping. Teenage girls 12 to 19 years of age spent over $8 billion on beauty products (cosmetics, fragrances, and hair/beauty salons) in 1997—spending more in this product category than in any other except clothing/jewelry (Parks, 1998). Expensive beauty products and treatments are unlikely to be affordable for low-income girls. Self-sexualization may serve, then, to widen the gulf many lower-income girls undoubtedly feel between themselves and those with the financial means to look “sexy” and thus be socially popular. Mental Health Research links sexualization with three of the most common mental health problems of girls and women: l eating disorders l low self-esteem l depression or depressed mood Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 23 . . . for both White and Black teenage girls, the more they idealized TV images and compared themselves . . . to those images, the stronger their drive was to be thin and the more dissatisfied they were with their bodies. Frequent exposure to cultural beauty ideals via the media has been shown to be associated with higher rates of eating disorders, both for individuals and for the population at large. Indeed, Lucas, Beard, O’Fallon, and Kurland (1991) studied the incidence of anorexia nervosa among 10- to 19-year-old girls during a 50-year period and found that it paralleled changes in fashion and idealized body image. The thin ideal preceded the times when the rates of anorexia nervosa were highest. For individual women, findings across several studies indicate associations between exposure to female beauty ideals and disordered eating attitudes and symptoms, such that greater exposure to thin-ideal media has been associated with higher levels of dieting, exercising, and disordered eating symptomatology (e.g.,Abramson & Valene, 1991; Harrison, 2000; Hofschire & Greenberg, 2001; Stice, Schupak-Neuberg, Shaw, & Stein, 1994;Thomsen,Weber, & Brown, 2002). For example, Botta (2000) reported that more frequent television viewing was associated with increased bulimic symptomatology for White teenage girls. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis testing links between media exposure and women’s behavior and beliefs related to eating reported a small (d = .29) but statistically reliable effect of media exposure across 8 experimental and 12 correlational studies (Grabe,Ward, & Hyde, 2008). Particularly strong evidence of the media’s role in shaping girls’ body image can be seen in before and after analyses of cultures that are new to Western media. For example, in a study on adolescent ethnic Fijian girls in Western Fiji, Becker (2004) found that the beginnings of weight and body shape preoccupation, purging behavior to control weight, and body disparagement were linked to the introduction of television. Before television, traditional Fijian culture emphasized a robust body shape and based notions of identity not on the body but on family, community, and relationships.Three years after television was introduced, girls’ eating behaviors and attitudes about their bodies had shifted, and rates of disordered eating had increased. Research also links exposure to sexualized female ideals with lower self-esteem, negative mood, and depressive symptoms among adolescent girls and young women.These associations have been examined in at least five correlational studies and in multiple experiments, demonstrating causal connections. For example, adolescent girls exposed to advertisements featuring idealized women reported significant increases in state depression scores (Durkin & Paxton, 2002). Similar effects have been shown for undergraduate women exposed to idealized images, especially among those who were already dieting (Mills, Polivy, Herman, & Tiggemann, 2002).At the same time, frequent exposure to mainstream media that feature female ideals, such as movies, prime-time television, and music videos, were associated with lower self-esteem among Black and Latino/a youth (Rivadeneyra,Ward, & Gordon, 2007; L. M.Ward, 2004b). Studies also show that self-objectification is associated with negative mental health outcomes in adolescent girls. For example,Tolman et al. (2006) found that in early adolescence, girls who had a more objectified relationship with their bodies were more likely to experience depression and had lower self-esteem. Similarly, Harrison and Fredrickson (2003) reported that among Black and White adolescent girls, self-objectification was a significant predictor of depression, body shame, and
disordered eating, even when controlling for race, grade in school, and body mass index. In one demonstration of these trends, Hawkins, Richards, Granley, and Stein (2004) exposed undergraduate women to 40 full-page photographs from Cosmopolitan, Vogue, and Glamour. For students in the experimental group, these ads contained female models; for those in the control group, only no-model ads were used. Findings indicated that young women exposed to the idealized models indicated more eating disorder symptoms than women in the control group, as well as more negative mood states and lower self-esteem. Physical Health In addition to the mental health consequences of sexualization, research suggests that girls’ and women’s physical health may also be negatively, albeit indirectly, affected. For example, studies have established an important link between body dissatisfaction and the onset of cigarette smoking among adolescent girls (e.g., Stice & Shaw, 2003). One theorized reason for this relationship is girls’ belief Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 24 that smoking will enable them to control their weight and thus meet standards of physical appearance considered desirable (Camp, Klesges, & Relyea, 1993). Newer research has shown that this relationship may be mediated by self-objectification, a feature of sexualization. In one study, college-aged women who had a more sexually objectified standard for their physical appearance (emphasizing sexual attractiveness, for example, over health and competence) were more likely to be smokers (Harrell, 2002).These studies begin to suggest that sexualization experiences may lead to dangerous addictive health behaviors. Sexuality Sexual well-being is an important part of healthy development and overall well-being (Satcher, 2001). Research indicates that among adults, healthy sexuality is related to greater intimacy (Weekes, 2002), higher selfesteem (Hurlbert & Whittaker, 1991), low levels of stress (Ellison, 2000; Weekes, 2002), personal happiness (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994), and other positive benefits (Planned Parenthood, 2003).Yet emerging evidence suggests that the sexualization of girls has negative consequences on girls’ ability to develop healthy sexuality. Self-objectification has been linked directly to diminished sexual health among adolescent girls. More specifically, Impett, Schooler, and Tolman (2006) found that White and Latina adolescent girls with a more objectified view of their bodies had diminished sexual health, measured by decreased condom use and diminished sexual assertiveness. Studies also show that supporting women’s sexual objectification may affect how women view their own reproductive body functions. L. M.Ward, Merriwether, and Caruthers (2006b) found that undergraduate women who frequently watch music videos or read women’s magazines, who attribute greater realism to media content, or who identify strongly with popular TV characters were also more accepting of sexually objectifying notions of women and of other traditional gender ideologies.At the same time, accepting these views of women and their bodies was associated with expressing more negative attitudes toward breastfeeding and toward the “functional” aspects of one’s own body (e.g., menstruation, body sweat). Other evidence suggests that frequent exposure to narrow ideals of attractiveness may affect adolescents’ perceptions of their own sexual experiences, perhaps contributing to unrealistic expectations. For example, Baran (1976) found that high school students who thought that TV accurately portrayed sexual behavior were more likely to be dissatisfied with either their first experience of intercourse or with their virginity. Similarly, L. M.Ward and Averitt (2005) reported that heavier reading of popular men’s magazines and stronger identification with popular male TV characters was associated with undergraduate (male and female) virgins’ expectation that their first coital experience would be more negative.T-A. Roberts and Gettman (2004) found that after exposure to objectifying words found on magazine covers, young women expressed reduced interest in sexual relationships. Moreover, Strouse and Buerkel-Rothfuss (1987) found that for undergraduate women, MTV consumption was the most powerful predictor of their notions about sexuality and love relationships, which was not true for men. Both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggest that, in addition to effects that occur during adolescence, the sexualization of girls may ultimately influence adult women’s sexuality by contributing to women’s body shame and self-objectification.The sexualization and objectification of women induce negative feelings in girls about their bodies in adolescence, which ultimately may lead to sexual problems in adulthood (Brotto, Heiman, & Tolman, 2009; Graham, Saunders, Milhausen, & McBride, 2004;Tolman, Spencer, Rosen-Reynoso, & Porche, 2003;Wiederman, Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 25 . . . studies have established an important link between body dissatisfaction and the onset of cigarette smoking among adolescent girls. 2000).A woman who has learned to fear negative evaluations of her body may be more focused on her partner’s judgments of her than on her own desires, safety, and pleasure. Focusing critically on one’s own appearance can limit the pleasure drawn from these sexual experiences (Wiederman, 2001) and can make it difficult for women to enact safer sex practices (Wingood & DiClemente, 1992).At the same time, a woman who has been socialized to separate from her inner feelings and experiences of arousal and desire may find it difficult to assert her desires or feel entitled to satisfaction in sexual situations. She may instead opt to let events unfold based on her partner’s wants and interests. Empirical evidence supports these concerns. Findings indicate that women with high body dissatisfaction engage in less sexual activity and are especially apprehensive about sexual situations in which their bodies can be seen. Conversely, women who feel more positively about and comfortable with their bodies are more comfortable with their own sexual feelings (Ackard, Kearney-Cooke, & Peterson, 2000; Faith & Schare, 1993;Trapnell, Meston, & Gorzalka, 1997;Wiederman, 2000). For example, women who report more body dissatisfaction report a later onset of masturbation (Wiederman & Pryor, 1997) and are less likely to receive (but not less likely to perform) oral sex (Wiederman & Hurst, 1998). In addition, Schooler,Ward, Merriwether, and Caruthers (2005) found that greater levels of body discomfort and body self-consciousness each predicted lower levels of sexual assertiveness, sexual experience, and condom use self-efficacy, as well as higher levels of sexual risk-taking.When self-objectification was experimentally induced in one study, women reported decreased interest in the physical aspects of sex (T-A. Roberts & Gettman, 2004).These findings suggest that body shame may inhibit women’s ability to advocate for, or even acknowledge, their own sexual feelings or pleasure. Girls with disabilities may experience particular challenges in developing a healthy sexuality. Health care professionals have historically viewed individuals with disabilities as inanimate objects, communicating an unspoken message that they are not fully human (Leeds Metropolitan University, 2005). Especially for girls with disabilities, this view may negatively affect identity development and exacerbate the effects of cultural messages that reduce girls to sexual objects. Moreover, with instances of abuse estimated to be 33%–83% depending on the type of disability and the definition of abuse (Schaller & Lagergren Frieberg, 1998), girls and young women with disabilities struggle to develop a healthy concept of sexuality and of themselves. Attitudes and Beliefs A central concern raised in this report is that frequent exposure to media images that sexualize girls and women may affect how girls conceptual
ize femininity and sexuality, leading them to accept more constrained and stereotypical notions about gender roles and sexual roles (i.e., that women are sexual objects). Findings across several studies indicate that this appears to be the case. Girls and young women who more frequently consume or engage with mainstream media content also offer stronger endorsement of sexual stereotypes that paint women as sexual objects (L. M.Ward, 2002; L. M.Ward & Rivadeneyra, 1999; Zurbriggen & Morgan, 2006). For example, findings indicate that among undergraduate women, more frequent viewing of reality dating television programs was correlated with greater acceptance of a sexual double standard and the belief that dating is a game and that men and women are adversaries (Zurbriggen & Morgan, 2006). Similarly, among Black high school girls, stronger identification with one’s favorite TV character and with more objectifying music artists was associated with greater support of stereotypes about women as sex objects (Gordon, 2004). Experimental work exploring connections between media use and girls’ acceptance of sexual objectification yields similar results. For example, L. M.Ward (2002) reported that young women exposed to images from prime-time TV that depicted women as sexual objects offered stronger support of this notion than did women in control groups. Similarly, Johnson,Adams,Ashburn, and Reed (1995) reported that Black adolescent girls exposed to sexualized rap videos expressed greater acceptance of teen dating violence than those not exposed. It appears that exposure to mainstream (i.e., sexually objectifying) media Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 26 encourages girls to objectify women and to see other women as less than human. Media exposure has been found to constrain young women’s conceptions of femininity by putting appearance and physical attractiveness at the center of women’s value. For example, Zurbriggen and Morgan (2006) reported that more frequent viewing of reality TV programming among young women was associated with a stronger belief in the importance of appearance. Indeed, when asked to rate the importance of particular qualities for women,White and Black high school students who consumed more mainstream media attributed greater importance to sexiness and beauty than did students who consumed less (L. M.Ward, 2004a; L. M.Ward, Hansbrough, & Walker, 2005). Similarly, Tan (1979) reported that girls who viewed beauty commercials subsequently rated physical attractiveness as more personally important and as a more important determinant of popularity than did girls who viewed neutral commercials.The sexualization and objectification of women in the media appear to teach girls that as women, all they have to offer is their body and face and that they should expend all their effort on physical appearance. Effects of Sexual Exploitation on Girls Childhood sexual abuse victimization is an extreme form of sexualization, one that always involves both sexual objectification and the inappropriate imposition of sexuality. Reviewing the sequelae of sexual abuse may, therefore, be relevant to understanding the effects of sexualization. It is important to remember, however, that sexual abuse may also involve or co-occur with violence or threats of violence, demands for secrecy, physical abuse, emotional abuse, or neglect.Thus, negative effects associated with sexual abuse victimization are unlikely to be due solely to sexualization. It is nevertheless useful to review these negative sequelae. Childhood sexual abuse victimization is associated with a host of negative effects, both during childhood (Kendall-Tackett et al., 1993) and subsequently as an adult (Browne & Finkelhor, 1986). Childhood sexual abuse has been linked to increased rates of dissociation (Putnam & Trickett, 1997), depression (Briere & Conte, 1993; Briere & Runtz, 1988), anxiety (Briere & Runtz, 1987; Molnar, Buka, & Kessler, 2001), posttraumatic stress disorder (Rodriguez,Van de Kemp, & Foy, 1998), body shame (Andrews, 1995), eating disorders (Smolak & Murnen, 2002), physical health impairment (Leserman, 2005), and difficulty in interpersonal relationships (Colman & Widom, 2004). Negative effects are more pervasive when the abuse is frequent, severe, or of long duration, involves force, or is perpetrated by someone close to the victim (Banyard & Williams, 1996; Kendall-Tackett et al., 1993; Mullen, Martin,Anderson, Romans, & Herbison, 1993).The responses of others (Ullman, 2003) and girls’ own perceptions and attributions (Haaken & Lamb, 2000; Hoagwood, 1990; Lamb, 1996, 1999) have also been shown to affect the likelihood and intensity of negative effects. Of special interest is the relationship between childhood sexual abuse victimization and sexual behavior.A common symptom of sexually abused children is sexualized behavior (e.g., self-sexualization; Friedrich et al., 2001; Kendall-Tackett et al., 1993; Letourneau, Schoenwald, & Sheidow, 2004).The sexually abused child may incorporate the perpetrator’s perspective into her identity, eventually viewing herself as good for nothing but sex (Herman, 1992; Putnam, 1990).The constricted sense of self of the sexually abused child and the coercive refusal of the perpetrator to respect the child’s physical boundaries may result in subsequent difficulties in asserting boundaries, impaired self-protection, and a greater likelihood of being further victimized as an adult (Classen, Palesh, & Aggarwal, 2005), including becoming involved in prostitution (Nadon et al., 1998; Silbert & Pines, 1981, 1982). Childhood sexual abuse victimization is Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 27 The sexualization and objectification of women in the media appear to teach girls that as women, all they have to offer is their body and face, and that they should expend all their effort on physical appearance. also linked to risky sexual behavior in adolescence and adulthood (Quina, Morokoff, Harlow, & Zurbriggen, 2004). Impact on Others In addition to the consequences for girls described previously, the sexualization of girls may also affect boys, men, and adult women. Evidence relevant to possible negative effects for these groups is described below. Boys and Men The sexualization of girls can have a negative impact on boys and men. Exposure to narrow ideals of female sexual attractiveness may make it difficult for some men to find an “acceptable” partner or to fully enjoy intimacy with a female partner (Schooler & Ward, 2006). Several experimental studies have shown that exposure to pornography (which often sexually objectifies women; Jensen & Dines, 2004) leads men to rate their female partners as less attractive (Weaver, Masland, & Zillmann, 1984), to indicate less satisfaction with their intimate partners’ attractiveness, sexual performance, and level of affection (Zillmann & Bryant, 1988), and to express greater desire for sex without emotional involvement (Zillmann & Bryant, 1988). Even viewing a single episode of an objectifying television program such as Charlie’s Angels may lead men to rate real women as less physically attractive (Kenrick & Guttieres, 1980). Frable, Johnson, and Kellman (1997) found that undergraduate men who regularly viewed pornography spontaneously generated more sexual terms to describe the construct “women” than did those who viewed pornography less regularly.The two groups did not differ in their descriptions of the construct “men,” suggesting that viewing pornography is associated specifically with sexualizing women and may not have a more generalized and gender-neutral effect. Objectifying girls/women and sex itself is integral to masculinity beliefs (Connell, 1987; Kimmel, 1996; Tolman, 2002), but these beliefs may jeopardize men’s ability to form and maintain intimate relationships with women (G. Brooks, 1995; Kindlon & Thompson, 1999; Pollack, 1998). Burn and Ward (2005) found that undergraduate men’s satisfaction with their romanti
c relationship was negatively correlated with most masculinity beliefs, including ones that are relevant to the objectification of women (i.e., dominance [“I should be in charge”], power over women [“In general, I control the women in my life”], and playboy [“If I could, I would frequently change sexual partners”]). Empathy may be important in understanding the relationship between objectification and relationship satisfaction.When one person objectifies another, it is difficult, perhaps even impossible, to treat that person with empathy (Herman, 1992), an important predictor of satisfaction and stability in intimate relationships (Davis & Oathout, 1987; Long & Andrews, 1990). If girls and women are seen exclusively as sexual beings rather than as complicated people with many interests, talents, and identities, boys and men may have difficulty relating to them on any level other than the sexual.This could dramatically limit the opportunities boys and men have to interact intellectually with girls and women, to compete with and against them in sports or games, to create art or make music with them, to work together for higher causes (e.g., volunteer work or activism), or to enjoy their company as friends. Women A cultural milieu in which women and girls are sexualized harms adult women in all the ways that it harms girls (detailed previously).That is, there are negative repercussions for women’s cognitive functioning, body satisfaction, mental and physical health, sexuality, and attitudes and beliefs. Selfsexualization and self-objectification by adult women, although perhaps less common in women as they age (T-A. Roberts, 2004), have the same causes and consequences as in girls and young women (Prichard & Tiggemann, 2005; Tiggemann & Lynch, 2001).There are additional consequences, however, for adult women in at least one domain that is less relevant for girls—the workplace. Although a meta-analysis of experimental studies suggests that the employment-related benefits of physical attractiveness are as strong for women as they are for men (Hosoda, Stone-Romero, & Coats 2003), these studies have focused on attractiveness rather than on sexiness per se. In contrast, Glick, Larsen, Johnson, and Branstiter (2005) Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 28 manipulated the sexiness of a female job applicant and held physical attractiveness constant.They found that when the sexy job applicant was applying for a managerial job, she was rated as less competent and less intelligent than the conservatively dressed job applicant; participants also indicated that they would experience fewer positive emotions and more negative emotions toward the sexy applicant (compared with the conservatively dressed applicant) if she were hired. None of these differences was found when the applicants were described as applying for a job as a receptionist.These data imply that self-sexualization or sexualization by others is likely to have a negative impact on women seeking professional careers. A cultural milieu in which girls are sexualized may have additional consequences for adult women.The sexualization of girls contributes to the idealization of youth as the only good and beautiful stage of life. If one accepts fashion “supermodels” as representing the culturally accepted standard of idealized female beauty, the ideal age appears to be about 17. Girls as young as 11 or 12 have achieved modeling success, and many of the most famous models became internationally well known before they were 16 (Moore, 2003). Of the six champions on the popular television program America’s Next Top Model (2006)(which requires contestants to be at least 18, presumably for legal reasons), the oldest champion was 23, and the average age of the champions was 20.2. Given this ideal, it is not surprising that as women age, they become increasingly invisible in the culture (Arber & Ginn, 1991; Cook & Kaiser, 2004;Wolf, 1991). Many women respond to this cultural standard by making every effort to remain and look as youthful as possible. Sales of “anti-aging” beauty products increased by 10.7% in 2005 (to over $11 billion worldwide), showing the greatest increase in any category of skin-care product (O. Phillips, 2006).An analysis of plastic surgery rates (especially for procedures that lift and tuck aging body parts) provides further evidence that some aging women feel strong pressure to look younger. Data from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons shows that common procedures designed to “freshen” the body and keep it looking young have been steadily increasing. Between 2000 and 2005, annual rates of Botox injections rose from roughly three quarters of a million to almost 4 million, amounting to a 388% increase. In the same 5-year period, there was also a 115% increase in tummy tucks (from 62,713 to 134,746 annually), a 283% increase in buttock lifts (from 1,356 to 5,193 annually), as well as a stunning 3,413% and 4,101% increase in upper arm and lower body lifts, respectively (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2006c). Many of these procedures were age specific. Although younger and older women receive rhinoplasty and breast augmentations at relatively equal rates, the rates for women 35–50 years of age who receive breast lifts, buttock lifts, tummy tucks, and liposuction are approximately double those of women 19–34 years of age (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2006b). Even with plastic surgery, it is impossible for an adult woman to maintain the look of a 17-year-old adolescent. This inability to meet the culturally imposed standard of beauty may lead to body shame, lowered self-esteem, and a reduced sense of well-being.There is evidence that exposure to thin-ideal images in the media and subsequent thin-ideal internalization have negative effects on adult women. For example, across two studies, Dittmar and colleagues (Dittmar & Howard, 2004; Halliwell & Dittmar, 2004) found that adult women (e.g., 20–60 years of age) exposed to ads featuring thin models expressed more body-focused anxiety than those exposed to average-sized or no models, and this was especially true for those who strongly internalized the thin ideal. Exposure to a “White-ideal” in the media may be damaging to women of color who cannot match that ideal; research showing a negative correlation between music video exposure and self-esteem in African American adolescents (L. M.Ward, 2004b) supports this supposition. It is, Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 29 Some aging women feel strong pressure to look younger. . . . Even with plastic surgery, it is impossible for an adult woman to maintain the look of a 17-year-old adolescent. therefore, reasonable to hypothesize that exposure to a “young ideal” in the media will be similarly damaging to “older” (i.e., not teenage) women of all ethnicities. The perpetuation of an extremely narrow range of desirable ages may also have repercussions for women’s ability to succeed and advance in the workplace. If women strive to appear as youthful as possible in order to more closely match the ideal of female beauty, their competence and skills may be questioned because of their youthful appearance.This double bind was apparent in the data of C. Duncan and Loretto (2004). In their study, both women and men reported experiencing age discrimination for being too young, but women were more likely than men to report that this discrimination was specifically related to their youthful appearance (as opposed to other characteristics associated with youth, such as experience). Moreover, women but not men recounted experiences of sexualized ageism (e.g, a 35-year-old woman reported being referred to as “a dried up old maid”). More evidence for the double bind was found in data from men and women in their 30s.Among this group, 25 of the 27 men who reported age discrimination stated that it was because of their youth; only 2 stated that it was because they were too old. But of the 25 women in this demographic, 13 reported age discrimination because they w
ere too young and 12 because they were too old. Impact on Society In addition to the serious consequences for girls that have been outlined previously, the sexualization of girls is likely to have numerous negative consequences for society and its other members, including boys, men, and women, which will impact girls indirectly. Cultural institutions such as schools and workplaces may be affected. More important, general social attitudes and expectations about sexuality and gender may change in problematic ways as a result of media objectification and sexualization. Pressing social problems that disproportionately affect girls both directly and indirectly, including violence against girls and women, sexual exploitation of girls, forms of pornography, and prostitution of girls, may be maintained or even increased if there is a continued and escalating sexualization of girls. Some of these consequences are explored in the following sections. Sexism The sexualization of girls and women may contribute to broader societal consequences, such as sexism, sex bias, and sexist attitudes. Evidence in support of this assertion comes from several types of studies. One group of studies tests whether exposure to sexualized or sexually objectifying content shapes viewers’ attitudes toward women in general. A second group of studies uses experimental means to investigate whether exposure to such content affects people’s perceptions of real women.A third group tests whether experimental exposure to this content affects people’s actions toward real women.Although these exposure studies focus on content that sexualizes adult women, the resulting consequences are noted for viewers of all ages, including adolescent boys and girls as well as young women and men.We hypothesize that exposure to sexualized girls likely leads to sexist attitudes about girls and women as well. Among the first set of studies that test links between exposure to objectifying content and the development of sexist attitudes, findings indicate that frequent, regular exposure to genres high in sexualized imagery (such as music videos) and deeper levels of media involvement are both associated with greater acceptance by men and women of attitudes that sexualize and sexually objectify women (e.g., Strouse, Goodwin, & Roscoe, 1994; L. M. Ward, 2002; L. M.Ward & Friedman, 2006; L. M.Ward et al., 2005). For example, L. M.Ward, Merriwether, and Caruthers (2006a) discovered that undergraduate men who were frequent readers of men’s magazines such as Maxim and Sports Illustrated, who attributed greater realism to media portrayals, and who watched TV more intently to learn about the world were also more accepting of traditional masculinity ideologies, including the sexual objectification of women. These correlational findings are strengthened by outcomes from experimental work that reach the same conclusion.Across several studies, women and men exposed to sexually objectifying images of women from mainstream Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 30 media (e.g., R-rated films, magazine advertisements, music videos) were found to be significantly more accepting of rape myths (e.g., the belief that women invite rape by engaging in certain behaviors), sexual harassment, sex role stereotypes, interpersonal violence, and adversarial sexual beliefs about relationships than were those in control conditions (e.g., Kalof, 1999; Milburn, Mather, & Conrad, 2000; L. M.Ward, 2002). For example,White undergraduates exposed to a sexually objectifying music video were more likely to endorse adversarial sexual beliefs than were students exposed to a nonsexual music video (Kalof, 1999). Exposure to sexist magazine ads featuring women as sexual objects produced a stronger acceptance of sex role stereotyping and of rape myths among male undergraduates (Lanis & Covell, 1995; MacKay & Covell, 1997).Additionally, high school students exposed to content featuring women as sexual objects drawn either from music videos (L. M.Ward et al., 2005) or prime-time television programs (L. M.Ward & Friedman, 2006) expressed more support of these attitudes than did students who did not receive this exposure. A second line of research demonstrates that experimental exposure to sexualized or sexually objectifying images of women affects people’s perceptions or judgments of other women.The findings here are few, yet provocative. Hansen and Hansen (1988) reported that undergraduate students who had watched three neutral music videos later perceived a man’s “hitting on” a female colleague to be akin to sexual harassment, yet students who had viewed sexist music videos perceived his sexual advances to be appropriate and thought less favorably of the woman if she rejected him. Gan, Zillmann, and Mitrook (1997) examined how exposure to sexualized images of Black women in R&B music videos affects White students’ perceptions of neutral Black and White women.They reported that whereas video exposure was inconsequential for judgments of White women, the Black women encountered later were judged least good, most bad, and furthest from the “ideal.” It appears that exposure to sexually enticing rap videos fostered perceptions of diminished positive traits and stronger negative traits in Black women in general. Finally, exposure to sexualized content has been shown to affect how women actually behave and how men treat and respond to real women in subsequent interactions. These studies have generally found that after men are exposed to sexualized content, their behavior toward women is more sexualized, and they treat women like sexual objects. For example, undergraduate men exposed to 16 sexist and objectifying commercials later asked more sexist questions of a female confederate posing as a job applicant, recalled more about her appearance and less about her personal background, and rated her as friendlier, more suitable to hire, but less competent than did controls (L. Rudman & Borgida, 1995). Similarly, McKenzie-Mohr and Zanna (1990) found that after exposure to a 15-minute pornography tape, stereotypically masculine men were perceived by a female experimenter to be more sexually motivated, they positioned themselves closer to her, and they recalled more information about her physical appearance than did men in other conditions. Using a similar paradigm, Jansma, Linz, Mulac, and Imrich (1997) reported a pattern in which gender-typed men appeared to rate a female partner lower on intellectual competence after viewing a sexually explicit film and higher after viewing a nonsexual film. Non-gender-typed men appeared to respond in the reverse. Overall, it is argued that exposure to sexualized depictions of women may lead to global thoughts that “women are seductive and frivolous sex objects” (Lavine, Sweeney, & Wagner, 1999) and “foster an overall climate that does not value girls’ and women’s voices or contributions to society” (Merskin, 2004). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 31 Exposure to sexist magazine ads featuring women as sexual objects produced a stronger acceptance of sex role stereotyping and of rape myths among male undergraduates. Girls’ Educational Success and Achievement Aspirations. If, as the self-objectification literature suggests, girls’ preoccupation with appearance ties up cognitive resources, girls will have less time and mental energy for other pursuits. Girls may be learning to prioritize certain rewards (male attention) over other rewards (academic accomplishment), thus limiting their future educational and occupational opportunities. If they perceive occupations relating to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) as less consistent with a sexy self-image, they may be induced to want to be a model, fashion designer, or pop star in order to embody the sexualized look that they know is valued for women rather than choose to be a chemist, computer programmer, or engineer. If girls perceive what research shows—that women who choose male-identified professions are least preferred (in college samples
) as romantic partners (Yoder & Schleicher, 1996)—then they will perceive some social costs to choosing careers that are not consistent with a “sexy” image. On the other hand, if girls continue along a nonfeminine career path, presenting a sexy image will also be costly and may result in being perceived as less competent (Glick et al., 2005). Two studies exploring stereotype threat exposed college-aged women to highly feminine-stereotyped television commercials, which emphasized a young woman’s sexual attractiveness and physical beauty (Davies, Spencer, Quinn, & Gerhardstein, 2002; Davies, Spencer, & Steele, 2005).After exposure to the sexy/pretty ads, compared with the gender-neutral or counterstereotypic ads, women indicated less interest in vocational options that emphasize quantitative reasoning (e.g., math and science) and also endorsed lower leadership aspirations, suggesting that sexualization may indeed “prime” lower achievement orientation among young women. Earlier research has shown different vocational aspirations for adolescent boys and girls (e.g., Corder & Stephan, 1984; Gottfredson, 1981; Grotevant & Thorbecke, 1982) and differential aspirations (e.g., Kerr, 1983, 1985) and achievement (favoring boys) for gifted girls and gifted boys (e.g., Eccles, 1985; Hollinger & Fleming, 1992).Although girls today have higher educational and occupational aspirations than they have had in the past, we do not know to what extent preoccupation with looks or even sexualization interferes with these aspirations. Given limited research suggesting that self-objectification practices may limit cognitive resources, exploring further whether sexualization exposure and experiences are responsible for a kind of “brain drain” among young girls and women is an important priority for future research. Sexual harassment in school. Despite the fact that many girls believe that a sexy appearance brings them power, quite the opposite may be true.Although sexy dress does not justify sexual harassment nor has it been shown to provoke sexual harassment in school studies, the belief that girls are sexual objects may be related to boys’ tendency to sexually harass girls in school and in this way could affect girls adversely. Sexual harassment by boys and men is a regular part of school and work life. Peers perpetrate 79% of the sexual harassment in schools (American Association of University Women, 2001), and much of this harassment is in the form of sexual jokes, leering, touching or grabbing areas like the breasts or buttocks, and comments on physical appearance (e.g., J. Duffy,Wareham, & Walsh, 2004).The consequences of sexual harassment are far-reaching, can be long lasting (J. Duffy et al., 2004), and move beyond psychological effects on girls to educational consequences (Houston & Hwang, 1996; Juvonen, Nishina, & Graham, 2000), costs to schools, and consequences to society in general. One study of the estimated economic cost of sexual harassment in the U.S.Army, for example, found that in one year alone, the cost of sexual harassment was over $250 billion (Faley, Knapp, Kustis, & Dubois, 1999). Several studies suggest that the sexualization of girls contributes to sexual harassment and coercion. In a survey Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 32 Girls may be learning to prioritize certain rewards (male attention) over other rewards (academic accomplishment), thus limiting their future educational and occupational opportunities. of university faculty, staff, and students, O’Hare and O’Donohue (1998) found that respondents who reported that their male coworkers held sexist attitudes reported more experiences of gender harassment, sexual harassment, and sexual coercion. Quinn’s (2002) qualitative study of adult men’s accounts of “girl-watching” in the workplace highlighted the role that objectification and (low) empathy with the targeted women played in this type of sexual harassment.Angelone, Hirschman, Suniga,Armey, and Armelie (2005) found that college men who were exposed to a sexist confederate (one who made objectifying comments about a female actress and denigrating comments about women on campus) told more sexual jokes to a female confederate than did men exposed to a nonsexist confederate.Taken together, these studies suggest that boys exposed to sexualization portrayals of girls may be more likely to commit sexual harassment. Some studies of the effects of school uniforms on students’ perceptions also lend indirect support for the notion that sexualizing clothing may be a factor in harassment of girls.When students dress in uniforms, fellow students as well as teachers rate them as higher in academic ability and positive school-related behavior than students in standard dress (Behling, 1994). Furthermore, one study showed that girls who wear uniforms report more positive perceptions of safety and peer relationships in school than girls in regular clothes (Fosseen, 2002). It is important to underscore that girls do not “cause” harassment or abusive behavior by wearing sexy clothes; no matter what girls wear, they have the right to be free of sexual harassment, and boys and men can and should control their behavior. But when sexualized clothing is part of a larger cultural context in which girls are sexually objectified, standardized uniforms may help to change those cultural messages and understandings of who girls are and what they are capable of, thereby reducing the incidence of sexual harassment in general. Violence and Exploitation Violence against girls. Numerous studies have shown a connection between stereotypical attitudes about women’s sexuality and aggressive sexual behavior. For example, adversarial sexual beliefs, rape myth acceptance, and sexist beliefs about women are related to aggressive sexual behaviors (Dean & Malamuth, 1997; Murnen,Wright, & Kaluzny, 2002; Osland, Fitch, & Willis, 1996; Spence, Losoff, & Robbins, 1991;Truman,Tokar, & Fischer, 1996; Vogel, 2000). Other studies have connected media exposure to sexist beliefs and acceptance of violence against women. Several studies have shown that women and men exposed to sexually objectifying images of women from mainstream media (e.g., R-rated films, magazine advertisements, music videos) were found to be significantly more accepting of rape myths, sexual harassment, sex role stereotypes, interpersonal violence, and adversarial sexual beliefs about relationships than were those in control conditions (Kalof, 1999; Lanis & Covell, 1995; MacKay & Covell, 1997; Milburn et al., 2000; L. M.Ward, 2002; L. M.Ward et al., 2005). In one of the few studies using children rather than college-aged men and women as participants, Strouse et al. (1994) found that for boys and girls who were 11–16 years of age, frequent TV viewing and greater exposure to Rand X-rated films were each related to stronger acceptance of sexual harassment. Given that viewing sexualized and objectifying portrayals of women is associated with many of these attitudes, viewing sexualized portrayals of girls may also lead to these same effects and to a greater acceptance of child sexual abuse myths, child sexual abuse, and viewing younger and younger girls as acceptable sexual partners. Sexual exploitation. There is little or no research on the effects on adults of viewing sexualized images of girls or even sexualized images of adult women made up to look like girls (a common practice in magazine advertisements). Several scholars (e.g., Merskin, 2004; O’Donohue et al., 1997) have noted the urgent need for such research. But there may be negative effects at a societal level in addition to possible negative effects to individual viewers; these include providing justification and a market for child pornography and the prostitution and sexual trafficking of children. Because the consequences of child sexual abuse and child prostitution are so great, it is important to consider the possible connections carefully.Although there is Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 33 so
me disagreement in the literature on the relationship between pornography and sexual aggression, the most rigorous reviews (e.g.,Allen, D’Alessio, & Brezgel, 1995; Allen, D’Alessio, & Emmers-Sommer, 2000;Allen, Emmers, Gebhardt, & Giery, 1995; Malamuth,Addison, & Koss, 2000) have concluded that there are reliable associations between viewing pornography and committing sexually aggressive acts.These associations are strongest when considering violent pornography and/or men who possess other risk factors for sexual aggression. When specifically considering child pornography, however, almost no experimental research has been conducted. One exception is a study by B. Paul (2004) designed to assess the effects of viewing child pornography. Paul used “barely legal” pornography as the stimuli in an experiment. In “barely legal” pornography, adult women are made to look like children.Thus, while the pornography is legal (the models are above the age of 18), the viewer perceives a sexualized child.The findings were that viewing such pornography led to a stronger mental association between neutral (nonsexual) images of children and words related to sex (e.g., arousing, sexy). These findings suggest that viewing sexualized portrayals of girls could lead viewers to associate children with sex, even when they are not being sexualized. One particularly pernicious effect of the constant exposure to sexualized images of girls is that individuals and society may be “trained” to perceive and label sexualized girls as “seductive.” Studies have shown that adult men often misperceive friendliness in adult women as sexual interest (Abbey, 1982, 1987). Images of young girls who are made to look like adult women may evoke similar responses. Another area of slippage concerns consent. Children are not legally able to give consent to sexual activity with an adult.When girls are dressed to resemble adult women, however, adults may project adult motives as well as an adult level of responsibility and agency on girls. Images of precocious sexuality in girls may serve to normalize abusive practices such as child abuse, child prostitution, and the sexual trafficking of children. Finally, the sexualization of girls may also contribute to the trafficking and prostitution of girls by helping to create a market for sex with children through the cultivation of new desires and experiences. If the idealized female sexual partner is a 15- or 16-year-old girl, male consumers may demand pornography featuring such girls and the opportunity to pay for sex with them.A 2005 report noted a disturbing new trend in the recruitment of children into pornography: Pedophiles and “johns” look in online chat rooms for teens with Web cameras linked to their computers and then seduce them into performing sex acts for money in front of the camera (Eichenwald, 2005). Summary of Consequences of the Sexualization of Girls The research summarized in this section offers evidence of negative consequences for girls when they are sexualized or exposed to sexualized images and when others are exposed to such images. First, there is evidence that girls exposed to sexualizing and objectifying media are more likely to experience body dissatisfaction, depression, and lower selfesteem; research to date suggests that these effects are not as pronounced for African American girls.There is no research to date on lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered youths. Selfobjectification has been shown to diminish cognitive ability and to cause shame.This cognitive diminishment, as well as the belief that physical appearance rather than academic or extracurricular achievement is the best path to power and acceptance, may influence girls’ achievement levels and opportunities later in life. Girls’ sexual development may also be affected as they are exposed to models of passivity, and studies indicate that the media may influence a girl’s perceptions of her own virginity or first sexual experience. Interpersonally, girls’ relationships with other girls are affected, as such relationships can become policing grounds where girls support or reject other girls for reasons having to do with conformity to a narrow beauty ideal that involves a sexualized presentation or competition for boys’ attention. Girls’ relationships with boys and men are affected in that exposure to sexualizing and objectifying media has been shown to relate to girls’ and boys’ views on dating, boys’ sexual harassment of girls, and attitudes toward sexual violence. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 34 Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization The research presented in the initial portion of this report focused on concerns that girls are sexualized by the current culture, by other people, and by themselves and that this sexualization is likely to lead to a host of negative effects. Despite the concerns raised throughout this report, however, there are several indications that negative outcomes are neither inevitable nor universal. Some girls and their supporters, now and in the past, have resisted mainstream characterizations of girls as sexual objects.Through media education and literacy, the creation of media subcultures, participation in athletics, comprehensive sex education programs, activism, and religious/spiritual practices, girls, their peers, adults in their lives, and institutions that support them help to challenge the narrow prescriptions for girls in this culture. The following sections describe existing programs and practices that counter sexualization and note others that, if implemented, have the potential to do so.We look, in turn, at approaches implemented through the schools, through families, and by girls themselves. Approach 1:Working Through Schools and Formal Education Schools can contribute in several ways to greater awareness of the sexualization of girls in the media and can help girls and their peers resist these negative influences. Media Literacy Because the media are important sources of sexualizing images, the development and implementation of schoolbased media literacy training programs could be key in combating the influence of sexualization.There is an urgent need for girls to view media critically.Although components vary from program to program, media literacy training in general provides media consumers with analytical tools that promote autonomy and critical understanding of media.The goal is to create active interpreters of messages rather than passive consumers. Training encourages media consumers to notice the messages inherent in media, to think about who is sending those messages and why, and to challenge their realism (Potter, 2004). Several nonprofit organizations, some that have girls serving on their boards, have designed media literacy programs.These programs aim not only to educate girls who consume media but also to raise awareness of how girls and women are represented and to advocate for improvement by providing resources to media producers, teachers, and parents.The Girls,Women + Media Project (www.mediaandwomen.org) is one such organization (see the Appendix for a list of others). Research on the effectiveness of media literacy programs has not yet focused on the sexualization of girls and women, but it has examined the related topic of body image. One study of college women found that three media literacy programs were effective in increasing women’s skepticism about the realism of images that promote a thin ideal of beauty, compared with a control group receiving no intervention (Irving & Berel, 2001). Another study found that high school girls who participated in a media literacy program had less internalization of the thin ideal and more questions about the realism of images than girls in a control group (Irving, DuPen, & Berel, 1998).Yamamiya, Cash, Melnyk, Posavac, and Posavac (2005) found that participation in a media literacy education program prior to exposure to stereotypical images prevented adverse effects. Studies indicate that media literacy programs address
ing alcohol use (e.g.,Austin & Johnson, 1997) and television violence (e.g.,Voojis & Van der Voort, 1993) have also been effective. Programs directly targeting the sexualization of girls and women may benefit the school-aged girls who consume sexualized media, as well as their male peers who are also exposed to these media images and who may treat girls differently as a result. Athletics Another school-based strategy is to provide access to athletics and other extracurricular activities that encourage girls to focus on body competence instead of body Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 35 appearance.Although girls’ and women’s participation in sports and physical activity can be dismissed, ignored, sexualized, or co-opted, participation in physical activity may be one of girls’ best means of resisting objectification and sexualization. Because athletic activities inherently require a focus on body competence, agency, and action, they provide girls with the opportunity to develop a selfconcept founded on what they can do rather than on how they look. Children’s and adolescents’ participation in sports and physical activities is related to increased selfesteem (Abernathy,Webster, & Vermeulen, 2002; Bonhauser et al., 2005; Crews, Lochbaum, & Landers, 2004; McAuley, 1994), and this association may be especially strong among children with economic disadvantages or those who have mental, emotional, or physical disabilities (Gruber, 1986). Sports participation is also linked to increased levels of body self-esteem (Bissell, 2004; DiBartolo & Shaffer, 2002). That these increases in self-esteem relate to healthier sexual development is suggested by evidence that sports participation is inversely related to engaging in risky sexual behavior (Lehman & Keorner, 2004; Miller, Barnes, Melnick, Sabo, & Farrell, 2002).The effects found by Lehman and Koehler were mediated by increased empowerment/self-efficacy and functional body orientation. Functional body orientation refers to the extent to which one thinks of one’s own body in terms of the things it can do and is capable of performing.Tracy and Erkut (2002) have shown that an additional pathway to less risky sexual behavior via sports participation is through the decreased feminine gender role orientation of girl participants. Because physical activity may be a powerful means of negating self-objectification and other negative consequences of sexualization, the sexualization of women and girl athletes may be especially dangerous or harmful for girls. If this domain becomes co-opted and turned into yet another venue where girls are taught to focus on how they look rather than on what their bodies can do, they will have been deprived of an important method of resistance and healthy development. Extracurricular Activities Some studies of adolescent risk behavior (e.g., early sexual activity and substance use) suggest that extracurricular participation and the development of a talent may be protective factors for these outcomes (Savage & Holcomb, 1998; Shilts, 1991). No studies to date, however, have examined extracurricular activities in relation to objectification of girls’ bodies or sexualization practices. It may be that participation in certain extracurricular activities, in addition to or instead of sports, protects girls against the negative effects of sexualization and objectification of girls and women in the media, particularly when the activity does not support feminine gender role ideals. It will thus be important for future researchers attempting to understand the effects of extracurricular activity on youth to differentiate those extracurricular activities that lend themselves to a narrow body image standard with an emphasis on sexiness, attractiveness, or thinness (e.g., some forms of dance) from those that require talents that are different (e.g. drama club, marching band,African drumming, dance forms such as hip-hop and modern). Schools that provide a variety of extracurricular activities, including activities that have generally been associated with boys’ interests (e.g., computer and video gaming), are giving girls alternatives to activities that emphasize beauty, thinness, and sex appeal. Comprehensive Sexuality Education A central way to help youth counteract distorted views presented by the media and culture about girls, sex, and the sexualization of girls is through comprehensive sexuality education.Although guidelines for comprehensive sexuality education vary, all include the presentation of accurate, evidence-based information about reproduction and contraception, the importance of delaying intercourse initiation for young people, and the building of communication skills. Most relevant to combating sexualization, many also address media, peer, and cultural influences on sexual behaviors and decisions (SIECUS, 2004) and promote a notion of sexual responsibility that includes respect for oneself and an emphasis on consensual, nonexploitative sexual activity (Office of Population Affairs, 1999). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 36 This kind of sex education may reverse the negative effects of the sexualization of girls. It is also likely to have other positive effects and unlikely to have adverse consequences. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher’s (2001) report on sexual health and responsible sexual behavior indicates that the most effective sex education for preventing teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections is comprehensive. Research indicates that comprehensive programs do not increase the frequency of sex or the number of sex partners, nor do such programs lower the age of first intercourse (Kirby, 2001). Approach 2:Working Through the Family Parents and other family members can help girls interpret sexualizing cultural messages in ways that mitigate or prevent harm. Because sexualization is often so pervasive as to seem normal and thus not even discernible to many girls, parents can make sexualization visible by discussing media and other cultural messages with girls. Religious practices and social or political activism are also helpful strategies. Mediation and Co-Viewing Traditionally, suggestions on how to combat potential negative effects of media use, such as aggression and stereotyping, have centered on the roles of parental mediation and co-viewing. Here, the notion is that having parents comment on appropriate and inappropriate content while watching TV with their children can alter the influence of the messages.Although media literacy and co-viewing were initially discussed and tested in the 1970s and early 1980s, renewed attention has been given to this approach in recent years. Findings from several experimental studies demonstrate the benefits of such interventions in promoting parent–child interactions involving media. In one study, grade school children viewed four TV clips portraying stereotypical gender roles (Nathanson, Wilson, McGee, & Sebastian, 2002). For children in one condition, the experimenter inserted comments contradicting the stereotypical behavior. In another condition, she did not. Results indicated that children in the mediation condition evaluated the program less positively and expressed greater acceptance of nontraditional gender roles for men than did children who received no mediation. Similar results have been obtained in experimental work testing children’s responses to media violence (Nathanson, 2004). A 2003 field study also suggested that parents can influence the way children interpret sexual content on television. R. L. Collins, Elliott, Berry, Kanouse, and Hunter (2003) interviewed a national sample of adolescents (ages 12–17 years) shortly after the airing of an episode of the sitcom Friends. The episode centered on discussion of a condom failure that had resulted in the pregnancy of one of the show’s main characters. One in four teen viewers saw condoms as less effective in preventing pregnancy than they had in a survey 6 months earlier.Viewers who reported talking with an adult about the program, however, actu
ally viewed condoms as more effective than they had previously.These studies hold promise that girls’ co-viewing and active discussions with parents may decrease the influence of viewing sexualized images. Religion, Spirituality, and Meditation Organized religious and other ethical instruction often begins within the family and can offer girls important practical and psychological alternatives to the values conveyed by popular culture.When parents, through their religious or ethical practices, communicate the message that other characteristics are more important than sexuality, they help to counteract the strong and prevalent message that it is only girls’ sexuality that makes them interesting, desirable, or valuable. By insisting that girls be allowed to remain girls and not be pushed into a precocious sexuality, they provide a haven where girls can develop at their own Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 37 Parents and other family members can help girls interpret sexualizing cultural messages in ways that mitigate or prevent harm. pace. In addition, although some religious institutions resist comprehensive sex education classes, others are open to such programs (Coyne-Beasley & Schoenbach, 2000) and may even be actively involved in designing them (e.g., the Our Whole Lives workshops by the Unitarian Universalist Church) (Casparian, 2000; Goldfarb, 2000; Sprung, 1999; Wilson, 1999). Religion may also counteract the effects of media representations. L. M.Ward (2004b) found that religiosity buffered the effects of increased media use on self-esteem among Black adolescents. Negative effects of increased media use on self-esteem were seen only for those low in religiosity. She noted, however, that religiosity might be a proxy variable for involvement in the Black community, with social networks being the true buffering factor. In addition to organized religion, a more diffuse sense of spirituality, or a self-directed spiritual practice, can also be a force for resistance. Just as many African American women recount using prayer and spirituality to cope with racism and sexism (Shorter-Gooden, 2004) or recover from childhood sexual violence (Bryant-Davis, 2005), so girls of all ethnicities may rely on spirituality to protect them from some of the effects of objectification and sexualization. Finally, meditative practices common in many spiritual traditions and mindful body-centered practices such as yoga, tai chi, or qigong have been shown to have mental and physical health benefits, including increased selfunderstanding, self-acceptance, and well-being (Walsh & Shapiro, 2006). Moreover, these practices typically facilitate the attainment of a mental state of calm, centered awareness that may be incompatible with self-objectification. Although many types of meditation involve a detached observation of the self (e.g., of one’s breath or body movements), such self-observation has an introspective quality.This is in marked contrast to self-objectification, which develops from continually imagining how one looks or appears to an outside observer. This reasoning finds support in the results of a recent study comparing yoga practitioners, aerobics practitioners, and a nonexercise group (Daubenmier, 2005). In addition to exhibiting greater body awareness and body satisfaction than the two comparison groups, the yoga practitioners also scored lower on self-objectification.This suggests that if girls regularly engage in meditation or other mindful practices, they might be protected against self-sexualization. Activism by Parents and Families Action by parents and families can have an impact in confronting sources of sexualized images of girls. In response to a May 2006 grassroots letter-writing campaign initiated by the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (www.commercialexploitation.org/) and Dads and Daughters (www.dadsanddaughters.org/), Hasbro cancelled a planned line of dolls based on the Pussycat Dolls, a music group known for their sexualized lyrics and dance routines (Goldiner, 2006).A dozen years earlier, a letter-writing campaign by one woman convinced Hyundai not to advertise in Sports Illustrated’s annual swimsuit edition (Horovitz, 1993). It is hoped that focused, sustained pressure on corporate sources of sexualization will lead to other such successes. Approach 3:Working Directly With Girls and Girls’ Groups to Resist Alternative Media Another approach to minimizing the impact and existence of sexualization is to encourage girls to become activists who speak out and develop their own alternatives. Prominent examples of this approach include “zines” (homemade magazines distributed in print form or on the Web), blogs (Web logs written by individuals), and feminist magazines, books, and Web sites. One of the most attractive features of these alternatives is that they provide a forum to teach girls to critically examine the sexualizing images presented by society and corporations. Several studies have examined how bodies are discussed in zines. Ogle and Thornburg (2003) conducted a content analysis of body-related content in the zine Girl Zone (www.girlzone.com/), which is not created by girls but is nevertheless widely read by them.They identified three themes: girls’ concerns about and experiences with their changing bodies (i.e., the pubertal process), the deconstruction and critique of body-related images in mainstream Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 38 media and society, and discussion of strategies to cope with body-related societal pressures. Schilt (2003) analyzed 33 girl-made zines to understand how girls used this vehicle to explore, construct, and experience their lives. She argued that zines offer an antidote to consumer-based empowerment strategies (e.g., buying a T-shirt with a “girl power” slogan) that do not encourage girls to express their own ideas and opinions.When girls create a zine rather than buy a commercially available product, they become cultural producers rather than consumers, an experience that enables them to be more effective cultural critics. Web pages (including Web logs or “blogs”), reflecting a vast range of topics and perspectives, are a fast-growing form of communication among adult and teen computer users. For girls,Web pages, whether created by adults or teens, can provide alternatives to what girls see in mainstream media as well as strategies for resistance, including recognition of sexualizing and objectifying cultural processes, along with language and support for describing related feelings (e.g., shame, anger).The Appendix provides a list of Web sites that offer articulate critiques of the media. Some of these are specific to particular groups of girls (e.g., girls of specific racial or ethnic backgrounds) and document the particular forms of objectification and sexualization to which these specific groups of girls are subjected. For example, Bamboo Girl (www.bamboogirl.com) is described by a girl-positive site (see www.thoughtworm.com) as a “zine that challenges the issues of racism/sexism/ homophobia from the point of view of smart, loud non-traditional girls of color” (Thoughtworm, 2006). Bamboo Girl includes stories by Filipina/Asian/Pacific Islander girls,“because life isn’t only Black & White” and “there’s more to life than straight white male patriarchy” (Bamboo Girl, 2006). Still, all Web sites about girls are not equal.Web sites with names that suggest that they are girl-friendly/girlsupportive can also be places where aspects of sexualization and objectification are reinscribed through advertising or content.The Web has enormous potential to encourage girls to critique the culture, explore cultural messages, and develop agency. But the Web as a form of media must also be approached with a critical eye. A third form of alternative media is magazines, books, and films created by feminists and feminist organizations. In recent years, there have been more magazines published for girls, young women, and people of all ages that advocate for girls and identify and provide strong critiq
ues of sexualization, objectification, and the economic and societal engines that fuel these practices. Some of these are cowritten with girls rather than written just about them.The goal in producing these magazines is to develop critiques and alternative ways for girls to relate to and celebrate their own and other female bodies, as well as to underscore that they are more than the sexualized objects that are projected in most media. Teen Voices, run by the nonprofit Women Express, is one such resource, and New Moon Magazine is another. Books such as Adios, Barbie: Young Women Write About Body and Identity (Edut, 1998) and Body Outlaws: Rewriting the Rules of Beauty (Edut, 2003) provide girls with information and alternative perspectives on their bodies and offer insights into how others have struggled with and overcome specific forms of sexualization and objectification. Independent films are also available that explore sexualization and objectification in the mainstream media (e.g., Dreamworlds, Killing Us Softly, Killing Us Softly 2 and 3, and The Strength to Resist) and in other contexts such as schooling, poverty, and pregnancy (e.g., Desire, Four Girls). Activism and Resistance Girls can and do work together in groups, publicly and visibly, to protest sexualization and to develop critical perspectives on how girls and women are sexualized. Several political and activist (feminist) movements and groups support young women as they express their feelings on these issues, develop critical perspectives, and participate Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 39 The Web has enormous potential to encourage girls to critique the culture, explore cultural messages, and develop agency. But the Web as a form of media must also be approached with a critical eye. in activities in the public sphere that lead to social change. Many of these movements are local (e.g., Hardy Girls Healthy Women and Mainely Girls in Maine), and some operate under the leadership of older girls and young women (e.g., the Center for Young Women’s Development in San Francisco). In addition to their work with local girls, many programs also make available (primarily through Web sites) descriptions of activities that other groups could implement (e.g., writing and staging plays, holding fairs, and developing innovative formats for girls and women to work together to implement specific social and political changes).The goals of these programs are typically to oppose objectification and sexualization, as well as to help girls identify and strengthen those characteristics that will result in less personal objectification and sexualization. One recent example of activism is the work of a group of 13- to 16-year-old girls who protested Abercrombie and Fitch (A&F) T-shirts printed with objectifying slogans such as,“Who needs a brain when you have these?”Working with the Women and Girls Foundation of Southwestern Pennsylvania, these girls began a “girlcott” of A&F that attracted national news attention;A&F eventually pulled these T-shirts from stores (“Racy T-Shirt Messages Drawing Girls’ Backlash,” 2005).Youth With Vision, a teen group in Kansas City, MI, conducted a study of slogans printed on T-shirts being sold in local stores (Uhlenhuth, 2006).They held a press conference to feature their “Wall of Shame”— examples of T-shirts that were demeaning and characterized girls as sluts and as bad—and a much smaller “Wall of Fame,” which showed the few examples of positive speech they had identified in their research.They were featured on the Today Show (May 11, 2006), where they talked about their activism and their desire for stores to provide better options. Several research studies have explored how girls of color are particularly effective in resisting mainstream notions of female sexuality, femininity, and beauty. Central to much of this research are feminist theories developed by and for women of color. For instance, Hill Collins (2000; see also Spillers, 1992) observed the significance of an oral tradition among Black women that allows women to be “bawdy, rowdy, and irreverent” and thus anchor resistance to oppressions including objectification and resistance. J. Ward (2002) researched the tradition of African American parents actively socializing their children to identify and resist racism. One strategy that J.Ward documented involves Black parents teaching children and teens to recognize the culture in which they live as being White culture and to critique it accordingly. Black women often reject Eurocentric ideals of beauty as culturally irrelevant and often feel better about their bodies than do White women (Duke, 2000; Milkie, 1999; Nichter, 2000).A study of nine 7th-grade Latinas revealed that although teachers perceived Puerto Rican girls in sexualized ways (e.g., as “hypersexual”) and as uninterested in education, the girls often resisted these labels and stereotypes (Rolón-Dow, 2004). For example, the girls resisted the notion that liking boys or dressing sexy was incompatible with being a good student.They did not tolerate sexual harassment, reporting it to school officials or resorting to punching boys themselves when it occurred. Similarly, Faulkner (2003) interviewed 30 Latina teens and women (18–36 years of age) and found that many rejected cultural imperatives for motherhood and virginity, were angry at sexism, the lack of sexuality information, and being labeled, and insisted on their right to be both religious and sexually active. Girl empowerment groups. There is a growing trend, both nationally and locally, of what are called “girl empowerment groups.”These groups are dedicated to supporting girls in a variety of ways: helping them to know what they want; teaching them how to make social changes, especially in their communities; building their leadership skills; and arranging for connections between girls and women mentors. Girl empowerment groups, such as GENaustin, Girls’ Empowerment Network, and Girlsforachange, can be found throughout the country. Several groups focus explicitly on how girls relate to physical competence and health. For example, GirlSports, a program of the Girl Scouts of America, allows girls access to and experience with an array of physical activities.The Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 40 expressed goals of the program include teaching girls to have fun playing sports; raising girls’ self-esteem and sense of competence and achievement; and encouraging girls to embrace physical fitness as a life-long practice. Opinions about what is necessary to empower girls can vary among the organizations and the individuals leading them. Some groups include programming or activities to encourage the development of girls’ critical thinking about the treatment of girls and women, including objectification and sexualization, but many groups have not incorporated this, choosing instead to focus on other dimensions (e.g., mentoring or the development of entrepreneurial skills). In addition, to work effectively with girls, the adult women leading these groups need to have confronted their own experience of sexualization, as well as other forms of oppression they have experienced (Taylor, Gilligan, & Sullivan, 1995). One counselor wrote that empowerment groups for African American girls must be led by African American women in order to help girls work through their legacy of struggle with multiple oppressions (Holcomb-McCoy, 2005). Summary of Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization Girls, boys, and those who support them can work through a number of venues to counteract the influence of a sexualizing culture. Schools are beginning to recognize the importance of media literacy.When media literacy programs teach girls to critique and understand the salience of sexualizing images in the media, the hope is that they will be better protected from these images. Comprehensive sex education can also address the issue of sexualizing media, culture, and peers and counter their influence by teaching girls
and boys the importance of autonomy and mutual respect in sexual relationships. Furthermore, schools that provide athletic and other extracurricular opportunities that help girls develop a more empowering view of their bodies may also protect girls from the influence of sexualization. Parents and other adults, through co-viewing and discussion, can help young minds think critically about what they see.They can also influence youth through spiritual or moral education programs. Many Internet magazines, alternative magazines for girls, books, and films developed by feminist and women’s organizations encourage girls to form their own alternative perspectives to the sexualizing influences in the culture. Girls of color have, in the past, shown a resistance to damaging mainstream images, and studying the roots of such resistance may lead to new practices and approaches for combating the effects of sexualization. Girls themselves can protest these sexualizing images just as the girls who protested A&F T-shirts did. Support for these kinds of efforts can come from girls’ groups, schools, families, religious institutions, and especially from girls themselves. Recommendations I. Research A solid research base has explored the effects of having an objectified body image or viewing objectified body images in the media. Much previous work, however, has focused on women. Future studies focusing on girls are needed. In addition, more culturally competent, focused work is required to document the phenomenon of the sexualization of girls; to explore the short- and long-term harm of viewing, listening to, and buying into a sexualized pathway to power; and to test alternative presentations of girlhood, sexuality, and power. We recommend that psychologists conduct research to: 1. Document the frequency of sexualization, specifically of girls, and examine whether sexualization is increasing. 2. Examine and inform our understanding of the circumstances under which the sexualization of girls occurs and identify factors involving the media and products that either contribute to or buffer against the sexualization of girls. 3. Examine the presence or absence of the sexualization of girls and women in all media but especially in movies, music videos, music lyrics, video games, books, blogs, and Internet sites. In particular, research is needed to examine the extent to which girls are portrayed in sexualized and objectified ways and whether this has increased over time. In addition, it is important that these Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 41 studies focus specifically on sexualization rather than on sexuality more broadly or on other constructs such as gender-role stereotyping. 4. Describe the influence and/or impact of sexualization on girls.This includes both short- and long-term effects of viewing or buying into a sexualizing objectifying image, how these effects influence girls’ development, self-esteem, friendships, and intimate relationships, ideas about femininity, body image, physical, mental, and sexual health, sexual satisfaction, desire for plastic surgery, risk factors for early pregnancy, abortion, and sexually transmitted infections, attitudes toward women, other girls, boys, and men, as well as educational aspirations and future career success. 5. Explore issues of age compression (“adultification” of young girls and “youthification” of adult women), including prevalence, impact on the emotional well-being of girls and women, and influences on behavior. 6. Explore differences in presentation of sexualized images and effects of these images on girls of color; lesbian, bisexual, questioning, and transgendered girls; girls of different cultures and ethnicities; girls of different religions; girls with disabilities; and girls from all socioeconomic groups. 7. Identify media (including advertising) and marketing alternatives to sexualized images of girls, such as positive depictions of sexuality. 8. Identify effective, culturally competent protective factors (e.g., helping adolescent girls develop a nonobjectified model of normal, healthy sexual development and expression through school or other programs). 9. Evaluate the effectiveness of programs and interventions that promote positive alternatives and approaches to the sexualization of girls. Particular attention should be given to programs and interventions at the individual, family, school, and/or community level. 10. Explore the relationship between the sexualization of girls and societal issues such as sexual abuse, child pornography, child prostitution, and the trafficking of girls. Research on the potential associations between the sexualization of girls and the sexual exploitation of girls is virtually nonexistent, and the need for this line of inquiry is pressing. 11. Investigate the relationships between international issues such as immigration and globalization and the sexualization of girls worldwide. Document the global prevalence of the sexualization of girls and the types of sexualization that occur in different countries or regions and any regional differences in the effects of sexualization.Assess the effects of sexualization on immigrant girls and determine whether these effects are moderated by country of origin, age at immigration, and level of acculturation. 12. Conduct controlled studies on the efficacy of working directly with girls and girls’ groups that address these issues, as well as other prevention/intervention programs. 13. Researchers who are conducting studies on related topics (e.g., physical attractiveness, body awareness, or acceptance of the thin ideal) should consider the impact of sexualization as they develop their findings. II. Practice As practitioners, psychologists can perform a valuable service by raising awareness of the negative impact of the sexualization of girls—on girls, as well as on boys, women, and men. As individuals and in collaboration with others, practitioners are encouraged to address the sexualization of girls. We recommend: 1.That APA make the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls available to practitioners working with children and adolescents in order to familiarize them with information and resources relevant to the sexualization of girls and objectifying behavior on the part of girls. 2.That APA make the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls available to practitioners as a source of information on assisting girls in developing the skills necessary to advocate for themselves and counter these adverse messages, taking into account the impact and influence of family and other relationships. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 42 III. Education and Training Education and training focusing on the prevalence and impact of the sexualization of girls are needed at all levels of psychology to raise awareness within the discipline of psychology and among psychologists about these important issues.We recommend: 1.That APA disseminate information about the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls to instructors at the middle-school, high-school, and undergraduate levels and to chairs of graduate departments of psychology. 2.That information from the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls be considered for inclusion in future revisions of the National Standards for High School Psychology Curricula and Guidelines on the Undergraduate Psychology Major by the groups charged with revising these documents. 3.That chairs of graduate departments of psychology and of graduate departments in other areas in which psychologists work be encouraged to consider information from the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls as curricula are developed within their programs and to aid in the dissemination of the report. 4.That information from the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls be considered for development as continuing education and online academy programming, in partnership with APA’s Continuing Education in Psychology Office. 5.That the Ethics Committee and APA Ethics Office consider and
use this report in developing ethics educational and training materials for psychologists and make this report available to the group responsible for the next revision of the APA “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.” IV. Public Policy APA, in collaboration with other organizations and through its advocacy efforts, is encouraged to advocate for and better support understanding of the nature and impact of the sexualization of girls, as well as identification and broad implementation of strategies to combat this serious societal problem.We recommend: 1.That APA advocate for funding to support needed research in the areas outlined above. 2.That APA advocate for funding to support the development and implementation by public agencies and private organizations of media literacy programs, including interactive media, in schools that combat sexualization and objectification. 3.That APA advocate for the inclusion of information about sexualization and objectification in health and other related programs, including comprehensive sex education and other sexuality education programs. 4.That APA encourage federal agencies to support the development of programming that may counteract damaging images of girlhood and test the effects of such programs—for example,Web “zines” (i.e.,Web magazines), extracurricular activities (such as athletics), and programs that help girls feel powerful in ways other than through a sexy appearance. 5.That APA work with Congress and relevant federal agencies and industry to reduce the use of sexualized images of girls in all forms of media and products. V. Public Awareness The task force offers the following recommendations with the goal of raising public awareness about this important issue. Achieving this goal will require a comprehensive, grassroots, communitywide effort. Participants and stakeholders will include parents and other caregivers, educators, young people, community-based organizations, religious communities, the media, advertisers, marketing professionals, and manufacturers. Overarching strategies will be needed to build linkages and partnerships among the community members. If the goal of raising public awareness is left unmet, the mission of this work will be significantly curtailed.We recommend: 1.That APA seek outside funding to support the development and implementation of an initiative to address the issues raised in this report and identify outside partners to collaborate on these goals.The long-term goals of this initiative, to be pursued in collaboration with these outside partners, should include the following: Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 43 l Develop age-appropriate multimedia education resources representing ethnically and culturally diverse young people (boys and girls) for parents, educators, health care providers, and community-based organizations, available in English and other languages, to help facilitate effective conversations about the sexualization of girls and its impact on girls, as well as on boys, women, and men. l Convene forums that will bring together members of the media and a panel of leading experts in the field to examine and discuss (a) the sexualization of girls in the United States, (b) the findings of this task force report, and (c) strategies to increase awareness about this issue and reduce negative images of girls in the media. l Develop media awards for positive portrayals of girls as strong, competent, and nonsexualized (e.g., the best television portrayal of girls or the best toy). l Convene forums with industry partners, including the media, advertisers, marketing professionals, and manufacturers, to discuss the presentation of sexualized images and the potential negative impact on girls and to develop relationships with the goal of providing guidance on appropriate material for varying developmental ages and on storylines and programming that reflect the positive portrayals of girls. 2.That school personnel, parents and other caregivers, community-based youth and parenting organizations, and local business and service organizations encourage positive extracurricular activities that help youth build nurturing connections with peers and enhance self-esteem based on young people’s abilities and character rather than on their appearance. References Abbey,A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838. Abbey,A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest:A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194. Abernathy,T. J.,Webster, G., & Vermeulen, M. (2002). Relationship between poverty and health among adolescents. Adolescence, 37, 55-67. Abramson, E., & Valene, P. (1991). Media use, dietary restraint, bulimia, and attitudes toward obesity:A preliminary study. British Review of Bulimia and Anorexia Nervosa, 5, 73-76. Ackard, D., Kearney-Cooke,A., & Peterson, C. (2000). Effect of body image and self-image on women’s sexual behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 422-429. Ackman, D. (2006, February 25). Not child’s play:Winning in the toy game is serious business. The Wall Street Journal, p. 12. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from www.proquest.umi.com Adelson, J. (1980). Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York:Wiley. Adler, P.A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169-187. Akima,A. (2003). Gender stereotypes in Japanese television advertisements. Sex Roles, 49(1/2), 81-90. Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995).A metaanalysis summarizing the effects of pornography: II. Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22, 258-283. Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Emmers-Sommer,T. M. (2000). Reactions of criminal sexual offenders to pornography:A meta-analytic summary. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 22 (pp. 139-169).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 44 Allen, M., Emmers,T. M., Gebhardt, L., & Giery, M. (1995). Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of Communication, 45, 5-26. Amateur Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles. (2001). Children and sport media. Los Angeles:Author. American Association of University Women. (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. Washington, DC:American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED454132.pdf American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2006a). 2005 cosmetic surgery age distributions 18 or younger. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from www.plasticsurgery.org/public_education/ loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/ getfile.cfm&PageID=17849 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2006b). 2006 cosmetic surgery age distribution: 19-34 and 35-50. Retrieved September 8, 2006, from www.plasticsurgery.org/ public_education/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/ getfile.cfm&PageID=17850 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2006c). 2000, 2004, 2005 national plastic surgery statistics: Cosmetic and reconstructive procedure trends. Retrieved September 8, 2006, from http://www.plasticsurgery.org/public_education/loader.cf m?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=17870 America’s next top model. (2007, January 5). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved January 5, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America%27s_Next_Top_ Model#About_The_Show on August 1, 2006 Andrews, B. (1995). Bodily shame as a mediator between abusive experiences and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 277-285. Andsager, J. L., & Roe, K. (1999). Country music video in country’s year of the woman. Journal of Communication, 49, 69-82. Andsager, J., & Roe, K. (2003).“What’s your definition of dirty, baby?”: Sex in music videos. Sexuality & Culture:An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 7(3), 79-97. Angelone, D. J., Hirschman, R., Suniga, S.,Armey, M., &am
p; Armelie,A. (2005).The influence of peer interactions on sexually oriented joke telling. Sex Roles, 52, 187-199. Arber, S., & Ginn, J. (1991). Gender and later life:A sociological analysis of resources and constraints. London: Sage. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood:A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480. Arnett, J. J. (2002).The sounds of sex: Sex in teens’ music and music videos. In J. Brown, K.Walsh-Childers, & J. Steele (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media (pp. 253-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Atkin, C. (1982).Television advertising and socialization of consumer roles. In D. Pearl (Ed.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (pp. 191-200). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. Austin, E.W., & Johnson, K. K. (1997). Effects of general and alcohol-specific media literacy training on children’s decision making about alcohol. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 17-42. Bachen, C. M., & Illouz, E. (1996). Imagining romance: Young people’s cultural models of romance and love. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 13, 279-308. Baker, C. N. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements:A content analysis of Black- and White-oriented women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 13-27. Bamboo Girl. (2006). [Web site manifesto]. Retrieved September 3, 2006, from www.bamboogirl.com/about/index.html Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald,A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 45 Bandura,A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bandura,A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects:Advances in theory and research (pp. 61-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Banyard,V. L., & Williams, L. M. (1996). Characteristics of child sexual abuse as correlates of women’s adjustment: A prospective study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 853-865. Baran, S. J. (1976). Sex on TV and adolescent self-image. Journal of Broadcasting, 20, 61-68. Bargh, J.A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925-945. Barnberg, M. (2004). Form and functions of “slut bashing” in male identity construction in 15-year-olds. Human Development, 47, 331-353. Baron,A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006).The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 53-58. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge. Bazzini, D. G., McIntosh,W. D., Smith, S. M., Cook, S., & Harris, C. (1997).The aging women in popular film: Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent. Sex Roles, 36, 531-553. Beasley, B., & Standley,T. C. (2002). Shirts vs. skins: Clothing as an indicator of gender stereotyping in video games. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 279-293. Becker,A. (2004).Television, disordered eating, and young women in Fiji: Negotiating body image and identity during rapid social change. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 28, 533-559. Behling, D. (1994). School uniforms and person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 723-729. Bem, S. L. (1985).Androgeny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 32. Psychology and gender (pp. 59–95). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Bissell, K. L. (2004). Sports model/sports mind:The relationship between entertainment and sports media exposure, sports participation, and body image distortion in Division I female athletes. Mass Communication, 47, 453-473. Bloom,A. (2004, September). Sex and the 6-year-old girl. O,The Oprah Magazine, pp. 209-210. Bonhauser, M., Fernandez, G., Püschel, K.,Yañez, F., Montero, J.,Thompson, B., & Coronado, G. (2005). Improving physical fitness and emotional well-being in adolescents of low socioeconomic status in Chile: Results of a school-based controlled trial. Health Promotion International, 20, 113-122. Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Robinson T. N. (1999).Viewing the viewers: 10 video case studies of children’s television viewing behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 506-528. Botta, R.A. (2000).The mirror of television:A comparison of Black and White adolescents’ body image. Journal of Communication, 50, 144-159. Botta, R.A. (2003). For your health? The relationship between magazine reading and adolescents’ body image and eating disturbances. Sex Roles, 48, 389-399. Boyer, D., Chapman, L., & Marshall, B. K. (1993). Survival sex in King County: Helping women out [Report to the King County Women’s Advisory Board]. Seattle,WA: Northwest Resource Associates. Briere, J., & Conte, J. (1993). Self-reported amnesia for abuse in adults molested as children. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 21-31. Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1987). Post sexual abuse trauma: Data and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 457-467. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 46 Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1988). Symptomatology associated with childhood sexual victimization in a nonclinical adult sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 51-59. Brooks, G. (1995). The centerfold syndrome: How men can overcome objectification and achieve intimacy with women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Brooks, R. (2006,August 25). No escaping sexualization of young girls. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0825-33.htm Brotto, L., Heiman, J., & Tolman, D. (2009). Narratives of desire in mid-age women with and without arousal difficulties. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 387-398. Brown, L. M. (1991).Telling a girl’s life: Self-authorization as a form of resistance. In C. Gilligan,A. G. Rogers, & D. L. Tolman (Eds.), Women, girls, and psychotherapy: Reframing resistance (pp. 71-86). New York: Harrington Park Press. Brown, L. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York: New York University Press. Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads:Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Brown, L. M., & Lamb, S. (2005, December 21). Selling an ideal of lipstick and lace. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/ articles/2005/12/21/selling_an_ideal_of_lipstick_and_lace/ Browne,A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse:A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66-77. Brumberg, J. J. (1997).The Body Project:An intimate history of American girls. New York:Vintage. Bryant-Davis,T. (2005). Coping strategies of African American adult survivors of childhood violence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 409-414. Burn, S. M., & Ward,A. Z. (2005). Men’s conformity to traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 254-263. Busby, L. J., & Leichty, G. (1993). Feminism and advertising in traditional and nontraditional women’s magazines 1950s1980s. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 247-264. Bushman, B. J. (2005).Violence and sex in television programs do not sell products in advertisements. Psychological Science, 16, 702-708. Bussey, K., & Bandura,A. (1984). Influence of gender constancy and social power on sex-linked modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1292-1302. Bussey, K., & Bandura,A. (1992). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing gender development. Child Development, 63, 1236-1250. Bussey, K., & Bandura,A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713. Buying into sexy:The sexing up of teens. (2005, January 9). [Broadcast by the Canadian Br
oadcasting Company]. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/ pre-2007/files/money/sexy/ Camp, D. E., Klesges, R. C., & Relyea, G. (1993).The relationship between body weight concerns and adolescent smoking. Health Psychology, 12, 24-32. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974-1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158-168. Casparian, E. M. (2000). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for Grades 4-6. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church. Chaplin, H. (1999,August). Smell my Candie’s. American Demographics, 21, 64-65. Christenson, P. G., & Roberts, D. F. (1998). It’s not only rock & roll: Popular music in the lives of adolescents. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Classen, C. C., Palesh, O. G., & Aggarwal, R. (2005). Sexual revictimization:A review of the empirical literature. Trauma,Violence, and Abuse, 6, 103-129. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 47 Collins, R. L., Elliott, M., Berry, S., Kanouse, D. E., & Hunter, S. (2003). Entertainment television as a healthy sex-educator:The impact of condom-efficacy information in an episode of “Friends.” Pediatrics, 112, 1115-1121. Collins,W. A., & Sroufe, L.A. (1999). Capacity for intimate relationships:A developmental construction. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.),The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 125-147). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Colman, R.A., & Widom, C. S. (2004). Childhood abuse and neglect and adult intimate relationships:A prospective study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 1133-1151. Connell, R.W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Cook, D.T., & Kaiser, S. B. (2004). Betwixt and between: Age ambiguity and the sexualization of the female consuming subject. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4, 203-227. Cookson, S. (Writer, Director). (2001). Living dolls:The making of a child beauty queen. In L. Otto (Producer), American undercover [HBO documentary]. New York: Home Box Office. Corder, J., & Stephan, C.W. (1984). Females’ combination of work and family roles:Adolescents’ aspirations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 391-402. Coyne-Beasley,T., & Schoenbach,V. J. (2000).The African-American church:A potential forum for adolescent comprehensive sexuality education. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 289-294. Crews, D., Lochbaum, M. R., & Landers, D. M. (2004). Aerobic physical activity effects on psychological well-being in low-income Hispanic children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 319-324. Cunningham,W.A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170. Dalton, P. (2005, November 20).What’s wrong with this outfit, Mom? The Washington Post, p. B01. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from www.washingtonpost.com Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658. Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald,A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814. Daubenmier, J. J. (2005).The relationship of yoga, body awareness, and body responsiveness to self-objectification and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 207-219. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. . Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287. Davis, M. H., & Oathout, H.A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 397-410. Dean, K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 449-455. DeSmedt, L. (2006). The Barbie case. Retrieved from http://www.awpagesociety.com/site/resources/2006_ winning_case_studies Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 48 DiBartolo, P. M., & Shaffer, C. (2002).A comparison of female college athletes and nonathletes: Eating disorder symptomatology and psychological well-being. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 33-41. Dietz,T. L. (1998).An examination of violence and gender role portrayals in video games: Implications for gender socialization and aggressive behavior. Sex Roles, 38, 425-442. Dill, K. E., Gentile, D.A., Richter,W.A., & Dill, J. C. (2005).Violence, sex, race, and age in popular video games:A content analysis. In E. Cole & J. Henderson Daniel (Eds.), Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 115-130).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Dittmar, H., & Howard, S. (2004).Thin-ideal internalization and social comparison tendency as moderators of media models’ impact on women’s body-focused anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 768-791. Dolliver, M. (1999, March 15). Is there too much sexual imagery in advertising? Adweek, pp. 21, 22. Dowling, C. (2000).The frailty myth:Women approaching physical equality. New York: Random House. Duffy, J.,Wareham, S., & Walsh, M. (2004). Psychological consequences for high school students of having been sexually harassed. Sex Roles, 50, 811-821. Duffy, M., & Gotcher, J. M. (1996). Crucial advice on how to get the guy:The rhetorical vision of power and seduction in the teen magazine YM. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 20, 32-48. Duke, L. (2000). Black in a blonde world: Race and girls’ interpretations of the feminine ideal in teen magazines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 367-392. Duncan, C., & Loretto,W. (2004). Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment. Gender,Work, and Organization, 11, 95-115. Duncan, M. C., Messner, M.A., & Williams, L. (1991). Coverage of women’s sports in four daily newspapers. Los Angeles:Amateur Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles. Durham, M. (1998). Dilemmas of desire: Representations of adolescent sexuality in two teen magazines.Youth and Society, 29, 369-389. Durkin, S. J., & Paxton, S. J. (2002). Predictors of vulnerability to reduced body image satisfaction and psychological well-being in response to exposure to idealized female media images in adolescent girls. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 995-1005. Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1990). Introduction. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 1-10). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Eaton, C. (1997). Prime-time stereotyping on the new television networks. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 859-872. Eccles, J. S. (1985).Why doesn’t Jane run? Sex differences in educational and occupational patterns. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 251-295).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Eder, D. (with C. C. Evans & S. Parker). (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Edut, O. (Ed.) (1998). Adios, Barbie:Young women write about body and identity. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press. Edut, O. (Ed.). (2003). Body outlaws: Rewriting the rules of beauty and body image. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press. Eichenwald, K. (2005, December 19).Through his Webcam, a boy joins a sordid online world.The New York Times, p.A1. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/19/national/ 19kids.ready.html Elliott, D. M. (1997).Traumati
c events: Prevalence and delayed recall in the general population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 811-820. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 49 Ellison, C. R. (2000). Women’s sexualities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger. English, B. (2005, May 12).The secret life of boys: Pornography is a mouse click away, and kids are being exposed to it in ever-increasing numbers. The Boston Globe, p. D1. Retrieved from http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/ 2005/05/12/the_secret_life_of_boys/ Entertainment Software Rating Board. (n.d.). Game ratings and descriptor guide. Retrieved from www.esrb.org/ratings/ ratings_guide.jsp Estes, R. J., & Weiner, N.A. (2001). The commercial sexual exploitation of children in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, School of Social Work. Retrieved from http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/ restes/CSEC.htm Etnier, J. L., Salazar,W., Landers, D. M., Petruzzello, S. J., Han, M., & Nowell, P. (1997).The influence of physical fitness and exercise upon cognitive functioning:A meta analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 249-277. Faith, M. S., & Schare, M. D. (1993).The role of body image in sexually avoidant behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 345-356. Faley, R. H., Knapp, D. E., Kustis, G.A., & Dubois, C. L. (1999). Estimating the organizational costs of sexual harassment:The case of the U.S.Army. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 461-484. Faulkner, S. L. (2003). Good girl or flirt girl: Latinas’ definitions of sex and sexual relationships. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 174-200. Fink, J .S., & Kensicki, L. J. (2002).An imperceptible difference:Visual and textual constructions of femininity in Sports Illustrated and Sports Illustrated for Women. Mass Communication & Society, 5, 317-339. Fosseen, L.L. (2002). School uniforms and sense of school as a community: Perceptions of belonging, safety, and caring relationships in urban middle school settings. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(2-B), 1087. Frable, D. E. S., Johnson,A. E., & Kellman, H. (1997). Seeing masculine men, sexy women, and gender differences: Exposure to pornography and cognitive constructions of gender. Journal of Personality, 65, 311-355. Fredrickson, B. L., & Harrison, K. (2005).Throwing like a girl: Self-objectification predicts adolescent girls’ motor performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29, 79-101. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts,T-A. (1997). Objectification theory:Toward understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts,T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998).That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269-284. Friedrich,W. N., Fisher, J. L., Ditner, C.A.,Acton, R., Berliner, L., & Butler, J. (2001). Child Sexual Behavior Inventory: Normative, psychiatric, and sexual abuse comparisons. Child Maltreatment, 6, 37-49. Frisby, C. M. (2004). Does race matter? Effects of idealized images on African American women’s perceptions of body esteem. Journal of Black Studies, 34, 323-347. Fullerton, J.A., & Kendrick,A. (2000). Portrayals of men and women in U. S. Spanish-language television commercials. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 128-139. Gan, S., Zillmann, D., & Mitrook, M. (1997). Stereotyping effect of Black women’s sexual rap on White audiences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 381-399. Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and “fat talk”: Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377-388. Garner,A., Sterk, H. M., & Adams, S. (1998). Narrative analysis of sexual etiquette in teenage magazines. Journal of Communication, 48, 59-78. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 50 Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television:The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects:Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389-395. Goldfarb, E. (2000). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for Grades 10-12. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church. Goldiner, D. (2006, May 25). Parents KO dolls: Hasbro axes dirty dancer toys for girls. The New York Daily News, p. 8. Retrieved from http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/ news/2006/05/25/2006-05-25_parents_ko_dolls__ hasbro_axe.html Gordon, M. (2004). Media images of women and African American girls’ sense of self. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Gottfredson, D. C. (1981). Personality and persistence in education:A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 532-545. Gow, J. (1990).The relationship between violent and sexual images and the popularity of music videos. Popular Music and Society, 14, 1-9. Gow, J. (1996). Reconsidering gender roles on MTV: Depictions in the most popular music videos of the early 1990s. Communication Reports, 9, 151-161. Grabe, S.,Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008).The role of the media in body image concerns among women:A metaanalysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476. Graham, C.A., Sanders, S.A., Milhausen, R., & McBride, K. (2004).Turning on and turning off:A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 537-548. Grauerholz, E., & King,A. (1997). Primetime sexual harassment. Violence Against Women, 3, 129-148. Greenberg, B. S., Siemicki, M., Dorfman, S., Heeter, C., Stanley, C., Soderman,A., & Linsangan, R. (1993). Sex content in R-rated films viewed by adolescents. In B. S. Greenberg, J. D. Brown, & N. Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.), Media, sex, and the adolescent (pp. 45-58). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Greenberg, J. (2001).The ambiguity of seduction in the development of Freud’s thinking. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 37, 417-426. Greene, B. (2000).African American lesbian and bisexual women. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 239-250. Greenwald,A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition:Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102, 4–27. Greeson, L. E., & Williams, R.A. (1986). Social implications of music videos for youth:An analysis of the contents and effects of MTV. Youth and Society, 18, 177-189. Griffiths, M. (2000). Excessive internet use: Implications for sexual behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 537-552. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002).The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction:A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1-16. Grotevant, H. D., & Thorbecke,W. D. (1982). Sex differences in styles of occupational identity information in late adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 18, 396-405. Gruber, J. J. (1986). Physical activity and self-esteem development in children:A meta-analysis. In G.A. Stull & H. M. Echert (Eds.), Effects of physical activity on children (American Academy of Physical Education Papers, No. 19, pp. 30-48). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Haaken, J., & Lamb, S. (2000).The politics of child sexual abuse. Society, 37, 7-14. Halliwell, E., & Dittmar, H. (2004). Does size matter? The impact of model’s body size on advertising effectiveness and women’s body-focused anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 104-122. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 51 Haninger, K., & Thompson, K. M. (2004). Content and ratings of teen-rated video games. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 856-865. Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). How rock music videos can change what is seen when boy meets girl: Priming s
tereotypic appraisal of social interactions. Sex Roles, 19, 287-316. Hare-Mustin, R.T., & Marecek, J. (1988).The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist, 43, 455-464. Hargreaves, D.A., & Tiggemann, M. (2004). Idealized media images and adolescent body image:“Comparing” boys and girls. Body Image, 1, 351-361. Harrell, Z.A. (2002).Trait self-objectification in college women’s mental health:An examination of smokers and never-smokers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(2-B), 1079. Harrison, K. (2000).The body electric:Thin-ideal media and eating disorders in adolescents. Journal of Communication, 50, 119-143. Harrison, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2003).Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53, 216-232. Harter, S. (1998).The development of self-representations. In W. Damon (Series Editor) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 553-617). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley. Hawkins, N., Richards, P. S., & Granley, H., & Stein, D. M. (2004).The impact of exposure to the thin-ideal media images on women. Eating Disorders:The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 12, 35-50. Haynes, M. (2005, November 3). Bawdy T-shirts set off “girlcott” by teens. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from www.postgazette.com/pg/05307/599884.stm Hebl, M. R., King, E. G., & Lin, J. (2004).The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322-1331. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery:The aftermath of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books. Hill,A.,Weaver, C., & Blundell, J. (1990). Dieting concerns of 10-year-old-girls and their mothers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 346-348. Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge. Hill Collins, P. (2004). Black sexual politics:African-Americans, gender and the new racism. New York: Routledge. Hoagwood, K. (1990). Blame and adjustment among women sexually abused as children. Women and Therapy, 9, 89-110. Hofschire, L. J., & Greenberg, B. S. (2001). Media’s impact on adolescents’ body dissatisfaction. In J. D. Brown & J. R. Steele (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media (pp. 125-149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Holcomb-McCoy, C. (2005). Empowerment of African American girls:A response. Professional School Counseling, 8, 390-391. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (2004).The male in the head:Young people, heterosexuality and power (2nd ed.). London:Tufnell Press. Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1992).A longitudinal examination of life choices of gifted and talented young women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 207-212. Holmstrom,A. J. (2004).The effects of the media on body image:A meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 196-217. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 52 Horovitz, B. (1993, February 16).Throwing in a towel: Hyundai agrees to boycott Sports Illustrated’s swimsuit issue. Los Angeles Times, p. D1. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/1993-02-16/business/fi-161_1_ swimsuit-issue Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes:A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-462. Houston, S., & Hwang, N. (1996). Correlates of the objective and subjective experience of sexual harassment in high school. Sex Roles, 34, 189-205. Hurlbert, D. F., & Whittaker, K. E. (1991).The role of masturbation in marital and sexual satisfaction:A comparative study of female masturbators and nonmasturbators. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 17, 272–282. Hurtado,A. (2003). Negotiating the color line. In A. Hurtado (Ed.),Voicing Chicana feminisms:Young women speak out on sexuality and identity (pp. 176-197). New York: New York University Press. Huston,A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1998). Mass media and children’s development. In W. Damon, I. E. Sigel, & K.A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:Vol 4. Child psychology in practice (pp. 999-1058). New York:Wiley. Impett, E.A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006).To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 129–142. Irving, L., & Berel, S. R. (2001). Comparison of media-literacy programs to strengthen college women’s resistance to media images. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 103-112. Irving, L. M., DuPen, J., & Berel, S. (1998).A media literacy program for high school females. Eating Disorders:The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 6, 119-132. Jansma, L. L., Linz, D. G., Mulac,A., & Imrich, D. J. (1997). Men’s interactions with women after viewing sexually explicit films: Does degradation make a difference? Communication Monographs, 63, 1-24. Jensen, R., & Dines, G. (2004). Pornography in a pornographic culture: Eroticizing domination and subordination. In R.A. Lind (Ed.), Race/gender/media: Considering diversity across audiences, content, and producers (pp. 274-281). Boston: Pearson Education. Johnson, J. D.,Adams, M. S.,Ashburn, L., & Reed,W. (1995). Differential gender effects of exposure to rap music on African American adolescents’ acceptance of teen dating violence. Sex Roles, 33, 597–605. Jordan, J.V., Kaplan,A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (1991). Women’s growth in connection:Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press. Juvonen, J., Nishina,A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349-359. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2001, December). Generation Rx.com: How young people use the internet for health information. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from www.kff.org/entmedia/20011211a-index.cfm Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003, October 28). New study finds children age zero to six spend as much time with TV, computers and video games as playing outside [Press release]. Retrieved from www.kff.org/entmedia/ entmedia102803nr.cfm Kalof, L. (1999).The effects of gender and music video imagery on sexual attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 378-385. Kane, M. J. (1996). Media coverage of the post Title-IX female athlete:A feminist analysis of sport, gender, and power. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Public Policy, 3, 95-127. Kane, M. J., & Greendorfer, S. L. (1994).The media’s role in accommodating and resisting stereotyped images of women in sport. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women, media and sport (pp. 28-44).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 53 Kang, M-E. (1997).The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37, 979-996. Kelly, J., & Smith, S. L. (2006). Where the girls aren’t: Gender disparity saturates G-rated films [Research brief]. Retrieved from http://www.learcenter.org/images/event_uploads/ where.the.girls.arent%5B1%5D.pdf Kendall-Tackett, K.A.,Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children:A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164-180. Kenrick, D.T., & Guttieres, S. E., (1980). Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness:When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 131-140. Kerr, B.A. (1983). Raising the career aspirations of gifted girls. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 32, 37-43. Kerr, B.A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women: Special guidance concerns. Roeper Review, 8, 30-33. Kilbourne, J. (1999). Deadly persuasion:Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York: Free Press. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America. Ne
w York:The Free Press. Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (1999). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York: Ballantine Books. Kirby, D. (2001). Emerging answers: Research findings on programs designed to prevent teen pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Kornblum, J. (2005, January 8).Adults question MySpace’s safety. USA Today. Retrieved from www.usatoday.com/ tech/news/2006-01-08-myspace-sidebar_x.htm Kosicki, G. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agendasetting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100-127 Krassas, N., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2001). Boxing Helena and corseting Eunice: Sexual rhetoric in Cosmopolitan and Playboy magazines. Sex Roles, 44, 751-771. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). “Master your Johnson”: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality & Culture, 7, 98-119. Kunkel, D., & Roberts, D. (1991).Young minds and marketplace values: Issues in children’s television advertising. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 57-72. Labre, M. P., & Walsh-Childers, K. (2003).Advice? Beauty messages in web sites of teen magazines. Mass Communication & Society, 6, 379-396. Lacroix, C. (2004). Images of animated others: The Orientalization of Disney’s cartoon heroines from the Little Mermaid to the Hunchback of Notre Dame. Popular Communication, 2, 213-229. La Ferla, R. (2003, October 26). Underdressed and hot: Dolls moms don’t love. The New York Times, Section 9, p. 1. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/ fashion/26DOLL.html Lamb, S. (1996). The trouble with blame:Victims, perpetrators and responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108-138). New York: New York University Press. Lamb, S. (2002). The secret lives of girls:What good girls really do—Sex play, aggression, and their guilt. New York: Free Press. Lamb, S. (2006). Sex, therapy, and kids:Addressing their concerns through talk and play. New York: Norton. Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers’ schemes. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 54 Lambiase, J. (2003). Sex—Online and in Internet advertising. In T. Reichert & J. Lambiase (Eds), Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal (pp. 247-269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Lampman, C., Rolfe-Maloney, B., David, E. J.,Yan, M., McCermott, N.,Winters, S., et al. (2002, Fall). Messages about sex in the workplace:A content analysis of primetime television. Sexuality & Culture, 6, 3-21. Lang,A.,Wise, K., Lee, S., & Cai, X. (2003).The effects of sexual appeals on physiological, cognitive, emotional, and attitudinal responses for product and alcohol billboard advertising. In J. Lambiase & T. Reichert (Eds.), Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal (pp. 107-132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32, 639-649. Laumann, E., Gagnon, J., Michael, R., & Michaels, D. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1049-1058. Leeds Metropolitan University. (2005). Defining disability— Medical model. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from www.lmu.ac.uk/metoffice/stuserv/disability/ models_medical.htm Lehman, S. J., & Koerner, S. S. (2004).Adolescent women’s sports involvement and sexual behavior/health: A process-level investigation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 443-455. Lenhart,A., Lewis, O., & Rainie, L. (2001). Teenage life online. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2001/Teenage-Life-Online.aspx Lenhart,A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005, July 27). Teens and technology:Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/ 2005/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf.pdf Leserman, J. (2005). Sexual abuse history: Prevalence, health effects, mediators, and psychological treatment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 906-915. Letourneau, E. J., Schoenwald, S. K., & Sheidow,A. J. (2004). Children and adolescents with sexual behavior problems. Child Maltreatment, 9, 49-61. Levin, D. E. (2005). So sexy, so soon:The sexualization of childhood. In S. Olfman (Ed.), Childhood lost: How American culture is failing our kids (pp. 137-153).Westport, CT: Praeger Press. Levine, M. P., Smolak, L., & Hayden, H. (1994).The relation of sociocultural factors to eating attitudes and behaviors among middle school girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 471-490. Levine, M. P., Smolak, L., Moodey,A., Shuman, M., & Hessen, L. (1994). Normative developmental challenges and dieting and eating disturbance in middle school girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 15, 11-20. Levy,A. (2005a). Female chauvinist pigs:Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press. Levy,A. (2005b, September 18). Raunchiness is powerful? C’mon, girls.The Washington Post, p. B05. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ article/2005/09/17/AR2005091700044.html Lewis, M. (2000). Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 623-636). New York: Guilford Press. Limbert,W. M., & Bullock, H. E. (2005).“Playing the fool:” U.S. welfare policy from a critical race perspective. Feminism and Psychology, 15, 253-274. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 55 Lin, C. (1997). Beefcake versus cheesecake in the 1990s: Sexist portrayals of both genders in television commercials. Howard Journal of Communications, 8, 237-249. Lin, C. (1998). Use of sex appeals in prime-time television commercials. Sex Roles, 38, 461-475. Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742. Lindner, K. (2004). Images of women in general interest and fashion advertisements from 1955 to 2002. Sex Roles, 51, 409-421. Linn, S. (2004). Consuming kids:The hostile takeover of childhood. New York:The New Press. Linn, S. (2005).The commercialization of childhood. In S. Olfman (Ed.), Childhood lost: How American culture is failing our kids (pp. 107-121).Westport, CT: Praeger Press. Linver, M., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2002,April). Influences of gender on academic achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, New Orleans, LA. Lips, H. (1989). Gender role socialization: Lessons in femininity. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women:A feminist perspective (pp. 197-216). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield. Long, E. C. J., & Andrews, D.W. (1990). Perspective taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 126-131. Lucas,A. R., Beard, C. M., O’Fallon,W. M., & Kurland, L. T. (1991). 50-year trends in the incidence of anorexia nervosa in Rochester, Minn.:A population-based study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 917-922. MacKay, N. L., & Covell, K. (1997).The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 36, 573-583. Major, B., Barr, L., & Zubek, J. (1999). Gender and selfesteem:A meta-analysis. In W. Swann, J. H. Langlois, & L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society:The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 223-253). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Makkar, J. K., & Strube, M. J. (1995). Black women’s selfperceptions of attra
ctiveness following exposure to white versus black beauty standards:The moderating role of racial identity and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1547-1566. Malamuth, N. M.,Addison,T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression:Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26-91. Martin, K.A. (1998). Becoming a gendered body: Practices in preschools. American Sociological Review, 63, 494-511. Martino, S. M., Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Strachman,A., Kanouse, D. E., & Berry, S. H. (2006). Exposure to degrading and nondegrading music lyrics and sexual behavior among youth. Pediatrics, 118, 430-441. McAuley, E. (1994). Physical activity and psychosocial outcomes. In C. Bouchard, R. J. Shephard, & T. Stephens (Eds.), Physical activity, fitness and health (pp. 551-568). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers. McConnell, C. (2001).An object to herself:The relationship between girls and their bodies. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(8B), p. 4416. McHale, S. M., Crouter,A. C., & Tucker, C. J. (1999). Family context and gender role socialization in middle childhood: Comparing girls to boys and sisters to brothers. Child Development, 70, 990-1004. McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. (1990).Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender schematic) male who has viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 296-308. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 56 McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem:The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113-123. McKinley, N. M. (1999).Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experiences in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760-769. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996).The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215. McMahon, K. (1990).The Cosmopolitan ideology and the management of desire. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 381-396. Menkes, S. (1994, March 27). Runways: Robbing the cradle. The New York Times, p.A1. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/27/style/runwaysrobbing-the-cradle.html Merskin, D. (2004). Reviving Lolita? A media literacy examination of sexual portrayals of girls in fashion advertising. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 119-129. Merten, D. E. (2004). Securing her experience: Friendship versus popularity. Feminism and Psychology, 14, 361-365. Messner, M.A., Duncan, M. C., & Cooky, C. (2003). Silence, sports bras, and wrestling porn. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 27, 38-51. Messner, M.A., Duncan, M. C., & Jensen, K. (1993). Separating the men from the girls:The gendered language of televised sports. In D. S. Eitzen (Ed.), Sport in contemporary society:An anthology (pp. 219-233). New York: St. Martin’s Press. Milburn, M., Mather, R., & Conrad, S. (2000).The effects of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 43, 645-664. Milkie, M.A. (1999). Social comparisons, reflected appraisals, and mass media:The impact of pervasive beauty images on black and white girls’ self-concepts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 190-210. Miller, K. E., Barnes, G. M., Melnick, M. J., Sabo, D. F., & Farrell, M. P. (2002). Gender and racial/ethnic differences in predicting adolescent sexual risk:Athletic participation versus exercise. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 436-450. Mills, J., Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). Effects of exposure to thin media images: Evidence of selfenhancement among restrained eaters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1687-1699. Molnar, B. E., Buka, S. L., & Kessler, R. C. (2001). Child sexual abuse and subsequent psychopathology: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 753-760. Monro, F., & Huon, G. (2005). Media-portrayed idealized images, body shame, and appearance anxiety. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 85-90. Montemurro, B. (2003). Not a laughing matter: Sexual harassment as “material” on workplace-based situation comedies. Sex Roles, 48, 433-445. More teens opt for plastic surgery. (2000,August 30). Christian Science Monitor, pp. 14-16. Mullen, P. E., Martin, J. L.,Anderson, J. C., Romans, S. E., & Herbison, G. P. (1993). Child sexual abuse and mental health in adult life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 721–732. Murnen, S. K.,Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375. Nadon, S. M., Koverola, C., & Schludermann, E. H. (1998). Antecedents to prostitution: Childhood victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 206-221. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 57 Nathanson,A. I. (2004). Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children’s responses to violent television. Journal of Communication, 54, 321-336. Nathanson,A. I.,Wilson, B. J., McGee, J., & Sebastian, M. (2002). Counteracting the effects of female stereotypes on television via active mediation. Journal of Communication, 42, 922-937. Nelson,A. (2000).The pink dragon is female: Halloween costumes and gender markers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 137-144. Nichter, M. (2000). Fat talk:What girls and their parents say about dieting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Nielsen Media Research. (1998). 1998 report on television. New York:Author. O’Donohue,W., Gold, S. R., & McKay, J. S. (1997). Children as sexual objects: Historical and gender trends in magazines. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment, 9, 291-301. Office of Population Affairs. (1999, December 12-14). Promoting responsible sexual behaviors (Office of Population Affairs Dialogue: Executive Summary and Summaries of Group Discussions).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Ogle, J. P., & Damhorst, M. L. (2004). Constructing and deconstructing the body malleable through mother-daughter interactions. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 180-209. Ogle, J. P., & Thornburg, E. (2003).An alternative voice amidst teen “zines”:An analysis of body-related content in Girl Zone. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 95, 47-56. O’Hare, E.A., & O’Donohue,W. (1998). Sexual harassment: Identifying risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 561-580. Olding, M., & Zuckerman, D. (2004, October 26). Cosmetic surgery and teens. The Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ articles/A63931-2004Oct26.html Osland, J.A., Fitch, M., & Willis, E. E. (1996). Likelihood to rape in college males. Sex Roles, 35, 171-183. Paik, H. (2001).The history of children’s use of electronic media. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 7-27).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pardun, C. J., L’Engle, K. L., & Brown, J. D. (2005). Linking exposure to outcomes: Early adolescents’ consumption of sexual content in six media. Mass Communication & Society, 8(2), 75-91. Pardun, C. J., & McKee, K. B. (1995). Strange bedfellows: Symbols of religion and sexuality on MTV. Youth & Society, 26, 438-449. Parks, L. (1998, September 7). Chains court teen shoppers as cosmetics customers. Drug Store News. Retrieved from www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3374/is_n14_v20/ ai_21147316 Parmariega,A. J., Gustavson, C. R., & Gustavson, J. C. (1994). Eating attitudes in African-American women:The Essence eating disorders survey. Eating Disorders, 2, 5-16. Paul, B., (2004). Testing the effects of exposure to virtual child pornography on viewer cognitions and attitudes toward deviant sexual behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(8A), 2693A. Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books. Pearl,A., & Weston, J. (
2003).Attitudes of adolescents about cosmetic surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 50, 628-630. Pedersen, P. M., & Whisenant,W.A. (2003). Examining stereotypical written and photographic reporting on the sports page:An analysis of newspaper coverage of interscholastic athletics. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 12, 67-86. Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger:Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: New York University Press. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 58 Phillips, O. (2006, May 1).Where will skincare go next? International Cosmetic News, 87. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from Lexis-Nexis database. Planned Parenthood. (2003).Who we are. Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://www.plannedparenthood. org/about-us/who-we-are-4648.htm Plante,T. G. (1993).Aerobic exercise in prevention and treatment of psychopathology. In P. Seragnian (Ed.), Exercise psychology:The influence of physical exercise on psychological processes (pp. 358-379). New York:Wiley. Plous, S., & Neptune, D. (1997). Racial and gender biases in magazine advertising:A content analytic study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 627-644. Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., & Kilmartin, C.T. (1998). Gender and age patterns in emotional expression, body image and self-esteem:A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles, 38, 1025-1048. Pollack,W. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House. Pollett,A., & Hurwitz, P. (2004, January 12/19). Strip til you drop. The Nation, 20-21, pp. 24-25. Potter,W. J. (2004).Argument for the need for a cognitive theory of media literacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 266-272. President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. (1997). Physical activity and sport in the lives of girls: Executive summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Prichard, I., & Tiggemann, M. (2005). Objectification in fitness centers: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Sex Roles, 53, 19-28. Putnam, F.W. (1990). Disturbances of “self” in victims of childhood sexual abuse. In R. Kluft (Ed.), Incest-related syndromes of adult psychopathology (pp. 113-131).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Putnam, F.W., & Trickett, P. K. (1997). Psychobiological effects of sexual abuse:A longitudinal study. In R.Yehuda & McFarlane,A. C. (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:Vol. 821. Psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (pp. 150-159). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. Quina, K., Morokoff, P. J., Harlow, L. L, & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2004). Cognitive and attitudinal paths from childhood trauma to adult HIV risk. In L. J. Koenig,A. O‘Leary, L. S. Doll, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child sexual abuse to adult sexual risk:Trauma, revictimization, and intervention (pp. 135-157).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Quinn, B.A. (2002). Sexual harassment and masculinity: The power and meaning of “girl watching.” Gender and Society, 16, 386-402. Rachman,A.W. M., Kennedy, R., & Yard, M. (2005).The role of childhood sexual seduction in the development of an erotic transference: Perversion in the psychoanalytic situation. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 14, 183-187. Racy t-shirt messages drawing girls’ backlash. (2005, November 2). Retrieved April 18, 2006, from www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9897452 Reichert,T. (2003).The prevalence of sexual imagery in ads targeted to young adults. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37, 403-412. Reichert,T., & Carpenter, C. (2004).An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823-837. Reichert,T., Lambiase, J., Morgan, S., Carstarphen, M., & Zavoina, S. (1999). Cheesecake and beefcake: No matter how you slice it, sexual explicitness in advertising continues to increase. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 7-20. Rivadeneyra, R.,Ward, L. M., & Gordon, M. (2007). Distorted reflections: Media exposure and Latino adolescents’ conceptions of self. Media Psychology, 9, 261–290. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 59 Roberton, M.A., & Halverson, L. E. (1984). Developing children:Their changing movements. New York: Lea & Febiger. Roberts, D., Foehr, U., & Rideout,V. (2005, March). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Roberts,T-A. (2004). Female trouble:The Menstrual SelfEvaluation Scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22-26. Roberts,T-A., & Gettman, J. (2004).“Mere exposure”: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17-27. Rodriguez, N. N.,Van de Kemp, H., & Foy, D.W. (1998). Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of childhood sexual and physical abuse:A critical review of the empirical research. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 7, 17-45. Rolón-Dow, R. (2004). Seduced by images: Identity and schooling in the lives of Puerto Rican girls. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35, 8-29. Rouner, D., Slater, M., & Domenech-Rodriquez, M. (2003).Adolescent evaluation of gender role and sexual imagery in television advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 435-454. Rubin,A. M. (2002).The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects:Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525- 548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Rudman, L., & Borgida, E. (1995).The afterglow of construct accessibility:The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517. Rudman, L., & Kilianski, S. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328. Rudman,W. J., & Verdi, P. (1993). Exploitation: Comparing sexual and violent imagery of females and males in advertising. Women & Health, 20, 1-14. Rutti, R. (1997, January 27). Putting gender into the equation: Single sex classes seem to add up. The Plain Dealer, p. 1B. Sanchez-Hucles, J., Hudgins, P. S., & Gamble, K. (2005). Reflection and distortion:Women of color in magazine advertisements. In E. Cole & J. H. Daniels (Eds.), Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 185-198).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Satcher, D. (2001).The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote sexual health and responsible sexual behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. Retrieved from www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/sexualhealth/call.pdf Savage, M., & Holcomb, D. (1998).Adolescent female athletes’ sexual risk-taking behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 595. Schaller, J., & Lagergren Frieberg, J. (1998). Issues of abuse for women with disabilities and implications for rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 29, 9-17. Scharff, J. S., & Scharff, D. E. (1994). Object relations therapy of physical and sexual trauma. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. Schilt, K. (2003).“I’ll resist with every inch and every breath”: Girls and zine making as a form of resistance. Youth and Society, 35, 71-97. Schooler, D., & Ward, L. M. (2006).Average joes: Men’s relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 7, 27-41. Schooler, D.,Ward, L. M., Merriwether,A., & Caruthers,A. (2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 324-334. Schor, J. B. (2004). Born to buy:The commercialized child and the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 60 Schultz, J. (2005). Reading the catsuit: Serena Williams and the production of blackness at the 2002 U.S. Open. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 29, 338-357. Seidman, S.A. (1992).An investigation of se
x-role stereotyping in music videos. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 209-216. Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. (2004). Guidelines for comprehensive sexuality education: Kindergarten–12th grade (3rd ed.). New York: Author. Retrieved from http://www.siecus.org/_data/ global/images/guidelines.pdf Sheff, D. (2005, January 4). New babes in toyland:Trollz. The New York Times, p. E1. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/04/arts/04trol.html Shengold, L. (1989). Soul murder:The effects of childhood abuse and deprivation. New York: Ballantine Books. Sherman, B. L., & Dominick, J. R. (1986).Violence and sex in music videos:TV and rock ’n roll. Journal of Communication, 36, 79-93. Shilts, L. (1991).The relationship of early adolescent substance abuse to extracurricular activities, peer influence, and personal attitudes. Adolescence, 26, 613-617. Shorter-Gooden, K. (2004). Multiple resistance strategies: How African American women cope with racism and sexism. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 406-425. Shugart, H.A. (2003). She shoots, she scores: Mediated constructions of contemporary female athletes in coverage of the 1999 U.S. women’s soccer team. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 1-31. Signorielli, N., McLeod, D., & Healy, E. (1994). Gender stereotypes in MTV commercials:The beat goes on. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 91-101. Silbert, M. H., & Pines,A. M. (1981). Sexual child abuse as an antecedent to prostitution. Child Abuse & Neglect, 5, 407-411. Silbert, M. H., & Pines,A. M. (1982). Entrance into prostitution. Youth and Society, 13, 471-500. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation:A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70-83. Slater,A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002).A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343-349. Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2002).A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between child sexual abuse and eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 136-150. Soley, L. C., & Kurzbard, G. (1986). Sex in advertising:A comparison of 1964 and 1984 magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 15, 46-64. Sommers-Flanagan, R., Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Davis, B. (1993).What’s happening on music television? A gender role content analysis. Sex Roles, 28, 745-753. Spence, J.T., Losoff, M., & Robbins,A. S. (1991). Sexually aggressive tactics in dating relationships: Personality and attitudinal correlates. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 289-304. Spillers, J. H. (1992). Interstices:A small drama of words. In C.Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 73–100). London: Pandora. Sprung, B. (1999). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for Grades K-1. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church. Steele, J. R. (1999).Teenage sexuality and media practice: Factoring in the influences of family, friends, and school. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 331-341. Stice, E., Schupak-Neuberg, E., Shaw, H., & Stein, R. (1994). Relation of media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology:An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 836-840. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 61 Stice, E., & Shaw, H. (2003). Prospective relations of body image, eating, and affective disturbances to smoking onset in adolescent girls: How Virginia slims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 129-135. Strasburger,V. C. (1995). Adolescents and the media: Medical and psychological impact. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strasburger,V. C., & Wilson B. J. (2002). Children, adolescents and the media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005).Women who objectify other women:The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707-712. Strouse, J. S., & Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (1987). Media exposure and the sexual attitudes and behaviors of college students. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 13, 43-51. Strouse, J. S., Goodwin, M. P., & Roscoe, B. (1994). Correlates of attitudes toward sexual harassment among early adolescents. Sex Roles, 31, 559-577. Sullivan, G. L., & O’Connor, P. J. (1988).Women’s role portrayals in magazine advertising: 1958-1983. Sex Roles, 18, 181-188. Sutton-Smith, B. (1986). Toys as culture. New York: Gardner Press. Tan,A. S. (1979).TV beauty ads and role expectations of adolescent female viewers. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 283-288. Taylor, J., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan,A. (1995). Between voice and silence:Women and girls, race and relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Teen market profile. (2005). New York: Mediamark Research. Retrieved from www.magazine.org/content/files/ teenprofile04.pdf Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2002).Are parents’ gender schemas related to their children’s gender-related cognitions? A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 38, 615-630. Thompson,T., & Zerbinos, E. (1997). Cartoons: Do children notice it’s a boy’s world? Sex Roles, 37, 415-432. Thomsen, S. R.,Weber, M. M., & Brown, L. B. (2002).The relationship between reading beauty and fashion magazines and the use of pathogenic dieting methods among adolescent females. Adolescence, 37, 1-18. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Thoughtworm. (2006). A zine bibliography. Retrieved September 3, 2006, from www.thoughtworm.com/zinebib.htm Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image in adult women across the life span:The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243-253. Tiggemann, M., & Slater,A. (2001).A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57-64. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998, November). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved September 11, 2006, from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire:Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Tolman, D. L. (2006). In a different position: Conceptualizing female adolescent sexuality development within compulsory heterosexuality. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 112, 71-90. Tolman, D. L., Impett, E.A.,Tracy,A. J., & Michael,A. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 85-95. Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche, M.V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159-178. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 62 Tracy,A. J., & Erkut, S. (2002). Gender and race patterns in the pathways from sports participation to self-esteem. Sociological Perspectives, 45, 445-466. Trapnell, P. D., Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1997). Spectatoring and the relationship between body image and sexual experience: Self-focus or self-valence? Journal of Sex Research, 34, 267-278. Truman, D. M.,Tokar, D. M., & Fischer,A. R. (1996). Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date rape, supportive attitudes, and sexual aggression in dating situations. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 555-562. Turner, S. L., Hamilton, H., Jacobs, M.,Angood, L. M., & Dwyer, D. H. (1997).The influence of fashion magazines on the body image satisfaction of college women:An exploratory analysis. Adolescence, 32, 603-614. Turner,T. (2005, May 17). Limited brands sees profits stripped down 76%. The Columbus Dispatch. Uhlenhuth, K. (2006,April 22).Teens visualize unoffensive tees. The Kansas City Star. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from www.kansascity.com Ullman, S. E. (2003). Social reactions to child sexual abuse discl
osures:A critical review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12, 89-121. Unger, R. K. (1979). Female and male. New York: Harper & Row. Uray, N., & Burnaz, S. (2003).An analysis of the portrayals of gender roles in Turkish television advertisements. Sex Roles, 48, 77-87. Villeneuve,A., & de Grandi, M. (1996). Perfumes, a mainstay of the French economy. Label France, 24. Retrieved from http://ebookpedia.net/A-mainstay-of-theFrench-economy.html Villimez, C., Eisenberg, N., & Carroll, J. L. (1986). Sex differences in the relation of children’s height and weight to academic performance and others’ attributions of competence. Sex Roles, 15, 667-681. Vincent, J., Imwold, C., Johnson, J.T., & Massey, D. (2003). Newspaper coverage of female athletes competing in selected sports in the 1996 Centennial Olympic Games: The more things change the more they stay the same. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 12, 1-21. Vincent, R. C. (1989). Clio’s consciousness raised? Portrayal of women in rock videos, re-examined. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 155-160. Vincent, R. C., Davis, D. K., & Boruszkowski, L.A. (1987). Sexism on MTV:The portrayal of women in rock videos. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 750-755. Vogel, B. L. (2000). Correlates of pre-college males’ sexual aggression:Attitudes, beliefs and behavior. Women and Criminal Justice, 11, 25-47. Vogeltanz, N. D.,Wilsnack, S. C., Harris,T. R.,Wilsnack, R.W.,Wonderlich, S.A., & Kristjanson,A. F. (1999). Prevalence and risk factors for childhood sexual abuse in women: National survey findings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 579-592. Voojis M.W., & van der Voort,T. H. (1993). Learning about television violence:The impact of a critical viewing curriculum on children’s attitudinal judgments about crime series. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 133-142. Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006).The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology:A mutually enriching dialogue. American Psychologist, 61, 227-239. Ward, J. (2002). The skin we’re in:Teaching our teens to be socially smart, emotionally strong and spiritually connected. New York:The Free Press. Ward, L. M. (1995).Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 24, 595-615. Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 31, 1–15. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 63 Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347-388. Ward, L. M. (2004a, March). The sexy/cool ideal: Contributions of media use to adolescents’ gender and sexual schema. Poster/paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, MD. Ward, L. M. (2004b).Wading through the stereotypes: Positive and negative associations between media use and Black adolescents’ conceptions of self. Developmental Psychology, 40, 284-294. Ward, L. M., & Averitt, L. (2005, November). Associations between media use and young adults’ perceptions of first intercourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston. Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133-156. Ward, L. M., Hansbrough, E., & Walker, E. (2005). Contributions of music video exposure to black adolescents’ gender and sexual schemas. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 143-166. Ward, L. M., Merriwether,A., & Caruthers,A. (2006a). Breasts are for men: Media use, masculinity ideology, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703-744 Ward, L. M., Merriwether,A., & Caruthers,A. (2006b, April). Media use, gender ideology, and beliefs about women’s bodies. Paper presented at the biennial Gender Development Conference, San Francisco. Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations:The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249. Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (2002,August). Dancing, strutting, and bouncing in cars:The women of music videos. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago. Warin, J. (2000).The attainment of self-consistency through gender in young children. Sex Roles, 42, 209-231. Weaver, J., Masland, J. L., & Zillmann, D. (1984). Effect of erotica on young men’s aesthetic perception of their female sexual partners. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 929-930. Weekes, D. (2002). Get your freak on: How black girls sexualise identity. Sex Education in England and Scotland, 2, 251-262. Wiederman, M. (2000).Women’s body image self-consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 60-68. Wiederman, M. (2001).“Don’t look now”:The role of selffocus in sexual dysfunction.The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 9, 210-214. Wiederman, M., & Hurst, S. (1998). Body size, physical attractiveness, and body image among young adult women: Relationships to sexual experience and sexual esteem. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 272-281. Wiederman, M., & Pryor,T. (1997). Body dissatisfaction and sexuality among women with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 21, 361-365. Wilson, P. (1999). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for Grades 7–9. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church. Wingood, G., & DiClemente, R. (1992). Culture, gender and psychosocial influences on HIV-related behavior of African female adolescents: Implications for the development of tailored prevention programs. Ethnicity & Disease, 3, 381-388. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York:Anchor Books. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 64 Yamamiya,Y., Cash,T. F., Melnyk, S. E., Posavac, H. D., & Posavac, S. S. (2005).Women’s exposure to thin-andbeautiful media images: Body image effects of media-ideal internalization and impact-reduction interventions. Body Image, 2, 74-80. Yoder, J. D., & Schleicher,T. L. (1996). Undergraduates regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as costly for women. Sex Roles, 34, 171-188. Young, I. M. (1980).Throwing like a girl:A phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality. Human Studies, 3, 137-156. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Pornography’s impact on sexual satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 438-453. Zurbriggen, E. L. (2000). Social motives and cognitive power/sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 559-581. Zurbriggen, E. L., & Freyd, J. J. (2004).The link between child sexual abuse and risky sexual behavior:The role of dissociative tendencies, information-processing effects, and consensual sex decision mechanisms. In L. J. Koenig,A. O’Leary, L. S. Doll, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child sexual abuse to adult sexual risk:Trauma revictimization and intervention (pp. 117-134).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. Zurbriggen, E. L., & Morgan, E. M. (2006).Who wants to marry a millionaire? Reality dating television programs, attitudes toward sex, and sexual behaviors. Sex Roles, 54, 1-17. Appendix Empowering Girls: Media Literacy This list of resources was provided to APA’s Council of Representatives with the Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls and has been filed with APA.This means that the list of resources has not been adopted as a policy of APA nor has APA endorsed each of the resources cited.This list of resources is provided only for information and reference
purposes. About-Face http://www.about-face.org ACT—Alliance for Children and Television http://www.act-aet.tv/index_en.html Advocates for Youth http://www.advocatesforyouth.org Beacon Street Girls http://www.beaconstreetgirls.com Center for Media Literacy http://www.medialit.org Dads and Daughters http://www.thedadman.com Girl Scouts of America http://www.girlscouts.org Girls Inc. http://www.girlsinc.org/index.html Girls Inc. Media Literacy http://www.girlsinc.org/about/programs/ media-literacy.html Girls,Women, + Media Project http://www.mediaandwomen.org/resources.html Hardy Girls Healthy Women http://www.hardygirlshealthywomen.org Mainely Girls http://www.midcoast.com/~megirls Media Awareness Network http://www.media-awareness.ca Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 65 Media Literacy Clearinghouse http://www.frankwbaker.com medialiteracy.com http://www.medialiteracy.com New Moon Girls http://www.newmoon.com ParentFurther http://www.parentfurther.com/technology-media See Jane/Improving Gender Portrayals in Children’s Media http://www.thegeenadavisinstitute.org Teen Voices/Women’s Express http://www.teenvoices.com Third Wave Foundation http://www.thirdwavefoundation.org uniquely Me! The Girl Scout/Dove Self-Esteem Program http://www.girlscouts.org/program/program_ opportunities/leadership/uniquelyme.asp Words Can Work http://www.wordscanwork.com Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 66 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 750 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20002–4242

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

GET A 40% DISCOUNT ON YOU FIRST ORDER

ORDER NOW DISCOUNT CODE >>>> WELCOME40

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Psychology of Human Sexuality – Answer two question

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

GET A 40% DISCOUNT ON YOU FIRST ORDER

ORDER NOW DISCOUNT CODE >>>> WELCOME40

Course: Psychology of Human Sexuality
Read the gender role reading – the task force report on the sexualization of girls. Answer the following questions:
-What are some of the consequences of sexualization for girls that are discussed in the reading?
-What are some of the approaches that the reading offers to counter sexualization or to counter the effects of sexualization on girls?
2 pages, double-spaced, APA format
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
Members
Eileen L. Zurbriggen, PhD (Chair)
Rebecca L. Collins, PhD
Sharon Lamb, EdD
Tomi-Ann Roberts, PhD
Deborah L.Tolman, EdD
L. Monique Ward, PhD
Jeanne Blake (Public Member)
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
Available online at http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf
Printed single copies available from:
American Psychological Association
Public Interest Directorate
Women’s Programs
750 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002-4242
(202-336-6044)
Suggested bibliographic reference:
American Psychological Association,Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2010).
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Retrieved from
http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf
Copyright © 2010 by the American Psychological Association.This material may
be reproduced in whole or in part without fees or permission, provided that
acknowledgment is given to the American Psychological Association.This material
may not be reprinted, translated, or distributed electronically without prior permission
in writing from the publisher. For permission, contact APA, Rights and Permissions,
750 First Street, NE,Washington, DC 20002-4242.
This report was originally printed in 2007 and reprinted in 2008.
The current edition contains some updated references.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
ii
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Scope of This Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Cultural Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Interpersonal Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Intrapsychic Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Summary of Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Consequences of the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Mechanisms by Which Sexualization Has an Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Developmental Processes Relevant to the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Impact on Girls’ Health and Well-Being . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Impact on Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Impact on Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
Summary of Consequences of the Sexualization of Girls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization . . . . . . .35
Approach 1:Working Through Schools and Formal Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
Approach 2:Working Through the Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
Approach 3:Working Directly With Girls and Girls’ Groups to Resist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
Summary of Positive Alternatives and Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization . . . .41
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
iii
Table of Contents
Preface
At the recommendation of the American
Psychological Association (APA) Committee on
Women in Psychology (CWP) and with the
approval of the Board for the Advancement of Psychology
in the Public Interest (BAPPI) and the Board of Directors,
APA’s Council of Representatives established the Task
Force on the Sexualization of Girls in February 2005.
The Council charged the task force as follows:
The Task Force will examine and summarize the best
psychological theory, research, and clinical experience
addressing the sexualization of girls via media and other
cultural messages, including the prevalence of these
messages and their impact on girls, and include attention to
the role and impact of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic
status.The Task Force will produce a report, including
recommendations for research, practice, education and
training, policy, and public awareness.
APA has long been involved in issues related to
the impact of media content on children. In 1994,APA
adopted a policy resolution on violence in mass media,
which updated and expanded an earlier resolution on
televised violence. In 2004, the APA Task Force on
Advertising and Children produced a report examining
broad issues related to advertising to children.That report
provided recommendations to restrict advertising that is
primarily directed at young children and to include
developmentally appropriate disclaimers in advertising.
The report also included recommendations regarding
research, applied psychology, industry practices, media
literacy, advertising, and schools.The sexualization of
girls in advertising was outside the scope of that report,
however, and the issue was therefore not addressed. In
2005,APA adopted the policy resolution on violence in
video games and interactive media, which documented
the negative impact of exposure to violent interactive
media on children and youth and called for the
reduction of violence in these media.These resolutions
and reports addressed how violent media and advertising
affect children and youth, but they did not address the
issue of sexualization.
BAPPI appointed six psychologists plus a public
member to the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls:
Eileen L. Zurbriggen, PhD (Chair); Rebecca L. Collins,
PhD; Sharon Lamb, EdD;Tomi-Ann Roberts, PhD;
Deborah L.Tolman, EdD; L. Monique Ward, PhD; and
Jeanne Blake (Public Member, Blake Works, Inc.). Jessica
Henderson Daniel, PhD, served as liaison from the Board
of Directors. Janet Shibley Hyde, PhD, and Louise B.
Silverstein, PhD, served as liaisons from CWP.
Task force members are indebted to the following
individuals for their thoughtful reviews and comments on
earlier versions of this report: Denise Alston, PhD;Toni
Antonucci, PhD;Thema Bryant-Davis, PhD; Bonita Cade,
PhD; Joan Chrisler, PhD; Ellen Cole, PhD; Lillian
Comas-Diaz, PhD; Deborah Cox, PhD; Jessica Henderson
Daniel, PhD; Melissa Farley, PhD; Barbara Fiese, PhD;
Jennifer Gibson, PhD; Mary Gregerson, PhD; Janet Shibley
Hyde, PhD; Lisa Jaycox, PhD; Joe Kelly; Susan Linn, EdD;
Jeanne Marecek, PhD; Susan Newcomer, PhD; Jaquelyn
Resnick, PhD; Glenda Russell, PhD; Julia da Silva;
Louise Silverstein, PhD; Catherine Steiner-Adair, EdD;
Lisa Thomas, PhD; and Maryanne Watson, PhD.
The task force also expresses its appreciation to
Gwendolyn Puryear Keita, PhD (Executive Director, Public
Interest Directorate), for her guidance and support.APA
staff who worked with and supported the task force in
developing this report include Leslie A. Cameron, Gabriel
H. J.Twose, and Tanya L. Burrwell. Gabriele McCormick
assisted in the preparation of the draft.Women’s Programs
Office intern Ashley Byrd and visiting middle-school
student Alexis Hicks also provided helpful comments.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
v
Report of the Task Force on
the Sexualization of Girls
Introduction
There are many examples of the sexualization of girls
and girlhood in U.S. culture.Toy manufacturers produce
dolls wearing black leather miniskirts, feather
boas, and thigh-high boots and market them to 8- to 12-
year-old girls (LaFerla, 2003). Clothing stores sell thongs sized
for 7– to 10-year-old girls (R. Brooks, 2006; Cook & Kaiser,
2004), some printed with slogans such as “eye candy” or
“wink wink” (Cook & Kaiser, 2004; Haynes, 2005; Levy,
2005a; Merskin, 2004); other thongs sized for women and
late adolescent girls are imprinted with characters from Dr.
Seuss and the Muppets (e.g., see www.princesscassie.com/
children/cat.shtml) (Levy, 2005a; Pollett & Hurwitz, 2004). In
the world of child beauty pageants, 5-year-old girls wear fake
teeth, hair extensions,and makeup and are encouraged to
“flirt” onstage by batting their long, false eyelashes (Cookson,
2001). On prime-time television, girls can watch fashion
shows in which models made to resemble little girls wear
sexy lingerie (e.g., the CBS broadcast of Victoria’s Secret
Fashion Show on December 6, 2005). Journalists, child
advocacy organizations, parents,and psychologists have
become alarmed,arguing that the sexualization of girls is a
broad and increasing problem and is harmful to girls (Bloom,
2004;“Buying Into Sexy,” 2005; Dalton, 2005; Lamb &
Brown, 2006; Levin, 2005; Levy, 2005a; Linn, 2004; Pollet &
Hurwitz, 2004; Schor, 2004).
The Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls was formed
in response to these expressions of public concern. In this
report, we examine and summarize psychological theory,
research, and clinical experience addressing the sexualization
of girls.We (a) define sexualization; (b) examine the prevalence
and provide examples of sexualization in society and in
cultural institutions, as well as interpersonally and intrapsychically;
(c) evaluate the evidence suggesting that sexualization
has negative consequences for girls and for the rest of society;
and (d) describe positive alternatives that may help counteract
the influence of sexualization.
Definition
There are several components to sexualization, and these
set it apart from healthy sexuality. Healthy sexuality is an
important component of both physical and mental health,
fosters intimacy, bonding, and shared pleasure, and involves
mutual respect between consenting partners (Satcher, 2001;
Sexuality Information and Education Council of the
United States [SIECUS], 2004). In contrast, sexualization
occurs when
l a person’s value comes only from his or her sexual appeal
or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics;
l a person is held to a standard that equates physical
attractiveness (narrowly defined) with being sexy;
l a person is sexually objectified—that is, made into a
thing for others’ sexual use, rather than seen as a person
with the capacity for independent action and decision
making; and/or
l sexuality is inappropriately imposed upon a person.
All four conditions need not be present; any one is an
indication of sexualization. Much of the evidence that we
evaluate in this report is specific to the third condition—
sexual objectification.The fourth condition (the inappropriate
imposition of sexuality) is especially relevant to children.Anyone
(girls, boys, men, women) can be sexualized.
But when children are imbued with adult sexuality, it is
often imposed upon them rather than chosen by them.
Self-motivated sexual exploration, on the other hand, is not
sexualization by our definition, nor is age-appropriate
exposure to information about sexuality.
We view the sexualization of girls as occurring along a
continuum, with sexualized evaluation (e.g., looking at
someone in a sexual way) at the less extreme end, and sexual
exploitation, such as trafficking or abuse, at the more
extreme end.We offer several examples of the sexualization
of girls to clarify our definition:
l Imagine a 5-year-old girl walking through a mall
wearing a short T-shirt that says “Flirt.”
l Consider the instructions given in magazines to
preadolescent girls on how to look sexy and get a
boyfriend by losing 10 pounds and straightening
their hair.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
1
l Envision a soccer team of adolescent girls whose sex
appeal is emphasized by their coach or a local journalist
to attract fans.
l Think of print advertisements that portray women as
little girls, with pigtails and ruffles, in adult sexual poses.
These examples illustrate different aspects of our definition
of sexualization. In the first example, we are concerned
with the imbuing of adult sexuality upon a child. In the
second, we are reminded that a specific and virtually
unattainable physical appearance constitutes sexiness for
women and girls in our society. In the third, we see that
sexuality is valued over other more relevant characteristics,
such as the girls’ athletic abilities. In addition, the girls are
being sexually objectified. In the fourth example, the adult
models are sexually objectified and the distinction between
adults and children is blurred, thus sexualizing girlhood.
Sexualization may be especially problematic when it
happens to youth. Developing a sense of oneself as a
sexual being is an important task of adolescence (Adelson,
1980;Arnett, 2000;W.A. Collins & Sroufe, 1999), but
sexualization may make this task more difficult. Indeed,
Tolman (2002) argued that in the current environment,
teen girls are encouraged to look sexy, yet they know little
about what it means to be sexual, to have sexual desires,
and to make rational and responsible decisions about
pleasure and risk within intimate relationships that
acknowledge their own desires.Younger girls imbued
with adult sexuality may seem sexually appealing, and
this may suggest their sexual availability and status as
appropriate sexual objects. Concomitantly, women are
often considered sexy only when they appear young, thus
blurring the line between who is and is not sexually
mature (Cook & Kaiser, 2004).
Scope of This Report
We propose that the sexualization of girls occurs within
three interrelated spheres.:
l The contribution by society—that is, the cultural1
norms,
expectations, and values that are communicated in
myriad ways, including through the media.A culture
can be infused with sexualized representations of girls
and women, suggesting that such sexualization is good
and normal.
l An interpersonal contribution—Girls can be treated as,
and encouraged to be, sexual objects by family, peers,
and others.
l Self-sexualization—Girls may treat and experience
themselves as sexual objects (Fredrickson & Roberts,
1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996). If girls learn that
sexualized behavior and appearance are approved of
and rewarded by society and by the people (e.g., peers)
whose opinions matter most to them, they are likely
to internalize these standards, thus engaging in
self-sexualization.
We review evidence concerning the prevalence of the
sexualization of girls and women in each of these three
spheres.We also review evidence that links sexualization to
a variety of harmful consequences.These consequences
include harm to the sexualized individuals themselves, to
their interpersonal relationships, and to society. For example,
there is evidence that sexualization contributes to
impaired cognitive performance in college-aged women,
and related research suggests that viewing material that is
sexually objectifying can contribute to body dissatisfaction,
eating disorders, low self-esteem, depressive affect, and even
physical health problems in high-school-aged girls and in
young women.The sexualization of girls may not only
reflect sexist attitudes, a societal tolerance of sexual violence,
and the exploitation of girls and women but may
also contribute to these phenomena.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
2
1
Although there are many sociocultural groups in the United States, most people, in particular young people, receive a great deal of exposure to what is
often referred to as the “dominant” U.S. culture (White, middle-to-upper-class, young-to-middle-aged, heterosexual). One especially salient dimension of
this dominant culture is “pop” (or popular) culture. For the purposes of this report, culture and cultural generally refer to this dominant culture.
Much of the research reviewed in this report concerns
the sexualization of women (college age and older) rather
than girls.2 One reason for this is the paucity of research
specifically on the sexualization of girls—research that is
urgently needed. However, research on both the prevalence
and the effects of the sexualization of women is highly
relevant to understanding the sexualization of girls for
several reasons.
First, there is a developmental argument that focuses
on the importance of modeling as a developmental process
(Bandura, 1986, 1994). Girls develop their identities as
teenagers and as women, and they learn the socially
acceptable ways to engage in intimate relationships by
modeling what they see older girls and young women
doing (Bussey & Bandura, 1984, 1992; Lips, 1989) and by
imitating the ways in which women are represented in the
media (Huston & Wright, 1998). Concomitantly, parents
and other adults may overtly or inadvertently communicate
expectations that girls should embody the appearances,
attitudes, and behaviors that are exemplified by sexualized
adult women (of course, parents might instead encourage
girls to reject these sexualized models).As this report
documents, there is no question that girls (and boys) grow
up in a cultural milieu saturated with sexualizing messages.
Thus, research on the sexualization of women is highly
relevant to the sexualization of girls.
Second, there is a methodological argument.Although
many of the existing studies on media effects have tested
college students and have examined their media exposure
levels and corresponding sexual attitudes and behavior,
this research is not just about the here and now. Most of
these studies have been conducted under the premise of
cultivation theory (Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli,
1994), which argues that exposure to consistent themes over
time leads viewers to adopt a particular perspective of the
world, one that coincides with the images they have been
viewing.Although researchers typically test this premise by
demonstrating that current exposure levels are associated
with current attitudes, this is usually done merely for the
sake of convenience.The underlying assumption is that a
lifetime of exposure to comparable images and messages
has led to such attitudes.We must deduce, therefore, that
what young women believe about themselves and how
they feel in the present moment were shaped by how
they were treated and what they were exposed to when
they were girls. Knowing how young women feel about
and respond to sexualization, then, is entirely relevant to
understanding how girls feel about and respond
to sexualization.
Much of this report focuses on the media, in large part
because this cultural contribution to the sexualization of
girls and women has been studied most extensively. In
addition, children and adolescents spend more time with
entertainment media than they do with any other activity
except school and sleeping (D. Roberts, Foehr, & Rideout,
2005).We recognize that there are other important
socialization influences, including churches, schools, peers,
siblings, parents, and other adults in girls’ lives, and where
studies concerning these socialization sources exist, we
review them.We also acknowledge that the media are not
just a means of creating or strengthening cultural values.
Fueled by consumer culture, they are also a delivery system
for already-existing cultural values. Finally, we do not
assume that girls are “empty vessels” into which information
from the media is poured but that they are actively
engaged in choosing and interpreting the media in their
lives, with increasing independence as they mature from
girlhood to late adolescence (Rubin, 2002; Steele, 1999).
We emphasize the importance of appreciating
developmental processes and the enormous differences in
girls as they develop.Thus, the effects of sexualization are
likely to vary depending on a girl’s age, so that what is
inappropriate for a 6-year-old might be perfectly appropriate
for a high school girl.The perspectives and experiences
that a young girl brings to her exposure to sexualizing
images and experiences, as well as her cognitive, intellectual,
social, and even physical development, might
profoundly influence the effect that such exposure
would have on her, rendering it quite different from
what a teenage girl would experience.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
3
2
Age ranges for childhood, preadolescence,and adolescence vary across the research summarized in this report.Where relevant, age ranges reported reflect definitions
from individual studies. Tween, though not a scientific term, is used by advertisers and marketers, and the report discusses the tween population in that context.
Ethnic and sociocultural differences are also relevant.
Immigrant girls and girls and women of color have
historically suffered stereotypes that focus on their sexuality
and their bodies (Hill Collins, 2004). In addition, women’s
sexuality (e.g., attitudes, beliefs, behaviors) can vary widely
for women of different ethnicities (Greene, 2000; Hurtado,
2003). Negative stereotypes concerning the sexuality of
poor women are prevalent (Limbert & Bullock, 2005).
Sexual socialization is profoundly heterosexual and
heteronormative (Holland, Ramazanoglu, Sharpe, &
Thomson, 2004; Phillips, 2000;Tolman, 2006).Throughout
this report, therefore, where data are available, we address
how the prevalence and effects of sexualization may vary
among girls from different ethnic, socioeconomic, religious,
and family backgrounds, as well as among girls of different
sexual orientations.
It is important to note what the report does not cover.
It does not review evidence concerning the prevalence and
effects of sexually suggestive or sexually explicit material
per se. Rather, we are concerned with such material only
insofar as it fits within the four-part definition of sexualization
given previously.The report also covers extreme forms
of sexualization (e.g., prostitution, pornography, trafficking,
child sexual abuse) only briefly. Finally, we acknowledge
that this phenomenon and the concern about it is not, and
cannot be, limited by U.S. borders, in part because U.S. culture
is exported worldwide. For the purposes of this report,
however, our focus is on the United States. Expanding to
an international scope is a useful goal for the future.
The rest of the report is divided into four sections.
In Section 2, we provide evidence of the existence of the
sexualization of girls and women in three spheres: in U.S.
society or culture, in girls’ interpersonal relationships, and
within individual girls themselves. In the third section, we
describe the potential mechanisms by which the sexualization
of girls occurs and the known and likely effects of the
sexualization of girls: on girls themselves, on others with
whom girls have interpersonal relationships (boys, men,
adult women), and on U.S. societal institutions. In the
fourth section, we outline positive alternatives to the
sexualization of girls and describe promising methods
of ameliorating the effects of sexualization when it
does occur. Finally, in the fifth section, we make
recommendations for action, beginning with a call for
research to develop a body of knowledge specifically on
the sexualization of girls as well as to expand our
knowledge of the prevalence and effects of sexualization
more generally.
Evidence for the Sexualization
of Girls
Cultural Contributions
Media
With the plethora of media options available today, it is
possible to access the latest news or the most popular song
almost anywhere and anytime, yet it is also possible to be
inundated by unwanted messages and material. Media
content responds to demand and is a reflection of culture,
but it also contributes to it.Throughout U.S. culture, and
particularly in mainstream media, women and girls are
depicted in a sexualizing manner.These representations can
be seen in virtually every medium, including prime-time
television programs (e.g., Grauerholz & King, 1997;
L. M.Ward, 1995), television commercials (e.g., Lin, 1997),
music videos (e.g., Gow, 1996; R. C.Vincent, 1989), and
magazines (e.g., Krassas, Blauwkamp, & Wesselink, 2001,
2003; Plous & Neptune, 1997).
Girls are major consumers of media and receive and
engage with these messages every day.According to
Nielsen Media Research (1998), the average child or teen
watches 3 hours of television per day, and the numbers are
higher for Black and Latino youth.When various media
are combined, children view 6 hours 32 minutes per day.
The Kaiser Family Foundation (2003) reported that 68% of
children have a TV in their bedroom, that 51% of girls play
interactive games on their computers and video game consoles,
and that girls, like boys, are on their computers about
an hour each day visiting Web sites, listening to music, frequenting
chat rooms, playing games, and sending messages
to friends (D. Roberts et al., 2005). Massive exposure to
media among youth creates the potential for massive
exposure to portrayals that sexualize women and girls and
teach girls that women are sexual objects.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
4
Television
On television, young viewers encounter a world that is
disproportionately male, especially in youth-oriented
programs, and one in which female characters are
significantly more likely than male characters to be
attractive and provocatively dressed (Eaton, 1997). Sexual
comments and remarks are pervasive on television (L. M.
Ward, 2003), and research has shown that they disproportionately
sexually objectify women. For example, in her
analysis of prime-time programs popular among children
and adolescents, L. M.Ward (1995) found that 11.5% of the
verbal sexual messages coded involved sexually objectifying
comments, nearly all of which were about women.
Similarly, Lampman et al. (2002),
studying sexual remarks made on
prime-time comedies, found that 23%
of the sexual behaviors coded were
leering, ogling, staring, and catcalling at
female characters.Additionally, 16.5% of
the sexual remarks detected were about
body parts or nudity.A majority of
these comments (85%)
came from men.
In their analysis of sexual harassment
on prime-time programming,
Grauerholz and King (1997) reported a
similar focus on the denigration of women that alluded to
their sexuality and lack of intellect and that objectified
their bodies. Of the 81 episodes analyzed, 84% contained at
least one incident of sexual harassment, with an average of
3.4 incidents per program.The most frequent acts were
sexist comments (33.3% of the incidents) in which a wide
variety of deprecating words were used to describe women
(e.g., broad, bimbo, dumb ass chick, toots, fox, babe, blondie).The
next most frequent occurrences were verbal sexual comments
(32% of the incidents).These comments typically
focused on women’s bodies or body parts, especially
breasts, which were referred to as jugs, boobs, knockers,
hooters, cookware, and canned goods.The third most common
category was body language (13%) and generally involved
men or adolescent boys leering at women or girls. In
total, the authors reported that approximately 78% of the
harassment focused on demeaning terms for women or on
the sexualization of their bodies.
In a more recent analysis of sexual harassment in
workplace-based situation comedies, Montemurro (2003)
made further distinctions, separating gender harassment
(jokes, looks, calls) from quid pro quo sexual harassment
(touches, favors, dates).Analyzing 56 episodes drawn from
five different programs, she found an average of 3.3
incidents of gender harassment per episode and 0.50
incidents of sexual harassment. Dominant were jokes
referring to women’s sexuality or women’s bodies and
comments that characterized women as sexual objects; 74%
of the episodes analyzed contained at least one incident
of gender harassment in the form of jokes, most of which
were accompanied by laugh tracks.
Music Videos
Content analyses indicate that 44%–81%
of music videos contain sexual imagery
(Gow, 1990; Greeson & Williams, 1986;
Pardun & McKee, 1995; Sherman &
Dominick, 1986). Sexually objectifying
images of women constitute a large portion
of this sexual content. In music
videos, women more frequently than men
are presented in provocative and revealing
clothing (e.g.,Andsager & Roe, 1999;
Seidman, 1992), are objectified (Sommers-Flanagan,
Sommers-Flanagan, & Davis, 1993), and typically serve as
decorative objects that dance and pose and do not play any
instruments (e.g.,Arnett, 2002; Gow, 1996).They are often
displayed in ways that emphasize their bodies, body parts,
facial features, and sexual readiness. R. C.Vincent, Davis,
and Boruskowski (1987) found that 57% of the videos
featured a woman portrayed exclusively as a decorative
sexual object. In the 182 videos analyzed by Seidman
(1992), 37% of women wore revealing clothing, compared
with 4.2% of men. L. M.Ward and Rivadeneyra’s (2002)
more recent analysis of the most popular music videos
on Black Entertainment Television found sexual imagery
in 84% of the videos; the two most frequently occurring
sexual behaviors were sexual objectification and
women dancing sexually. Seventy-one percent of
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
5
Massive exposure
to media among youth creates
the potential for massive
exposure to portrayals that
sexualize women
and girls and teach
girls that women are
sexual objects.
women in these videos were dressed in mildly
provocative or provocative clothing or wore no clothing
at all, compared with 35% of male characters.
In contrast to public perception, these patterns are not
restricted to pop or hip-hop videos. In one analysis of
country music videos, 42% of female artists were coded as
wearing alluring clothing (Andsager & Roe, 1999). In their
analysis of 40 MTV music videos, Sommers-Flanagan et al.
(1993) found objectification in 44.4% of the 30-second
segments coded.They commented,“given . . . the frequency
of objectification within these videos, the concept of
a whole person involved in a complex relationship
with another whole person is clearly absent from the
video’s message” (p. 752).
Music videos convey information about female
sexuality not only through the images and story lines of
individual videos but also through the changing personas of
the artists themselves. In their analysis of the last 20 years of
music videos, communication scholars Andsager and Roe
(2003) noted that one of the distinct ways in which sex is
used is as a metamorphosis.They show how teen artists
exploit their sexuality to establish a more mature and
“edgier” version of their former selves as they cross the
threshold from teenage icon to adult musician.According to
the authors, this process is exemplified by Christina Aguilera,
Faith Hill,and Britney Spears, who displayed her “mature”
image at the 2001 MTV Awards in a nude body stocking.
The authors commented that such tactics often provoke
sexualized discussion of the artist—that is, discussion focuses
not on her talent or music but rather on her body and
sexuality.These transformations likely drive home the
point that being a successful sexual object is the way to be
perceived as mature and successful in the music industry.
Music Lyrics
Although studies have documented the sexualization of
women in music videos, sexualizing content in the lyrics
that accompany these videos has not been documented as
extensively. References to relationships, romance, and
sexual behavior are commonplace in popular music
lyrics and videos (Christenson & Roberts, 1998). One
comprehensive analysis of sexual content in adolescents’
“media diets” demonstrated that sexual content appeared
more frequently in adolescents’ musical choices than in
their television, movie, or magazine choices (Pardun,
L’Engle, & Brown, 2005); however, there are no recent
content analyses to determine how often sexual content
consumed by teens objectifies girls or women. It is evident
that the lyrics of some recent popular songs sexualize
women or refer to them in highly degrading ways, or both.
Some examples include the following:
l “So blow me bitch I don’t rock for cancer/I rock for
the cash and the topless dancers” (Kid Rock,“f*ck
off,” 1998)
l “Don’tcha wish your girlfriend was hot like me?”
(Pussycat Dolls, 2005)
l “That’s the way you like to f*** . . . rough sex make it
hurt, in the garden all in the dirt” (Ludacris, 2000)
l “I tell the hos all the time, Bitch get in my car”
(50 Cent, 2005)
l “Ho shake your ass” (Ying Yang Twins, 2003)
As part of a recent study of the effects of listening to
popular music on sexual behavior (Martino et al., 2006),
researchers coded the content of 164 songs from 16 artists
popular with teens. Overall, 15% of songs contained
sexually degrading lyrics. Most of these lyrics were
concentrated within the work of rap and R&B artists;
as many as 70% of individual artists’ songs included
degrading sexual content.
Movies
Adolescents constitute the largest demographic segment of
moviegoers (Strasburger, 1995), and a good number of
movies with sexual themes have plots that appeal primarily
to teen and young adult audiences (e.g., Cruel Intentions,
American Pie). Children are also consumers of movies, with
13% attending movie theaters on a typical day and 39%
watching a video or DVD (D. Roberts et al., 2005).Yet few
empirical data have been gathered on the sexual content of
feature films or the prevalence of sexualizing portrayals
of girls and women. One pattern that has been studied,
however, is the asymmetrical presence of nudity. In R-rated
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
6
movies of the 1980s, instances of female nudity were
reported to exceed those of male nudity in a 4 to 1
ratio (B. S. Greenberg et al., 1993).
Another notable trend is the near absence of female
characters in the top-grossing motion pictures (Bazzini,
McIntosh, Smith, Cook, & Harris, 1997) and in G-rated
movies (Kelly & Smith, 2006). Kelly and Smith evaluated
the 101 top-grossing G-rated films from 1990 to 2004.
Of the over 4,000 characters in these films, 75% overall
were male, 83% of characters in crowds were male, 83%
of narrators were male, and 72% of speaking characters
were male. In addition, there was little change from
1990 to 2004.This gross underrepresentation of women
or girls in films with family-friendly content reflects
a missed opportunity to present a broad spectrum
of girls and women in roles that are
nonsexualized.
Cartoons and Animation
Much of children’s programming
features cartoons.Although the
prevalence of sexualization in
children’s cartoons or teen animation
(e.g., anime) has not yet been systematically
studied, there is anecdotal evidence
that cartoons may contain sexualizing
images of girls and women.
Several authors (Lamb & Brown, 2006;
Levin, 2005) have expressed concern about the presence
of sexualized content in some recent movies and television
programs for children (e.g., sexy costumes that don’t match
the characters’ roles in Ella Enchanted, the parody of a
stripper in Shrek 2). Others have noted that Disney’s
female characters today (e.g.,The Little Mermaid,
Pocahontas) have more cleavage, fewer clothes, and are
depicted as “sexier” than those of yesteryear (e.g., Snow
White, Cinderella) (Lacroix, 2004).And the currently
popular and sexily clad Bratz dolls (discussed in the
Products section of this report, pp. 13–15) are the subject
of an animated cartoon.This product tie-in could reinforce
the appeal of the cartoon Bratz dolls and their potential
power to influence girls. Studies do show that, with a few
notable exceptions (e.g., Dora the Explorer), cartoons
primarily portray girls as domestic, interested in boys, and
concerned with their appearance (Thompson & Zerbinos,
1997), suggesting an overemphasis on the self as a romantic
object, if not necessarily a sexual one.
Magazines
The number of teen-focused magazines has increased dramatically
from 5 in 1990 to 19 in 2000, and most teens
regularly read magazines (“Teen Market Profile,” 2005). For
example, one study (D. Roberts et al., 2005) found that
47% of 8- to 18-year-olds reported having read at least 5
minutes of a magazine the previous day, and 22% reported
having read a magazine for 20 minutes or more the previous
day; on average, 8- to 18-year-olds reported reading
magazines 14 minutes a day.
Much of the research analyzing the
sexual content of magazines focuses heavily
on teen girls’ and women’s magazines (e.g.,
Carpenter, 1998; Durham, 1998; Garner,
Sterk, & Adams, 1998; McMahon, 1990).
One of the dominant themes about
sexuality reported across these studies
and across magazines is that presenting
oneself as sexually desirable and thereby
gaining the attention of men is and
should be the focal goal for women.
Girls and young women are repeatedly
encouraged to look and dress in specific ways to look
sexy for men, a phenomenon labeled “costuming for
seduction” (M. Duffy & Gotcher, 1996), and to use
certain products in order to be more attractive to and
desired by males.
These studies document that attracting the attention of
boys by looking “hot” and “sexy” is the point of many of
the articles, text, cover lines, ads, and photographs.
Repeated attempts are made, in the form of advice about
hairstyles, cosmetics, clothing, diet, and exercise, to remake
the reader as an object of male desire (McMahon, 1990).
Nearly everything girls and women are encouraged to do
in the line of self-improvement is geared toward gaining
the attention of men. Even articles on physical fitness
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
7
This gross underrepresentation
of women or girls
in films with family-friendly
content reflects a missed
opportunity to present a
broad spectrum of girls
and women in roles that
are nonsexualized.
analyzed in Seventeen and the now defunct YM (Durham,
1998) centered on the need for girls to increase their
sexual desirability through exercise rather than on
improving their health or well-being.
Similar results were reported by Garner et al. (1998),
who analyzed advice given about sex in five magazines
aimed at girls, adolescents, and young women: YM,Teen,
Seventeen, Glamour, and Mademoiselle.The authors reported
that the content of these magazines encouraged young
women to think of themselves as sexual objects whose lives
were not complete unless sexually connected with a man.
Female readers were given advice on how to look and
dress to attract men and on which attributes were most
successful in attracting men (i.e., innocence) and which
were least successful and should be avoided (e.g., being
pushy or bossy, acting like a mom, being too demanding,
pushing too early for commitment).
Thus, much of the content of mainstream magazines
geared toward adolescent girls and young women heavily
emphasizes the centrality of heterosexual relationships for
women and the need to achieve rigid norms of physical
attractiveness through the consumption of products such
as cosmetics and fashionable clothing (Durham, 1998).
As M. Duffy and Gotcher (1996) concluded from their
analysis of YM,
the world of YM is a place where young women . . . must consume
and beautify themselves to achieve an almost impossible physical
beauty ideal.And, it is a place where sexuality is both a means and
an objective, where the pursuit of males is almost the sole focus of
life. In fact, the objective of attracting males is the only objective
presented—it is an unquestioned “good.” (p. 43)
Sports Media
A large body of research shows that media coverage of
women’s sports is minimal compared with the extensive
coverage of men’s sports, despite the boom in female
athletic participation since the passage of Title IX and the
development of professional women’s teams (e.g.,Amateur
Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles, 2001; M. C. Duncan,
Messner, & Williams, 1991; Kane, 1996; Messner, Duncan,
& Jensen, 1993; Pedersen & Whisenant, 2003; J.Vincent,
Imwold, Johnson, & Massey, 2003).This paucity of research
means that what is covered must suffice to represent
women’s sports more broadly.Thus, it is particularly
problematic that when women’s sports are featured,
coverage is often selective (Kane, 1996), and commentary
often sexually objectifies female athletes as well as female
fans in the audience (Messner, Duncan, & Cooky, 2003;
Schultz, 2005).
Although scholars have documented differential and
sexist treatment of female athletes for over a decade
(e.g., Kane & Greendorfer, 1994; Messner et al., 1993,
2003), available evidence suggests a trend for increasing
sexualization of female athletes comparable to their overall
increasing visibility. Male athletes are rarely depicted solely
as sexual objects in their endorsement work, but several
female athletes have recently posed nude or in provocative
poses in national magazines. For example, eight Olympic
athletes were featured in the September 2004 issue of
Playboy, swimmer Amanda Beard appeared in Sports
Illustrated’s 2005 swimsuit edition, and soccer player
Brandi Chastain was in Gear Magazine in 1999.
Several targeted studies of specific media genres, sports,
or sporting events have documented the frequency with
which female athletes are sexualized. Fink and Kensicki
(2002) explored the coverage of female athletes in
Sports Illustrated (SI) and Sports Illustrated for Women (SIW)
from 1997 to 1999.They found that only 10% of the
photographs in SI during this 3-year period were of
female athletes. Five percent of these photographs were
“pornographic/sexually suggestive,” defined as women
dressed provocatively or photographed in such a way as
to focus solely on sexual attributes (e.g., photograph
framed on an athlete’s breasts). Only .2% of the
photographs of men fell into this category. Sixty-six
percent of the photographs of men showed them actively
engaged in a sport versus 34% of the photographs of
women. Representations of women in SIW were
only slightly better; 56% of photographs of women in
SIW depicted them actively engaged in sports, and
2% were pornographic.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
8
Shugart’s (2003) study on print and television coverage
of the 1999 U.S. women’s soccer team lends further support
for a pattern of sexualizing female athletes. Shugart
argued that media coverage of the team was sexualized in
three ways:
l Subtle sexualization occurred through passive
objectification—for example, photographs that favored
an athlete’s face rather than her athletic performance.
l Less subtle sexualization was shown in commentators’
remarks—for example, when Brandi Chastain removed
her jersey after scoring the winning goal of the World
Cup.Although this specific behavior was identical to
that of male soccer players in the same circumstances, in
Chastain’s case, sportscasters called it a “striptease” and
deemed her “the owner of the most talked-about breasts
in the country” (pp. 12-13). In several media sources, the
team was referred to as “booters with hooters” (p. 13).
l “Vigilant heterosexuality” was evident in commentary
that placed the femininity of female athletes and their
family lives in the foreground to suggest that they were
not lesbians (regardless of their real-life sexual
orientation).This form of sexualization marginalizes the
athleticism of female athletes:“Female strength has been
redefined as male pleasure” (p. 27).This assessment is
echoed by Hill Collins (2004), who argued in an
analysis of depictions of several African American
athletes that their appearances in passive “sexy” poses in
various media counteracted their aggression and passion
on the court or field.
Video/Computer Games
The vast majority of children play video games: 87% of
younger children and 70% of adolescents (Paik, 2001).A
gender divide in heavy video game play exists, with 41%
of boys playing games for more than an hour a day and
only 18% of girls doing so (D. Roberts et al., 2005). Girls,
however, spend an average of 40 minutes per day playing
games online or on home systems (D. Roberts et al., 2005).
Games made for specialized systems and those made
for personal computers contain highly sexualized content
and few strong female protagonists (Dietz, 1998). In a
recent study, Haninger and Thompson (2004) sampled 80
“Teen”-rated3 video games from a population of 396
games in release in 2001.They observed sexual themes in
27% of games. Games were significantly more likely to
depict female characters partially nude or engaged in sexual
behaviors than to depict male characters in this way.When
the authors expanded their definition of “sexual theme” to
include “pronounced cleavage, large breasts, or provocative
clothing,” the percentage of female characters so depicted
rose to 46%.
Beasley and Standley (2002) examined 64 games for
sexualizing themes.Women were seldom depicted in any of
these games (14% of all characters were female).When the
clothing of female characters was compared with that of
males, female characters’ clothing was more likely to
expose skin. Dill, Gentile, Richter, and Dill (2005) found
that in the 20 top-selling games in 1999, only female characters
were portrayed as highly sexualized.
Internet
Girls use the Internet frequently and for many purposes (D.
Roberts et al., 2005). In recent years, studies have shown
that girls and boys use the Internet in equal numbers
(Lenhart, Lewis, & Rainie, 2001; D. Roberts et al., 2005),
with girls leading boys in Internet use in the early
middle-school years (Lenhart, Madden, & Hitlin, 2005).
The wide popularity of sites like MySpace.com as well as
blog centers has encouraged youth, including girls, to
describe themselves on the Internet. Recently, public
attention has focused on the sexualized self-presentations
by some girls on these Web sites and the dangers inherent
in this practice (Kornblum, 2005), although there is
currently no research that has assessed how girls portray
themselves or how dangerous this practice is. Some girls
have posed in provocative clothing and posted notices of
their sexual availability.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
9
3 According to the Entertainment Software Rating Board (n.d.),“T” or teen-rated video games have content that may be suitable for ages 13 and older.Titles in
this category may contain violence, suggestive themes, crude humor, minimal blood, simulated gambling, and/or infrequent use of strong language.
The recent and global proliferation of Web sites of all
kinds that may be of interest to girls makes it difficult to
assess the sexualization of girls and women. Lambiase
(2003) examined the sexualization of girls and women on
one specific type of Web site that targets and attracts girls
and teens: official and fan Web sites of male and female
celebrities. She found that female celebrities were far more
likely than male celebrities to be represented by sexualized
images, regardless of whether the site was official or produced
by fans. She also found that female musicians were
more likely to be sexualized than other female celebrities.
Pornography is readily available on the Internet (Griffiths,
2000), with one source estimating that 12% of all Web sites
are pornography sites, and 25% of all search engine requests
are for pornography (English, 2005). Extensive data on
children’s and adolescents’ exposure to sexually objectifying
material online is lacking; however, a Kaiser Family
Foundation (2001) study found that 70% of teens 15–17
years of age had accidentally encountered pornography
on the Internet, with 23% saying this happened somewhat
or very often.
Advertising
The sexualization of women is particularly prominent in
the world of advertising. In prime-time television commercials,
for example, Lin (1997) demonstrated that women
more often than men were shown in a state of undress,
exhibited more “sexiness,” and were depicted as sexual
objects (9.2% of men vs. 20.8% of women). Similar findings
have appeared in analyses of commercials on MTV
(Signorielli, McLeod, & Healy, 1994), on Spanish-language
programming (Fullerton & Kendrick, 2000), and in countries
around the world, such as Turkey and Japan (Akima,
2003; Uray & Burnaz, 2003). Beer commercials have
emerged as a particularly rich source of images that
sexualize young women. Of the 72 beer and nonbeer
ads randomly selected from prime-time sports and
entertainment programming, 75% of the beer ads and
50% of the nonbeer ads were labeled as “sexist,” featuring
women in very limited and objectifying roles (Rouner,
Slater, & Domenech-Rodriguez, 2003).
Magazine advertisements also sexualize women. First,
studies indicate that women are frequently featured as
sexual objects in such ads (e.g., Baker, 2005; Lindner, 2004;
W. J. Rudman & Verdi, 1993). In one analysis of women
appearing in advertisements in Time and Vogue from 1955
to 2002, Lindner (2004) reported that an average of 40% of
ads featured women as decorative objects.When women
are featured as “decorations” in ads (e.g., shown standing
seductively next to a car to enhance the image of the car),
their major purpose is to be looked at.They are treated as
appendages to the product rather than as active consumers
or users of the product.
Differences in these patterns emerge based on the
magazine’s intended audience and are particularly high in
magazines targeting men. For example, Baker (2005)
reported that in magazines targeting Black men or White
men, 68.2% of women appearing in magazines for Black
men and 53.3% in magazines for White men could be categorized
as filling the decorative object role.This was the
case for 22.0% and 15.8% of women in magazines targeting
Black women and White women, respectively. Similarly,
Reichert and Carpenter (2004) found that whereas women
were suggestively dressed, partially clad, or nude about half
the time in ads in women’s magazines (e.g., Redbook)
published in 2003, almost four out of five women (78%)
were depicted in this manner in ads in men’s magazines
(e.g., Esquire).Analyses of photographs from Maxim
and Stuff (two popular men’s magazines) revealed that
80.5% of the women were depicted as sex objects
(Krassas et al., 2003).
Magazine advertisements sexualize women in a second
way. Evidence indicates that such sexual objectification
occurs more frequently for women in magazine ads than
for men (Plous & Neptune, 1997; Reichert, 2003; Soley &
Kurzbard, 1986). For example, Reichert, Lambiase,
Morgan, Carstarphen, and Zavoina (1999) found that
women were three times more likely than men to be
dressed in a sexually provocative manner in ads. In their
analysis of fashion and fitness magazine advertisements
published in 1992,W. J. Rudman and Verdi (1993) found
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
10
that female models were more likely than male models to
be placed in submissive, sexually exploitive, and violent
positions. In approximately 80% of the ads in their sample,
female models were posed in sexually exploitive postures.
In half of the ads studied, female models were “dismembered”
(i.e., body parts were excluded or obscured) by the
camera angle or logo placement.This was the case for only
17% of men in ads.
Findings document that such patterns have been
increasing over time. Sullivan and O’Connor (1988)
reported a 60% increase since 1970 in the portrayals of
women in purely “decorative” roles. In an analysis of 1,871
ads from 1959, 1969, 1979, and 1989, Busby and Leichty
(1993) found an increase in the number of decorative or
alluring roles for women—from 54% in 1959 to 73% in
1989. Kang (1997) reported an increase in the display of
women’s bodies in advertisements—from 25% of ads in
1979 to 32% in 1991. In comparing the sexual imagery in
ads from six magazines published over a 20-year-period,
Reichert and Carpenter (2004) found a significant increase
over time in the explicitness of female dress, male dress, and
physical contact between women and men. Here, 28% of
women were shown as suggestively dressed, partially clad,
or nude in ads in 1983, and this increased to 49% in 2003.
Only one study found no change over time in
objectification or body display for women from 1955
to 2002 (Lindner, 2004). Overall, research shows
magazines’ growing focus on women’s bodies as sexual
objects for others’ viewing pleasure.
Some researchers have found that such patterns differ
depending on the race of the woman pictured or targeted
as an audience for the magazine. In her analysis of images
of women’s sexuality in advertisements in eight Black- and
White-oriented women’s and men’s magazines, Baker
(2005) found that White women in women’s magazines,
more often than Black women in women’s magazines, were
represented with their faces hidden (thus placing an
emphasis on their body and physical attributes).White
women were also more likely than Black women to be
represented as a decorative object in men’s magazines.
Similar findings were reported by Sanchez-Hucles,
Hudgins, and Gamble (2005) in their comparison of
women in ads in mainstream, Black-oriented, and Latina
magazines. In this study, 42% of ads in Cosmopolitan were
found to contain suggestive body exposure, compared with
13% in Ebony, 32% in Essence, 0% in Filipinas, and 21% in
Latin Girl.These patterns appear to persist over time.
Plous and Neptune (1997) examined 10 years of fashion
advertisements drawn from six magazines geared
toward White women (Cosmopolitan, Glamour), Black
women (Ebony, Essence), and White men (Esquire, GQ).
They found that body exposure of White women increased
significantly over the 10 years, from approximately 34% in
1985-1986 to nearly 50% in 1993-1994.Ads displaying
cleavage of White women nearly doubled, from 22.8% in
1985–1986 to 42.8% in 1993–1994. Breast exposure of
Black women increased from 30% of ads in 1986-1988 to
more than 40% by 1993–1994. If breast exposure is included
with other types of body exposure, the percentage of
1993–1994 ads with body exposure rises to 52.9% for
Black women and 61.6% for White women.
Despite evidence that ads are more sexual than ever
(Lin, 1998; Reichert et al., 1999), there is also some
indication that this is not what the public wants.A 1999
Adweek poll showed that 70% of respondents thought there
was too much sexual imagery in advertising (Dolliver,
1999). Moreover, evidence indicates that such tactics may
not be as effective as advertisers think.Advertising and
marketing researchers have studied sex in advertising since
the 1960s, and a general finding has been that attention
and processing resources are directed toward sexual material
including nudity, sexual behavior, and embedded sexual
material (Lang,Wise, Lee, & Cai, 2003). Recent evidence,
however, indicates that drawing attention does not always
translate into selling products. In an experimental investigation
involving 366 adults 18–54 years of age, Bushman
(2005) demonstrated that participants exposed to programming
featuring sexual commercials were less likely to
remember the advertised brands and expressed less interest
in buying those brands than participants who had seen ads
with no sexual content.
These data indicate that young women and adult
women are frequently, consistently, and increasingly
presented in sexualized ways in advertising, creating an
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
11
environment in which being female becomes nearly
synonymous with being a sexual object.Although advertisers
are typically careful not to sexualize young girls directly,
several advertising techniques do so indirectly:
l There is some empirical evidence that children, and girls
especially, are sometimes depicted as sexual objects or as
counterparts to adult versions. In their analysis of children
appearing in advertisements drawn from five popular
magazines (e.g., Ladies Home Journal, Newsweek) over
a 40-year-period, O’Donohue, Gold and McKay (1997)
found 38 ads (1.5%) that portrayed children in sexual
ways. Moreover, 85% of these ads focused on girls, and
this depiction of sexualized girls was found to increase
significantly over time. In these ads, girls often appear
with sexualized adult women and are posed in matching
clothing or seductive poses.
l Advertising imagery presents the public with both a “trickle
up” and a “trickle down” framework on girls and women
(Cook & Kaiser, 2004); thus, the distinction between women and
girls may become blurred. In this framework, young girls are
“adultified” and adult women are “youthified.” Merskin
(2004) wrote that advertising is full of photographs in
which women are “dressed down” to look like little girls
and young girls are “dressed up” as grown women.
Evidence for trickle-up includes the launching of new
magazines CosmoGirl and ElleGirl in 2001 and Teen Vogue
in 2003.These magazines “downsize” the sexualizing
messages of their “mother” publications: how to please
your man becomes how to please your prom date. The
trickle-down or “youthification” side of the equation
includes sexual portrayals of adult women as young girls in
advertising (Kilbourne, 1999), often wearing schoolgirl
clothing and licking lollipops or popsicles or wearing
scaled-up versions of children’s clothing styles like babydoll
dresses and tops, knee socks, and Mary Janes, all
marketed as adult women’s wear.This trend has led some
critics to denounce “pedophilic fashion” (Menkes, 1994).
As another example, a recent television fashion show (the
Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show on CBS in December 2005)
featured a Christmas-themed segment in which the
highly sexualized runway models were dressed like little
girls in baby doll teddies, pulling stuffed animals, and
surrounded by toys.
l Individual ads have employed youthful or “barely legal”
celebrity adolescents in highly sexual ways. News stories
over the last 25 years have reported on these ads—
both successful and controversial—that have been
debated and sometimes pulled because of their
presentation of sexualized young girls: the Brooke
Shields/Calvin Klein jeans ad, and in more recent years,
the Abercrombie and Fitch catalogue, the Calvin Klein
child underwear ads, the Christina Aguilera/Skechers
ads, and the Paris Hilton/Carl’s Jr. hamburger ads. Such
ads often take a star popular with teens and preteens and
present her in highly sexualized poses. Some explicitly
play up innocence as sexy, as in one of the Skechers
“naughty and nice” ads that featured Aguilera dressed
as a schoolgirl in pigtails, with her shirt unbuttoned,
licking a lollipop. Merskin (2004) concluded that
the message from advertisers and the mass media to girls (as eventual
women) is they should always be sexually available, always have sex
on their minds, be willing to be dominated and even sexually aggressed
against, and they will be gazed on as sexual objects. (p. 120)
Products
Products designed for children and adolescents are big
business; toy sales alone amounted to over $21 billion in
2005 (Ackman, 2006).These products are one of the
sources of societal-level socialization and can shape
children’s development in a variety of ways. For example,
cultural model theorists (Bachen & Illouz, 1996; Duveen
& Lloyd, 1990) have argued that marketers present schemas
to young people for life events about which they have little
experience and which then become cultural models
for them.Although few systematic studies have been
conducted to examine the prevalence or psychological
impact of products that sexualize girls or women, the
following sections on dolls, clothing, and cosmetics
present examples of products marketed to girls that
present images of sexy, sexualized persons.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
12
Dolls. Doll play is a popular activity for children, especially
girls (Sutton-Smith, 1986). It is therefore of concern when
sexualized dolls are marketed to girls. One series of dolls
popular with girls as young as age 4 are the Bratz dolls, a
multiethnic crew of teenagers who are interested in fashion,
music, boys, and image (see www.bratz.com). Bratz
girls are marketed in bikinis, sitting in a hot tub, mixing
drinks, and standing around, while the “Boyz” play guitar
and stand with their surf boards, poised for action (Brown
& Lamb, 2005; Lamb & Brown, 2006). Moreover, Bratz
dolls come dressed in sexualized clothing such as
miniskirts, fishnet stockings, and feather boas.Although
these dolls may present no more sexualization of girls
or women than is seen in MTV videos, it is worrisome
when dolls designed specifically for
4- to 8-year-olds are associated with
an objectified adult sexuality.The
objectified sexuality presented by
these dolls, as opposed to the healthy
sexuality that develops as a normal
part of adolescence, is limiting for
adolescent girls, and even more so
for the very young girls who represent
the market for these dolls.
With the success of the Bratz dolls,
other doll manufacturers have followed
suit. Mattel created “My Scene Barbie”
and was promptly sued by Hasbro for “serial copycatting”
(DeSmedt, 2006).The pudgy, cuddly, and asexual troll dolls
that sold by the millions in the 1960s have been reinvented
as Trollz (à la Bratz), hip teenagers who are “BFFL” (Best
Friends for Life; see www.trollz.com) (Sheff, 2005).The
full-lipped Sapphire,Amethyst, Onyx, Ruby, and Topaz
sport big hair, miniskirts, bare midriffs, and “magical belly
gems” and are being marketed to girls as young as 4–8
years old (Sheff, 2005). Recently, Hasbro was poised to
release a series of dolls modeled after the musical group
The Pussycat Dolls (a former burlesque troup known for
their revealing clothing and highly sexualized lyrics),
designed for 4- to 8-year-old girls.A grassroots protest
campaign convinced them to pull this line of dolls
(Goldiner, 2006).
Although the hugely popular American Girl dolls,
known for their championing of multiethnic girls’ histories,
have not been overtly sexualized,American Girl’s recent
co-branding with Bath & Body Works (T.Turner, 2005)
may lead to product tie-ins that will encourage girls to
develop a precocious body consciousness and one
associated with narrowly sexual attractiveness.
Clothing. Whereas girls may have little control over how
they are represented in the media, they have more control
over the identity they create via their clothing choices
(Cook & Kaiser, 2004). Labre and Walsh-Childers (2003)
argued that teen magazines combine fashion and beauty
into one category and that girls are encouraged to express
their individuality through fashion choices.
Indeed, as Lamb and Brown (2006)
indicated, marketers specifically sell
unique identity to girls via clothing, often
pointing out how a girl might choose
one day to look “punk” and another to
look “innocent.”
Given that girls may be developing
their identity in part through the clothing
they choose, it is of concern when girls
at increasingly younger ages are invited to
try on and wear teen clothes designed to
highlight female sexuality.Wearing such
clothing may make it more difficult for girls to see their
own worth and value in any way other than sexually.The
sexualization of girls in clothing advertisements appeared at
least as early as 25 years ago, with such advertisements as a
girl in jeans, dropping her rag doll by her side, with the
headline “13 going on 18” (1981), and the controversial
Calvin Klein ad in which the 15-year-old Brooke Shields
declared,“Nothing comes between me and my Calvins”
(Cook & Kaiser, 2004).
What seems to be a more recent phenomenon,
however, is the production of “sexy” clothing in child and
teen sizes. Pollett and Hurwitz (2004) noted that the
thong, an item of clothing based on what a stripper might
wear, is now offered in “tween” stores as well as children’s
wear departments, often with decorations that will specifiReport
of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
13
. . . the thong, an item
of clothing based on what
a stripper might wear, is
now offered in “tween”
stores as well as women’s
wear departments, often with
decorations that will specifically
appeal to children.
cally appeal to children. Retail stores such as Limited Too
that focus on the so-called tween population (defined by
the store as ages 7 up to teen years) sell sexy lingerie such
as camisoles and lacy panties, items that once would have
been marketed solely to adults (Lamb & Brown, 2006).
In a recent content analysis of Halloween costumes, Nelson
(2000) found that there was greater variation in the types
of costumes marketed to boys than in those marketed to
girls and that girls’ costumes nearly always emphasized
physical attractiveness (e.g., beauty queens and princesses).
Among the few female villain costumes, sexual eroticism
was emphasized (e.g.,“Sexy Devil” or “Bewitched”).
Cosmetics.The cosmetics industry has also seen the value of
marketing their products to younger and younger girls.Toy
shops sell “Girls Ultimate Spa and Perfume Kit” (“for use by
up to eight kids and perfect for spa parties, sleepovers, and
rainy days”); the Body Shop has lip glosses intended for
teens and fruity lip glosses for preteens; Claire’s, an accessory
store in thousands of malls, sells lip gloss and perfume to
young girls. Barbie has perfumes called “Free Spirit,”
“Summer Fun,” and “Super Model.”
French perfumeries have introduced perfumes to the
market specifically for little girls (e.g.,“smellies”).Villeneuve
and de Grandi (1996) stated that “very young girls are targeted
with a whole range from the leading brands, with
Fleur d’interdit by Givenchy and Tendre Poison by Dior, lighter
versions of Interdit and Poison,a reminder of the ‘grown-up
version’at gentler prices.”The marketers at Yves Rocher
write of their Blackberry Cream perfume,“Little girls love to
wear fragrance just like Mom.” Publishers of teen magazines
such as CosmoGIRL! advertise cosmetics, perfumes, and personal
hygiene products, along with fashion, to their anticipated
audience of preteens and teens.These pitches appear
to be effective. Marketing surveys show that the average 12-
to 19-year-old girl uses fragrances five times a week
(Chaplin, 1999).Although there is nothing wrong with girls
wanting to smell nice and look attractive, advertisements for
adult women’s perfume overwhelmingly advertise seduction
and sex appeal through the use of scent. Cosmetics and
perfume are often associated specifically with the desire
to be sexually attractive,a desire that seems misplaced in prepubescent
girls.
Summary of Cultural Contributions
The evidence reviewed in this section demonstrates that
women and girls are more likely than men and boys to be
objectified and sexualized in a variety of media outlets
(including television, magazines, sports media, and music
videos), in advertising, and in several products that are
marketed to children.Although much of this research has
focused on adult or college-aged women rather than on
girls or teenagers, portrayals of adult women provide girls
with models that they can use to fashion their own behaviors,
self-concepts, and identities.Although media images of
girls directly affect girls, media images of women can also
affect them through this indirect process.
Interpersonal Contributions
Societal messages that contribute to the sexualization of
girls come not only from media and merchandise but also
through girls’ interpersonal relationships (e.g., with parents,
teachers, and peers) (Brown & Gilligan, 1992). Parents,
teachers, and peers exist within the context of society’s sexualizing
representations and can be affected by them.Thus,
these individuals may contribute to girls’ sexualization
when they convey their support for these cultural messages,
either subtly or overtly. In addition, parents, teachers,
and peers, as well as others (e.g., other family members,
coaches, or strangers) sometimes sexually harass, abuse, or
assault girls, a most destructive form of sexualization.
Research suggests that parents’ gender schemas have a
significant effect on children’s gender self-concepts and
gender-related attitudes toward others (Tenenbaum &
Leaper, 2002). Fathers’ attitudes in particular influence the
gender typing of children’s activities and whether children
conform to this gender typing (McHale, Crouter, &
Tucker, 1999).Although these studies investigated gender
schemas rather than sexualization, they suggest that if
parents’ schemas include sexualized ideas about girls
(which is likely given that the sexualization of women
and heterosexual interactions are a key dimension of
dominant cultural femininity; Bartky, 1990; Brown, 2003),
these beliefs will be conveyed to their daughters and sons.
Because the current standard for sexy physical appearance
for girls requires that girls be quite thin, research on
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
14
the “thin ideal” is relevant to the sexualization of girls.
There is evidence that parents, peers, and the media all support
a “culture of dieting” for girls (Levine, Smolak, &
Hayden, 1994; Nichter, 2000). Several studies (with mostly
White participants) have shown that mother–daughter
interactions affect how adolescent girls respond to cultural
messages about thinness (Ogle & Damhorst, 2004) and that
mothers’ investment in their own slenderness and mothers’
criticisms of their daughters’ weight are correlated with disordered
eating in their daughters (Hill,Weaver, & Blundell,
1990; Levine, Smolak, Moodey, Shuman, & Hessen, 1994).
More recently, in a 3-year qualitative, longitudinal study
of eighth and ninth graders, Nichter (2000) found that
White mothers routinely engaged in “fat talk” about their
own bodies and the bodies of their daughters, concluding
that “girls seemed to be surrounded by excessive concerns
over physical appearance and talk of feeling
fat” (p. 120). Fewer girls received
messages from fathers, but when they
did, it was in the form of criticism,
“appraising looks, kidding quips, putdowns,
and snide comments like ‘When
did you start getting boobs?’” (p. 140).
This last comment suggests that body
comments and fat talk do, at least for
fathers, include specific references to sexuality
and that comments on a girl’s body are often conflated
or experienced as comments on her sexuality. In addition,
such encouragement for girls to look at their bodies rather
than attend to their feelings teaches them to treat their
bodies as objects to be decorated and made desirable for
others; as they mature into adolescence, such looking
becomes sexualized (Lamb, 2002, 2006;Tolman, 2002).
Nichter (2000) found a different pattern for African
American girls, who received much more positive feedback
about their appearance and “style” from their parents.They
also said that they looked up to their mothers as role
models who would teach them how to succeed in a hostile
world.Although African American girls reported dieting at
almost the same rates as European American girls, they also
reported greater body satisfaction and self-esteem and less
concern about their weight. Both African American and
European American girls thus seem to be internalizing the
messages, whether positive or negative, they receive from
their parents.
Parents can also contribute to the sexualization of their
daughters in very direct and concrete ways—for example,
by entering their 5-year-old daughter in a beauty pageant
in which she and the other contestants engage in behaviors
and practices that are socially associated with sexiness:
wearing heavy makeup to emphasize full lips, long eyelashes,
and flushed cheeks, high heels to emulate adult women,
and revealing “evening gowns.”Although relatively few
girls actually participate in such pageants, they have
become a topic of interest in the news, documentaries, and
advertising, in particular regarding whether this
precocious sexualization is problematic for these or other
girls. In this way, the participation of a few may in fact
contribute to the sexualization of many.
Some parents have agreed to let
their daughters undergo plastic surgery in
order to become sexier or more attractive.
Over 77,000 invasive surgical procedures
were performed on teens 18 years old and
younger in 2005, a 15% increase since
2000 (American Society of Plastic
Surgeons, 2006a). Minors cannot obtain
such surgery unless their parents consent;
parents typically finance the surgery, as well. Because these
procedures are expensive (and generally not covered by
health insurance), only girls from upper-middle-class or
wealthy families are likely to have access to them.
Teachers may also contribute to the sexualization of
girls. In her ethnographic research in preschools, Martin
(1998) found that girls were encouraged to play dress up
more than boys and that teachers encouraged girls in their
dress-up games to play at being sexualized adult women.
This often involved looking in mirrors, walking in “fancy”
high heels, and “vamping.”Teachers may also communicate
messages to girls that promote a thin-ideal body image.
For example, one study showed that teachers have negative
attitudes toward girls whose bodies do not conform to the
thin ideal (Villimez, Eisenberg, & Carroll, 1986). In this
study, teachers rated children in kindergarten through
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
15
African American girls . . .
reported greater body
satisfaction and self-esteem
and less concern about
their weight.
fourth grade. Heaviness and body “bulk” were negatively
correlated with teachers’ ratings of girls’ competence but
positively correlated with their ratings of boys’ competence.Although
the thin ideal is conceptually distinct
from sexualization, the two are often connected. In another
study (Rolón-Dow, 2004), middle-school teachers’
descriptions of their Latina (Puerto Rican) students
focused almost exclusively on the appearance and sexuality
of the girls.The girls’“hypersexuality” was seen as being
incompatible with academic achievement.
Peers also participate in the sexualization of girls.
Thorne’s (1993) research on girls and boys together on the
playground showed that girls are marked as sexual by boys
at a very early age, quite independent of their own behavior.
Nichter (2000) and Eder (1995) found that girls police
each other to ensure conformance with ideals of thinness
and sexiness, and Brown (2003) found that teenage girls
will seek revenge by negatively sexualizing girls whom
they perceive as a threat (e.g., by labeling them as “sluts”).
Several authors (Levy, 2005b; P. Paul, 2005; Pollet &
Hurwitz, 2004) have argued that girls now equate
popularity with sexiness and view behaving in a sexual
way with boys as a pathway to power. Indeed, previous
research has shown that girls’ popularity is based in part
on physical attractiveness and social precocity regarding
interest in boys (Adler, Kless, & Adler, 1992). Merten’s
(2004) ethnographic study of (mostly White) suburban
Chicago junior high school girls also supports this idea.
He found that popularity required girls to construct a
femininity that focused on physical attractiveness and
“emphasized the male gaze” (p. 364).
Sexual harassment by boys and men is a regular part of
school and work life. In the American Association of
University Women’s (2001) “Hostile Hallways” study, 63%
of girls reported experiencing sexual harassment “often” or
“occasionally.”The most common form of harassment was
being made the object of sexual jokes, comments, gestures,
or looks; next most frequent was being touched, grabbed,
pinched, or brushed up against in a sexual way. Of girls
who reported physical sexual harassment, 90% had been
harassed by a student, 45% by a former student, and 6% by
a teacher.
Peers appear to play a very direct role in the sexualization
of girls, making sexual commentary and evaluation in
school. One recent study explored early adolescents’ experiences
with sexual harassment from peers (Lindberg,
Grabe, & Hyde, 2007). Even 10- to 12-year-olds, most of
whom had not yet completed the fifth grade, reported significant
and frequent experiences of sexual harassment in
school.Although both boys and girls reported such experiences,
the nature and effects of these experiences differed.
Girls’ pubertal development predicted more peer sexual
harassment.That is, girls experience more sexually harassing
comments as their bodies mature.These experiences, in
turn, lead girls to experience greater feelings of shame
about their bodies.
Particularly damaging forms of sexualization include
sexual abuse and being prostituted or sexually trafficked.
Estimates of the prevalence of child sexual abuse vary, in
part because of methodological differences between studies
(e.g., how sexual abuse is defined). However, epidemiological
and other nationally representative studies generally
place lifetime prevalence rates for women at 15%-25%,
with men experiencing sexual abuse less frequently (Elliott,
1997; Molnar, Buka, & Kessler, 2001;Tjaden & Thoennes,
1998;Vogeltanz et al., 1999).
Girls and women in prostitution are by definition
sexualized—objectified and treated as sexual commodities.
In the case of girls under age 18, prostitution is legally considered
sexual abuse; it is often instead described as commercial
sexual exploitation of children or child prostitution.
Most women over the age of 18 in prostitution began
prostituting when they were adolescents. Boyer, Chapman,
and Marshall (1993) interviewed 50 women prostituting in
escort services, on the street, in strip clubs, through phone
sex, and in massage parlors (brothels) in Seattle,WA.All of
these women began prostituting between the ages of 12
and 14. In another study, Nadon, Koverola, and
Schludermann (1998) found that 89% of their respondents
had begun prostitution before the age of 16. It is difficult
to accurately assess the number of girls currently in prostitution,
but a multimethod study by Estes and Weiner
(2001) estimated that between 244,000 and 325,000
American children and adolescents are at risk each year of
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
16
being victims of commercial sexual exploitation.
Childhood sexual abuse puts girls at risk for prostitution
(Nadon et al., 1998; Silbert & Pines, 1981, 1982).
Intrapsychic Contributions
Many parents as well as marketers would likely argue that
girls want the clothes and accessories that make them
“sexy” and that it is difficult to convince teenagers and
younger girls to make less sexualizing choices.As girls
participate actively in a consumer culture (often buying
products and clothes designed to make them look
physically appealing and sexy) and make choices about
how to behave and whom to become (often styling their
identities after the sexy celebrities who populate their
cultural landscape), they are, in effect, sexualizing themselves.
Keen observers of how social processes operate, girls
anticipate that they will accrue social advantages, such as
popularity, for buying into the sexualization of girls (i.e.,
themselves), and they fear social rejection for not doing so
(Brown & Gilligan, 1992; Nichter, 2000;Tolman, 2002).
A focus on physical attractiveness is not new; over 3
decades ago, Unger (1979) argued that physical beauty can
translate into power for girls. But the definition of attractiveness
differs depending on the tastes of the culture.
Whereas yesterday’s culture may have equated “domesticity”
with attractiveness in women, today’s culture equates
“sexy” with attractiveness (Wolf, 1991). Moreover, there is
evidence that physical appearance was not always the
prime currency for girls’ social success. Brumberg (1997)
examined diaries of adolescent girls in the United States
over the past 100 years to explore how they discussed
self-improvement.Whereas girls of earlier eras focused
on improving their studies and becoming more wellmannered,
in the last 20 years that Brumberg studied,
girls almost exclusively described changing their bodies
and enhancing their physical appearance as the focus of
their self-improvement.
Girls sexualize themselves when they think of themselves
mostly or exclusively in sexual terms and when they
equate their sexiness with a narrow standard of physical
attractiveness.They also sexualize themselves when they
think of themselves in objectified terms. Psychological
researchers have identified self-objectification (Fredrickson &
Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996) as a key process
whereby girls learn to think of and treat their own bodies
as objects of others’ desires. In self-objectification, girls
internalize an observer’s perspective on their physical selves
and learn to treat themselves as objects to be looked at and
evaluated for their appearance.Though portraying oneself
solely as a sexual object to be looked at is sometimes
viewed by girls and women as exercising control over their
sexuality (e.g., at some social networking Web sites), presentation
of the self in this way can be viewed as a form of
self-objectification.
There is ample evidence that self-objectification is
common among girls and women. For example, Slater and
Tiggemann (2002) found that girls as young as 12 years old
placed greater emphasis on their body’s appearance than on
its competence. In addition, many studies have demonstrated
that girls and women self-objectify more than boys and
men do (e.g., Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, &
Twenge, 1998; Strelan & Hargreaves, 2005).
Most studies have focused on European Americans, but
one study of ninth- and tenth-grade girls showed that most
girls, regardless of race, engaged in self-objectification
(McConnell, 2001).That is, they internalized an observer’s
standard of appearance and engaged in activities designed
to enhance their sexual attractiveness. In addition,African
American and White girls did not differ in the amount of
time they spent enhancing their physical appearance,
although African American girls spent more time on their
hair and White girls spent more time on their makeup.
Nichter’s (2000) study, however, suggests that the time
African American girls spend on their appearance may have
more to do with creating an individualized and ethnically
derived “style” (i.e., one that involves personality and
attitude, in addition to physical appearance) than with
adhering to the narrow vision of the “ideal girl” depicted
in the media.Thus, ethnic differences concerning the
meaning attached to self-objectifying practices may exist.
In addition to making sexualizing choices regarding
clothing, hair, and makeup, girls and teens sometimes “act
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
17
out” in sexually precocious ways. Given the highly sexualized
cultural milieu in which most girls are immersed, these
behaviors may simply be the result of modeling. It is important
to note, however, that sexualized behavior in children
(e.g., compulsive sex play, persistent and sometimes public
self-stimulation, inappropriate sexual overtures to others) is
one of the common sequelae of childhood sexual abuse
(Friedrich et al., 2001; Kendall-Tackett,Williams, &
Finkelhor, 1993; Letourneau, Schoenwald, & Sheidow, 2004).
In this case, girls are sexualizing themselves through their
behavior (i.e., they are presenting themselves as sexual objects
for others to use and/or they are engaging in age-inappropriate
sexual behavior). It would be inaccurate, though, to state
that girls are freely choosing these behaviors. Rather, the
mental functions and cognitive processes necessary for
healthy sexual decision-making have likely been damaged
through the experience of sexual abuse victimization
(Zurbriggen & Freyd, 2004), leading to precocious or
inappropriate sexual behavior.
These data support the contention that girls sometimes
participate in and contribute to their own sexualization.
However, the surrounding cultural milieu (and, for some
girls, their experiences of childhood sexual abuse victimization)
have encouraged and facilitated this process.Thus, girls’
choices are not fully independent of cultural or past interpersonal
influences. In addition, it is important to remember
that girls are fully capable of agency and resistance in this
area. (We return to this point in the Positive Alternatives and
Approaches to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization
section, pp. 36–42.)
Summary of Evidence for the Sexualization of Girls
Many studies have suggested that the culture delivers
abundant messages about the objectification and
sexualization of adult women and that this is the cultural
milieu in which girls develop. Parents, schools, and peers
sometimes contribute to the sexualization of girls, and
girls themselves sometimes adopt a sexualized and selfobjectified
identity.Additional research is needed that
(a) focuses specifically on girls rather than on adult
women; (b) further explores the ways in which parents,
schools, and peers sexualize girls; and (c) addresses girls’
self-sexualization—how often it occurs and what factors
encourage it. In the next section, we examine research and
theory suggesting that the sexualization of women and
girls may have a variety of negative consequences for
girls as well as for others in our culture.
Consequences of the Sexualization
of Girls
I
n this section we describe psychological theories
concerning mechanisms whereby people (girls
included) might be affected by sexualization.We also
describe some of the special vulnerabilities due to developmental
stage that are relevant to the sexualization of girls.
We then describe research showing that the sexualization
of girls is associated with many negative consequences.
Mechanisms by Which Sexualization Has an Impact
Psychology offers several theories to explain how the
sexualization of girls and women could influence girls’
well-being:
l Socialization theories describe how girls receive
and anticipate direct rewards and punishments from
socialization agents regarding sexualization.
l Sociocultural theories point out that girls exist within a
cultural milieu in which direct reinforcement is not
always necessary for internalization or activation of a
sexualized standard to be cultivated or for girls to
engage in early sexualized behaviors.
l Cognitive theories highlight the automatic and
unconscious nature of some of the schemas and other
cognitive structures that develop through socialization.
l Psychoanalytic theories point to early experiences as
formative in the development of the self.
l Objectification theory combines all of these approaches
to argue that girls’ observations of the world around
them contribute to an internalization that produces
self-sexualization.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
18
Socialization Theories
Social learning theory (e.g., Bussey & Bandura, 1999),
cognitive developmental theory (e.g.,Warin, 2000), and
gender schema theory (e.g., Bem, 1985) all offer explanations
for the learning of culturally appropriate gender roles,
ideologies, practices, and behaviors via reinforcement from
others and modeling.According to socialization theories,
girls learn about women’s expected roles in the world and
strive to enact these expectations, because doing so brings
specific rewards and because being consistent with
expectations is itself rewarding. In addition, violations of
the boundaries of these roles or ideologies can be met with
punishment, denigration, and even violence. Socialization
theories help us see that girls’ understanding of appropriate
femininity is not “natural” or innate but is acquired
through developmental processes whereby girls draw
information from the adults and peers, real and fictional,
around them.
Sociocultural Theories
Other psychological theories emphasize the culture or
context within which girls develop and through which
meanings are created.According to these theories,
choices about one’s appearance and behavior, as well as
reinforcement from socialization agents, exist within a
cultural milieu in which only certain options are available,
recognized as existing, or sanctioned. Cultivation theory
(Gerbner et al., 1994) proposes that when people are
exposed to media content or other socialization agents,
they gradually come to cultivate or adopt beliefs about the
world that coincide with the images they have been viewing
or messages they have been hearing.Agenda setting and
framing theories (Kosicki, 1993) highlight the fact that
important media outlets focus attention on certain issues
or domains, in effect telling girls what is and is not salient
or important. Feminist psychodynamic theories (e.g.,
Jordan, Kaplan, Miller, Stiver, & Surrey, 1991) and social
construction theories (e.g., Hare-Mustin & Marecek, 1988)
emphasize the messages culture delivers regarding femininity
and the ways in which such messages maintain gender
relations as power relations.
Cognitive Theories
Social psychologists have demonstrated that many attitudes
and beliefs operate, at least in part, on an “implicit” or
unconscious (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995) and automatic
(Bargh & Ferguson, 2000) level. For example, in numerous
studies, most White participants show an automatic
association between African Americans’ names or faces
and negative adjectives (Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji,
2001).This is true for children as well as adults (Baron &
Banaji, 2006).Automatic gender stereotypes and attitudes
operate in both women and men (Banaji & Greenwald,
1995; L. Rudman & Kilianski, 2000), and other types of
automatic associations (e.g., a link between power and sex;
Zurbriggen, 2000) are present in some people.Although
these attitudes, beliefs, and associations are automatic, they
are not immutable (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001). For
example, exposure to female leaders led to a decrease
in women’s automatic gender stereotyping (Dasgupta
& Asgari, 2004). Schemas and beliefs concerning
objectification and sexualization may also operate
implictly and automatically.
Psychoanalytic Theories
Psychoanalytic theories argue that “parental seduction” in
the form of overstimulation or boundary crossing can cause
guilt and conflict and can produce symptoms that affect the
very character of developing children as well as their ability
to form relationships in the future (J. Greenberg, 2001;
Shengold, 1989).Trauma theory and research show that
the early introduction of adult sexual material and behavior
in the lives of children through abuse can cause lifelong
struggles with their sexual development and with their
ability to form intimate relationships (Herman, 1992;
Scharff & Scharff, 1994). Shengold (1989) argued that the
mechanism through which such effects occur supposes
a natural progression of development, which, when
interrupted by the introduction of material or behaviors
that are too much for a child to bear, causes overwhelming
feelings that must be defended against. In psychoanalytic
theories, the defenses that explain self-sexualization and
risky sexual behavior that leads to retraumatization are
sometimes called “enactment” and sometimes “repetition”
(Rachman, Kennedy, & Yard, 2005).
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
19
Objectification Theory
Objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997;
McKinley & Hyde, 1996) is the theory that most
directly describes the process by which girls internalize
the sexualizing messages of culture.This theory focuses
particularly on the impact of the sexual objectification of
female bodies as the cultural milieu in which girls exist and
develop.According to this theory, girls internalize and
reproduce within their own self-schemas this objectified
perspective, an effect referred to as “self-objectification.”
Self-objectification involves adopting a third-person perspective
on the physical self and constantly assessing one’s
own body in an effort to conform to the culture’s standards
of attractiveness. Self-objectification in a
culture in which a woman is a “good
object” when she meets the salient cultural
standard of “sexy” leads girls to evaluate
and control their own bodies more in
terms of their sexual desirability to others
than in terms of their own desires, health,
wellness, achievements, or competence.
Developmental Processes Relevant to
the Sexualization of Girls
Cognitive Development
Children’s cognitive development affects their ability to
critically process cultural messages.According to
researchers, very young children are highly susceptible to
marketing (e.g., Borzekowski & Robinson, 1999), they
have difficulty distinguishing between commercial and regular
programming on TV (Atkin, 1982), and only after they
are approximately 8 years old can they recognize that the
purpose of advertisements is to persuade them to want to
purchase something (Kunkel & Roberts, 1991). Girls’
understanding of sexuality is also limited by their cognitive
development. Linn (2005) therefore asked rhetorically,
“How does a 7-year-old understand the plastic sexuality
of Britney Spears? How do 10-year-olds cope with
pressure to dress and act in sexually provocative ways?”
(p. 115). Girls have much less ability than adults to
comprehend and cope with cultural messages.
Identity Formation
Identity formation is a developmental hallmark of adolescence
in Western cultures. Research has shown identity to
be a major concern for adolescent girls (e.g., Brown, 1991),
for whom every day can feel like a struggle to fit in.
Strasburger and Wilson (2002) argued that preadolescents
and adolescents are like actors as they experiment with
different features of their newly forming identities and try
on different social “masks.”This plasticity may make them
especially susceptible to the messages society conveys,
particularly when marketers link popularity and social
acceptance to their products.Thus, sexualized messages
and products may be more easily accepted during this
developmental stage.
Age-Related Changes in
Self-Esteem
Just at the time when girls begin to
construct identity, they are more likely
to suffer losses in self-esteem. Research
has documented losses in self-esteem
for girls in adolescence (e.g., Harter,
1998; Major, Barr, & Zubek, 1999), and
perceived physical attractiveness is
closely linked to self-esteem (PolceLynch,
Myers, & Kilmartin, 1998). In particular,Tolman,
Impett,Tracy, and Michael (2006) have shown that in the
eighth grade, girls who objectify their bodies more have
much lower self-esteem. For this reason, diminishing selfesteem
arising in early adolescence may make girls particularly
vulnerable to cultural messages that promise them
popularity, effectiveness, and social acceptance through
the right “sexy” look. On the other hand, the drop in
self-esteem may be related to how responsive they are to
these cultural messages.
Impact on Girls’ Health and Well-Being
In this section, we describe and document the consequences
of the sexualization of girls and women.Ample
evidence indicates that sexualization has negative effects in
a variety of domains, including cognitive functioning,
physical and mental health, sexuality, and attitudes and
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
20
“How does a 7-year-old
understand the plastic
sexuality of Britney Spears?
How do 10-year-olds cope
with pressure to dress
and act in sexually
provocative ways?”
beliefs.We also briefly review some of the negative consequences
of sexual abuse and exploitation (extreme forms of
sexualization), noting that because sexual exploitation often
involves violence, some of the findings reported in this section
might not be applicable to sexualization more broadly.
Cognitive and Physical Functioning
Perhaps the most insidious consequence of self-objectification
is that it fragments consciousness. Chronic attention
to physical appearance leaves fewer cognitive resources
available for other mental and physical activities. One study
demonstrated this fragmenting quite vividly (Fredrickson et
al., 1998).While alone in a dressing room, college students
were asked to try on and evaluate either a swimsuit or a
sweater.While they waited for 10 minutes wearing the
garment, they completed a math test.The results revealed
that young women in swimsuits performed significantly
worse on the math problems than did those wearing
sweaters. No differences were found for young men. In
other words, thinking about the body and comparing it to
sexualized cultural ideals disrupted mental capacity. Recent
research has shown that this impairment occurs among
African American, Latina, and Asian American young
women (Hebl, King, & Lin, 2004) and extends beyond
mathematics to other cognitive domains including logical
reasoning and spatial skills (Gapinski, Brownell, &
LaFrance, 2003).
The implications are stunning and suggest that
sexualization may contribute to girls’ dropping out of
higher level mathematics in high school. Studies show that
as girls develop through adolescence, their science and
math self-concepts are less stable than those of boys (e.g.,
Simpkins, Davis-Kean, & Eccles, 2006). For example, girls
begin to underestimate their math ability relative to boys
and show diminished interest in upper level, optional math
classes in high school (Linver, Davis-Kean, & Eccles, 2002).
Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) have pointed out that
these declines in estimations of ability and the value girls
place on math begin around puberty, when their bodies
mature. Studies show that single-sex math classes lead
girls to feel less self-conscious and improve their math
performance substantially (Rutti, 1997).This may not
be solely because boys would otherwise dominate the
classroom (one popular explanation for the success of
single-sex math classes for girls) but also because without
boys, girls can literally take their minds off their own
bodies and think more effectively.
Self-objectification appears to disrupt physical performance
as well. One study explored self-objectification’s
relation to the commonly observed phenomenon of
“throwing like a girl” (Young, 1980). Girls do indeed
appear to have a distinctive way of throwing. Compared
with boys, girls tend not to bring their whole bodies into a
throw, instead remaining relatively immobile except for the
throwing arm, which is often not extended completely
(Roberton & Halverson, 1984). Fredrickson and Harrison
(2005) had 200 Anglo and African American girls, 10–17
years of age, throw a softball as hard as they could against a
distant gymnasium wall.They found that the extent to
which girls viewed their bodies as objects and were
concerned about their bodies’ appearance predicted
poorer motor performance on the softball throw. Selfobjectification,
it appears, limits the form and effectiveness
of girls’ physical movements.
Ample research shows that physical activity leads to
experiences of positive mood and feelings of confidence
(Plante, 1993), is associated with achieving and maintaining
physical health (President’s Council on Physical Fitness and
Sports, 1997), and improves cognitive performance (Etnier
et al., 1997). If the practices of sexualization and the resultant
self-objectification in which many girls engage serve to
limit their physical activities, then girls and women are
likely to suffer a wide range of consequences for their
overall health and well-being. For example, Dowling (2000)
suggested that girls and women who are physically active
and confident are more able to defend themselves from
physical attack and abuse.
Taken together, the work on the cognitive and physical
decrements associated with self-objectification suggests that
sexualization practices may function to keep girls “in their
place” as objects of sexual attraction and beauty, significantly
limiting their free thinking and movement in the world.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
21
Body Dissatisfaction and Appearance Anxiety
Sexualization and objectification undermine confidence in
and comfort with one’s own body, leading to a host of
negative emotional consequences, such as shame, anxiety,
and even self-disgust.The evidence to support this claim
comes from studies of self-objectification (mostly using
college-aged samples) and from experimental and
correlational studies of exposure to media emphasizing
a narrow ideal of women’s sexual attractiveness.
Studies based on objectification theory have shown
that the near-constant monitoring of appearance that
accompanies self-objectification leads to increased feelings
of shame about one’s body (e.g., Fredrickson et al., 1998;
McKinley, 1998, 1999;Tiggemann & Slater, 2001). Shame
is an emotion that occurs when one perceives one’s failure
to meet cultural standards of conduct (Lewis, 2000).
Individuals who feel shame deem the whole self as
deficient and typically have the urge to hide or disappear.
Given that so few women meet the dominant cultural
standard for an attractive, sexy appearance (Wolf, 1991), it is
not surprising that a girl’s chronic comparison of her own
body to this impossible cultural standard would result in
feelings of inadequacy and shame.
A second emotional consequence of self-objectification
is appearance anxiety, which is manifested by checking and
adjusting one’s appearance. Not knowing exactly when or
how one’s body will be looked at and evaluated creates
anxiety about exposure. Girls’ fashions arguably compound
the opportunities for this kind of anxiety:Tight-fitting
“belly shirts,” micro-miniskirts, and plunging necklines
require regular body monitoring and a kind of chronic
vigilance about whether everything is in place. Indeed,
numerous studies have shown stronger appearance anxiety
in those young women who internalize a sexualizing gaze
as their primary view of self (e.g.,Tiggemann & Lynch,
2001); other studies have shown that young women, in
general, will have stronger appearance anxiety after viewing
media portrayals of idealized women’s bodies (Monro &
Huon, 2005) or after being exposed to sexualizing words
that commonly appear on magazine covers, such as sexy or
shapely (T-A. Roberts & Gettman, 2004).
In one study of adolescent girls, Slater and Tiggemann
(2002) found that self-objectification correlated with both
body shame and appearance anxiety. For girls as young as
12 and 13 years of age, viewing oneself primarily from the
perspective of an observer and emphasizing features like
“attractiveness” and “sex appeal” with respect to one’s body
were related to higher levels of anxiety about appearance
and feelings of shame.
In addition to leading to feelings of shame and anxiety,
sexualizing treatment and self-objectification can generate
feelings of disgust toward one’s physical self. Girls may feel
they are “ugly” and “gross” or untouchable. In the study in
which college students were asked to try on and evaluate
swimwear, young women, regardless of body size, responded
to the experience with feelings of “disgust, distaste, and
revulsion” compared with those who tried on a sweater
(Fredrickson et al., 1998).The authors speculated that
standing alone in a dressing room and seeing their
bodies in the mirror led the young women to imagine
critical viewers, and this made them feel not only ashamed
but repulsive.
Complementing the evidence from studies on selfobjectification,
strong empirical evidence indicates that
exposure to ideals of sexual attractiveness in the media is
associated with greater body dissatisfaction among girls and
young women (for recent reviews, see Groesz, Levine, &
Murnen, 2002; Holmstrom, 2004).At least 38 experiments,
32 surveys, and 2 interview studies have been conducted
investigating these harmful connections, most of which
yielded the expected, statistically reliable results. For
example, Hargreaves and Tiggemann (2004) exposed
high school girls and boys either to “beauty ideal” or to
“nonappearance” commercials. Girls exposed to beauty
ideal commercials expressed significantly increased body
dissatisfaction. S. L.Turner, Hamilton, Jacobs,Angood, and
Dwyer (1997) examined the impact of exposure to fashion
magazines on women’s body image.Young women who
viewed fashion magazines versus news magazines preferred
to weigh less, were less satisfied with their bodies, were
more frustrated about their weight, were more preoccupied
with the desire to be thin, and were more afraid of getting
fat than were their peers who viewed news magazines.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
22
Many of the studies to date have mostly consisted of
White samples. Because the cultural ideal for female
beauty is racialized (i.e., the idealized beautiful woman is
White), exposure to these idealized images may affect girls of
color differently. Indeed, the evidence from studies of African
American girls suggests that identification with the
idealized standard may be an important predictor of negative
outcomes.When exposed to sexualized women in the media
who are White,African American girls did not demonstrate
negative body-image effects of objectifying media (Frisby,
2004; Makkar & Strube, 1995). Moreover, qualitative interviews
of Black and White high school girls (Duke, 2000;
Milkie, 1999) suggest that Black girls are largely uninterested
in the beauty images of mainstream teen
magazines because they conflict with
African American standards of attractiveness
and appeal.
Frisby (2004) found, however, that
when Black women were exposed to
idealized images of African American
models, those who were initially lower
in self-esteem were later less satisfied
with their own bodies. Furthermore,
Botta (2003) found that for both White
and Black teenage girls, the more they
idealized TV images and compared themselves and their
friends to those images, the stronger their drive was to be
thin and the more dissatisfied they were with their bodies.
Parmariega, Gustavson, and Gustavson (1994) found that
many Black female stars in the film, music, and fashion
industry are now just as thin as their White counterparts.
This finding, combined with the results reported
previously, suggest that body dissatisfaction among
African American girls may increase.
Body dissatisfaction may spur teens to seek plastic
surgery, a decision that incurs health risks and comes at a
high financial cost. Between 2000 and 2005, there was a
15% increase in teen (age 18 and younger) invasive
cosmetic surgery and a 7% increase in minimally invasive
cosmetic procedures (e.g., botox injections, chemical peels,
laser hair removal), according to the American Society of
Plastic Surgeons (2006a). Given that the most common
procedures sought by teenagers are breast enlargements,
nose and ear reshaping, and liposuction (“More Teens Opt
for Plastic Surgery,” 2000), it is safe to assume that the
majority of teens receiving plastic surgery are girls.
Indeed, from 2002 to 2003, the number of girls 18
years old and younger who got breast implants nearly
tripled, from 3,872 to 11,326 (Olding & Zuckerman,
2004). In one study, two thirds of 16-year-old girls in a
suburban high school knew someone who had undergone
cosmetic surgery (Pearl & Weston, 2003). Many of these
girls desired it themselves, and the most desired procedures
were liposuction for the reduction of fat in the hips, thighs,
and belly and breast augmentation (Pearl
& Weston, 2003).The fact that parents
must consent to these procedures for their
daughters under age 18 (and that parents
often pay for the procedures) illustrates
that girls’ self-sexualization desires and
practices occur in a broader context. In
this case, they are likely to be directly
supported by parents.
Body image dissatisfaction
may also support girls’ use not only of
cosmetics and beauty products but also of
expensive salon treatments such as facials,
manicures, pedicures, waxing, and eyebrow shaping.
Teenage girls 12 to 19 years of age spent over $8 billion on
beauty products (cosmetics, fragrances, and hair/beauty
salons) in 1997—spending more in this product category
than in any other except clothing/jewelry (Parks, 1998).
Expensive beauty products and treatments are unlikely to
be affordable for low-income girls. Self-sexualization may
serve, then, to widen the gulf many lower-income girls
undoubtedly feel between themselves and those with the
financial means to look “sexy” and thus be socially popular.
Mental Health
Research links sexualization with three of the most
common mental health problems of girls and women:
l eating disorders
l low self-esteem
l depression or depressed mood
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
23
. . . for both White and
Black teenage girls, the more
they idealized TV
images and compared
themselves . . . to those
images, the stronger their
drive was to be thin and
the more dissatisfied they
were with their bodies.
Frequent exposure to cultural beauty ideals via the
media has been shown to be associated with higher rates of
eating disorders, both for individuals and for the population
at large. Indeed, Lucas, Beard, O’Fallon, and Kurland (1991)
studied the incidence of anorexia nervosa among 10- to
19-year-old girls during a 50-year period and found that it
paralleled changes in fashion and idealized body image.
The thin ideal preceded the times when the rates of
anorexia nervosa were highest. For individual women,
findings across several studies indicate associations between
exposure to female beauty ideals and disordered eating
attitudes and symptoms, such that greater exposure to
thin-ideal media has been associated with higher levels of
dieting, exercising, and disordered eating symptomatology
(e.g.,Abramson & Valene, 1991; Harrison, 2000; Hofschire
& Greenberg, 2001; Stice, Schupak-Neuberg, Shaw, &
Stein, 1994;Thomsen,Weber, & Brown, 2002). For
example, Botta (2000) reported that more frequent
television viewing was associated with increased bulimic
symptomatology for White teenage girls. Indeed, a recent
meta-analysis testing links between media exposure and
women’s behavior and beliefs related to eating reported a
small (d = .29) but statistically reliable effect of media
exposure across 8 experimental and 12 correlational
studies (Grabe,Ward, & Hyde, 2008).
Particularly strong evidence of the media’s role in shaping
girls’ body image can be seen in before and after analyses
of cultures that are new to Western media. For example,
in a study on adolescent ethnic Fijian girls in Western Fiji,
Becker (2004) found that the beginnings of weight and
body shape preoccupation, purging behavior to control
weight, and body disparagement were linked to the introduction
of television. Before television, traditional Fijian
culture emphasized a robust body shape and based notions
of identity not on the body but on family, community, and
relationships.Three years after television was introduced,
girls’ eating behaviors and attitudes about their bodies had
shifted, and rates of disordered eating had increased.
Research also links exposure to sexualized female
ideals with lower self-esteem, negative mood, and
depressive symptoms among adolescent girls and young
women.These associations have been examined in at least
five correlational studies and in multiple experiments,
demonstrating causal connections. For example, adolescent
girls exposed to advertisements featuring idealized women
reported significant increases in state depression scores
(Durkin & Paxton, 2002). Similar effects have been shown
for undergraduate women exposed to idealized images,
especially among those who were already dieting (Mills,
Polivy, Herman, & Tiggemann, 2002).At the same time,
frequent exposure to mainstream media that feature female
ideals, such as movies, prime-time television, and music
videos, were associated with lower self-esteem among
Black and Latino/a youth (Rivadeneyra,Ward, & Gordon,
2007; L. M.Ward, 2004b).
Studies also show that self-objectification is associated
with negative mental health outcomes in adolescent girls.
For example,Tolman et al. (2006) found that in early adolescence,
girls who had a more objectified relationship with
their bodies were more likely to experience depression and
had lower self-esteem. Similarly, Harrison and Fredrickson
(2003) reported that among Black and White adolescent
girls, self-objectification was a significant predictor of
depression, body shame, and disordered eating, even when
controlling for race, grade in school, and body mass index.
In one demonstration of these trends, Hawkins,
Richards, Granley, and Stein (2004) exposed undergraduate
women to 40 full-page photographs from Cosmopolitan,
Vogue, and Glamour. For students in the experimental
group, these ads contained female models; for those in the
control group, only no-model ads were used. Findings
indicated that young women exposed to the idealized
models indicated more eating disorder symptoms than
women in the control group, as well as more negative
mood states and lower self-esteem.
Physical Health
In addition to the mental health consequences of sexualization,
research suggests that girls’ and women’s physical
health may also be negatively, albeit indirectly, affected. For
example, studies have established an important link
between body dissatisfaction and the onset of cigarette
smoking among adolescent girls (e.g., Stice & Shaw, 2003).
One theorized reason for this relationship is girls’ belief
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
24
that smoking will enable them to control their weight and
thus meet standards of physical appearance considered
desirable (Camp, Klesges, & Relyea, 1993). Newer research
has shown that this relationship may be mediated by
self-objectification, a feature of sexualization. In one study,
college-aged women who had a more sexually objectified
standard for their physical appearance (emphasizing sexual
attractiveness, for example, over health and competence)
were more likely to be smokers (Harrell, 2002).These
studies begin to suggest that sexualization experiences may
lead to dangerous addictive health behaviors.
Sexuality
Sexual well-being is an important part of healthy
development and overall well-being (Satcher, 2001).
Research indicates that among adults,
healthy sexuality is related to greater
intimacy (Weekes, 2002), higher selfesteem
(Hurlbert & Whittaker, 1991),
low levels of stress (Ellison, 2000;
Weekes, 2002), personal happiness
(Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, &
Michaels, 1994), and other positive
benefits (Planned Parenthood, 2003).Yet
emerging evidence suggests that the
sexualization of girls has negative
consequences on girls’ ability to
develop healthy sexuality.
Self-objectification has been linked directly to
diminished sexual health among adolescent girls. More
specifically, Impett, Schooler, and Tolman (2006) found
that White and Latina adolescent girls with a more
objectified view of their bodies had diminished sexual
health, measured by decreased condom use and diminished
sexual assertiveness. Studies also show that supporting
women’s sexual objectification may affect how women
view their own reproductive body functions. L. M.Ward,
Merriwether, and Caruthers (2006b) found that
undergraduate women who frequently watch music
videos or read women’s magazines, who attribute greater
realism to media content, or who identify strongly with
popular TV characters were also more accepting of sexually
objectifying notions of women and of other traditional
gender ideologies.At the same time, accepting these views
of women and their bodies was associated with expressing
more negative attitudes toward breastfeeding and
toward the “functional” aspects of one’s own body
(e.g., menstruation, body sweat).
Other evidence suggests that frequent exposure to
narrow ideals of attractiveness may affect adolescents’
perceptions of their own sexual experiences, perhaps
contributing to unrealistic expectations. For example,
Baran (1976) found that high school students who
thought that TV accurately portrayed sexual behavior
were more likely to be dissatisfied with either their first
experience of intercourse or with their virginity. Similarly,
L. M.Ward and Averitt (2005) reported
that heavier reading of popular men’s
magazines and stronger identification
with popular male TV characters was
associated with undergraduate (male
and female) virgins’ expectation that
their first coital experience would be
more negative.T-A. Roberts and
Gettman (2004) found that after
exposure to objectifying words found
on magazine covers, young women
expressed reduced interest in sexual
relationships. Moreover, Strouse and
Buerkel-Rothfuss (1987) found that for undergraduate
women, MTV consumption was the most powerful
predictor of their notions about sexuality and love
relationships, which was not true for men.
Both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence
suggest that, in addition to effects that occur during
adolescence, the sexualization of girls may ultimately
influence adult women’s sexuality by contributing to
women’s body shame and self-objectification.The
sexualization and objectification of women induce
negative feelings in girls about their bodies in
adolescence, which ultimately may lead to sexual
problems in adulthood (Brotto, Heiman, & Tolman, 2009;
Graham, Saunders, Milhausen, & McBride, 2004;Tolman,
Spencer, Rosen-Reynoso, & Porche, 2003;Wiederman,
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
25
. . . studies have
established an important
link between body
dissatisfaction and the
onset of cigarette
smoking among
adolescent girls.
2000).A woman who has learned to fear
negative evaluations of her body may be more focused on
her partner’s judgments of her than on her own desires,
safety, and pleasure. Focusing critically on one’s own
appearance can limit the pleasure drawn from these sexual
experiences (Wiederman, 2001) and can make it difficult
for women to enact safer sex practices (Wingood &
DiClemente, 1992).At the same time, a woman who has
been socialized to separate from her inner feelings and
experiences of arousal and desire may find it difficult to
assert her desires or feel entitled to satisfaction in sexual
situations. She may instead opt to let events unfold based
on her partner’s wants and interests.
Empirical evidence supports these concerns. Findings
indicate that women with high body dissatisfaction engage
in less sexual activity and are especially apprehensive about
sexual situations in which their bodies can be seen.
Conversely, women who feel more positively about and
comfortable with their bodies are more comfortable with
their own sexual feelings (Ackard, Kearney-Cooke, &
Peterson, 2000; Faith & Schare, 1993;Trapnell, Meston, &
Gorzalka, 1997;Wiederman, 2000). For example, women
who report more body dissatisfaction report a later onset of
masturbation (Wiederman & Pryor, 1997) and are less
likely to receive (but not less likely to perform) oral sex
(Wiederman & Hurst, 1998). In addition, Schooler,Ward,
Merriwether, and Caruthers (2005) found that greater
levels of body discomfort and body self-consciousness
each predicted lower levels of sexual assertiveness, sexual
experience, and condom use self-efficacy, as well as higher
levels of sexual risk-taking.When self-objectification was
experimentally induced in one study, women reported
decreased interest in the physical aspects of sex (T-A.
Roberts & Gettman, 2004).These findings suggest that
body shame may inhibit women’s ability to advocate for, or
even acknowledge, their own sexual feelings or pleasure.
Girls with disabilities may experience particular
challenges in developing a healthy sexuality. Health care
professionals have historically viewed individuals with
disabilities as inanimate objects, communicating an
unspoken message that they are not fully human (Leeds
Metropolitan University, 2005). Especially for girls with
disabilities, this view may negatively affect identity
development and exacerbate the effects of cultural messages
that reduce girls to sexual objects. Moreover, with instances
of abuse estimated to be 33%–83% depending on the type
of disability and the definition of abuse (Schaller &
Lagergren Frieberg, 1998), girls and young women
with disabilities struggle to develop a healthy concept of
sexuality and of themselves.
Attitudes and Beliefs
A central concern raised in this report is that frequent
exposure to media images that sexualize girls and women
may affect how girls conceptualize femininity and sexuality,
leading them to accept more constrained and stereotypical
notions about gender roles and sexual roles (i.e., that
women are sexual objects). Findings across several studies
indicate that this appears to be the case. Girls and young
women who more frequently consume or engage with
mainstream media content also offer stronger endorsement
of sexual stereotypes that paint women as sexual objects
(L. M.Ward, 2002; L. M.Ward & Rivadeneyra, 1999;
Zurbriggen & Morgan, 2006). For example, findings
indicate that among undergraduate women, more frequent
viewing of reality dating television programs was correlated
with greater acceptance of a sexual double standard and
the belief that dating is a game and that men and women
are adversaries (Zurbriggen & Morgan, 2006).
Similarly, among Black high school girls, stronger
identification with one’s favorite TV character and with
more objectifying music artists was associated with greater
support of stereotypes about women as sex objects
(Gordon, 2004). Experimental work exploring connections
between media use and girls’ acceptance of sexual objectification
yields similar results. For example, L. M.Ward (2002)
reported that young women exposed to images from
prime-time TV that depicted women as sexual objects
offered stronger support of this notion than did women in
control groups. Similarly, Johnson,Adams,Ashburn, and
Reed (1995) reported that Black adolescent girls exposed
to sexualized rap videos expressed greater acceptance of
teen dating violence than those not exposed. It appears that
exposure to mainstream (i.e., sexually objectifying) media
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
26
encourages girls to objectify women and to see other
women as less than human.
Media exposure has been found to constrain young
women’s conceptions of femininity by putting appearance
and physical attractiveness at the center of women’s value.
For example, Zurbriggen and Morgan (2006) reported that
more frequent viewing of reality TV programming among
young women was associated with a stronger belief in the
importance of appearance. Indeed, when asked to rate the
importance of particular qualities for women,White and
Black high school students who consumed more mainstream
media attributed greater importance to sexiness
and beauty than did students who consumed less
(L. M.Ward, 2004a; L. M.Ward,
Hansbrough, & Walker, 2005). Similarly,
Tan (1979) reported that girls who
viewed beauty commercials subsequently
rated physical attractiveness as more
personally important and as a more
important determinant of popularity
than did girls who viewed neutral
commercials.The sexualization and
objectification of women in the media
appear to teach girls that as women, all
they have to offer is their body and face
and that they should expend all their
effort on physical appearance.
Effects of Sexual Exploitation on Girls
Childhood sexual abuse victimization is an extreme
form of sexualization, one that always involves both
sexual objectification and the inappropriate imposition
of sexuality. Reviewing the sequelae of sexual abuse may,
therefore, be relevant to understanding the effects of
sexualization. It is important to remember, however, that
sexual abuse may also involve or co-occur with violence
or threats of violence, demands for secrecy, physical
abuse, emotional abuse, or neglect.Thus, negative effects
associated with sexual abuse victimization are unlikely to
be due solely to sexualization. It is nevertheless useful to
review these negative sequelae.
Childhood sexual abuse victimization is associated
with a host of negative effects, both during childhood
(Kendall-Tackett et al., 1993) and subsequently as an adult
(Browne & Finkelhor, 1986). Childhood sexual abuse has
been linked to increased rates of dissociation (Putnam &
Trickett, 1997), depression (Briere & Conte, 1993; Briere &
Runtz, 1988), anxiety (Briere & Runtz, 1987; Molnar,
Buka, & Kessler, 2001), posttraumatic stress disorder
(Rodriguez,Van de Kemp, & Foy, 1998), body shame
(Andrews, 1995), eating disorders (Smolak & Murnen,
2002), physical health impairment (Leserman, 2005), and
difficulty in interpersonal relationships (Colman & Widom,
2004). Negative effects are more pervasive when the abuse
is frequent, severe, or of long duration,
involves force, or is perpetrated by
someone close to the victim (Banyard &
Williams, 1996; Kendall-Tackett et al.,
1993; Mullen, Martin,Anderson,
Romans, & Herbison, 1993).The
responses of others (Ullman, 2003) and
girls’ own perceptions and attributions
(Haaken & Lamb, 2000; Hoagwood,
1990; Lamb, 1996, 1999) have also been
shown to affect the likelihood and
intensity of negative effects.
Of special interest is the
relationship between childhood sexual abuse victimization
and sexual behavior.A common symptom of sexually
abused children is sexualized behavior (e.g., self-sexualization;
Friedrich et al., 2001; Kendall-Tackett et al., 1993;
Letourneau, Schoenwald, & Sheidow, 2004).The sexually
abused child may incorporate the perpetrator’s perspective
into her identity, eventually viewing herself as good for
nothing but sex (Herman, 1992; Putnam, 1990).The
constricted sense of self of the sexually abused child and
the coercive refusal of the perpetrator to respect the child’s
physical boundaries may result in subsequent difficulties in
asserting boundaries, impaired self-protection, and a
greater likelihood of being further victimized as an adult
(Classen, Palesh, & Aggarwal, 2005), including becoming
involved in prostitution (Nadon et al., 1998; Silbert &
Pines, 1981, 1982). Childhood sexual abuse victimization is
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
27
The sexualization
and objectification of
women in the media
appear to teach girls
that as women, all they
have to offer is their body
and face, and that they
should expend all their
effort on physical appearance.
also linked to risky sexual behavior in adolescence and
adulthood (Quina, Morokoff, Harlow, & Zurbriggen, 2004).
Impact on Others
In addition to the consequences for girls described
previously, the sexualization of girls may also affect boys,
men, and adult women. Evidence relevant to possible
negative effects for these groups is described below.
Boys and Men
The sexualization of girls can have a negative impact on
boys and men. Exposure to narrow ideals of female sexual
attractiveness may make it difficult for some men to find
an “acceptable” partner or to fully enjoy intimacy with
a female partner (Schooler & Ward, 2006). Several experimental
studies have shown that exposure to pornography
(which often sexually objectifies women; Jensen & Dines,
2004) leads men to rate their female partners as less attractive
(Weaver, Masland, & Zillmann, 1984), to indicate less
satisfaction with their intimate partners’ attractiveness, sexual
performance, and level of affection (Zillmann & Bryant,
1988), and to express greater desire for sex without emotional
involvement (Zillmann & Bryant, 1988).
Even viewing a single episode of an objectifying
television program such as Charlie’s Angels may lead men to
rate real women as less physically attractive (Kenrick &
Guttieres, 1980). Frable, Johnson, and Kellman (1997)
found that undergraduate men who regularly viewed
pornography spontaneously generated more sexual terms
to describe the construct “women” than did those who
viewed pornography less regularly.The two groups did not
differ in their descriptions of the construct “men,” suggesting
that viewing pornography is associated specifically with
sexualizing women and may not have a more generalized
and gender-neutral effect.
Objectifying girls/women and sex itself is integral
to masculinity beliefs (Connell, 1987; Kimmel, 1996;
Tolman, 2002), but these beliefs may jeopardize men’s
ability to form and maintain intimate relationships with
women (G. Brooks, 1995; Kindlon & Thompson, 1999;
Pollack, 1998). Burn and Ward (2005) found that undergraduate
men’s satisfaction with their romantic relationship
was negatively correlated with most masculinity beliefs,
including ones that are relevant to the objectification of
women (i.e., dominance [“I should be in charge”], power
over women [“In general, I control the women in my
life”], and playboy [“If I could, I would frequently change
sexual partners”]). Empathy may be important in understanding
the relationship between objectification and relationship
satisfaction.When one person objectifies another,
it is difficult, perhaps even impossible, to treat that person
with empathy (Herman, 1992), an important predictor of
satisfaction and stability in intimate relationships (Davis &
Oathout, 1987; Long & Andrews, 1990).
If girls and women are seen exclusively as sexual
beings rather than as complicated people with many
interests, talents, and identities, boys and men may have
difficulty relating to them on any level other than the
sexual.This could dramatically limit the opportunities
boys and men have to interact intellectually with girls and
women, to compete with and against them in sports or
games, to create art or make music with them, to work
together for higher causes (e.g., volunteer work or
activism), or to enjoy their company as friends.
Women
A cultural milieu in which women and girls are sexualized
harms adult women in all the ways that it harms girls
(detailed previously).That is, there are negative repercussions
for women’s cognitive functioning, body satisfaction, mental
and physical health, sexuality, and attitudes and beliefs. Selfsexualization
and self-objectification by adult women,
although perhaps less common in women as they age (T-A.
Roberts, 2004), have the same causes and consequences as in
girls and young women (Prichard & Tiggemann, 2005;
Tiggemann & Lynch, 2001).There are additional consequences,
however, for adult women in at least one domain
that is less relevant for girls—the workplace.
Although a meta-analysis of experimental studies
suggests that the employment-related benefits of physical
attractiveness are as strong for women as they are for men
(Hosoda, Stone-Romero, & Coats 2003), these studies have
focused on attractiveness rather than on sexiness per se. In
contrast, Glick, Larsen, Johnson, and Branstiter (2005)
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
28
manipulated the sexiness of a female job applicant and held
physical attractiveness constant.They found that when the
sexy job applicant was applying for a managerial job, she
was rated as less competent and less intelligent than the
conservatively dressed job applicant; participants also indicated
that they would experience fewer positive emotions
and more negative emotions toward the sexy applicant
(compared with the conservatively dressed applicant) if
she were hired. None of these differences was found when
the applicants were described as applying for a job as a
receptionist.These data imply that self-sexualization or
sexualization by others is likely to have a negative impact
on women seeking professional careers.
A cultural milieu in which girls are sexualized may
have additional consequences for adult
women.The sexualization of girls
contributes to the idealization of youth
as the only good and beautiful stage
of life. If one accepts fashion “supermodels”
as representing the culturally
accepted standard of idealized female
beauty, the ideal age appears to be about
17. Girls as young as 11 or 12 have
achieved modeling success, and many of
the most famous models became internationally
well known before they were
16 (Moore, 2003). Of the six champions
on the popular television program America’s Next Top Model
(2006)(which requires contestants to be at least 18,
presumably for legal reasons), the oldest champion was 23,
and the average age of the champions was 20.2. Given this
ideal, it is not surprising that as women age, they become
increasingly invisible in the culture (Arber & Ginn, 1991;
Cook & Kaiser, 2004;Wolf, 1991).
Many women respond to this cultural standard by
making every effort to remain and look as youthful as possible.
Sales of “anti-aging” beauty products increased by
10.7% in 2005 (to over $11 billion worldwide), showing
the greatest increase in any category of skin-care product
(O. Phillips, 2006).An analysis of plastic surgery rates
(especially for procedures that lift and tuck aging body
parts) provides further evidence that some aging women
feel strong pressure to look younger. Data from the
American Society of Plastic Surgeons shows that common
procedures designed to “freshen” the body and keep it
looking young have been steadily increasing. Between 2000
and 2005, annual rates of Botox injections rose from
roughly three quarters of a million to almost 4 million,
amounting to a 388% increase. In the same 5-year period,
there was also a 115% increase in tummy tucks (from
62,713 to 134,746 annually), a 283% increase in buttock
lifts (from 1,356 to 5,193 annually), as well as a stunning
3,413% and 4,101% increase in upper arm and lower body
lifts, respectively (American Society of Plastic Surgeons,
2006c). Many of these procedures were age specific.
Although younger and older women receive rhinoplasty
and breast augmentations at relatively
equal rates, the rates for women 35–50
years of age who receive breast lifts, buttock
lifts, tummy tucks, and liposuction
are approximately double those of women
19–34 years of age (American Society of
Plastic Surgeons, 2006b).
Even with plastic surgery, it is
impossible for an adult woman to maintain
the look of a 17-year-old adolescent.
This inability to meet the culturally
imposed standard of beauty may lead to
body shame, lowered self-esteem, and a
reduced sense of well-being.There is evidence that exposure
to thin-ideal images in the media and subsequent
thin-ideal internalization have negative effects on adult
women. For example, across two studies, Dittmar and colleagues
(Dittmar & Howard, 2004; Halliwell & Dittmar,
2004) found that adult women (e.g., 20–60 years of age)
exposed to ads featuring thin models expressed more
body-focused anxiety than those exposed to average-sized
or no models, and this was especially true for those who
strongly internalized the thin ideal.
Exposure to a “White-ideal” in the media may be
damaging to women of color who cannot match that ideal;
research showing a negative correlation between music
video exposure and self-esteem in African American adolescents
(L. M.Ward, 2004b) supports this supposition. It is,
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
29
Some aging women feel
strong pressure to look
younger. . . . Even with plastic
surgery, it is impossible for
an adult woman to
maintain the look of a
17-year-old adolescent.
therefore, reasonable to hypothesize that exposure to a
“young ideal” in the media will be similarly damaging to
“older” (i.e., not teenage) women of all ethnicities.
The perpetuation of an extremely narrow range of
desirable ages may also have repercussions for women’s
ability to succeed and advance in the workplace. If women
strive to appear as youthful as possible in order to more
closely match the ideal of female beauty, their competence
and skills may be questioned because of their youthful
appearance.This double bind was apparent in the data of
C. Duncan and Loretto (2004). In their study, both women
and men reported experiencing age discrimination for
being too young, but women were more likely than men
to report that this discrimination was specifically related to
their youthful appearance (as opposed to other characteristics
associated with youth, such as experience).
Moreover, women but not men recounted experiences
of sexualized ageism (e.g, a 35-year-old woman reported
being referred to as “a dried up old maid”). More evidence
for the double bind was found in data from men and
women in their 30s.Among this group, 25 of the 27 men
who reported age discrimination stated that it was because
of their youth; only 2 stated that it was because they were
too old. But of the 25 women in this demographic, 13
reported age discrimination because they were too young
and 12 because they were too old.
Impact on Society
In addition to the serious consequences for girls that have
been outlined previously, the sexualization of girls is likely
to have numerous negative consequences for society and its
other members, including boys, men, and women, which
will impact girls indirectly. Cultural institutions such as
schools and workplaces may be affected. More important,
general social attitudes and expectations about sexuality
and gender may change in problematic ways as a result of
media objectification and sexualization. Pressing social
problems that disproportionately affect girls both directly
and indirectly, including violence against girls and women,
sexual exploitation of girls, forms of pornography, and
prostitution of girls, may be maintained or even increased if
there is a continued and escalating sexualization of
girls. Some of these consequences are explored in the
following sections.
Sexism
The sexualization of girls and women may contribute to
broader societal consequences, such as sexism, sex bias, and
sexist attitudes. Evidence in support of this assertion comes
from several types of studies. One group of studies tests
whether exposure to sexualized or sexually objectifying
content shapes viewers’ attitudes toward women in general.
A second group of studies uses experimental means to
investigate whether exposure to such content affects
people’s perceptions of real women.A third group tests
whether experimental exposure to this content affects
people’s actions toward real women.Although these
exposure studies focus on content that sexualizes adult
women, the resulting consequences are noted for viewers
of all ages, including adolescent boys and girls as well as
young women and men.We hypothesize that exposure to
sexualized girls likely leads to sexist attitudes about girls
and women as well.
Among the first set of studies that test links between
exposure to objectifying content and the development of
sexist attitudes, findings indicate that frequent, regular
exposure to genres high in sexualized imagery (such as
music videos) and deeper levels of media involvement are
both associated with greater acceptance by men and
women of attitudes that sexualize and sexually objectify
women (e.g., Strouse, Goodwin, & Roscoe, 1994; L. M.
Ward, 2002; L. M.Ward & Friedman, 2006; L. M.Ward et
al., 2005). For example, L. M.Ward, Merriwether, and
Caruthers (2006a) discovered that undergraduate men
who were frequent readers of men’s magazines such as
Maxim and Sports Illustrated, who attributed greater
realism to media portrayals, and who watched TV
more intently to learn about the world were also more
accepting of traditional masculinity ideologies, including
the sexual objectification of women.
These correlational findings are strengthened by outcomes
from experimental work that reach the same conclusion.Across
several studies, women and men exposed to
sexually objectifying images of women from mainstream
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
30
media (e.g., R-rated films, magazine advertisements, music
videos) were found to be significantly more accepting of
rape myths (e.g., the belief that women invite rape by
engaging in certain behaviors), sexual harassment, sex role
stereotypes, interpersonal violence, and adversarial sexual
beliefs about relationships than were those in control
conditions (e.g., Kalof, 1999; Milburn, Mather, &
Conrad, 2000; L. M.Ward, 2002). For example,White
undergraduates exposed to a sexually objectifying music
video were more likely to endorse adversarial sexual
beliefs than were students exposed to a nonsexual music
video (Kalof, 1999). Exposure to sexist magazine ads
featuring women as sexual objects produced a stronger
acceptance of sex role stereotyping and
of rape myths among male undergraduates
(Lanis & Covell, 1995; MacKay &
Covell, 1997).Additionally, high school
students exposed to content featuring
women as sexual objects drawn either
from music videos (L. M.Ward et al.,
2005) or prime-time television programs
(L. M.Ward & Friedman, 2006)
expressed more support of these attitudes
than did students who did not
receive this exposure.
A second line of research demonstrates
that experimental exposure to sexualized or sexually
objectifying images of women affects people’s perceptions
or judgments of other women.The findings here are few,
yet provocative. Hansen and Hansen (1988) reported that
undergraduate students who had watched three neutral
music videos later perceived a man’s “hitting on” a
female colleague to be akin to sexual harassment, yet
students who had viewed sexist music videos perceived his
sexual advances to be appropriate and thought less favorably
of the woman if she rejected him. Gan, Zillmann, and
Mitrook (1997) examined how exposure to sexualized
images of Black women in R&B music videos affects
White students’ perceptions of neutral Black and White
women.They reported that whereas video exposure was
inconsequential for judgments of White women, the Black
women encountered later were judged least good, most
bad, and furthest from the “ideal.” It appears that exposure
to sexually enticing rap videos fostered perceptions of
diminished positive traits and stronger negative traits in
Black women in general.
Finally, exposure to sexualized content has been shown
to affect how women actually behave and how men treat
and respond to real women in subsequent interactions.
These studies have generally found that after men are
exposed to sexualized content, their behavior toward
women is more sexualized, and they treat women like
sexual objects. For example, undergraduate men exposed to
16 sexist and objectifying commercials later asked more
sexist questions of a female confederate
posing as a job applicant, recalled more
about her appearance and less about her
personal background, and rated her as
friendlier, more suitable to hire, but
less competent than did controls (L.
Rudman & Borgida, 1995). Similarly,
McKenzie-Mohr and Zanna (1990)
found that after exposure to a 15-minute
pornography tape, stereotypically
masculine men were perceived by a
female experimenter to be more
sexually motivated, they positioned
themselves closer to her, and they recalled more
information about her physical appearance than did men
in other conditions.
Using a similar paradigm, Jansma, Linz, Mulac, and
Imrich (1997) reported a pattern in which gender-typed
men appeared to rate a female partner lower on intellectual
competence after viewing a sexually explicit film and
higher after viewing a nonsexual film. Non-gender-typed
men appeared to respond in the reverse. Overall, it is
argued that exposure to sexualized depictions of women
may lead to global thoughts that “women are seductive and
frivolous sex objects” (Lavine, Sweeney, & Wagner, 1999)
and “foster an overall climate that does not value girls’
and women’s voices or contributions to society”
(Merskin, 2004).
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
31
Exposure to sexist
magazine ads
featuring women as
sexual objects produced
a stronger acceptance of
sex role stereotyping and
of rape myths among
male undergraduates.
Girls’ Educational Success and Achievement
Aspirations. If, as the self-objectification literature suggests,
girls’ preoccupation with appearance ties up cognitive
resources, girls will have less time and mental energy for
other pursuits. Girls may be learning to prioritize certain
rewards (male attention) over other rewards (academic
accomplishment), thus limiting their future educational and
occupational opportunities. If they perceive occupations
relating to science, technology, engineering, and math
(STEM) as less consistent with a sexy self-image, they may
be induced to want to be a model, fashion designer, or pop
star in order to embody the sexualized look that they
know is valued for women rather than choose to be a
chemist, computer programmer, or engineer. If girls
perceive what research shows—that women who
choose male-identified professions are least preferred
(in college samples) as romantic partners
(Yoder & Schleicher, 1996)—then
they will perceive some social costs to
choosing careers that are not consistent
with a “sexy” image. On the other hand,
if girls continue along a nonfeminine
career path, presenting a sexy image
will also be costly and may result in
being perceived as less competent
(Glick et al., 2005).
Two studies exploring stereotype
threat exposed college-aged women to
highly feminine-stereotyped television commercials, which
emphasized a young woman’s sexual attractiveness and
physical beauty (Davies, Spencer, Quinn, & Gerhardstein,
2002; Davies, Spencer, & Steele, 2005).After exposure to
the sexy/pretty ads, compared with the gender-neutral
or counterstereotypic ads, women indicated less interest
in vocational options that emphasize quantitative reasoning
(e.g., math and science) and also endorsed lower leadership
aspirations, suggesting that sexualization may indeed
“prime” lower achievement orientation among young
women.
Earlier research has shown different vocational aspirations
for adolescent boys and girls (e.g., Corder & Stephan,
1984; Gottfredson, 1981; Grotevant & Thorbecke, 1982)
and differential aspirations (e.g., Kerr, 1983, 1985) and
achievement (favoring boys) for gifted girls and gifted boys
(e.g., Eccles, 1985; Hollinger & Fleming, 1992).Although
girls today have higher educational and occupational
aspirations than they have had in the past, we do not
know to what extent preoccupation with looks or even
sexualization interferes with these aspirations. Given limited
research suggesting that self-objectification practices
may limit cognitive resources, exploring further whether
sexualization exposure and experiences are responsible for
a kind of “brain drain” among young girls and women is
an important priority for future research.
Sexual harassment in school. Despite the fact that many
girls believe that a sexy appearance brings them power,
quite the opposite may be true.Although sexy dress does
not justify sexual harassment nor has it
been shown to provoke sexual harassment
in school studies, the belief that girls are
sexual objects may be related to boys’
tendency to sexually harass girls in school
and in this way could affect girls adversely.
Sexual harassment by boys and men is
a regular part of school and work life.
Peers perpetrate 79% of the sexual harassment
in schools (American Association of
University Women, 2001), and much of
this harassment is in the form of sexual
jokes, leering, touching or grabbing areas
like the breasts or buttocks, and comments on physical
appearance (e.g., J. Duffy,Wareham, & Walsh, 2004).The
consequences of sexual harassment are far-reaching, can
be long lasting (J. Duffy et al., 2004), and move beyond
psychological effects on girls to educational consequences
(Houston & Hwang, 1996; Juvonen, Nishina, & Graham,
2000), costs to schools, and consequences to society in
general. One study of the estimated economic cost of
sexual harassment in the U.S.Army, for example, found
that in one year alone, the cost of sexual harassment was
over $250 billion (Faley, Knapp, Kustis, & Dubois, 1999).
Several studies suggest that the sexualization of girls
contributes to sexual harassment and coercion. In a survey
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
32
Girls may be learning to
prioritize certain rewards
(male attention) over
other rewards (academic
accomplishment), thus
limiting their future
educational and
occupational opportunities.
of university faculty, staff, and students, O’Hare and
O’Donohue (1998) found that respondents who reported
that their male coworkers held sexist attitudes reported
more experiences of gender harassment, sexual harassment,
and sexual coercion. Quinn’s (2002) qualitative study of
adult men’s accounts of “girl-watching” in the workplace
highlighted the role that objectification and (low) empathy
with the targeted women played in this type of sexual
harassment.Angelone, Hirschman, Suniga,Armey, and
Armelie (2005) found that college men who were exposed
to a sexist confederate (one who made objectifying comments
about a female actress and denigrating comments
about women on campus) told more sexual jokes to a
female confederate than did men exposed to a nonsexist
confederate.Taken together, these studies suggest that boys
exposed to sexualization portrayals of girls may be more
likely to commit sexual harassment.
Some studies of the effects of school uniforms on
students’ perceptions also lend indirect support for the
notion that sexualizing clothing may be a factor in
harassment of girls.When students dress in uniforms, fellow
students as well as teachers rate them as higher in academic
ability and positive school-related behavior than students in
standard dress (Behling, 1994). Furthermore, one study
showed that girls who wear uniforms report more positive
perceptions of safety and peer relationships in school than
girls in regular clothes (Fosseen, 2002). It is important to
underscore that girls do not “cause” harassment or abusive
behavior by wearing sexy clothes; no matter what girls
wear, they have the right to be free of sexual harassment,
and boys and men can and should control their behavior.
But when sexualized clothing is part of a larger cultural
context in which girls are sexually objectified, standardized
uniforms may help to change those cultural messages and
understandings of who girls are and what they are capable
of, thereby reducing the incidence of sexual harassment
in general.
Violence and Exploitation
Violence against girls. Numerous studies have shown a
connection between stereotypical attitudes about women’s
sexuality and aggressive sexual behavior. For example,
adversarial sexual beliefs, rape myth acceptance, and
sexist beliefs about women are related to aggressive sexual
behaviors (Dean & Malamuth, 1997; Murnen,Wright, &
Kaluzny, 2002; Osland, Fitch, & Willis, 1996; Spence,
Losoff, & Robbins, 1991;Truman,Tokar, & Fischer, 1996;
Vogel, 2000).
Other studies have connected media exposure to sexist
beliefs and acceptance of violence against women. Several
studies have shown that women and men exposed to
sexually objectifying images of women from mainstream
media (e.g., R-rated films, magazine advertisements, music
videos) were found to be significantly more accepting of
rape myths, sexual harassment, sex role stereotypes, interpersonal
violence, and adversarial sexual beliefs about
relationships than were those in control conditions (Kalof,
1999; Lanis & Covell, 1995; MacKay & Covell, 1997;
Milburn et al., 2000; L. M.Ward, 2002; L. M.Ward et al.,
2005). In one of the few studies using children rather than
college-aged men and women as participants, Strouse et al.
(1994) found that for boys and girls who were 11–16 years
of age, frequent TV viewing and greater exposure to Rand
X-rated films were each related to stronger acceptance
of sexual harassment. Given that viewing sexualized and
objectifying portrayals of women is associated with many
of these attitudes, viewing sexualized portrayals of girls may
also lead to these same effects and to a greater acceptance
of child sexual abuse myths, child sexual abuse, and viewing
younger and younger girls as acceptable sexual partners.
Sexual exploitation. There is little or no research on the
effects on adults of viewing sexualized images of girls or
even sexualized images of adult women made up to look
like girls (a common practice in magazine advertisements).
Several scholars (e.g., Merskin, 2004; O’Donohue et al.,
1997) have noted the urgent need for such research. But
there may be negative effects at a societal level in addition
to possible negative effects to individual viewers; these
include providing justification and a market for child
pornography and the prostitution and sexual trafficking of
children. Because the consequences of child sexual abuse
and child prostitution are so great, it is important to consider
the possible connections carefully.Although there is
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
33
some disagreement in the literature on the relationship
between pornography and sexual aggression, the most
rigorous reviews (e.g.,Allen, D’Alessio, & Brezgel, 1995;
Allen, D’Alessio, & Emmers-Sommer, 2000;Allen, Emmers,
Gebhardt, & Giery, 1995; Malamuth,Addison, & Koss,
2000) have concluded that there are reliable associations
between viewing pornography and committing sexually
aggressive acts.These associations are strongest when
considering violent pornography and/or men who
possess other risk factors for sexual aggression.
When specifically considering child pornography,
however, almost no experimental research has been
conducted. One exception is a study by B. Paul (2004)
designed to assess the effects of viewing child pornography.
Paul used “barely legal” pornography as the stimuli in
an experiment. In “barely legal” pornography, adult
women are made to look like children.Thus, while the
pornography is legal (the models are above the age of 18),
the viewer perceives a sexualized child.The findings
were that viewing such pornography led to a stronger
mental association between neutral (nonsexual) images
of children and words related to sex (e.g., arousing, sexy).
These findings suggest that viewing sexualized portrayals
of girls could lead viewers to associate children with sex,
even when they are not being sexualized.
One particularly pernicious effect of the constant exposure
to sexualized images of girls is that individuals and
society may be “trained” to perceive and label sexualized
girls as “seductive.” Studies have shown that adult men often
misperceive friendliness in adult women as sexual interest
(Abbey, 1982, 1987). Images of young girls who are made to
look like adult women may evoke similar responses.
Another area of slippage concerns consent. Children
are not legally able to give consent to sexual activity with
an adult.When girls are dressed to resemble adult women,
however, adults may project adult motives as well as an
adult level of responsibility and agency on girls. Images of
precocious sexuality in girls may serve to normalize abusive
practices such as child abuse, child prostitution, and the
sexual trafficking of children.
Finally, the sexualization of girls may also contribute to
the trafficking and prostitution of girls by helping to create
a market for sex with children through the cultivation of
new desires and experiences. If the idealized female sexual
partner is a 15- or 16-year-old girl, male consumers may
demand pornography featuring such girls and the
opportunity to pay for sex with them.A 2005 report noted
a disturbing new trend in the recruitment of children into
pornography: Pedophiles and “johns” look in online
chat rooms for teens with Web cameras linked to their
computers and then seduce them into performing sex acts
for money in front of the camera (Eichenwald, 2005).
Summary of Consequences of the Sexualization
of Girls
The research summarized in this section offers evidence of
negative consequences for girls when they are sexualized or
exposed to sexualized images and when others are exposed
to such images. First, there is evidence that girls exposed
to sexualizing and objectifying media are more likely to
experience body dissatisfaction, depression, and lower selfesteem;
research to date suggests that these effects are not as
pronounced for African American girls.There is no research
to date on lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered youths. Selfobjectification
has been shown to diminish cognitive ability
and to cause shame.This cognitive diminishment, as well as
the belief that physical appearance rather than academic or
extracurricular achievement is the best path to power and
acceptance, may influence girls’ achievement levels and
opportunities later in life.
Girls’ sexual development may also be affected as they
are exposed to models of passivity, and studies indicate that
the media may influence a girl’s perceptions of her own
virginity or first sexual experience. Interpersonally, girls’
relationships with other girls are affected, as such relationships
can become policing grounds where girls support or
reject other girls for reasons having to do with conformity
to a narrow beauty ideal that involves a sexualized presentation
or competition for boys’ attention. Girls’ relationships
with boys and men are affected in that exposure to sexualizing
and objectifying media has been shown to relate to
girls’ and boys’ views on dating, boys’ sexual harassment of
girls, and attitudes toward sexual violence.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
34
Positive Alternatives and Approaches
to Counteracting the Influence
of Sexualization
The research presented in the initial portion of
this report focused on concerns that girls are
sexualized by the current culture, by other people,
and by themselves and that this sexualization is likely to
lead to a host of negative effects. Despite the concerns
raised throughout this report, however, there are several
indications that negative outcomes are neither inevitable
nor universal. Some girls and their supporters, now and in
the past, have resisted mainstream characterizations of girls
as sexual objects.Through media education and literacy, the
creation of media subcultures, participation in athletics,
comprehensive sex education programs, activism, and
religious/spiritual practices, girls, their peers, adults in
their lives, and institutions that support them help to
challenge the narrow prescriptions for girls in this culture.
The following sections describe existing programs and
practices that counter sexualization and note others that,
if implemented, have the potential to do so.We look, in
turn, at approaches implemented through the schools,
through families, and by girls themselves.
Approach 1:Working Through Schools and
Formal Education
Schools can contribute in several ways to greater awareness
of the sexualization of girls in the media and can help girls
and their peers resist these negative influences.
Media Literacy
Because the media are important sources of sexualizing
images, the development and implementation of schoolbased
media literacy training programs could be key in
combating the influence of sexualization.There is an
urgent need for girls to view media critically.Although
components vary from program to program, media
literacy training in general provides media consumers
with analytical tools that promote autonomy and critical
understanding of media.The goal is to create active
interpreters of messages rather than passive consumers.
Training encourages media consumers to notice the
messages inherent in media, to think about who is sending
those messages and why, and to challenge their realism
(Potter, 2004). Several nonprofit organizations, some that
have girls serving on their boards, have designed media
literacy programs.These programs aim not only to educate
girls who consume media but also to raise awareness of
how girls and women are represented and to advocate for
improvement by providing resources to media producers,
teachers, and parents.The Girls,Women + Media Project
(www.mediaandwomen.org) is one such organization (see
the Appendix for a list of others).
Research on the effectiveness of media literacy
programs has not yet focused on the sexualization of girls
and women, but it has examined the related topic of body
image. One study of college women found that three
media literacy programs were effective in increasing
women’s skepticism about the realism of images that
promote a thin ideal of beauty, compared with a control
group receiving no intervention (Irving & Berel, 2001).
Another study found that high school girls who participated
in a media literacy program had less internalization
of the thin ideal and more questions about the realism of
images than girls in a control group (Irving, DuPen, &
Berel, 1998).Yamamiya, Cash, Melnyk, Posavac, and
Posavac (2005) found that participation in a media literacy
education program prior to exposure to stereotypical
images prevented adverse effects. Studies indicate that
media literacy programs addressing alcohol use (e.g.,Austin
& Johnson, 1997) and television violence (e.g.,Voojis &
Van der Voort, 1993) have also been effective. Programs
directly targeting the sexualization of girls and women
may benefit the school-aged girls who consume sexualized
media, as well as their male peers who are also exposed
to these media images and who may treat girls differently
as a result.
Athletics
Another school-based strategy is to provide access to
athletics and other extracurricular activities that encourage
girls to focus on body competence instead of body
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
35
appearance.Although girls’ and women’s participation
in sports and physical activity can be dismissed, ignored,
sexualized, or co-opted, participation in physical activity
may be one of girls’ best means of resisting objectification
and sexualization. Because athletic activities inherently
require a focus on body competence, agency, and action,
they provide girls with the opportunity to develop a selfconcept
founded on what they can do rather than on
how they look. Children’s and adolescents’ participation in
sports and physical activities is related to increased selfesteem
(Abernathy,Webster, & Vermeulen, 2002; Bonhauser
et al., 2005; Crews, Lochbaum, & Landers, 2004; McAuley,
1994), and this association may be especially strong among
children with economic disadvantages or those who have
mental, emotional, or physical disabilities (Gruber, 1986).
Sports participation is also linked to increased levels of
body self-esteem (Bissell, 2004; DiBartolo & Shaffer, 2002).
That these increases in self-esteem relate to healthier
sexual development is suggested by evidence that sports
participation is inversely related to engaging in risky sexual
behavior (Lehman & Keorner, 2004; Miller, Barnes,
Melnick, Sabo, & Farrell, 2002).The effects found by
Lehman and Koehler were mediated by increased empowerment/self-efficacy
and functional body orientation.
Functional body orientation refers to the extent to which
one thinks of one’s own body in terms of the things it can
do and is capable of performing.Tracy and Erkut (2002)
have shown that an additional pathway to less risky sexual
behavior via sports participation is through the decreased
feminine gender role orientation of girl participants.
Because physical activity may be a powerful means
of negating self-objectification and other negative
consequences of sexualization, the sexualization of women
and girl athletes may be especially dangerous or harmful
for girls. If this domain becomes co-opted and turned into
yet another venue where girls are taught to focus on how
they look rather than on what their bodies can do, they
will have been deprived of an important method of resistance
and healthy development.
Extracurricular Activities
Some studies of adolescent risk behavior (e.g., early sexual
activity and substance use) suggest that extracurricular participation
and the development of a talent may be protective
factors for these outcomes (Savage & Holcomb, 1998;
Shilts, 1991). No studies to date, however, have examined
extracurricular activities in relation to objectification of
girls’ bodies or sexualization practices. It may be that
participation in certain extracurricular activities, in addition
to or instead of sports, protects girls against the negative
effects of sexualization and objectification of girls and
women in the media, particularly when the activity does
not support feminine gender role ideals. It will thus be
important for future researchers attempting to understand
the effects of extracurricular activity on youth to differentiate
those extracurricular activities that lend themselves to a
narrow body image standard with an emphasis on sexiness,
attractiveness, or thinness (e.g., some forms of dance) from
those that require talents that are different (e.g. drama club,
marching band,African drumming, dance forms such as
hip-hop and modern). Schools that provide a variety of
extracurricular activities, including activities that have generally
been associated with boys’ interests (e.g., computer
and video gaming), are giving girls alternatives to activities
that emphasize beauty, thinness, and sex appeal.
Comprehensive Sexuality Education
A central way to help youth counteract distorted views
presented by the media and culture about girls, sex, and the
sexualization of girls is through comprehensive sexuality
education.Although guidelines for comprehensive sexuality
education vary, all include the presentation of accurate,
evidence-based information about reproduction and
contraception, the importance of delaying intercourse
initiation for young people, and the building of communication
skills. Most relevant to combating sexualization,
many also address media, peer, and cultural influences on
sexual behaviors and decisions (SIECUS, 2004) and promote
a notion of sexual responsibility that includes respect
for oneself and an emphasis on consensual, nonexploitative
sexual activity (Office of Population Affairs, 1999).
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
36
This kind of sex education may reverse the negative
effects of the sexualization of girls. It is also likely to have
other positive effects and unlikely to have adverse
consequences. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher’s (2001)
report on sexual health and responsible sexual behavior
indicates that the most effective sex education for preventing
teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections is
comprehensive. Research indicates that comprehensive
programs do not increase the frequency of sex or the number
of sex partners, nor do such programs lower the age of
first intercourse (Kirby, 2001).
Approach 2:Working Through the Family
Parents and other family members can
help girls interpret sexualizing cultural
messages in ways that mitigate or prevent
harm. Because sexualization is often so
pervasive as to seem normal and thus not
even discernible to many girls, parents
can make sexualization visible by
discussing media and other cultural
messages with girls. Religious practices
and social or political activism are also
helpful strategies.
Mediation and Co-Viewing
Traditionally, suggestions on how to combat potential
negative effects of media use, such as aggression and
stereotyping, have centered on the roles of parental
mediation and co-viewing. Here, the notion is that having
parents comment on appropriate and inappropriate
content while watching TV with their children can alter
the influence of the messages.Although media literacy
and co-viewing were initially discussed and tested in the
1970s and early 1980s, renewed attention has been given
to this approach in recent years. Findings from several
experimental studies demonstrate the benefits of such
interventions in promoting parent–child interactions
involving media.
In one study, grade school children viewed four TV
clips portraying stereotypical gender roles (Nathanson,
Wilson, McGee, & Sebastian, 2002). For children in one
condition, the experimenter inserted comments contradicting
the stereotypical behavior. In another condition, she
did not. Results indicated that children in the mediation
condition evaluated the program less positively and
expressed greater acceptance of nontraditional gender roles
for men than did children who received no mediation.
Similar results have been obtained in experimental
work testing children’s responses to media violence
(Nathanson, 2004).
A 2003 field study also suggested that parents can
influence the way children interpret sexual content on
television. R. L. Collins, Elliott, Berry,
Kanouse, and Hunter (2003) interviewed
a national sample of adolescents (ages
12–17 years) shortly after the airing of
an episode of the sitcom Friends. The
episode centered on discussion of a
condom failure that had resulted in the
pregnancy of one of the show’s main
characters. One in four teen viewers saw
condoms as less effective in preventing
pregnancy than they had in a survey 6
months earlier.Viewers who reported
talking with an adult about the program,
however, actually viewed condoms as more effective than
they had previously.These studies hold promise that girls’
co-viewing and active discussions with parents may decrease
the influence of viewing sexualized images.
Religion, Spirituality, and Meditation
Organized religious and other ethical instruction often
begins within the family and can offer girls important
practical and psychological alternatives to the values
conveyed by popular culture.When parents, through their
religious or ethical practices, communicate the message
that other characteristics are more important than sexuality,
they help to counteract the strong and prevalent message
that it is only girls’ sexuality that makes them interesting,
desirable, or valuable. By insisting that girls be allowed to
remain girls and not be pushed into a precocious sexuality,
they provide a haven where girls can develop at their own
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
37
Parents and other
family members can help
girls interpret sexualizing
cultural messages in
ways that mitigate or
prevent harm.
pace. In addition, although some religious institutions resist
comprehensive sex education classes, others are open to
such programs (Coyne-Beasley & Schoenbach, 2000) and
may even be actively involved in designing them (e.g., the
Our Whole Lives workshops by the Unitarian Universalist
Church) (Casparian, 2000; Goldfarb, 2000; Sprung, 1999;
Wilson, 1999).
Religion may also counteract the effects of media
representations. L. M.Ward (2004b) found that religiosity
buffered the effects of increased media use on self-esteem
among Black adolescents. Negative effects of increased
media use on self-esteem were seen only for those low in
religiosity. She noted, however, that religiosity might be a
proxy variable for involvement in the Black community,
with social networks being the true buffering factor.
In addition to organized religion, a more diffuse sense
of spirituality, or a self-directed spiritual practice, can also
be a force for resistance. Just as many African American
women recount using prayer and spirituality to cope with
racism and sexism (Shorter-Gooden, 2004) or recover from
childhood sexual violence (Bryant-Davis, 2005), so girls of
all ethnicities may rely on spirituality to protect them from
some of the effects of objectification and sexualization.
Finally, meditative practices common in many spiritual
traditions and mindful body-centered practices such as
yoga, tai chi, or qigong have been shown to have mental
and physical health benefits, including increased selfunderstanding,
self-acceptance, and well-being (Walsh &
Shapiro, 2006). Moreover, these practices typically facilitate
the attainment of a mental state of calm, centered awareness
that may be incompatible with self-objectification.
Although many types of meditation involve a detached
observation of the self (e.g., of one’s breath or body
movements), such self-observation has an introspective
quality.This is in marked contrast to self-objectification,
which develops from continually imagining how one looks
or appears to an outside observer.
This reasoning finds support in the results of a recent
study comparing yoga practitioners, aerobics practitioners,
and a nonexercise group (Daubenmier, 2005). In addition
to exhibiting greater body awareness and body satisfaction
than the two comparison groups, the yoga practitioners
also scored lower on self-objectification.This suggests that
if girls regularly engage in meditation or other mindful
practices, they might be protected against self-sexualization.
Activism by Parents and Families
Action by parents and families can have an impact in
confronting sources of sexualized images of girls. In
response to a May 2006 grassroots letter-writing campaign
initiated by the Campaign for a Commercial-Free
Childhood (www.commercialexploitation.org/) and Dads
and Daughters (www.dadsanddaughters.org/), Hasbro
cancelled a planned line of dolls based on the Pussycat
Dolls, a music group known for their sexualized lyrics and
dance routines (Goldiner, 2006).A dozen years earlier, a
letter-writing campaign by one woman convinced
Hyundai not to advertise in Sports Illustrated’s annual
swimsuit edition (Horovitz, 1993). It is hoped that focused,
sustained pressure on corporate sources of sexualization
will lead to other such successes.
Approach 3:Working Directly With Girls and
Girls’ Groups to Resist
Alternative Media
Another approach to minimizing the impact and existence
of sexualization is to encourage girls to become activists
who speak out and develop their own alternatives.
Prominent examples of this approach include “zines”
(homemade magazines distributed in print form or on
the Web), blogs (Web logs written by individuals), and
feminist magazines, books, and Web sites. One of the most
attractive features of these alternatives is that they provide a
forum to teach girls to critically examine the sexualizing
images presented by society and corporations.
Several studies have examined how bodies are discussed
in zines. Ogle and Thornburg (2003) conducted a content
analysis of body-related content in the zine Girl Zone
(www.girlzone.com/), which is not created by girls but is
nevertheless widely read by them.They identified three
themes: girls’ concerns about and experiences with their
changing bodies (i.e., the pubertal process), the deconstruction
and critique of body-related images in mainstream
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
38
media and society, and discussion of strategies to cope with
body-related societal pressures. Schilt (2003) analyzed 33
girl-made zines to understand how girls used this vehicle
to explore, construct, and experience their lives. She argued
that zines offer an antidote to consumer-based empowerment
strategies (e.g., buying a T-shirt with a “girl power”
slogan) that do not encourage girls to express their own
ideas and opinions.When girls create a zine rather than
buy a commercially available product, they become cultural
producers rather than consumers, an experience that
enables them to be more effective cultural critics.
Web pages (including Web logs or “blogs”), reflecting a
vast range of topics and perspectives, are a fast-growing
form of communication among adult and teen computer
users. For girls,Web pages, whether created
by adults or teens, can provide alternatives
to what girls see in mainstream
media as well as strategies for resistance,
including recognition of sexualizing and
objectifying cultural processes, along with
language and support for describing related
feelings (e.g., shame, anger).The
Appendix provides a list of Web sites that
offer articulate critiques of the media.
Some of these are specific to particular
groups of girls (e.g., girls of specific racial
or ethnic backgrounds) and document
the particular forms of objectification and sexualization to
which these specific groups of girls are subjected. For
example, Bamboo Girl (www.bamboogirl.com) is described
by a girl-positive site (see www.thoughtworm.com) as
a “zine that challenges the issues of racism/sexism/
homophobia from the point of view of smart, loud
non-traditional girls of color” (Thoughtworm, 2006).
Bamboo Girl includes stories by Filipina/Asian/Pacific
Islander girls,“because life isn’t only Black & White”
and “there’s more to life than straight white male
patriarchy” (Bamboo Girl, 2006).
Still, all Web sites about girls are not equal.Web sites
with names that suggest that they are girl-friendly/girlsupportive
can also be places where aspects of sexualization
and objectification are reinscribed through advertising or
content.The Web has enormous potential to encourage
girls to critique the culture, explore cultural messages, and
develop agency. But the Web as a form of media must also
be approached with a critical eye.
A third form of alternative media is magazines, books,
and films created by feminists and feminist organizations. In
recent years, there have been more magazines published for
girls, young women, and people of all ages that advocate for
girls and identify and provide strong critiques of sexualization,
objectification, and the economic and societal engines
that fuel these practices. Some of these are cowritten with
girls rather than written just about them.The goal in producing
these magazines is to develop critiques and alternative
ways for girls to relate to and celebrate their own and other
female bodies, as well as to underscore
that they are more than the sexualized
objects that are projected in most media.
Teen Voices, run by the nonprofit Women
Express, is one such resource, and New
Moon Magazine is another.
Books such as Adios, Barbie:
Young Women Write About Body and
Identity (Edut, 1998) and Body Outlaws:
Rewriting the Rules of Beauty (Edut, 2003)
provide girls with information and
alternative perspectives on their bodies
and offer insights into how others
have struggled with and overcome specific forms of
sexualization and objectification. Independent films are also
available that explore sexualization and objectification in
the mainstream media (e.g., Dreamworlds, Killing Us Softly,
Killing Us Softly 2 and 3, and The Strength to Resist)
and in other contexts such as schooling, poverty, and
pregnancy (e.g., Desire, Four Girls).
Activism and Resistance
Girls can and do work together in groups, publicly and
visibly, to protest sexualization and to develop critical
perspectives on how girls and women are sexualized.
Several political and activist (feminist) movements and
groups support young women as they express their feelings
on these issues, develop critical perspectives, and participate
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
39
The Web has enormous
potential to encourage girls
to critique the culture,
explore cultural messages,
and develop agency. But
the Web as a form of media
must also be approached
with a critical eye.
in activities in the public sphere that lead to social change.
Many of these movements are local (e.g., Hardy Girls
Healthy Women and Mainely Girls in Maine), and some
operate under the leadership of older girls and young
women (e.g., the Center for Young Women’s Development
in San Francisco).
In addition to their work with local girls, many programs
also make available (primarily through Web sites)
descriptions of activities that other groups could implement
(e.g., writing and staging plays, holding fairs, and
developing innovative formats for girls and women to
work together to implement specific social and political
changes).The goals of these programs are typically to
oppose objectification and sexualization, as well as to help
girls identify and strengthen those characteristics that will
result in less personal objectification and sexualization.
One recent example of activism is the work of a group
of 13- to 16-year-old girls who protested Abercrombie and
Fitch (A&F) T-shirts printed with objectifying slogans such
as,“Who needs a brain when you have these?”Working
with the Women and Girls Foundation of Southwestern
Pennsylvania, these girls began a “girlcott” of A&F that
attracted national news attention;A&F eventually pulled
these T-shirts from stores (“Racy T-Shirt Messages Drawing
Girls’ Backlash,” 2005).Youth With Vision, a teen group in
Kansas City, MI, conducted a study of slogans printed on
T-shirts being sold in local stores (Uhlenhuth, 2006).They
held a press conference to feature their “Wall of Shame”—
examples of T-shirts that were demeaning and characterized
girls as sluts and as bad—and a much smaller “Wall of
Fame,” which showed the few examples of positive speech
they had identified in their research.They were featured on
the Today Show (May 11, 2006), where they talked about
their activism and their desire for stores to provide better
options.
Several research studies have explored how girls of
color are particularly effective in resisting mainstream
notions of female sexuality, femininity, and beauty. Central
to much of this research are feminist theories developed by
and for women of color. For instance, Hill Collins (2000;
see also Spillers, 1992) observed the significance of an oral
tradition among Black women that allows women to be
“bawdy, rowdy, and irreverent” and thus anchor resistance
to oppressions including objectification and resistance. J.
Ward (2002) researched the tradition of African American
parents actively socializing their children to identify and
resist racism. One strategy that J.Ward documented
involves Black parents teaching children and teens to
recognize the culture in which they live as being White
culture and to critique it accordingly.
Black women often reject Eurocentric ideals of beauty
as culturally irrelevant and often feel better about their
bodies than do White women (Duke, 2000; Milkie, 1999;
Nichter, 2000).A study of nine 7th-grade Latinas revealed
that although teachers perceived Puerto Rican girls in sexualized
ways (e.g., as “hypersexual”) and as uninterested in
education, the girls often resisted these labels and stereotypes
(Rolón-Dow, 2004). For example, the girls resisted
the notion that liking boys or dressing sexy was incompatible
with being a good student.They did not tolerate sexual
harassment, reporting it to school officials or resorting to
punching boys themselves when it occurred. Similarly,
Faulkner (2003) interviewed 30 Latina teens and women
(18–36 years of age) and found that many rejected
cultural imperatives for motherhood and virginity, were
angry at sexism, the lack of sexuality information, and
being labeled, and insisted on their right to be both
religious and sexually active.
Girl empowerment groups. There is a growing trend,
both nationally and locally, of what are called “girl
empowerment groups.”These groups are dedicated to
supporting girls in a variety of ways: helping them to
know what they want; teaching them how to make social
changes, especially in their communities; building their
leadership skills; and arranging for connections between
girls and women mentors. Girl empowerment groups, such
as GENaustin, Girls’ Empowerment Network, and
Girlsforachange, can be found throughout the country.
Several groups focus explicitly on how girls relate to
physical competence and health. For example, GirlSports,
a program of the Girl Scouts of America, allows girls access
to and experience with an array of physical activities.The
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
40
expressed goals of the program include teaching girls to
have fun playing sports; raising girls’ self-esteem and sense
of competence and achievement; and encouraging girls to
embrace physical fitness as a life-long practice.
Opinions about what is necessary to empower girls can
vary among the organizations and the individuals leading
them. Some groups include programming or activities to
encourage the development of girls’ critical thinking about
the treatment of girls and women, including objectification
and sexualization, but many groups have not incorporated
this, choosing instead to focus on other dimensions (e.g.,
mentoring or the development of entrepreneurial skills).
In addition, to work effectively with girls, the adult
women leading these groups need to have confronted their
own experience of sexualization, as well as other forms of
oppression they have experienced (Taylor, Gilligan, &
Sullivan, 1995). One counselor wrote that empowerment
groups for African American girls must be led by African
American women in order to help girls work through
their legacy of struggle with multiple oppressions
(Holcomb-McCoy, 2005).
Summary of Positive Alternatives and Approaches
to Counteracting the Influence of Sexualization
Girls, boys, and those who support them can work
through a number of venues to counteract the influence
of a sexualizing culture. Schools are beginning to recognize
the importance of media literacy.When media literacy
programs teach girls to critique and understand the
salience of sexualizing images in the media, the hope
is that they will be better protected from these images.
Comprehensive sex education can also address the issue
of sexualizing media, culture, and peers and counter
their influence by teaching girls and boys the importance
of autonomy and mutual respect in sexual relationships.
Furthermore, schools that provide athletic and other
extracurricular opportunities that help girls develop a more
empowering view of their bodies may also protect girls
from the influence of sexualization. Parents and other
adults, through co-viewing and discussion, can help young
minds think critically about what they see.They can also
influence youth through spiritual or moral education
programs. Many Internet magazines, alternative magazines
for girls, books, and films developed by feminist and
women’s organizations encourage girls to form their own
alternative perspectives to the sexualizing influences in the
culture. Girls of color have, in the past, shown a resistance
to damaging mainstream images, and studying the roots of
such resistance may lead to new practices and approaches
for combating the effects of sexualization. Girls themselves
can protest these sexualizing images just as the girls who
protested A&F T-shirts did. Support for these kinds of
efforts can come from girls’ groups, schools, families,
religious institutions, and especially from girls themselves.
Recommendations
I. Research
A solid research base has explored the effects of having an
objectified body image or viewing objectified body images in
the media. Much previous work, however, has focused on
women. Future studies focusing on girls are needed. In
addition, more culturally competent, focused work is required
to document the phenomenon of the sexualization of girls; to
explore the short- and long-term harm of viewing, listening
to, and buying into a sexualized pathway to power; and to
test alternative presentations of girlhood, sexuality, and power.
We recommend that psychologists conduct research to:
1. Document the frequency of sexualization, specifically of
girls, and examine whether sexualization is increasing.
2. Examine and inform our understanding of the
circumstances under which the sexualization of girls
occurs and identify factors involving the media and
products that either contribute to or buffer against the
sexualization of girls.
3. Examine the presence or absence of the sexualization
of girls and women in all media but especially in movies,
music videos, music lyrics, video games, books, blogs,
and Internet sites. In particular, research is needed to
examine the extent to which girls are portrayed in
sexualized and objectified ways and whether this has
increased over time. In addition, it is important that these
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
41
studies focus specifically on sexualization rather than on
sexuality more broadly or on other constructs such as
gender-role stereotyping.
4. Describe the influence and/or impact of sexualization
on girls.This includes both short- and long-term effects of
viewing or buying into a sexualizing objectifying image,
how these effects influence girls’ development, self-esteem,
friendships, and intimate relationships, ideas about femininity,
body image, physical, mental, and sexual health, sexual
satisfaction, desire for plastic surgery, risk factors for early
pregnancy, abortion, and sexually transmitted infections,
attitudes toward women, other girls, boys, and men, as well
as educational aspirations and future career success.
5. Explore issues of age compression (“adultification” of
young girls and “youthification” of adult women),
including prevalence, impact on the emotional well-being
of girls and women, and influences on behavior.
6. Explore differences in presentation of sexualized images
and effects of these images on girls of color; lesbian, bisexual,
questioning, and transgendered girls; girls of different
cultures and ethnicities; girls of different religions; girls
with disabilities; and girls from all socioeconomic groups.
7. Identify media (including advertising) and marketing
alternatives to sexualized images of girls, such as positive
depictions of sexuality.
8. Identify effective, culturally competent protective factors
(e.g., helping adolescent girls develop a nonobjectified
model of normal, healthy sexual development and expression
through school or other programs).
9. Evaluate the effectiveness of programs and interventions
that promote positive alternatives and approaches to the
sexualization of girls. Particular attention should be given
to programs and interventions at the individual, family,
school, and/or community level.
10. Explore the relationship between the sexualization of
girls and societal issues such as sexual abuse, child pornography,
child prostitution, and the trafficking of girls.
Research on the potential associations between the
sexualization of girls and the sexual exploitation of girls is
virtually nonexistent, and the need for this line of inquiry
is pressing.
11. Investigate the relationships between international issues
such as immigration and globalization and the sexualization
of girls worldwide. Document the global prevalence of the
sexualization of girls and the types of sexualization that
occur in different countries or regions and any regional
differences in the effects of sexualization.Assess the effects
of sexualization on immigrant girls and determine whether
these effects are moderated by country of origin, age at
immigration, and level of acculturation.
12. Conduct controlled studies on the efficacy of working
directly with girls and girls’ groups that address these issues,
as well as other prevention/intervention programs.
13. Researchers who are conducting studies on related
topics (e.g., physical attractiveness, body awareness, or
acceptance of the thin ideal) should consider the impact of
sexualization as they develop their findings.
II. Practice
As practitioners, psychologists can perform a valuable service
by raising awareness of the negative impact of the sexualization
of girls—on girls, as well as on boys, women, and men.
As individuals and in collaboration with others, practitioners
are encouraged to address the sexualization of girls.
We recommend:
1.That APA make the Report of the Task Force on the
Sexualization of Girls available to practitioners working
with children and adolescents in order to familiarize them
with information and resources relevant to the sexualization
of girls and objectifying behavior on the part of girls.
2.That APA make the Report of the Task Force on the
Sexualization of Girls available to practitioners as a source
of information on assisting girls in developing the skills
necessary to advocate for themselves and counter these
adverse messages, taking into account the impact and influence
of family and other relationships.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
42
III. Education and Training
Education and training focusing on the prevalence and impact
of the sexualization of girls are needed at all levels of
psychology to raise awareness within the discipline of
psychology and among psychologists about these important
issues.We recommend:
1.That APA disseminate information about the Report of
the Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls to instructors
at the middle-school, high-school, and undergraduate levels
and to chairs of graduate departments of psychology.
2.That information from the Report of the Task Force
on the Sexualization of Girls be considered for inclusion
in future revisions of the National Standards for High
School Psychology Curricula and Guidelines on the
Undergraduate Psychology Major by the groups charged
with revising these documents.
3.That chairs of graduate departments of psychology
and of graduate departments in other areas in which
psychologists work be encouraged to consider information
from the Report of the Task Force on the Sexualization of
Girls as curricula are developed within their programs and
to aid in the dissemination of the report.
4.That information from the Report of the Task Force on
the Sexualization of Girls be considered for development as
continuing education and online academy programming, in
partnership with APA’s Continuing Education in
Psychology Office.
5.That the Ethics Committee and APA Ethics Office consider
and use this report in developing ethics educational
and training materials for psychologists and make this
report available to the group responsible for the next
revision of the APA “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conduct.”
IV. Public Policy
APA, in collaboration with other organizations and through
its advocacy efforts, is encouraged to advocate for and better
support understanding of the nature and impact of the
sexualization of girls, as well as identification and broad
implementation of strategies to combat this serious societal
problem.We recommend:
1.That APA advocate for funding to support needed
research in the areas outlined above.
2.That APA advocate for funding to support the
development and implementation by public agencies and
private organizations of media literacy programs, including
interactive media, in schools that combat sexualization
and objectification.
3.That APA advocate for the inclusion of information
about sexualization and objectification in health and other
related programs, including comprehensive sex education
and other sexuality education programs.
4.That APA encourage federal agencies to support the
development of programming that may counteract damaging
images of girlhood and test the effects of such programs—for
example,Web “zines” (i.e.,Web magazines),
extracurricular activities (such as athletics), and programs
that help girls feel powerful in ways other than through a
sexy appearance.
5.That APA work with Congress and relevant federal
agencies and industry to reduce the use of sexualized
images of girls in all forms of media and products.
V. Public Awareness
The task force offers the following recommendations with the
goal of raising public awareness about this important issue.
Achieving this goal will require a comprehensive, grassroots,
communitywide effort. Participants and stakeholders will
include parents and other caregivers, educators, young people,
community-based organizations, religious communities, the
media, advertisers, marketing professionals, and manufacturers.
Overarching strategies will be needed to build linkages and
partnerships among the community members. If the goal of
raising public awareness is left unmet, the mission of this
work will be significantly curtailed.We recommend:
1.That APA seek outside funding to support the development
and implementation of an initiative to address the
issues raised in this report and identify outside partners to
collaborate on these goals.The long-term goals of this initiative,
to be pursued in collaboration with these outside
partners, should include the following:
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
43
l Develop age-appropriate multimedia education
resources representing ethnically and culturally diverse
young people (boys and girls) for parents, educators,
health care providers, and community-based organizations,
available in English and other languages, to help
facilitate effective conversations about the sexualization
of girls and its impact on girls, as well as on boys,
women, and men.
l Convene forums that will bring together members of
the media and a panel of leading experts in the field to
examine and discuss (a) the sexualization of girls in the
United States, (b) the findings of this task force report,
and (c) strategies to increase awareness about this issue
and reduce negative images of girls in the media.
l Develop media awards for positive portrayals of girls as
strong, competent, and nonsexualized (e.g., the best
television portrayal of girls or the best toy).
l Convene forums with industry partners, including the
media, advertisers, marketing professionals, and manufacturers,
to discuss the presentation of sexualized images
and the potential negative impact on girls and to
develop relationships with the goal of providing
guidance on appropriate material for varying
developmental ages and on storylines and programming
that reflect the positive portrayals of girls.
2.That school personnel, parents and other caregivers,
community-based youth and parenting organizations, and
local business and service organizations encourage positive
extracurricular activities that help youth build nurturing
connections with peers and enhance self-esteem based on
young people’s abilities and character rather than on their
appearance.
References
Abbey,A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly
behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
Abbey,A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as
sexual interest:A survey of naturally occurring incidents.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194.
Abernathy,T. J.,Webster, G., & Vermeulen, M. (2002).
Relationship between poverty and health among
adolescents. Adolescence, 37, 55-67.
Abramson, E., & Valene, P. (1991). Media use, dietary restraint,
bulimia, and attitudes toward obesity:A preliminary study.
British Review of Bulimia and Anorexia Nervosa, 5, 73-76.
Ackard, D., Kearney-Cooke,A., & Peterson, C. (2000).
Effect of body image and self-image on women’s
sexual behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28,
422-429.
Ackman, D. (2006, February 25). Not child’s play:Winning
in the toy game is serious business. The Wall Street Journal, p.
12. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from www.proquest.umi.com
Adelson, J. (1980). Handbook of adolescent psychology.
New York:Wiley.
Adler, P.A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to
gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and
girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169-187.
Akima,A. (2003). Gender stereotypes in Japanese television
advertisements. Sex Roles, 49(1/2), 81-90.
Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995).A metaanalysis
summarizing the effects of pornography: II.
Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research,
22, 258-283.
Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Emmers-Sommer,T. M. (2000).
Reactions of criminal sexual offenders to pornography:A
meta-analytic summary. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication
Yearbook 22 (pp. 139-169).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
44
Allen, M., Emmers,T. M., Gebhardt, L., & Giery, M.
(1995). Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape
myths. Journal of Communication, 45, 5-26.
Amateur Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles. (2001).
Children and sport media. Los Angeles:Author.
American Association of University Women. (2001). Hostile
hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school.
Washington, DC:American Association of University
Women Educational Foundation. Retrieved from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED454132.pdf
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2006a).
2005 cosmetic surgery age distributions 18 or younger.
Retrieved September 5, 2006, from
www.plasticsurgery.org/public_education/
loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/
getfile.cfm&PageID=17849
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2006b). 2006 cosmetic
surgery age distribution: 19-34 and 35-50. Retrieved
September 8, 2006, from www.plasticsurgery.org/
public_education/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/
getfile.cfm&PageID=17850
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2006c). 2000, 2004,
2005 national plastic surgery statistics: Cosmetic and reconstructive
procedure trends. Retrieved September 8, 2006, from
http://www.plasticsurgery.org/public_education/loader.cf
m?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=17870
America’s next top model. (2007, January 5). In Wikipedia,
The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved January 5, 2007, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America%27s_Next_Top_
Model#About_The_Show on August 1, 2006
Andrews, B. (1995). Bodily shame as a mediator between
abusive experiences and depression. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 104, 277-285.
Andsager, J. L., & Roe, K. (1999). Country music video in
country’s year of the woman. Journal of Communication, 49,
69-82.
Andsager, J., & Roe, K. (2003).“What’s your definition of
dirty, baby?”: Sex in music videos. Sexuality & Culture:An
Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 7(3), 79-97.
Angelone, D. J., Hirschman, R., Suniga, S.,Armey, M., &
Armelie,A. (2005).The influence of peer interactions on
sexually oriented joke telling. Sex Roles, 52, 187-199.
Arber, S., & Ginn, J. (1991). Gender and later life:A sociological
analysis of resources and constraints. London: Sage.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood:A theory of
development from the late teens through the twenties.
American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
Arnett, J. J. (2002).The sounds of sex: Sex in teens’ music
and music videos. In J. Brown, K.Walsh-Childers, & J.
Steele (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media (pp. 253-264).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Atkin, C. (1982).Television advertising and socialization
of consumer roles. In D. Pearl (Ed.), Television and behavior:
Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties
(pp. 191-200). Rockville, MD: National Institute of
Mental Health.
Austin, E.W., & Johnson, K. K. (1997). Effects of general
and alcohol-specific media literacy training on children’s
decision making about alcohol. Journal of Health
Communication, 2, 17-42.
Bachen, C. M., & Illouz, E. (1996). Imagining romance:
Young people’s cultural models of romance and love.
Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 13, 279-308.
Baker, C. N. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements:A
content analysis of Black- and White-oriented
women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 13-27.
Bamboo Girl. (2006). [Web site manifesto]. Retrieved
September 3, 2006, from
www.bamboogirl.com/about/index.html
Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald,A. G. (1995). Implicit gender
stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
45
Bandura,A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action:A
social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura,A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass
communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.),
Media effects:Advances in theory and research (pp. 61-90).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Banyard,V. L., & Williams, L. M. (1996). Characteristics
of child sexual abuse as correlates of women’s adjustment:
A prospective study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58,
853-865.
Baran, S. J. (1976). Sex on TV and adolescent self-image.
Journal of Broadcasting, 20, 61-68.
Bargh, J.A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism:
On the automaticity of higher mental processes.
Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925-945.
Barnberg, M. (2004). Form and functions of “slut bashing”
in male identity construction in 15-year-olds. Human
Development, 47, 331-353.
Baron,A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006).The development of
implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6
and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 53-58.
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the
phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
Bazzini, D. G., McIntosh,W. D., Smith, S. M., Cook, S., &
Harris, C. (1997).The aging women in popular film:
Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent.
Sex Roles, 36, 531-553.
Beasley, B., & Standley,T. C. (2002). Shirts vs. skins:
Clothing as an indicator of gender stereotyping in video
games. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 279-293.
Becker,A. (2004).Television, disordered eating, and
young women in Fiji: Negotiating body image and identity
during rapid social change. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry,
28, 533-559.
Behling, D. (1994). School uniforms and person perception.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 723-729.
Bem, S. L. (1985).Androgeny and gender schema theory:
A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B.
Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation:
Vol. 32. Psychology and gender (pp. 59–95). Lincoln:
University of Nebraska Press.
Bissell, K. L. (2004). Sports model/sports mind:The relationship
between entertainment and sports media exposure,
sports participation, and body image distortion in Division
I female athletes. Mass Communication, 47, 453-473.
Bloom,A. (2004, September). Sex and the 6-year-old girl.
O,The Oprah Magazine, pp. 209-210.
Bonhauser, M., Fernandez, G., Püschel, K.,Yañez, F.,
Montero, J.,Thompson, B., & Coronado, G. (2005).
Improving physical fitness and emotional well-being in
adolescents of low socioeconomic status in Chile: Results
of a school-based controlled trial. Health Promotion
International, 20, 113-122.
Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Robinson T. N. (1999).Viewing
the viewers: 10 video case studies of children’s television
viewing behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic
Media, 43, 506-528.
Botta, R.A. (2000).The mirror of television:A comparison
of Black and White adolescents’ body image. Journal of
Communication, 50, 144-159.
Botta, R.A. (2003). For your health? The relationship
between magazine reading and adolescents’ body image
and eating disturbances. Sex Roles, 48, 389-399.
Boyer, D., Chapman, L., & Marshall, B. K. (1993). Survival
sex in King County: Helping women out [Report to the
King County Women’s Advisory Board]. Seattle,WA:
Northwest Resource Associates.
Briere, J., & Conte, J. (1993). Self-reported amnesia for
abuse in adults molested as children. Journal of Traumatic
Stress, 6, 21-31.
Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1987). Post sexual abuse trauma:
Data and implications for clinical practice. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 2, 457-467.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
46
Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1988). Symptomatology associated
with childhood sexual victimization in a nonclinical adult
sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 51-59.
Brooks, G. (1995). The centerfold syndrome: How men can
overcome objectification and achieve intimacy with women.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brooks, R. (2006,August 25). No escaping sexualization of
young girls. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0825-33.htm
Brotto, L., Heiman, J., & Tolman, D. (2009). Narratives of
desire in mid-age women with and without arousal difficulties.
Journal of Sex Research, 46, 387-398.
Brown, L. M. (1991).Telling a girl’s life: Self-authorization
as a form of resistance. In C. Gilligan,A. G. Rogers, & D. L.
Tolman (Eds.), Women, girls, and psychotherapy: Reframing
resistance (pp. 71-86). New York: Harrington Park Press.
Brown, L. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among
girls. New York: New York University Press.
Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the
crossroads:Women’s psychology and girls’ development.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, L. M., & Lamb, S. (2005, December 21). Selling an
ideal of lipstick and lace. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from
www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/
articles/2005/12/21/selling_an_ideal_of_lipstick_and_lace/
Browne,A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child
sexual abuse:A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin,
99, 66-77.
Brumberg, J. J. (1997).The Body Project:An intimate history
of American girls. New York:Vintage.
Bryant-Davis,T. (2005). Coping strategies of African
American adult survivors of childhood violence. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 409-414.
Burn, S. M., & Ward,A. Z. (2005). Men’s conformity to
traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction.
Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 254-263.
Busby, L. J., & Leichty, G. (1993). Feminism and advertising
in traditional and nontraditional women’s magazines 1950s1980s.
Journalism Quarterly, 70, 247-264.
Bushman, B. J. (2005).Violence and sex in television
programs do not sell products in advertisements.
Psychological Science, 16, 702-708.
Bussey, K., & Bandura,A. (1984). Influence of gender constancy
and social power on sex-linked modeling. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1292-1302.
Bussey, K., & Bandura,A. (1992). Self-regulatory
mechanisms governing gender development.
Child Development, 63, 1236-1250.
Bussey, K., & Bandura,A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of
gender development and differentiation. Psychological
Review, 106, 676-713.
Buying into sexy:The sexing up of teens. (2005, January 9).
[Broadcast by the Canadian Broadcasting Company].
Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/
pre-2007/files/money/sexy/
Camp, D. E., Klesges, R. C., & Relyea, G. (1993).The relationship
between body weight concerns and adolescent
smoking. Health Psychology, 12, 24-32.
Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for
sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974-1994.
Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158-168.
Casparian, E. M. (2000). Our whole lives: Sexuality
education for Grades 4-6. Boston: Unitarian
Universalist Church.
Chaplin, H. (1999,August). Smell my Candie’s. American
Demographics, 21, 64-65.
Christenson, P. G., & Roberts, D. F. (1998). It’s not only
rock & roll: Popular music in the lives of adolescents.
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Classen, C. C., Palesh, O. G., & Aggarwal, R. (2005). Sexual
revictimization:A review of the empirical literature.
Trauma,Violence, and Abuse, 6, 103-129.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
47
Collins, R. L., Elliott, M., Berry, S., Kanouse, D. E., &
Hunter, S. (2003). Entertainment television as a healthy
sex-educator:The impact of condom-efficacy information
in an episode of “Friends.” Pediatrics, 112, 1115-1121.
Collins,W. A., & Sroufe, L.A. (1999). Capacity for intimate
relationships:A developmental construction. In W. Furman,
B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.),The development of romantic
relationships in adolescence (pp. 125-147). Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Colman, R.A., & Widom, C. S. (2004). Childhood abuse
and neglect and adult intimate relationships:A prospective
study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 1133-1151.
Connell, R.W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
Cook, D.T., & Kaiser, S. B. (2004). Betwixt and between:
Age ambiguity and the sexualization of the female consuming
subject. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4, 203-227.
Cookson, S. (Writer, Director). (2001). Living dolls:The
making of a child beauty queen. In L. Otto (Producer),
American undercover [HBO documentary]. New York:
Home Box Office.
Corder, J., & Stephan, C.W. (1984). Females’ combination
of work and family roles:Adolescents’ aspirations. Journal
of Marriage and the Family, 46, 391-402.
Coyne-Beasley,T., & Schoenbach,V. J. (2000).The
African-American church:A potential forum for adolescent
comprehensive sexuality education. Journal of Adolescent
Health, 26, 289-294.
Crews, D., Lochbaum, M. R., & Landers, D. M. (2004).
Aerobic physical activity effects on psychological
well-being in low-income Hispanic children.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 319-324.
Cunningham,W.A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001).
Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and
convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
Dalton, P. (2005, November 20).What’s wrong with this
outfit, Mom? The Washington Post, p. B01. Retrieved April
18, 2006, from www.washingtonpost.com
Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing:
Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its
effect on automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658.
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald,A. G. (2001). On the
malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic
prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
Daubenmier, J. J. (2005).The relationship of yoga, body
awareness, and body responsiveness to self-objectification
and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29,
207-219.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein,
R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials
that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically
and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. .
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing
the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype
threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287.
Davis, M. H., & Oathout, H.A. (1987). Maintenance of
satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and
relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 53, 397-410.
Dean, K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of
men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine
aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 449-455.
DeSmedt, L. (2006). The Barbie case. Retrieved
from http://www.awpagesociety.com/site/resources/2006_
winning_case_studies
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
48
DiBartolo, P. M., & Shaffer, C. (2002).A comparison of
female college athletes and nonathletes: Eating disorder
symptomatology and psychological well-being. Journal of
Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 33-41.
Dietz,T. L. (1998).An examination of violence and
gender role portrayals in video games: Implications for
gender socialization and aggressive behavior.
Sex Roles, 38, 425-442.
Dill, K. E., Gentile, D.A., Richter,W.A., & Dill, J. C.
(2005).Violence, sex, race, and age in popular video
games:A content analysis. In E. Cole & J. Henderson
Daniel (Eds.), Featuring females: Feminist analyses of
media (pp. 115-130).Washington, DC:American
Psychological Association.
Dittmar, H., & Howard, S. (2004).Thin-ideal internalization
and social comparison tendency as moderators of media
models’ impact on women’s body-focused anxiety. Journal of
Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 768-791.
Dolliver, M. (1999, March 15). Is there too much sexual
imagery in advertising? Adweek, pp. 21, 22.
Dowling, C. (2000).The frailty myth:Women approaching physical
equality. New York: Random House.
Duffy, J.,Wareham, S., & Walsh, M. (2004). Psychological
consequences for high school students of having been sexually
harassed. Sex Roles, 50, 811-821.
Duffy, M., & Gotcher, J. M. (1996). Crucial advice on how
to get the guy:The rhetorical vision of power and seduction
in the teen magazine YM. Journal of Communication
Inquiry, 20, 32-48.
Duke, L. (2000). Black in a blonde world: Race and
girls’ interpretations of the feminine ideal in teen
magazines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
77, 367-392.
Duncan, C., & Loretto,W. (2004). Never the right age?
Gender and age-based discrimination in employment.
Gender,Work, and Organization, 11, 95-115.
Duncan, M. C., Messner, M.A., & Williams, L. (1991).
Coverage of women’s sports in four daily newspapers. Los
Angeles:Amateur Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles.
Durham, M. (1998). Dilemmas of desire: Representations
of adolescent sexuality in two teen magazines.Youth and
Society, 29, 369-389.
Durkin, S. J., & Paxton, S. J. (2002). Predictors of vulnerability
to reduced body image satisfaction and psychological
well-being in response to exposure to idealized female
media images in adolescent girls. Journal of Psychosomatic
Research, 53, 995-1005.
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1990). Introduction. In G. Duveen
& B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the
development of knowledge (pp. 1-10). Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Eaton, C. (1997). Prime-time stereotyping on the new
television networks. Journalism and Mass Communication
Quarterly, 74, 859-872.
Eccles, J. S. (1985).Why doesn’t Jane run? Sex differences in
educational and occupational patterns. In F. D. Horowitz &
M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives
(pp. 251-295).Washington, DC:American
Psychological Association.
Eder, D. (with C. C. Evans & S. Parker). (1995). School talk:
Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press.
Edut, O. (Ed.) (1998). Adios, Barbie:Young women write about
body and identity. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
Edut, O. (Ed.). (2003). Body outlaws: Rewriting the rules of
beauty and body image. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
Eichenwald, K. (2005, December 19).Through his Webcam, a
boy joins a sordid online world.The New York Times, p.A1.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/19/national/
19kids.ready.html
Elliott, D. M. (1997).Traumatic events: Prevalence and
delayed recall in the general population. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 65, 811-820.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
49
Ellison, C. R. (2000). Women’s sexualities. Oakland, CA:
New Harbinger.
English, B. (2005, May 12).The secret life of boys:
Pornography is a mouse click away, and kids are
being exposed to it in ever-increasing numbers.
The Boston Globe, p. D1. Retrieved from
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/
2005/05/12/the_secret_life_of_boys/
Entertainment Software Rating Board. (n.d.). Game ratings
and descriptor guide. Retrieved from www.esrb.org/ratings/
ratings_guide.jsp
Estes, R. J., & Weiner, N.A. (2001). The commercial sexual
exploitation of children in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, School of Social
Work. Retrieved from http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/
restes/CSEC.htm
Etnier, J. L., Salazar,W., Landers, D. M., Petruzzello, S. J.,
Han, M., & Nowell, P. (1997).The influence of physical
fitness and exercise upon cognitive functioning:A meta
analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 249-277.
Faith, M. S., & Schare, M. D. (1993).The role of body
image in sexually avoidant behavior. Archives of Sexual
Behavior, 22, 345-356.
Faley, R. H., Knapp, D. E., Kustis, G.A., & Dubois, C. L.
(1999). Estimating the organizational costs of sexual
harassment:The case of the U.S.Army. Journal of Business
and Psychology, 13, 461-484.
Faulkner, S. L. (2003). Good girl or flirt girl: Latinas’ definitions
of sex and sexual relationships. Hispanic Journal of
Behavioral Sciences, 25, 174-200.
Fink, J .S., & Kensicki, L. J. (2002).An imperceptible difference:Visual
and textual constructions of femininity in
Sports Illustrated and Sports Illustrated for Women. Mass
Communication & Society, 5, 317-339.
Fosseen, L.L. (2002). School uniforms and sense of school
as a community: Perceptions of belonging, safety, and caring
relationships in urban middle school settings.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(2-B), 1087.
Frable, D. E. S., Johnson,A. E., & Kellman, H. (1997).
Seeing masculine men, sexy women, and gender
differences: Exposure to pornography and cognitive
constructions of gender. Journal of Personality, 65, 311-355.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Harrison, K. (2005).Throwing like a
girl: Self-objectification predicts adolescent girls’ motor
performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29, 79-101.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts,T-A. (1997). Objectification
theory:Toward understanding women’s lived experience
and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21,
173-206.
Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts,T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M.,
& Twenge, J. M. (1998).That swimsuit becomes you: Sex
differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and
math performance. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 75, 269-284.
Friedrich,W. N., Fisher, J. L., Ditner, C.A.,Acton, R.,
Berliner, L., & Butler, J. (2001). Child Sexual Behavior
Inventory: Normative, psychiatric, and sexual abuse comparisons.
Child Maltreatment, 6, 37-49.
Frisby, C. M. (2004). Does race matter? Effects of idealized
images on African American women’s perceptions of body
esteem. Journal of Black Studies, 34, 323-347.
Fullerton, J.A., & Kendrick,A. (2000). Portrayals of
men and women in U. S. Spanish-language television
commercials. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
77, 128-139.
Gan, S., Zillmann, D., & Mitrook, M. (1997). Stereotyping
effect of Black women’s sexual rap on White audiences.
Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 381-399.
Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003).
Body objectification and “fat talk”: Effects on
emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance.
Sex Roles, 48, 377-388.
Garner,A., Sterk, H. M., & Adams, S. (1998). Narrative
analysis of sexual etiquette in teenage magazines. Journal of
Communication, 48, 59-78.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
50
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N.
(1994). Growing up with television:The cultivation
perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media
effects:Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005).
Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389-395.
Goldfarb, E. (2000). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for
Grades 10-12. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church.
Goldiner, D. (2006, May 25). Parents KO dolls: Hasbro axes
dirty dancer toys for girls. The New York Daily News, p. 8.
Retrieved from http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/
news/2006/05/25/2006-05-25_parents_ko_dolls__
hasbro_axe.html
Gordon, M. (2004). Media images of women and African
American girls’ sense of self. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Michigan.
Gottfredson, D. C. (1981). Personality and persistence in
education:A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 43, 532-545.
Gow, J. (1990).The relationship between violent and sexual
images and the popularity of music videos. Popular Music
and Society, 14, 1-9.
Gow, J. (1996). Reconsidering gender roles on MTV:
Depictions in the most popular music videos of the early
1990s. Communication Reports, 9, 151-161.
Grabe, S.,Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008).The role of the
media in body image concerns among women:A metaanalysis
of experimental and correlational studies.
Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476.
Graham, C.A., Sanders, S.A., Milhausen, R., & McBride,
K. (2004).Turning on and turning off:A focus group study
of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 33, 537-548.
Grauerholz, E., & King,A. (1997). Primetime sexual harassment.
Violence Against Women, 3, 129-148.
Greenberg, B. S., Siemicki, M., Dorfman, S., Heeter, C.,
Stanley, C., Soderman,A., & Linsangan, R. (1993). Sex
content in R-rated films viewed by adolescents. In B. S.
Greenberg, J. D. Brown, & N. Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.),
Media, sex, and the adolescent (pp. 45-58). Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press.
Greenberg, J. (2001).The ambiguity of seduction in the
development of Freud’s thinking. Contemporary
Psychoanalysis, 37, 417-426.
Greene, B. (2000).African American lesbian and bisexual
women. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 239-250.
Greenwald,A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social
cognition:Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
Psychological Review 102, 4–27.
Greeson, L. E., & Williams, R.A. (1986). Social implications
of music videos for youth:An analysis of the contents and
effects of MTV. Youth and Society, 18, 177-189.
Griffiths, M. (2000). Excessive internet use: Implications for
sexual behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 537-552.
Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002).The
effect of experimental presentation of thin media images
on body satisfaction:A meta-analytic review. International
Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1-16.
Grotevant, H. D., & Thorbecke,W. D. (1982). Sex differences
in styles of occupational identity information in late
adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 18, 396-405.
Gruber, J. J. (1986). Physical activity and self-esteem development
in children:A meta-analysis. In G.A. Stull & H. M.
Echert (Eds.), Effects of physical activity on children (American
Academy of Physical Education Papers, No. 19, pp. 30-48).
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Haaken, J., & Lamb, S. (2000).The politics of child sexual
abuse. Society, 37, 7-14.
Halliwell, E., & Dittmar, H. (2004). Does size matter? The
impact of model’s body size on advertising effectiveness
and women’s body-focused anxiety. Journal of Social and
Clinical Psychology, 23, 104-122.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
51
Haninger, K., & Thompson, K. M. (2004). Content and ratings
of teen-rated video games. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 291, 856-865.
Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). How rock music
videos can change what is seen when boy meets girl:
Priming stereotypic appraisal of social interactions.
Sex Roles, 19, 287-316.
Hare-Mustin, R.T., & Marecek, J. (1988).The meaning of
difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology.
American Psychologist, 43, 455-464.
Hargreaves, D.A., & Tiggemann, M. (2004). Idealized
media images and adolescent body image:“Comparing”
boys and girls. Body Image, 1, 351-361.
Harrell, Z.A. (2002).Trait self-objectification in
college women’s mental health:An examination of smokers
and never-smokers. Dissertation Abstracts International,
63(2-B), 1079.
Harrison, K. (2000).The body electric:Thin-ideal media
and eating disorders in adolescents. Journal of
Communication, 50, 119-143.
Harrison, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2003).Women’s
sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in
Black and White adolescent females. Journal of
Communication, 53, 216-232.
Harter, S. (1998).The development of self-representations.
In W. Damon (Series Editor) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.),
Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and
personality development (5th ed., pp. 553-617).
Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Hawkins, N., Richards, P. S., & Granley, H., & Stein, D. M.
(2004).The impact of exposure to the thin-ideal media
images on women. Eating Disorders:The Journal of Treatment
& Prevention, 12, 35-50.
Haynes, M. (2005, November 3). Bawdy T-shirts set
off “girlcott” by teens. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Retrieved August 26, 2006, from www.postgazette.com/pg/05307/599884.stm
Hebl, M. R., King, E. G., & Lin, J. (2004).The swimsuit
becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to
self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
30, 1322-1331.
Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery:The aftermath
of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror. New York:
Basic Books.
Hill,A.,Weaver, C., & Blundell, J. (1990). Dieting concerns
of 10-year-old-girls and their mothers. British Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 29, 346-348.
Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge,
consciousness, and the politics of empowerment.
New York: Routledge.
Hill Collins, P. (2004). Black sexual politics:African-Americans,
gender and the new racism. New York: Routledge.
Hoagwood, K. (1990). Blame and adjustment among
women sexually abused as children. Women and Therapy, 9,
89-110.
Hofschire, L. J., & Greenberg, B. S. (2001). Media’s impact
on adolescents’ body dissatisfaction. In J. D. Brown & J. R.
Steele (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media (pp. 125-149).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holcomb-McCoy, C. (2005). Empowerment of
African American girls:A response. Professional School
Counseling, 8, 390-391.
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R.
(2004).The male in the head:Young people, heterosexuality and
power (2nd ed.). London:Tufnell Press.
Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1992).A longitudinal
examination of life choices of gifted and talented young
women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 207-212.
Holmstrom,A. J. (2004).The effects of the media on body
image:A meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic
Media, 48, 196-217.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
52
Horovitz, B. (1993, February 16).Throwing in a towel:
Hyundai agrees to boycott Sports Illustrated’s swimsuit issue.
Los Angeles Times, p. D1. Retrieved from
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-02-16/business/fi-161_1_
swimsuit-issue
Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003).
The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related
outcomes:A meta-analysis of experimental studies.
Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-462.
Houston, S., & Hwang, N. (1996). Correlates of the
objective and subjective experience of sexual harassment in
high school. Sex Roles, 34, 189-205.
Hurlbert, D. F., & Whittaker, K. E. (1991).The role of
masturbation in marital and sexual satisfaction:A comparative
study of female masturbators and nonmasturbators.
Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 17, 272–282.
Hurtado,A. (2003). Negotiating the color line. In A.
Hurtado (Ed.),Voicing Chicana feminisms:Young women speak
out on sexuality and identity (pp. 176-197). New York: New
York University Press.
Huston,A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1998). Mass media and
children’s development. In W. Damon, I. E. Sigel, & K.A.
Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:Vol 4. Child
psychology in practice (pp. 999-1058). New York:Wiley.
Impett, E.A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006).To be
seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent
girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 129–142.
Irving, L., & Berel, S. R. (2001). Comparison of media-literacy
programs to strengthen college women’s resistance to
media images. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 103-112.
Irving, L. M., DuPen, J., & Berel, S. (1998).A media literacy
program for high school females. Eating Disorders:The
Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 6, 119-132.
Jansma, L. L., Linz, D. G., Mulac,A., & Imrich, D. J. (1997).
Men’s interactions with women after viewing sexually
explicit films: Does degradation make a difference?
Communication Monographs, 63, 1-24.
Jensen, R., & Dines, G. (2004). Pornography in a pornographic
culture: Eroticizing domination and subordination.
In R.A. Lind (Ed.), Race/gender/media: Considering diversity
across audiences, content, and producers (pp. 274-281). Boston:
Pearson Education.
Johnson, J. D.,Adams, M. S.,Ashburn, L., & Reed,W.
(1995). Differential gender effects of exposure to rap music
on African American adolescents’ acceptance of teen dating
violence. Sex Roles, 33, 597–605.
Jordan, J.V., Kaplan,A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey,
J. L. (1991). Women’s growth in connection:Writings from the
Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.
Juvonen, J., Nishina,A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer
harassment, psychological adjustment, and school
functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 92, 349-359.
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2001, December). Generation
Rx.com: How young people use the internet for health information.
Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved
from www.kff.org/entmedia/20011211a-index.cfm
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003, October 28). New study
finds children age zero to six spend as much time with TV, computers
and video games as playing outside [Press release].
Retrieved from www.kff.org/entmedia/
entmedia102803nr.cfm
Kalof, L. (1999).The effects of gender and music video
imagery on sexual attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology,
139, 378-385.
Kane, M. J. (1996). Media coverage of the post Title-IX
female athlete:A feminist analysis of sport, gender, and
power. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Public Policy, 3,
95-127.
Kane, M. J., & Greendorfer, S. L. (1994).The media’s role in
accommodating and resisting stereotyped images of women
in sport. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women, media and sport
(pp. 28-44).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
53
Kang, M-E. (1997).The portrayal of women’s images
in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis
revisited. Sex Roles, 37, 979-996.
Kelly, J., & Smith, S. L. (2006). Where the girls aren’t: Gender
disparity saturates G-rated films [Research brief]. Retrieved
from http://www.learcenter.org/images/event_uploads/
where.the.girls.arent%5B1%5D.pdf
Kendall-Tackett, K.A.,Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D.
(1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children:A review and
synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin,
113, 164-180.
Kenrick, D.T., & Guttieres, S. E., (1980). Contrast effects
and judgments of physical attractiveness:When beauty
becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 38, 131-140.
Kerr, B.A. (1983). Raising the career aspirations of gifted
girls. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 32, 37-43.
Kerr, B.A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women: Special
guidance concerns. Roeper Review, 8, 30-33.
Kilbourne, J. (1999). Deadly persuasion:Why women
and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising.
New York: Free Press.
Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America. New York:The
Free Press.
Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (1999). Raising
Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York:
Ballantine Books.
Kirby, D. (2001). Emerging answers: Research findings on programs
designed to prevent teen pregnancy. Washington, DC:
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Kornblum, J. (2005, January 8).Adults question MySpace’s
safety. USA Today. Retrieved from www.usatoday.com/
tech/news/2006-01-08-myspace-sidebar_x.htm
Kosicki, G. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agendasetting
research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100-127
Krassas, N., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2001).
Boxing Helena and corseting Eunice: Sexual rhetoric in
Cosmopolitan and Playboy magazines. Sex Roles, 44, 751-771.
Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003).
“Master your Johnson”: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and
Stuff magazines. Sexuality & Culture, 7, 98-119.
Kunkel, D., & Roberts, D. (1991).Young minds and marketplace
values: Issues in children’s television advertising.
Journal of Social Issues, 47, 57-72.
Labre, M. P., & Walsh-Childers, K. (2003).Advice? Beauty
messages in web sites of teen magazines. Mass
Communication & Society, 6, 379-396.
Lacroix, C. (2004). Images of animated others:
The Orientalization of Disney’s cartoon heroines
from the Little Mermaid to the Hunchback of Notre
Dame. Popular Communication, 2, 213-229.
La Ferla, R. (2003, October 26). Underdressed and hot:
Dolls moms don’t love. The New York Times, Section 9, p. 1.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/
fashion/26DOLL.html
Lamb, S. (1996). The trouble with blame:Victims, perpetrators
and responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images
and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims:
Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108-138). New York:
New York University Press.
Lamb, S. (2002). The secret lives of girls:What good girls really
do—Sex play, aggression, and their guilt. New York: Free Press.
Lamb, S. (2006). Sex, therapy, and kids:Addressing their concerns
through talk and play. New York: Norton.
Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2006). Packaging girlhood:
Rescuing our daughters from marketers’ schemes. New York: St.
Martin’s Press.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
54
Lambiase, J. (2003). Sex—Online and in Internet
advertising. In T. Reichert & J. Lambiase (Eds), Sex in
advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal (pp. 247-269).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lampman, C., Rolfe-Maloney, B., David, E. J.,Yan, M.,
McCermott, N.,Winters, S., et al. (2002, Fall). Messages
about sex in the workplace:A content analysis of primetime
television. Sexuality & Culture, 6, 3-21.
Lang,A.,Wise, K., Lee, S., & Cai, X. (2003).The effects of
sexual appeals on physiological, cognitive, emotional, and
attitudinal responses for product and alcohol billboard
advertising. In J. Lambiase & T. Reichert (Eds.), Sex in
advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal (pp. 107-132).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements:
Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression.
Sex Roles, 32, 639-649.
Laumann, E., Gagnon, J., Michael, R., & Michaels, D.
(1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in
the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. (1999). Depicting
women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on
body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
25, 1049-1058.
Leeds Metropolitan University. (2005). Defining disability—
Medical model. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from
www.lmu.ac.uk/metoffice/stuserv/disability/
models_medical.htm
Lehman, S. J., & Koerner, S. S. (2004).Adolescent
women’s sports involvement and sexual behavior/health:
A process-level investigation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
33, 443-455.
Lenhart,A., Lewis, O., & Rainie, L. (2001). Teenage life
online. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/
Reports/2001/Teenage-Life-Online.aspx
Lenhart,A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005, July 27). Teens
and technology:Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired
and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and
American Life Project. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/
2005/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf.pdf
Leserman, J. (2005). Sexual abuse history: Prevalence, health
effects, mediators, and psychological treatment.
Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 906-915.
Letourneau, E. J., Schoenwald, S. K., & Sheidow,A. J.
(2004). Children and adolescents with sexual behavior
problems. Child Maltreatment, 9, 49-61.
Levin, D. E. (2005). So sexy, so soon:The sexualization
of childhood. In S. Olfman (Ed.), Childhood lost: How
American culture is failing our kids (pp. 137-153).Westport,
CT: Praeger Press.
Levine, M. P., Smolak, L., & Hayden, H. (1994).The
relation of sociocultural factors to eating attitudes and
behaviors among middle school girls. Journal of Early
Adolescence, 14, 471-490.
Levine, M. P., Smolak, L., Moodey,A., Shuman, M., &
Hessen, L. (1994). Normative developmental challenges and
dieting and eating disturbance in middle school girls.
International Journal of Eating Disorders, 15, 11-20.
Levy,A. (2005a). Female chauvinist pigs:Women and the rise of
raunch culture. New York: Free Press.
Levy,A. (2005b, September 18). Raunchiness is powerful?
C’mon, girls.The Washington Post, p. B05. Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/
article/2005/09/17/AR2005091700044.html
Lewis, M. (2000). Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment,
pride, shame, and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones
(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 623-636). New
York: Guilford Press.
Limbert,W. M., & Bullock, H. E. (2005).“Playing the
fool:” U.S. welfare policy from a critical race perspective.
Feminism and Psychology, 15, 253-274.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
55
Lin, C. (1997). Beefcake versus cheesecake in the 1990s:
Sexist portrayals of both genders in television commercials.
Howard Journal of Communications, 8, 237-249.
Lin, C. (1998). Use of sex appeals in prime-time television
commercials. Sex Roles, 38, 461-475.
Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender,
pubertal development and peer sexual harassment predict
objectified body consciousness in early adolescents. Journal
of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.
Lindner, K. (2004). Images of women in general interest
and fashion advertisements from 1955 to 2002. Sex Roles,
51, 409-421.
Linn, S. (2004). Consuming kids:The hostile takeover of childhood.
New York:The New Press.
Linn, S. (2005).The commercialization of childhood. In S.
Olfman (Ed.), Childhood lost: How American culture is failing
our kids (pp. 107-121).Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
Linver, M., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2002,April).
Influences of gender on academic achievement. Paper
presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on
Adolescence, New Orleans, LA.
Lips, H. (1989). Gender role socialization: Lessons in femininity.
In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women:A feminist perspective (pp.
197-216). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Long, E. C. J., & Andrews, D.W. (1990). Perspective taking
as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 59, 126-131.
Lucas,A. R., Beard, C. M., O’Fallon,W. M., & Kurland, L.
T. (1991). 50-year trends in the incidence of anorexia nervosa
in Rochester, Minn.:A population-based study.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 917-922.
MacKay, N. L., & Covell, K. (1997).The impact of
women in advertisements on attitudes toward women.
Sex Roles, 36, 573-583.
Major, B., Barr, L., & Zubek, J. (1999). Gender and selfesteem:A
meta-analysis. In W. Swann, J. H. Langlois, & L.
Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society:The
gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 223-253).
Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
Makkar, J. K., & Strube, M. J. (1995). Black women’s selfperceptions
of attractiveness following exposure to white
versus black beauty standards:The moderating role of racial
identity and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
25, 1547-1566.
Malamuth, N. M.,Addison,T., & Koss, M. (2000).
Pornography and sexual aggression:Are there reliable
effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex
Research, 11, 26-91.
Martin, K.A. (1998). Becoming a gendered body: Practices
in preschools. American Sociological Review, 63, 494-511.
Martino, S. M., Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Strachman,A.,
Kanouse, D. E., & Berry, S. H. (2006). Exposure to degrading
and nondegrading music lyrics and sexual behavior
among youth. Pediatrics, 118, 430-441.
McAuley, E. (1994). Physical activity and psychosocial outcomes.
In C. Bouchard, R. J. Shephard, & T. Stephens
(Eds.), Physical activity, fitness and health (pp. 551-568).
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
McConnell, C. (2001).An object to herself:The relationship
between girls and their bodies. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 61(8B), p. 4416.
McHale, S. M., Crouter,A. C., & Tucker, C. J. (1999).
Family context and gender role socialization in middle
childhood: Comparing girls to boys and sisters to brothers.
Child Development, 70, 990-1004.
McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. (1990).Treating women
as sexual objects: Look to the (gender schematic) male who
has viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 16, 296-308.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
56
McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’
body esteem:The mediating effect of objectified
body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy.
Sex Roles, 39, 113-123.
McKinley, N. M. (1999).Women and objectified body
consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experiences
in cultural, developmental, and familial context.
Developmental Psychology, 35, 760-769.
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996).The Objectified
Body Consciousness Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
20, 181-215.
McMahon, K. (1990).The Cosmopolitan ideology
and the management of desire. Journal of Sex Research, 27,
381-396.
Menkes, S. (1994, March 27). Runways: Robbing the cradle.
The New York Times, p.A1. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/27/style/runwaysrobbing-the-cradle.html
Merskin, D. (2004). Reviving Lolita? A media literacy
examination of sexual portrayals of girls in fashion advertising.
American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 119-129.
Merten, D. E. (2004). Securing her experience: Friendship
versus popularity. Feminism and Psychology, 14, 361-365.
Messner, M.A., Duncan, M. C., & Cooky, C. (2003).
Silence, sports bras, and wrestling porn. Journal of Sport &
Social Issues, 27, 38-51.
Messner, M.A., Duncan, M. C., & Jensen, K. (1993).
Separating the men from the girls:The gendered language of
televised sports. In D. S. Eitzen (Ed.), Sport in contemporary society:An
anthology (pp. 219-233). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Milburn, M., Mather, R., & Conrad, S. (2000).The effects
of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on
perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 43, 645-664.
Milkie, M.A. (1999). Social comparisons, reflected
appraisals, and mass media:The impact of pervasive beauty
images on black and white girls’ self-concepts. Social
Psychology Quarterly, 62, 190-210.
Miller, K. E., Barnes, G. M., Melnick, M. J., Sabo,
D. F., & Farrell, M. P. (2002). Gender and racial/ethnic
differences in predicting adolescent sexual risk:Athletic
participation versus exercise. Journal of Health and Social
Behavior, 43, 436-450.
Mills, J., Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Tiggemann, M. (2002).
Effects of exposure to thin media images: Evidence of selfenhancement
among restrained eaters. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1687-1699.
Molnar, B. E., Buka, S. L., & Kessler, R. C. (2001). Child
sexual abuse and subsequent psychopathology: Results from
the National Comorbidity Survey. American Journal of Public
Health, 91, 753-760.
Monro, F., & Huon, G. (2005). Media-portrayed idealized
images, body shame, and appearance anxiety. International
Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 85-90.
Montemurro, B. (2003). Not a laughing matter: Sexual
harassment as “material” on workplace-based situation
comedies. Sex Roles, 48, 433-445.
More teens opt for plastic surgery. (2000,August 30).
Christian Science Monitor, pp. 14-16.
Mullen, P. E., Martin, J. L.,Anderson, J. C., Romans, S. E.,
& Herbison, G. P. (1993). Child sexual abuse and mental
health in adult life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163,
721–732.
Murnen, S. K.,Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys
will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic
review of the research that relates masculine ideology to
sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375.
Nadon, S. M., Koverola, C., & Schludermann, E. H. (1998).
Antecedents to prostitution: Childhood victimization.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 206-221.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
57
Nathanson,A. I. (2004). Factual and evaluative approaches
to modifying children’s responses to violent television.
Journal of Communication, 54, 321-336.
Nathanson,A. I.,Wilson, B. J., McGee, J., & Sebastian, M.
(2002). Counteracting the effects of female stereotypes on
television via active mediation. Journal of Communication,
42, 922-937.
Nelson,A. (2000).The pink dragon is female: Halloween
costumes and gender markers. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 24, 137-144.
Nichter, M. (2000). Fat talk:What girls and their parents say
about dieting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nielsen Media Research. (1998). 1998 report on television.
New York:Author.
O’Donohue,W., Gold, S. R., & McKay, J. S. (1997).
Children as sexual objects: Historical and gender trends in
magazines. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment, 9,
291-301.
Office of Population Affairs. (1999, December 12-14).
Promoting responsible sexual behaviors (Office of Population
Affairs Dialogue: Executive Summary and Summaries of
Group Discussions).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
Ogle, J. P., & Damhorst, M. L. (2004). Constructing and
deconstructing the body malleable through mother-daughter
interactions. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 180-209.
Ogle, J. P., & Thornburg, E. (2003).An alternative
voice amidst teen “zines”:An analysis of body-related
content in Girl Zone. Journal of Family and Consumer
Sciences, 95, 47-56.
O’Hare, E.A., & O’Donohue,W. (1998). Sexual harassment:
Identifying risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
27, 561-580.
Olding, M., & Zuckerman, D. (2004, October 26).
Cosmetic surgery and teens. The Washington Post.
Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
articles/A63931-2004Oct26.html
Osland, J.A., Fitch, M., & Willis, E. E. (1996). Likelihood to
rape in college males. Sex Roles, 35, 171-183.
Paik, H. (2001).The history of children’s use of electronic
media. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of
children and the media (pp. 7-27).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pardun, C. J., L’Engle, K. L., & Brown, J. D. (2005). Linking
exposure to outcomes: Early adolescents’ consumption of
sexual content in six media. Mass Communication & Society,
8(2), 75-91.
Pardun, C. J., & McKee, K. B. (1995). Strange bedfellows:
Symbols of religion and sexuality on MTV. Youth & Society,
26, 438-449.
Parks, L. (1998, September 7). Chains court teen shoppers
as cosmetics customers. Drug Store News. Retrieved from
www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3374/is_n14_v20/
ai_21147316
Parmariega,A. J., Gustavson, C. R., & Gustavson, J. C.
(1994). Eating attitudes in African-American women:The
Essence eating disorders survey. Eating Disorders, 2, 5-16.
Paul, B., (2004). Testing the effects of exposure to virtual
child pornography on viewer cognitions and attitudes
toward deviant sexual behavior. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 64(8A), 2693A.
Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming
our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York:
Times Books.
Pearl,A., & Weston, J. (2003).Attitudes of adolescents about
cosmetic surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 50, 628-630.
Pedersen, P. M., & Whisenant,W.A. (2003). Examining
stereotypical written and photographic reporting on the
sports page:An analysis of newspaper coverage of interscholastic
athletics. Women in Sport and Physical Activity
Journal, 12, 67-86.
Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger:Young women’s
reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: New York
University Press.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
58
Phillips, O. (2006, May 1).Where will skincare go next?
International Cosmetic News, 87. Retrieved August 1, 2006,
from Lexis-Nexis database.
Planned Parenthood. (2003).Who we are. Retrieved
September 14, 2006, from http://www.plannedparenthood.
org/about-us/who-we-are-4648.htm
Plante,T. G. (1993).Aerobic exercise in prevention and
treatment of psychopathology. In P. Seragnian (Ed.), Exercise
psychology:The influence of physical exercise on psychological
processes (pp. 358-379). New York:Wiley.
Plous, S., & Neptune, D. (1997). Racial and gender biases
in magazine advertising:A content analytic study. Psychology
of Women Quarterly, 21, 627-644.
Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., & Kilmartin, C.T. (1998).
Gender and age patterns in emotional expression, body
image and self-esteem:A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles, 38,
1025-1048.
Pollack,W. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths
of boyhood. New York: Random House.
Pollett,A., & Hurwitz, P. (2004, January 12/19). Strip til
you drop. The Nation, 20-21, pp. 24-25.
Potter,W. J. (2004).Argument for the need for a cognitive
theory of media literacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48,
266-272.
President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. (1997).
Physical activity and sport in the lives of girls: Executive
summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services.
Prichard, I., & Tiggemann, M. (2005). Objectification in
fitness centers: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and
disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants.
Sex Roles, 53, 19-28.
Putnam, F.W. (1990). Disturbances of “self” in victims of
childhood sexual abuse. In R. Kluft (Ed.), Incest-related syndromes
of adult psychopathology (pp. 113-131).Washington,
DC:American Psychological Association.
Putnam, F.W., & Trickett, P. K. (1997). Psychobiological
effects of sexual abuse:A longitudinal study. In R.Yehuda
& McFarlane,A. C. (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences:Vol. 821. Psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder
(pp. 150-159). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Quina, K., Morokoff, P. J., Harlow, L. L, & Zurbriggen, E.
L. (2004). Cognitive and attitudinal paths from childhood
trauma to adult HIV risk. In L. J. Koenig,A. O‘Leary, L. S.
Doll, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child sexual abuse to
adult sexual risk:Trauma, revictimization, and intervention
(pp. 135-157).Washington, DC:American
Psychological Association.
Quinn, B.A. (2002). Sexual harassment and masculinity:
The power and meaning of “girl watching.” Gender and
Society, 16, 386-402.
Rachman,A.W. M., Kennedy, R., & Yard, M. (2005).The
role of childhood sexual seduction in the development of
an erotic transference: Perversion in the psychoanalytic situation.
International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 14, 183-187.
Racy t-shirt messages drawing girls’ backlash. (2005,
November 2). Retrieved April 18, 2006, from
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9897452
Reichert,T. (2003).The prevalence of sexual imagery in
ads targeted to young adults. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37,
403-412.
Reichert,T., & Carpenter, C. (2004).An update on sex in
magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism and Mass
Communication Quarterly, 81, 823-837.
Reichert,T., Lambiase, J., Morgan, S., Carstarphen, M.,
& Zavoina, S. (1999). Cheesecake and beefcake: No matter
how you slice it, sexual explicitness in advertising
continues to increase. Journalism and Mass Communication
Quarterly, 76, 7-20.
Rivadeneyra, R.,Ward, L. M., & Gordon, M. (2007).
Distorted reflections: Media exposure and Latino adolescents’
conceptions of self. Media Psychology, 9, 261–290.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
59
Roberton, M.A., & Halverson, L. E. (1984). Developing children:Their
changing movements. New York: Lea & Febiger.
Roberts, D., Foehr, U., & Rideout,V. (2005, March).
Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo
Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
Roberts,T-A. (2004). Female trouble:The Menstrual SelfEvaluation
Scale and women’s self-objectification.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22-26.
Roberts,T-A., & Gettman, J. (2004).“Mere exposure”:
Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state
of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17-27.
Rodriguez, N. N.,Van de Kemp, H., & Foy, D.W. (1998).
Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of childhood sexual
and physical abuse:A critical review of the empirical
research. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 7, 17-45.
Rolón-Dow, R. (2004). Seduced by images: Identity and
schooling in the lives of Puerto Rican girls. Anthropology
and Education Quarterly, 35, 8-29.
Rouner, D., Slater, M., & Domenech-Rodriquez, M.
(2003).Adolescent evaluation of gender role and sexual
imagery in television advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting
& Electronic Media, 47, 435-454.
Rubin,A. M. (2002).The uses-and-gratifications perspective
of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.),
Media effects:Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525-
548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rudman, L., & Borgida, E. (1995).The afterglow of construct
accessibility:The behavioral consequences of priming
men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517.
Rudman, L., & Kilianski, S. (2000). Implicit and explicit
attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328.
Rudman,W. J., & Verdi, P. (1993). Exploitation: Comparing
sexual and violent imagery of females and males in advertising.
Women & Health, 20, 1-14.
Rutti, R. (1997, January 27). Putting gender into the
equation: Single sex classes seem to add up. The Plain
Dealer, p. 1B.
Sanchez-Hucles, J., Hudgins, P. S., & Gamble, K. (2005).
Reflection and distortion:Women of color in magazine
advertisements. In E. Cole & J. H. Daniels (Eds.), Featuring
females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 185-198).Washington,
DC:American Psychological Association.
Satcher, D. (2001).The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote
sexual health and responsible sexual behavior. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office of the Surgeon General. Retrieved from
www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/sexualhealth/call.pdf
Savage, M., & Holcomb, D. (1998).Adolescent female athletes’
sexual risk-taking behavior. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 28, 595.
Schaller, J., & Lagergren Frieberg, J. (1998). Issues of
abuse for women with disabilities and implications for
rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation
Counseling, 29, 9-17.
Scharff, J. S., & Scharff, D. E. (1994). Object relations therapy
of physical and sexual trauma. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Schilt, K. (2003).“I’ll resist with every inch and every
breath”: Girls and zine making as a form of resistance.
Youth and Society, 35, 71-97.
Schooler, D., & Ward, L. M. (2006).Average joes: Men’s
relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality.
Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 7, 27-41.
Schooler, D.,Ward, L. M., Merriwether,A., & Caruthers,A.
(2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame,
and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research, 42,
324-334.
Schor, J. B. (2004). Born to buy:The commercialized child and
the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
60
Schultz, J. (2005). Reading the catsuit: Serena Williams and
the production of blackness at the 2002 U.S. Open. Journal
of Sport & Social Issues, 29, 338-357.
Seidman, S.A. (1992).An investigation of sex-role stereotyping
in music videos. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic
Media, 36, 209-216.
Sexuality Information and Education Council of the
United States. (2004). Guidelines for comprehensive sexuality
education: Kindergarten–12th grade (3rd ed.). New York:
Author. Retrieved from http://www.siecus.org/_data/
global/images/guidelines.pdf
Sheff, D. (2005, January 4). New babes in toyland:Trollz.
The New York Times, p. E1. Retrieved from

Shengold, L. (1989). Soul murder:The effects of childhood abuse
and deprivation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Sherman, B. L., & Dominick, J. R. (1986).Violence and sex
in music videos:TV and rock ’n roll. Journal of
Communication, 36, 79-93.
Shilts, L. (1991).The relationship of early adolescent substance
abuse to extracurricular activities, peer influence,
and personal attitudes. Adolescence, 26, 613-617.
Shorter-Gooden, K. (2004). Multiple resistance strategies:
How African American women cope with racism and sexism.
Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 406-425.
Shugart, H.A. (2003). She shoots, she scores: Mediated
constructions of contemporary female athletes in coverage
of the 1999 U.S. women’s soccer team. Western Journal of
Communication, 67, 1-31.
Signorielli, N., McLeod, D., & Healy, E. (1994). Gender
stereotypes in MTV commercials:The beat goes on.
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 91-101.
Silbert, M. H., & Pines,A. M. (1981). Sexual child abuse as
an antecedent to prostitution. Child Abuse & Neglect, 5,
407-411.
Silbert, M. H., & Pines,A. M. (1982). Entrance into prostitution.
Youth and Society, 13, 471-500.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006).
Math and science motivation:A longitudinal examination
of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental
Psychology, 42, 70-83.
Slater,A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002).A test of objectification
theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343-349.
Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2002).A meta-analytic
examination of the relationship between child sexual abuse
and eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders,
31, 136-150.
Soley, L. C., & Kurzbard, G. (1986). Sex in advertising:A
comparison of 1964 and 1984 magazine advertisements.
Journal of Advertising, 15, 46-64.
Sommers-Flanagan, R., Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Davis, B.
(1993).What’s happening on music television? A gender
role content analysis. Sex Roles, 28, 745-753.
Spence, J.T., Losoff, M., & Robbins,A. S. (1991). Sexually
aggressive tactics in dating relationships: Personality and
attitudinal correlates. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,
10, 289-304.
Spillers, J. H. (1992). Interstices:A small drama of words. In
C.Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality
(pp. 73–100). London: Pandora.
Sprung, B. (1999). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for
Grades K-1. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church.
Steele, J. R. (1999).Teenage sexuality and media practice:
Factoring in the influences of family, friends, and school.
Journal of Sex Research, 36, 331-341.
Stice, E., Schupak-Neuberg, E., Shaw, H., & Stein, R.
(1994). Relation of media exposure to eating disorder
symptomatology:An examination of mediating mechanisms.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 836-840.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
61
Stice, E., & Shaw, H. (2003). Prospective relations of body
image, eating, and affective disturbances to smoking onset
in adolescent girls: How Virginia slims. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 71, 129-135.
Strasburger,V. C. (1995). Adolescents and the media: Medical
and psychological impact. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strasburger,V. C., & Wilson B. J. (2002). Children, adolescents
and the media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005).Women who objectify
other women:The vicious circle of objectification? Sex
Roles, 52, 707-712.
Strouse, J. S., & Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (1987). Media
exposure and the sexual attitudes and behaviors of college
students. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 13, 43-51.
Strouse, J. S., Goodwin, M. P., & Roscoe, B. (1994).
Correlates of attitudes toward sexual harassment among
early adolescents. Sex Roles, 31, 559-577.
Sullivan, G. L., & O’Connor, P. J. (1988).Women’s role
portrayals in magazine advertising: 1958-1983. Sex Roles,
18, 181-188.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1986). Toys as culture. New York:
Gardner Press.
Tan,A. S. (1979).TV beauty ads and role expectations of adolescent
female viewers. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 283-288.
Taylor, J., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan,A. (1995). Between voice
and silence:Women and girls, race and relationships. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Teen market profile. (2005). New York: Mediamark Research.
Retrieved from www.magazine.org/content/files/
teenprofile04.pdf
Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2002).Are parents’
gender schemas related to their children’s gender-related
cognitions? A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 38,
615-630.
Thompson,T., & Zerbinos, E. (1997). Cartoons: Do children
notice it’s a boy’s world? Sex Roles, 37, 415-432.
Thomsen, S. R.,Weber, M. M., & Brown, L. B. (2002).The
relationship between reading beauty and fashion magazines
and the use of pathogenic dieting methods among adolescent
females. Adolescence, 37, 1-18.
Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school.
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Thoughtworm. (2006). A zine bibliography. Retrieved
September 3, 2006, from
www.thoughtworm.com/zinebib.htm
Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image in adult
women across the life span:The role of self-objectification.
Developmental Psychology, 37, 243-253.
Tiggemann, M., & Slater,A. (2001).A test of objectification
theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of
Women Quarterly, 25, 57-64.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998, November). Prevalence,
incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings
from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington,
DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Retrieved September 11, 2006,
from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf
Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire:Teenage girls talk
about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tolman, D. L. (2006). In a different position:
Conceptualizing female adolescent sexuality development
within compulsory heterosexuality. New Directions for Child
and Adolescent Development, 112, 71-90.
Tolman, D. L., Impett, E.A.,Tracy,A. J., & Michael,A.
(2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology
and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 30, 85-95.
Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche,
M.V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual
relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality.
Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159-178.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
62
Tracy,A. J., & Erkut, S. (2002). Gender and race patterns in
the pathways from sports participation to self-esteem.
Sociological Perspectives, 45, 445-466.
Trapnell, P. D., Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1997).
Spectatoring and the relationship between body image and
sexual experience: Self-focus or self-valence? Journal of Sex
Research, 34, 267-278.
Truman, D. M.,Tokar, D. M., & Fischer,A. R. (1996).
Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date rape, supportive
attitudes, and sexual aggression in dating situations.
Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 555-562.
Turner, S. L., Hamilton, H., Jacobs, M.,Angood, L. M., &
Dwyer, D. H. (1997).The influence of fashion magazines
on the body image satisfaction of college women:An
exploratory analysis. Adolescence, 32, 603-614.
Turner,T. (2005, May 17). Limited brands sees profits
stripped down 76%. The Columbus Dispatch.
Uhlenhuth, K. (2006,April 22).Teens visualize unoffensive
tees. The Kansas City Star. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from
www.kansascity.com
Ullman, S. E. (2003). Social reactions to child sexual abuse
disclosures:A critical review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse,
12, 89-121.
Unger, R. K. (1979). Female and male. New York:
Harper & Row.
Uray, N., & Burnaz, S. (2003).An analysis of the portrayals
of gender roles in Turkish television advertisements. Sex
Roles, 48, 77-87.
Villeneuve,A., & de Grandi, M. (1996). Perfumes, a
mainstay of the French economy. Label France, 24.
Retrieved from http://ebookpedia.net/A-mainstay-of-theFrench-economy.html
Villimez, C., Eisenberg, N., & Carroll, J. L. (1986). Sex differences
in the relation of children’s height and weight to
academic performance and others’ attributions of competence.
Sex Roles, 15, 667-681.
Vincent, J., Imwold, C., Johnson, J.T., & Massey, D. (2003).
Newspaper coverage of female athletes competing in
selected sports in the 1996 Centennial Olympic Games:
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 12, 1-21.
Vincent, R. C. (1989). Clio’s consciousness raised? Portrayal
of women in rock videos, re-examined. Journalism Quarterly,
66, 155-160.
Vincent, R. C., Davis, D. K., & Boruszkowski, L.A. (1987).
Sexism on MTV:The portrayal of women in rock videos.
Journalism Quarterly, 64, 750-755.
Vogel, B. L. (2000). Correlates of pre-college males’ sexual
aggression:Attitudes, beliefs and behavior. Women and
Criminal Justice, 11, 25-47.
Vogeltanz, N. D.,Wilsnack, S. C., Harris,T. R.,Wilsnack,
R.W.,Wonderlich, S.A., & Kristjanson,A. F. (1999).
Prevalence and risk factors for childhood sexual abuse
in women: National survey findings. Child Abuse & Neglect,
23, 579-592.
Voojis M.W., & van der Voort,T. H. (1993). Learning about
television violence:The impact of a critical viewing curriculum
on children’s attitudinal judgments about crime
series. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26,
133-142.
Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006).The meeting of meditative
disciplines and Western psychology:A mutually enriching
dialogue. American Psychologist, 61, 227-239.
Ward, J. (2002). The skin we’re in:Teaching our teens to be
socially smart, emotionally strong and spiritually connected.
New York:The Free Press.
Ward, L. M. (1995).Talking about sex: Common themes
about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children
and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth &
Adolescence, 24, 595-615.
Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect
emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual
relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation.
Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 31, 1–15.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
63
Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment
media in the sexual socialization of American youth:
A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23,
347-388.
Ward, L. M. (2004a, March). The sexy/cool ideal:
Contributions of media use to adolescents’ gender and sexual
schema. Poster/paper presented at the biennial meeting of
the Society for Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, MD.
Ward, L. M. (2004b).Wading through the stereotypes:
Positive and negative associations between media use and
Black adolescents’ conceptions of self. Developmental
Psychology, 40, 284-294.
Ward, L. M., & Averitt, L. (2005, November). Associations
between media use and young adults’ perceptions of first intercourse.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
National Communication Association, Boston.
Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide:
Associations between television viewing and adolescents’
sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on
Adolescence, 16, 133-156.
Ward, L. M., Hansbrough, E., & Walker, E. (2005).
Contributions of music video exposure to black adolescents’
gender and sexual schemas. Journal of Adolescent
Research, 20, 143-166.
Ward, L. M., Merriwether,A., & Caruthers,A. (2006a).
Breasts are for men: Media use, masculinity ideology, and
men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703-744
Ward, L. M., Merriwether,A., & Caruthers,A. (2006b,
April). Media use, gender ideology, and beliefs about women’s
bodies. Paper presented at the biennial Gender Development
Conference, San Francisco.
Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of
entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and
expectations:The role of viewing amount versus viewer
involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249.
Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (2002,August). Dancing,
strutting, and bouncing in cars:The women of music videos.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Psychological Association, Chicago.
Warin, J. (2000).The attainment of self-consistency through
gender in young children. Sex Roles, 42, 209-231.
Weaver, J., Masland, J. L., & Zillmann, D. (1984). Effect of
erotica on young men’s aesthetic perception of their female
sexual partners. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 929-930.
Weekes, D. (2002). Get your freak on: How black girls
sexualise identity. Sex Education in England and Scotland, 2,
251-262.
Wiederman, M. (2000).Women’s body image self-consciousness
during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal
of Sex Research, 37, 60-68.
Wiederman, M. (2001).“Don’t look now”:The role of selffocus
in sexual dysfunction.The Family Journal: Counseling
and Therapy for Couples and Families, 9, 210-214.
Wiederman, M., & Hurst, S. (1998). Body size, physical
attractiveness, and body image among young adult women:
Relationships to sexual experience and sexual esteem.
Journal of Sex Research, 35, 272-281.
Wiederman, M., & Pryor,T. (1997). Body dissatisfaction
and sexuality among women with bulimia nervosa.
International Journal of Eating Disorders, 21, 361-365.
Wilson, P. (1999). Our whole lives: Sexuality education for
Grades 7–9. Boston: Unitarian Universalist Church.
Wingood, G., & DiClemente, R. (1992). Culture, gender and
psychosocial influences on HIV-related behavior of African
female adolescents: Implications for the development of tailored
prevention programs. Ethnicity & Disease, 3, 381-388.
Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are
used against women. New York:Anchor Books.
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
64
Yamamiya,Y., Cash,T. F., Melnyk, S. E., Posavac, H. D.,
& Posavac, S. S. (2005).Women’s exposure to thin-andbeautiful
media images: Body image effects of media-ideal
internalization and impact-reduction interventions.
Body Image, 2, 74-80.
Yoder, J. D., & Schleicher,T. L. (1996). Undergraduates
regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as
costly for women. Sex Roles, 34, 171-188.
Young, I. M. (1980).Throwing like a girl:A phenomenology
of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality.
Human Studies, 3, 137-156.
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Pornography’s impact
on sexual satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18,
438-453.
Zurbriggen, E. L. (2000). Social motives and cognitive
power/sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual
behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,
559-581.
Zurbriggen, E. L., & Freyd, J. J. (2004).The link between
child sexual abuse and risky sexual behavior:The role of
dissociative tendencies, information-processing effects, and
consensual sex decision mechanisms. In L. J. Koenig,A.
O’Leary, L. S. Doll, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child
sexual abuse to adult sexual risk:Trauma revictimization and
intervention (pp. 117-134).Washington, DC:American
Psychological Association.
Zurbriggen, E. L., & Morgan, E. M. (2006).Who wants to
marry a millionaire? Reality dating television programs,
attitudes toward sex, and sexual behaviors. Sex Roles, 54,
1-17.
Appendix
Empowering Girls: Media Literacy
This list of resources was provided to APA’s Council of
Representatives with the Report of the APA Task Force on the
Sexualization of Girls and has been filed with APA.This means
that the list of resources has not been adopted as a policy of APA
nor has APA endorsed each of the resources cited.This list of
resources is provided only for information and reference purposes.
About-Face

Home


ACT—Alliance for Children and Television
http://www.act-aet.tv/index_en.html
Advocates for Youth

Home


Beacon Street Girls
http://www.beaconstreetgirls.com
Center for Media Literacy
http://www.medialit.org
Dads and Daughters
http://www.thedadman.com
Girl Scouts of America
http://www.girlscouts.org
Girls Inc.
http://www.girlsinc.org/index.html
Girls Inc. Media Literacy
http://www.girlsinc.org/about/programs/
media-literacy.html
Girls,Women, + Media Project
http://www.mediaandwomen.org/resources.html
Hardy Girls Healthy Women
http://www.hardygirlshealthywomen.org
Mainely Girls
http://www.midcoast.com/~megirls
Media Awareness Network
http://www.media-awareness.ca
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
65
Media Literacy Clearinghouse

Home


medialiteracy.com
http://www.medialiteracy.com
New Moon Girls
http://www.newmoon.com
ParentFurther
http://www.parentfurther.com/technology-media
See Jane/Improving Gender Portrayals in
Children’s Media

Blog


Teen Voices/Women’s Express
http://www.teenvoices.com
Third Wave Foundation

Home


uniquely Me! The Girl Scout/Dove Self-Esteem
Program
http://www.girlscouts.org/program/program_
opportunities/leadership/uniquelyme.asp
Words Can Work
http://www.wordscanwork.com
Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls
66
AMERICAN
PSYCHOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATION
750 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002–4242

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

GET A 40% DISCOUNT ON YOU FIRST ORDER

ORDER NOW DISCOUNT CODE >>>> WELCOME40

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized