This project aims to analyze different fruits and vegetables for their nitrogen

This project aims to analyze different fruits and vegetables for their nitrogen content. The samples are generally delivered to the lab where we process and analyze them. The goal of the project is to determine how much nitrogen is removed from fields at harvest. The results of this project will be used by growers throughout Central Valley to comply with water quality regulation.
For the write-up, I want you to provide a description of the whole research activities(Abstract, method, data). You would have to do a writeup on your findings ( including any relevant data analysis) as well as how your activities connect to the water quality management and policy mentioned(no less than 1 and a half page), including a discussion of the relevant regulations and how your activities or the project’s findings can support compliance with those regulations.
Attached is the proposal of this research project and the link to the N removal project. There is plenty of information that you can summarize into the writeup:) I also want you to look at this link (Very helpful for describing how your activities connect to the water quality management and policy mentioned45or discussion how the activities connect to the water quality management and policy mentioned)
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/irrigated_lands/
Here is a link to the N removal project, the one you’re planning to focus on in your report:
http://geisseler.ucdavis.edu/Project_N_Removal.html
At the bottom, there are links to two reports:
The first report was a literature review using data from around the world. Much of the information in this report is not specific to California. Our goal now is to get values that are more representative of cropping systems in the Central Valley.

 

 

First, compare and contrast local, regional and federal collaboration with stak

First, compare and contrast local, regional and federal collaboration with stakeholder involvement of the following watersheds (2 pages);
Monterey Bay Watershed,
The Carbonera Creek-San Lorenzo River Watershed,
Lower Pajaro River Watershed,
Aptos Creek Watershed and
Elkhorn Slough watershed.
Second, Compare and contrast watershed management strategies including top down and bottom up approaches. Identify projects that watershed mgmt. has succeeded with as well as needed projects (2 pages).
Third, identify topographic and soil properties influencing erosion of each of the watersheds (2 pages).
Perform a literature review utilizing peer reviewed sources less than 5 years old for at least 6 articles related to the above topics (2 pages).
The attached document has tables, maps and references that should and can be utilized. While the references, tables and charts can be incorporated, they cannot count in the total word/page count.
Use a professional, scholarly, and formal tone. Use course vocabulary but define any unusual or overly technical terms. This paper is not a summary of each individual watershed; do not have section headings for each watershed. The comparative analysis paper is an analysis, not a summary of the research.
The entire paper should be in APA style. Include section headings, paragraph indents and spacing, visuals (i.e., Tables and Figures), in-text parenthetical citation, reference list, and all other style in APA (7th ed)

 

 

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery sto

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery stores group and how this group is addressing the issue and find solutions.
Critically discuss why it is important to protect natural ecosystems and significantly reduce degradation of natural habitats:
1.1 Critical analysis of the issue (400 words)
Think about what is relevant to your organisation / community / supply chain to help you focus your answer, but write the critical analysis in the third person, as a 400-word critical literature review . You should show what is important to you by how you use your references rather than expressing your own opinion directly. We are looking for depth of understanding. We recommend four sources.
Thinking about what can go wrong (for example when marine / water environments are polluted or forests are destroyed), as well as the best practice you have learned through your study can help you think through your answer.
1.2 Current Status
How does your organisation currently respond to this issue? (75 words)
1.3 Recommendations
Use extended bullet points to outline your three top recommendations for your organisation. Based on your learning this week, what could your organisation do to address this issue? You should include specific short term, as well as medium term, actions. Try to include positive ideas for change rather than just doing less harm. You should reference the specific source of your ideas from the learning (150 words in total)

 

 

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery sto

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery stores group and how this group is addressing the issue and find solutions.
Critically discuss why it is important to protect natural ecosystems and significantly reduce degradation of natural habitats:
1.1 Critical analysis of the issue (400 words)
Think about what is relevant to your organisation / community / supply chain to help you focus your answer, but write the critical analysis in the third person, as a 400-word critical literature review . You should show what is important to you by how you use your references rather than expressing your own opinion directly. We are looking for depth of understanding. We recommend four sources.
Thinking about what can go wrong (for example when marine / water environments are polluted or forests are destroyed), as well as the best practice you have learned through your study can help you think through your answer.
1.2 Current Status
How does your organisation currently respond to this issue? (75 words)
1.3 Recommendations
Use extended bullet points to outline your three top recommendations for your organisation. Based on your learning this week, what could your organisation do to address this issue? You should include specific short term, as well as medium term, actions. Try to include positive ideas for change rather than just doing less harm. You should reference the specific source of your ideas from the learning (150 words in total)

 

 

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery sto

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery stores group and how this group is addressing the issue and find solutions.
Critically discuss why it is important to protect natural ecosystems and significantly reduce degradation of natural habitats:
1.1 Critical analysis of the issue (400 words)
Think about what is relevant to your organisation / community / supply chain to help you focus your answer, but write the critical analysis in the third person, as a 400-word critical literature review . You should show what is important to you by how you use your references rather than expressing your own opinion directly. We are looking for depth of understanding. We recommend four sources.
Thinking about what can go wrong (for example when marine / water environments are polluted or forests are destroyed), as well as the best practice you have learned through your study can help you think through your answer.
1.2 Current Status
How does your organisation currently respond to this issue? (75 words)
1.3 Recommendations
Use extended bullet points to outline your three top recommendations for your organisation. Based on your learning this week, what could your organisation do to address this issue? You should include specific short term, as well as medium term, actions. Try to include positive ideas for change rather than just doing less harm. You should reference the specific source of your ideas from the learning (150 words in total)

 

 

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery sto

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery stores group and how this group is addressing the issue and find solutions.
Critically discuss why it is important to protect natural ecosystems and significantly reduce degradation of natural habitats:
1.1 Critical analysis of the issue (400 words)
Think about what is relevant to your organisation / community / supply chain to help you focus your answer, but write the critical analysis in the third person, as a 400-word critical literature review . You should show what is important to you by how you use your references rather than expressing your own opinion directly. We are looking for depth of understanding. We recommend four sources.
Thinking about what can go wrong (for example when marine / water environments are polluted or forests are destroyed), as well as the best practice you have learned through your study can help you think through your answer.
1.2 Current Status
How does your organisation currently respond to this issue? (75 words)
1.3 Recommendations
Use extended bullet points to outline your three top recommendations for your organisation. Based on your learning this week, what could your organisation do to address this issue? You should include specific short term, as well as medium term, actions. Try to include positive ideas for change rather than just doing less harm. You should reference the specific source of your ideas from the learning (150 words in total)

 

 

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery sto

Please see below the instructions. Please consider a restaurants and grocery stores group and how this group is addressing the issue and find solutions.
Critically discuss why it is important to protect natural ecosystems and significantly reduce degradation of natural habitats:
1.1 Critical analysis of the issue (400 words)
Think about what is relevant to your organisation / community / supply chain to help you focus your answer, but write the critical analysis in the third person, as a 400-word critical literature review . You should show what is important to you by how you use your references rather than expressing your own opinion directly. We are looking for depth of understanding. We recommend four sources.
Thinking about what can go wrong (for example when marine / water environments are polluted or forests are destroyed), as well as the best practice you have learned through your study can help you think through your answer.
1.2 Current Status
How does your organisation currently respond to this issue? (75 words)
1.3 Recommendations
Use extended bullet points to outline your three top recommendations for your organisation. Based on your learning this week, what could your organisation do to address this issue? You should include specific short term, as well as medium term, actions. Try to include positive ideas for change rather than just doing less harm. You should reference the specific source of your ideas from the learning (150 words in total)

 

 

Develop a hypothesis from the information Gather empirical evidence. You must us

Develop a hypothesis from the information
Gather empirical evidence. You must use a minimum of three resources that meet the CRAAPO (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose, and objectivity) criteria.
Summarize your results based on the data you used (the information found in the sources and the connection to the hypothesis) and include at least one suggestion individuals could use to reduce the risk and/or impact of the identified problem.
Formulate a conclusion based on your data.
Determine whether your conclusion supports or refutes (or does not support) your hypothesi.

 

 

Develop a hypothesis from the information Gather empirical evidence. You must us

Develop a hypothesis from the information
Gather empirical evidence. You must use a minimum of three resources that meet the CRAAPO (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose, and objectivity) criteria.
Summarize your results based on the data you used (the information found in the sources and the connection to the hypothesis) and include at least one suggestion individuals could use to reduce the risk and/or impact of the identified problem.
Formulate a conclusion based on your data.
Determine whether your conclusion supports or refutes (or does not support) your hypothesi.

 

 

Develop a hypothesis from the information Gather empirical evidence. You must us

Develop a hypothesis from the information
Gather empirical evidence. You must use a minimum of three resources that meet the CRAAPO (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose, and objectivity) criteria.
Summarize your results based on the data you used (the information found in the sources and the connection to the hypothesis) and include at least one suggestion individuals could use to reduce the risk and/or impact of the identified problem.
Formulate a conclusion based on your data.
Determine whether your conclusion supports or refutes (or does not support) your hypothesi.